Irving Shipbuilding faces charges stemming from 2024 workplace death
The company was arraigned on the charges Monday in Halifax provincial court.
Defence lawyer Stan MacDonald said it will take time for him to review the evidence gathered during the investigation. The case is scheduled to return to court in October.
Jamie Knight died Feb. 19, 2024, after being hit at the Halifax Shipyard by a wheel loader, a tractor-like piece of equipment with a large bucket on the front.
Two of the Occupational Health and Safety Act charges relate to Irving's alleged failure to have a safe-work plan for snow removal, or complete a risk assessment for hazards related to snow clearing.
It's also alleged the company failed to ensure the wheel loader was used in accordance with manufacturer specifications, or designate a competent person as a signaller.
The company is also accused of not doing a risk assessment for workers heading to and from a hut where they could smoke.
More than 2,000 people work at Irving's Halifax Shipyard, which has been contracted since 2011 to build ships for the Royal Canadian Navy.
An Irving Shipbuilding spokesperson did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the charges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
North Bay police mentor teens in career-focused summer program
Northern Ontario Watch Two North Bay teens, Naomi and Morgan, are gaining hands-on policing experience this summer through the Youth in Policing Initiative. The program, running since 2009, lets youth aged 15-18 shadow officers, assist with community outreach and explore career paths. The pair are also organizing a bike safety event for kids.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
House of Commons hit by cyberattack from 'threat actor': internal email
The House of Commons and Canada's cybersecurity agency are investigating a significant data breach caused by an unknown "threat actor" targeting employee information. According to an internal email obtained by CBC News, the House of Commons alerted staff on Monday that there was an information breach. It said a malicious actor was able to exploit a recent Microsoft vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to a database containing information used to manage computers and mobile devices. Some of the information obtained by the hacker is not available to the public, according to the email. That includes employees' names, job titles, office locations and email addresses, as well as information regarding their House of Commons-managed computers and mobile devices. Canada's Communications Security Establishment (CSE) said it is aware of the incident and is working with the House of Commons to provide support, but could not confirm who was behind the attack. The CSE defines a threat actor as a group or individual that aims "with malicious intent" to "gain unauthorized access to or otherwise affect victims' data, devices, systems and networks." A recent threat report from the CSE found that adversarial nations, including the People's Republic of China (PRC), Russia and Iran, are increasingly behind cyber threats to Canada. But the agency said it's too early to tell who — or what — was behind this breach. "Attribution of a cyber incident is difficult. Investigating cyber threat activity takes resources and time, and there are many considerations involved in the process of attributing malicious cyber activity," said the CSE in a statement. The cyberattack happened on Friday, according to the email sent to employees. It calls on employees and members of the House of Commons to be especially vigilant as information accessed during the breach could be used in scams, or to target and impersonate parliamentarians. In a statement, the House of Commons said it was working with national security partners to investigate the matter, but would not disclose information — including how many employees are affected — citing the ongoing probe. Sharp increase in cyber threats The most recent national cyber threat assessment from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security reports that Canada is considered a "valuable target" for criminals and state adversaries looking to disrupt systems. It also found a "sharp increase in both the number and severity of cyber incidents" over the past two years. "State adversaries are getting bolder and more aggressive," wrote Rajiv Gupta, the head of the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security. "Cybercriminals driven by profit are increasingly benefiting from new illicit business models to access malicious tools and are using artificial intelligence to enhance their capabilities." The report says China presents the most sophisticated and active cyber threat to Canada, noting that over the past four years, at least 20 networks associated with Government of Canada agencies and departments have been compromised by PRC threat actors.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
2 Montreal police officers suspended for lying about man who died in custody win appeal
Two Montreal police officers who were suspended for lying about the health condition of a man who died in custody have won their appeal — thanks to a technicality about how the evidence against them was gathered. A Quebec court judge decision issued last month overturns the initial decision from 2023, in which the police ethics committee slammed the two officers — Dominic Gagné and Mathieu Paré. At the time, the police ethics committee said the officers were caught in a lie and tried to "explain the inexplicable" after it became clear that there was video footage that contradicted their claims. But following an appeal, Quebec court Judge Alexandre Henri ruled that evidence against the two officers was obtained in a way that violated their Charter right against self-incrimination because they were not told they had the right to remain silent. As a result, the judge significantly reduced the suspension for the two officers from 22 days without pay to two days. The July ruling largely revolves around the way meetings between the two officers and the province's police watchdog unfolded. And it's the latest twist in a case that goes back nearly eight years, when David Tshiteya Kalubi died the same night police arrested him. Kalubi was 23 years old. Officers 'somewhat trapped' by investigators, judge says On Nov. 7, 2017, Kalubi was a passenger in a car that was pulled over during a traffic stop. Police discovered there were two outstanding warrants for his arrest and brought him to their operations centre in the city's east end. While being processed, police asked him if he had any medical conditions they should know about: He told them he had sickle cell anemia and needed medication to treat the condition. He did not have it on him at the time. But the officers, Paré and Gagné, didn't log that information on the inmate control sheet and Kalubi died hours later after being transferred to be detained at municipal court. A Quebec coroner ultimately concluded that Kalubi did not die because he didn't have access to medication, but the officers' actions were still the focus of an investigation by the province's police watchdog, the Bureau des enquêtes indépendantes (BEI). BEI investigators met with the officers, one at a time, in January 2018. After BEI investigators showed video footage that showed Kalubi had told them about his condition, "Paré ended the meeting and left the premises," the Quebec court ruling reads. "Gagné also watched the video. On the advice of his lawyer, he indicated in a written statement that he would not add further details to his version of events." In his decision, the Quebec court judge contemplated whether the BEI's investigation was administrative or criminal in nature. He believes it was clearly the latter. And if the meeting with the officers is part of a criminal investigation, the officers, according to the judge, had to be told they had the right to remain silent. Judge Henri described the violation of the officers' rights to silence and against self-incrimination as "grave" and said "the officers are somewhat trapped by the BEI investigators that wait until Paré makes his statement to show them the video." "The court is of the opinion that the protection of the fundamental rights of the police officers must prevail over the search for the truth," his ruling reads. "By excluding the police officers' reports and statements as well as their testimony linked to those documents, it becomes difficult to conclude that they gave the BEI statements that they knew were false or inaccurate." According to the July court decision, the police ethics commissioner warned against introducing concepts from criminal proceedings into ethics cases. CBC News reached out to the police ethics committee and asked if it plans to appeal. We're waiting to hear back. We've also reached out to the Montreal Police Brotherhood for comment. Montreal police acknowledged it was aware of the decision but declined to comment, citing ongoing legal proceedings. In 2019, the province's Crown prosecutor's office announced there would be no charges laid in connection with Kalubi's death. A ruling that changes everything In addition to his argument that the officers had a right to remain silent because the BEI investigation was criminal in nature, the Quebec court judge in last month's ruling also brought up a Quebec Court of Appeal decision from 2024. In that case, the province's highest court sided with the Montreal Police Brotherhood and a group representing local police officers across the province and said officers had the right to remain silent and had no obligation to submit their version of events during BEI investigations. Although this came after the police ethics committee's decision to suspend the two officers, it reaffirmed a lower court ruling from 2022. "In retrospect, it would've certainly been more prudent, even advised, for the committee to suspend its proceedings while waiting for the Court of Appeal," the judge wrote. He also said that the 2024 Court of Appeal ruling had to be applied retroactively because it was a "judicial change of law" and not just a legislative change. By ruling that the officers did not knowingly lie to investigators — in light of the evidence now deemed inadmissible — the judge shaved 20 days off their 22-day suspensions without pay. They are still suspended for two days for showing negligence and carelessness toward Kalubi's health and safety by failing to document his medical condition.
