Apple Eyes 2027 Launch for Pixar Lamp-Inspired Tabletop Robot with AI-Powered Siri
At its core, the robot is said to feature a 7-inch horizontal display mounted on a motorised arm. This arm can swivel, tilt, and extend about six inches in any direction, enabling the device to physically follow a user's movements during conversations, video calls, or while displaying information. The concept aims to create a more interactive and lifelike experience than existing smart displays.
Functionality-wise, Apple is reportedly testing features such as automatic subject tracking for FaceTime calls. This would allow the camera to keep a user perfectly framed even as they move around. Another potential feature in development would let an iPhone serve as a joystick, giving users remote control over the robot's position during calls. This could add a layer of flexibility and fun to video interactions.
Driving this innovation is a major upgrade to Siri. The redesigned assistant is expected to handle multi-person conversations, remember past exchanges, and deliver real-time suggestions. Bloomberg notes Apple is exploring giving Siri an animated on-screen personality, with options like the classic Mac Finder smiley or Memoji-style characters under a concept internally referred to as 'Bubbles.'
The vision for this Pixar Lamp-inspired robot extends far beyond serving as a display. Gurman reports Apple wants it to manage daily schedules, assist with planning, and enable more natural, engaging communication. The company is also positioning it as a hub for work, entertainment, and household coordination, making it a potential centrepiece for smart-home living.
Apple's AI, hardware, software, and design teams are reportedly collaborating on the project, with Kevin Lynch—who has previously overseen Apple Watch software and automotive initiatives—playing a key role in its development. Despite the buzz, Gurman cautions that the product is still a prototype, meaning plans and timelines could shift.
The tabletop robot is part of a broader push into AI-driven home products. Bloomberg reports Apple intends to launch a smart speaker with a display as soon as next year and is working on home security cameras to form the backbone of a new Apple security system. Other concepts under consideration include a wheeled home assistant, akin to Amazon's Astro, and a large robotic arm for industrial or retail use.
If these plans come to fruition, Apple could be setting the stage for a future where AI-powered robotics blend seamlessly into daily life—transforming how people work, communicate, and manage their homes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Smartphone market hits record price of $275 in Q2 2025; premium phones in high demand
India's smartphone market reached a significant milestone in Q2 2025, with the average selling price (ASP) rising to an all-time high of $275, marking a 10.8% year-over-year increase, according to IDC. This means more Indian consumers are now purchasing smartphones that are priced around or above $275, reflecting a growing trend toward better and more feature-rich devices. The lower end of the market, the entry-level segment which includes phones priced under $100, saw strong growth of 22.9% and now holds 16% of the total market. These are usually basic smartphones suitable for first-time users or people on a tight budget. Xiaomi led this segment with its popular Redmi A4 and A5 models. The budget segment, which includes devices priced between $100 and $200, grew modestly by 1.1%, though its overall share declined from 44% to 42%. Brands like Vivo, Oppo, and Realme continue to dominate this category, offering affordable phones with good performance. The entry-premium segment, covering smartphones priced between $200 and $400, saw a slight dip with a 2.5% drop in shipments and its market share falling to 27%. These phones generally offer a balance of performance and affordability. Motorola stood out in this range with strong growth, moving up to the fourth spot. Meanwhile, demand for higher-end devices surged. The mid-premium category, which includes phones priced between $400 and $600, grew by 39.5%, while the premium segment, covering $600 to $800 devices, witnessed a remarkable 96.4% jump in shipments. Apple dominated this space, with the iPhone 15 and iPhone 16 series making up more than 60% of the shipments in this price range. The super-premium segment, which includes phones priced above $800, grew by 15.8%, though its market share remained steady at 7%. For the first time, Samsung overtook Apple in this category, capturing 49% of the segment, just ahead of Apple's 48%, driven by the popularity of its Galaxy S25, S24 Ultra, and the iPhone 16 series. Overall, the Indian smartphone market is clearly shifting toward premiumization. Consumers are no longer just looking for low-cost devices; they are willing to spend more for better features, design, performance, and long-term value, especially with easier financing options now available. Top smartphone brands in Q2 2025 In terms of brand performance, Vivo led the market in Q2 2025 with a 19% share, up from 16.5% last year. Samsung followed with 14.5%, showing steady growth, while OPPO came in third with a 13.4% share. realme dropped to fourth place at 9.7%, down from 12.6%, and Xiaomi slipped to fifth, falling from 13.5% to 9.6%. Motorola and iQOO showed impressive growth, while brands like OnePlus and Poco faced sharp declines in sales. The competition is heating up across all price ranges, but the clear shift is toward smartphones that offer more than just affordability.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Big Tech's AI data centers are driving up electricity bills for everyone
The annual meeting of state utility regulators is typically a humdrum affair of dry speeches and panel discussions. But in November, the scene at the Marriott in Anaheim, California, had a bit more flash. The conference's top sponsors included the nation's biggest tech companies -- Amazon, Microsoft and Google. Their executives sat on panels, and the companies' branding was plastered on product booths and at networking events. Even the lanyards around attendees' necks were stamped with Google's colorful logo. Just a few years ago, tech companies were minor players in energy, making investments in solar and wind farms to rein in their growing carbon footprints and placate customers concerned about climate change. But now they are changing the face of the U.S. power industry and blurring the line between energy consumer and energy producer. They have morphed into some of energy's most dominant players. They have set up subsidiaries that invest in power generation and sell electricity. Much of the energy they produce is bought by utilities and then delivered to homes and businesses, including the tech companies themselves. Their operations and investments dwarf those of many traditional utilities. But the tech industry's all-out artificial intelligence push is fueling soaring demand for electricity to run data centers that dot the landscape in Virginia, Ohio and other states. Large, rectangular buildings packed with servers consumed more than 4% of the nation's electricity in 2023, and government analysts estimate that will increase to as much as 12% in just three years. That's partly because computers training and running AI systems consume far more energy than machines that stream Netflix or TikTok. Electricity is essential to their success. Andy Jassy, Amazon's CEO, recently told investors that the company could have had higher sales if it had more data centers. "The single biggest constraint," he said, "is power." The rush to build power plants and transmission lines comes as big tech companies are richer than ever because of their pivot to AI; after announcing blowout financial results in late July, Microsoft became the second public company to surpass $4 trillion in value. Even as some corporate customers have been underwhelmed by AI's usefulness so far, tech companies plan to invest hundreds of billions of dollars on it. At the same time, the boom threatens to drive up power bills for residents and small businesses. Nationally, the average electricity rate for residents has risen more than 30% since 2020, after years of relatively modest increases. Much of that increase has been driven by utilities catching up on deferred maintenance and hardening grids for extreme weather. In the coming years, AI could turbocharge those increases. It is difficult to predict what that will mean for consumers' power bills. But recent reports expect data centers will require expensive upgrades to the electric grid, a cost that will be shared with residents and smaller businesses through higher rates unless state regulators and lawmakers force tech companies to cover those expenses. A June analysis, from Carnegie Mellon University and North Carolina State University, found that electricity bills are on track to rise an average of 8% nationwide by 2030 and as much as 25% in places like Virginia because of data centers. In some places, it is happening already. Starting in June, the electricity bill for a typical household in Ohio increased at least $15 a month because of data centers, according to data from a major local utility and an independent monitor of the electric grid that stretches across 13 states and the District of Columbia. Tech companies insist they are not trying to fob energy costs onto residents and small businesses, saying they are willing to pay for the power they use and for much of the equipment needed to make it available. "We don't want to see other customers bearing the cost of us trying to grow," said Bobby Hollis, who leads Microsoft's energy procurement. But even with their expressed goodwill, getting the companies to make consumers whole will not be easy because determining how much large users like data centers should pay is not straightforward. The business of keeping America's lights on is mostly about two things: supplying reliable electricity and figuring out what to charge to deliver it. In recent years, big tech companies have inserted themselves into debates over both. They lobby lawmakers and regulators, and they are pitching their own pricing schemes to challenge those of utilities -- something that would have been unthinkable a few years ago. That has led to growing tensions. The utilities pay for grid projects over decades, typically by raising prices for everyone connected to the grid. But suddenly, technology companies want to build so many data centers that utilities are being asked to spend a lot more money a lot faster. Lawmakers, regulators and consumer groups fear that households and smaller companies could be stuck footing these mounting utilities, working with technology companies can be difficult but also lucrative. States allow utilities to charge customers enough to recoup their costs and make money for shareholders based on how much they invest. New data centers require utilities to spend billions of dollars on power lines and plants, which should lead to bigger profits for the utilities over time. "My No 1 priority in all of this is to keep the lights on," said Calvin Butler, the CEO of Exelon, a large utility company, and the chair of Edison Electric Institute, an industry association. "I think the tech companies being engaged in our industry makes this a very exciting time. Just pay your fair share of the grid." Ultimately, the technology companies may have an upper hand. In many states bursting with data centers, utilities cannot own power plants because of policies intended to encourage competition. But the tech giants do not have the same restrictions, and many have invested in power plants and secured control of electricity produced by others, making them both big users and suppliers of power. The tech companies use the electricity produced at these facilities to help power their data centers or sell it to retail utilities on the wholesale market -- a small but growing source of revenue. Over the past five years, electricity sales from tech companies' energy subsidiaries totaled $2.2 billion, with much of that generated since 2022. "Unless people lean on the public utilities commissions, the ratepayers will take it on the chin," said Mark Cooper, an economic analyst at the Institute for Energy and the Environment at the Vermont Law and Graduate School. 'Extremely new territory' In the debate over who will foot the bill, the industry's eyes have been fixed on Ohio. On a snowy day in December, a first-of-its-kind showdown played out in a small hearing room in Columbus. Lawyers for Amazon, Google, Microsoft and other technology companies faced off against representatives of an electric utility. The tech companies had plans for dozens of new data centers -- so much that the local utility, American Electric Power, projected it would need six times the electricity central Ohio produced. The utility had spent months meeting with the state's consumer representative, tech companies, related industries and the staff of the regulator, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, to hammer out a deal. But in October, before the negotiations were done, the tech companies gave the utility a few days' notice that they were submitting their own proposal. Industry experts said they had never seen that kind of front-running before. Under the companies' plan, they would pay less upfront than the utility had wanted. Days later, the Ohio utility, the consumer representative and the regulator's staff countered with a plan that would create a class of customer for data centers and would require them to pay more. This category would be in addition to the four main types of electricity customers -- homes, businesses, factories and public rail systems -- that pay different rates in Ohio and other states. The hearing in Columbus, before an administrative law judge, was about power in the literal sense -- the electrons that keep the lights on and fuel modern technology -- and power in the political sense. American Electric Power, which has 5.6 million customers in 11 states, warned the judge that if the state did not adopt its proposal, residents and smaller businesses would bear much of the costs for tech companies' power demands. Despite tech companies' professed desire not to burden others, they often push regulators to impose some of the upgrade costs on everybody. They contend that data centers bring jobs to the area and that grid upgrades will ultimately help local businesses and one point, a lawyer representing Amazon sought to get an executive from the Ohio utility to admit that he had once welcomed data centers to the state. "You said something to the effect of, 'Data centers are great for the economy,'" David Proaño, a partner at the law firm BakerHostetler, prodded. "Do you remember saying something like that?" The executive, Kamran Ali, deadpanned that he had "said a lot of things." Ali testified that he worried about how the voracious power demands would tax the electric grid and hurt other consumers. Scores of residential and business customers raised similar concerns in comments to Ohio regulators. "To even consider foisting more fees on Ohio's private citizens is a travesty," Benjamin Yoder, who lives in Blacklick, east of Columbus, wrote in a comment for a public hearing in January. An anonymous customer from Upper Sandusky wrote, "Our wallets cannot be strained anymore. Make them pay their own bills like we do!" The utility in Ohio has already committed to supplying electricity for 30 data centers in the region by 2030, reaching power consumption levels in the Columbus area as high as Manhattan's. But the tech industry is making additional requests to power 90 more data centers, which could make consumption comparable to the entire state of New York during a peak summer day. "We're used to a couple megawatts added to our system," Marc Reitter, president and chief operating officer at the utility, said in an interview. "Massive amounts of power is extremely new territory." The utility's proposal for a new category of customer will require data centers to make years of payments for the energy they need -- something other customers are not required to do. It wanted data centers and cryptocurrency miners to pay at least 85% of the electricity they request, even if they did not use it. But Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and other tech companies said they should pay less than what the utility wanted. The settlement the companies filed had committed to 75% of the electricity they requested, depending on the length of the contract. That would leave other utility customers to shoulder more of the cost of new grid equipment. In addition, the tech industry wanted all large customers, including factories, to be treated the same. And it proposed a higher threshold for determining if data centers should be considered large users than in the utility-led proposal. Kevin Miller, who was until recently a vice president at Amazon, said the Ohio utility's plan could result in tech companies overpaying because data centers ramp up operations in phases. And data centers could be required to pay for power even if the utility failed to deliver all the energy it had committed to supplying, he said. "We just don't think that it has the right kind of flexibility to really match the profile over time that the data center brings," Miller said in an interview before he left Amazon in July. Last month, after spending months weighing the proposals, the commission ruled 5-0 against the tech companies. "Today's order represents a well-balanced package that safeguards non-data-center customers," Jenifer French, the chair of the commission, said in a statement after the ruling. Last Friday, the tech companies asked the commission to reconsider the case, calling the ruling "unlawful and unreasonable." Another risk: Growth could falter The Ohio ruling hinged on a big concern for utilities and lawmakers: that the tech companies may be asking for a lot more power than they will ultimately use. The worry is that executives could overestimate demand for AI or underestimate the energy efficiency of future computer chips. Residents and smaller businesses would then be stuck covering much of the cost because utilities largely recoup the cost of improvements over time as customers use power rather than through upfront payments. These are not idle fears. Tech companies have announced plans for data centers that are never built or delayed for years. The utility's executives said their proposal sought to protect all customers if tech companies abandoned or delayed projects. They pointed to a case in Virginia where regular customers had to cover initial costs of grid upgrades for a data center that started operating years later than planned. In that case, a developer of data centers, Unicorn Interests, told Dominion Energy, a large utility, in 2010 that it would build a data center next to the regional airport in Manassas, near Washington, that would need electricity by July 2013. Virginia regulators approved Dominion's $42 million plan to build a substation and a transmission line to serve the campus, which was run by an investment trust founded by real estate developers Hossein Fateh and Lammot J du Pont, a descendant of the du Pont dynasty. By late spring 2013, Dominion had procured most of the materials it needed for the project and done some site work, but Unicorn was behind schedule. Ultimately, the data center did not sign a customer until summer 2017. During the four-year delay, ratepayers in and around Manassas paid millions of dollars for upgrades that were not being used. Because Unicorn was not drawing electricity from the new equipment, it paid Dominion nothing or very little in those years. In an interview, Fateh acknowledged the delays but said Unicorn had helped usher in a data center boom in the area. He also said he supported the utility industry's efforts to have data centers make upfront payments for grid upgrades to weed out projects that might not be completed. "Most utilities really, really like our business because we are using a consistent amount of power, day or night," he said. That means once they are up and running, data centers buy power all the time, unlike homes, which primarily use electricity in the morning and evening. A spokesperson for Dominion Energy, Aaron Ruby, said another data center project had replaced Unicorn and covered some of the costs, so "any impacts to residential customers would have been temporary and minimal, if anything at all." Data centers are contractually required, Ruby said, to pay for the full cost of new distribution infrastructure -- including substations and the poles and wires that connect the data center to the substation -- within the first four years of their service. But that requirement does not apply to all upgrade costs. To serve large energy users, utilities also have to upgrade transmission lines that take electricity from power plants to the substation. The cost of upgrading those lines is generally borne by everyone. Data centers have flocked to northern Virginia because it is home to critical internet cabling and government agencies. The tech buildings now account for more than a quarter of the region's energy use. A Virginia agency concluded in a report in December that data centers had generally been paying their fair share of grid upgrade expenses but that costs to residents could rise $276 a year by 2030 because of data centers. That number could be substantially higher if construction plans for data centers are delayed, if they are never built or if they use less electricity than planned. The report recommended that the state create a rate class for data centers -- similar to the proposal that regulators approved in Ohio and other states are contemplating. At a hearing in Richmond, Virginia, in December, the tech companies pushed back against that idea. "We do see an industry-specific rate class as discriminatory," Brian George, a Google executive, said at the hearing. "Once we start going down that road, it does become a very slippery slope for how we can stop. If we assign it to one particular industry, how do we not assign it to another?" But James Wilson, an energy economist who has consulted for consumer and environmental groups, noted that data centers accounted for almost all the electricity demand growth expected over the coming years in the mid-Atlantic region. "Discrimination, yes; undue, not really," he testified at the same hearing. The technology companies say they are open to compromises. In an interview, Amanda Peterson Corio, a Google executive responsible for data center energy, pointed to a deal with American Electric Power's subsidiary in Indiana and consumer groups in that state, where tech companies agreed to pay some grid upgrade costs upfront to allay concerns about canceled or delayed projects. But under that deal, data centers are not put into a new rate class. "You start to isolate different classes and start to allocate who we're going to give power to and who we're not," Corio said. "That goes against every construct of how our electricity system was designed, which is to be open access." Tech companies say they plan to keep building data centers, but where those sites will be is uncertain. That puts utilities at risk of building more than their area needs. Microsoft, for example, announced plans in October to build three data center campuses that would require power from the Ohio utility. "The Columbus region's skilled workforce, strong infrastructure and strategic location make it ideal for this project," the company said then. But six months later -- before regulators ruled against the tech industry -- Microsoft changed its data center strategy and said it was putting the Ohio projects on ice. For the foreseeable future, those sites would remain farmland. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Tariffs, tantrums, and tech: How Trump's trade drama is keeping Indian IT on tenterhooks Good, bad, ugly: How will higher ethanol in petrol play out for you? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy Stock Radar: JSPL forms Ascending Triangle pattern on weekly charts, could hit fresh 52-week high soon Nifty and business are different species: 5 small-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of up to 30% F&O Radar | Deploy Bear Put Spread in Nifty to play index's negative stance amid volatility Wealth creation: Look beyond the obvious in some things; 10 fertilizer sector companies worth watching
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
iPhone 17 Pro Max vs 14 Pro Max: The flagship upgrades Apple fans have waited for
The most awaited comparison between iPhone 17 Pro Max and iPhone 14 Pro Max is here. From display, storage, RAM, cameras, battery, to AI features, this is a full guide to all the upgrades and performance improvements. iPhone 14 Pro Max was released in September 2022, it was one of the best phones of its time but is now showing its age compared to new models. iPhone 17 Pro Max release is expected to be revealed next month at Apple's fall launch event. Many leaks give an idea of upgrades coming to the iPhone 17 Pro Max, making the 14 Pro Max vs 17 Pro Max comparison important for buyers, as reported by tom's guide. Display size of 14 Pro Max is 6.7 inches, 17 Pro Max is expected to have 6.9 inches. 14 Pro Max runs on A16 Bionic (4nm), 17 Pro Max will use the newer, faster A19 Pro (3nm). 14 Pro Max storage offers 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB. 17 Pro Max will start at 256GB, with options for 512GB and 1TB. RAM will double from 6GB on the 14 Pro Max to 12GB on the 17 Pro Max. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sleep Apnea Ruined My Life – Then I Found This Simple Trick Health Insight Undo ALSO READ: Apple teases stunning all-glass iPhone design - sleek, futuristic, concept that looks straight out of Sci-Fi 14 Pro Max rear cameras have 48MP main, 12MP ultrawide, and 12MP telephoto (3x zoom). 17 Pro Max is expected to have all 48MP (main, ultrawide, telephoto) with 3.5x zoom. 14 Pro Max front camera has 12MP; the 17 Pro Max will have 24MP. 14 Pro Max battery has 4,323 mAh; 17 Pro Max is rumored to have 5,000 mAh. Live Events iPhone 17 Pro Max camera specs and photography features 17 Pro Max will support Apple's new AI tools, but 14 Pro Max won't due to lower RAM and older processor. iPhone 14 Pro Max started at $1,099 for the 128GB model in 2022. Price rise in later models, iPhone 15 Pro Max increased to $1,199 and 16 Pro Max stayed at $1,199. Possible price for iPhone 17 Pro Max may stay at $1,199, but could increase due to global economic issues and tariffs. When Apple raised prices, it removed the 128GB model. The 17 Pro Max base model will still start at 256GB. The 17 Pro Max may have a wide camera bar across the top third of the back instead of the 14 Pro Max's corner bump. The bigger 6.9-inch screen means a slightly larger body compared to the 14 Pro Max, as stated by tom's guide. Expected to be smaller in the 17 Pro Max, giving more screen space. iPhone 14 Pro Max size – Measures 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches. iPhone 16 Pro Max size (for comparison), measures 6.42 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches, showing how size increased with bigger screens. The 14 Pro Max's 3x zoom was good in 2022, but newer iPhones now offer 5x zoom, making the 14 Pro Max fall behind. ALSO READ: Apple Watch just got a stunning upgrade, new blood oxygen feature launches today - what it means for you iPhone 17 Pro Max camera, performance, battery, and AI upgrades Apple's 16 Pro series already moved to 48MP ultrawide, and the 17 Pro Max will keep that. 17 Pro Max telephoto zoom may be 3.5x, slightly more than the 14 Pro Max's 3x. 24MP selfies on the 17 Pro Max will be sharper than the 14 Pro Max's 12MP shots, as per tom's guide report. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman says the 17 Pro Max could let you record with front and back cameras at the same time. A19 Pro chip in the 17 Pro Max should outperform A16 Bionic easily, with better speed and battery use. Could appear in 17 Pro Max to keep performance steady during heavy tasks like gaming or editing. 12GB RAM on 17 Pro Max will help with multitasking and future-proofing, double the 14 Pro Max's 6GB. iPhone 17 Pro Max battery life, charging speed, and AI tools Both phones will run iOS 26, but only the 17 Pro Max will run Apple Intelligence features. 14 Pro Max lasted 13 hours 39 minutes in tests; 16 Pro Max lasted over 17 hours; 17 Pro Max might beat that. 17 Pro Max may use Qi2 wireless charging up to 50W, faster than current speeds. Upgrades over 14 Pro Max include bigger screen, better cameras, stronger chip, more RAM, better battery, and AI features. Price will be key — if the 17 Pro Max costs more, buyers must decide if all these changes are worth it, reported by tom's guide. FAQs Q1: What are the main upgrades in iPhone 17 Pro Max compared to iPhone 14 Pro Max? iPhone 17 Pro Max has a bigger screen, faster A19 chip, double RAM, triple 48MP cameras, better battery, and AI features. Q2: When will the iPhone 17 Pro Max be released and what is its expected price? It is expected to launch at Apple's fall event next month, likely starting around $1,199.
