ABC reveals Laura Tingle's 7.30 replacement
Greber takes on the highly scrutinised position of political editor, having joined the ABC less than a year ago from The Australian Financial Review.
He is currently chief digital political correspondent at the ABC's Parliament House bureau.
Greber's appointment was announced by 7.30 host Sarah Ferguson on Thursday night.
Greber has had almost 30 years of experience as a journalist, including an eight-year stint at Bloomberg and 12 years working at the AFR, where he was a US correspondent and later a senior correspondent.
Tingle has been appointed the ABC's global affairs editor, bringing an end her to seven years on the program.
The global affairs editor leads the ABC's international coverage, with reporting and analysis of major world events. The role was created in 2022 for John Lyons, who is now Americas editor, based in Washington.
Other prominent ABC figures tipped as potential candidates included bureau chief David Lipson, national affairs editor and Radio National Breakfast correspondent Melissa Clarke, and Insiders host David Speers. Patricia Karvelas and ABC Melbourne radio host Raf Epstein were also flagged as possible replacements, but ruled themselves out when contacted by this masthead in May.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
6 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Government to freeze housing code as part of red tape blitz
Housing Minister Clare O'Neil has reaffirmed the government's intention to prohibit further adjustments to the National Construction Code to reduce compliance costs and building delays, as the government swings the focus of next week's economic summit away from tax towards red tape reduction and deregulation. O'Neil, who a week ago told The Australian Financial Review the code freeze was in play, despite Labor attacking the opposition for taking such a policy to the last election, said on Thursday her consultation with industry had driven a change in thinking.

ABC News
8 hours ago
- ABC News
Why do we need to boost productivity?
INGA TING, ABC DATA JOURNALIST: For those of us toiling five full days a week, the idea of a working four days a week – at 100 per cent of pay – sounds almost too good to be true. But at the upcoming economic roundtable, Australia's unions will cite research showing it not only boosts living standards, but also productivity. To understand how that might work, we first need to understand what productivity is, what it measures and what it doesn't. Put simply, productivity measures how much we output compared to how much we input. It's about quantity, not cost or profit. Today, the average Australian worker takes just one hour to produce the same amount produced over an entire day in 1901. That's thanks to a bunch of factors like economies of scale, higher skilled and educated workers, better management practices and - the single biggest factor historically – technology. A series of reports from the Productivity Commission have highlighted a long-standing productivity problem, showing Australians are working record-long hours and yet productivity growth is at its slowest in 60 years. And that trend is across most industrialised countries, not just Australia. So how does that work? Labour productivity typically measures the number of hours it takes to produce a good or service. This is fairly straightforward when you're looking at manufacturing or agriculture, and measuring, say, the number of cars or tonnes of wheat produced per worker. But it gets trickier when applied to sectors like care services, health or education, where the maths might tell you that bigger class sizes mean more productive teachers while the reality for students suggests the opposite. Bear in mind that nearly 90 per cent of Australians now work in the service industry, and we start to see how the way we typically measure productivity is starting to unravel. The picture gets muddier still, when we consider that labour isn't the only driver of productivity. Physical capital – like buildings, machines and equipment – as well as intangible capital like intellectual property, also have big impacts. This chart compares labour productivity to multifactor productivity, which measures the combined input from both labour and capital. It shows both types of productivity have been declining but capital productivity has lagged labour productivity for the best part of 30 years. The Productivity Commission has made the same point; that the added hours workers are putting in have not been matched by business investment in the systems and technologies that would allow workers to use those hours more efficiently. So, can we actually work less but produce more? The data suggests, yes especially if investments in better management and new technology are matched with less burnout, better staff retention and more motivated employees. Work smarter, not longer - that's the challenge for next week's roundtable.

Sky News AU
9 hours ago
- Sky News AU
ABC slammed for pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel ‘tosh' at taxpayers' expense
Sky News host Chris Kenny slams the ABC for their pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel 'tosh' delivered to Australia at the expense of taxpayers. 'Let me show you some of the pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel tosh the ABC delivers at your expense, this is a video post made by their so-called Global Affairs Editor Laura Tingle,' Mr Kenny said. 'This clip is essentially an attempt to explain, justify and advocate for the Albanese government's decision to recognise the non-existent Palestinian state.'