Court closes 10-year legal battle over downtown Sudbury construction death
The case dates back to September 2015, when 58-year-old Cécile Paquette was struck and killed by a reversing road grader while trying to cross Elgin Street in a downtown construction zone.
The machine was operated by an employee of Interpaving, the contractor hired for the roadwork.
Both Interpaving and the City of Greater Sudbury were charged under Ontario's Occupational Health and Safety Act. Interpaving pleaded guilty. The city contested the charges, arguing it was not directly responsible for supervising workers at the site and had taken reasonable steps to ensure safety.
In August 2024, a Provincial Offences Appeal Court judge upheld an earlier trial decision, finding the city had met the standard of due diligence required by law.
The Ministry of Labour sought leave to appeal that decision, but on Monday, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the request.
The ruling brings an end to a lengthy legal process involving five court decisions, including a 2023 ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada. That decision upheld an earlier ruling in the city's favour but called for a closer review of whether it had fulfilled its legal responsibilities.
The city said it had "consistently upheld its position" in response to the charges and is pleased that the matter has been resolved, in a statement to CBC News.
It added that while it remains mindful of the tragedy, it is firmly committed to the health and safety of residents and to maintaining public trust.
With no further legal avenues available, the case is now officially closed — nearly 10 years after Paquette's death.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
3 days ago
- CTV News
Road closures in effect on Carling Ave. after ‘industrial incident'
The sign outside Ottawa Police headquarters on Elgin St. is seen in this undated photo. (Aaron Reid/CTV News Ottawa) Road closures are in effect on Carling Avenue in Ottawa's west end after an incident at a construction site Saturday morning, according to police. The Ottawa Police Service says emergency crews were called to an 'industrial incident' at 8:22 a.m. Police have closed westbound Carling Avenue between Churchill Avenue and Clyde Avenue. A minor injury was reported, police say. An Ottawa paramedics spokesperson says they were not called to the scene. Additional details were not immediately available. Police say the Ministry of Labour has been notified and will be conducting an investigation. The public is being asked to avoid the area.
National Observer
06-08-2025
- National Observer
Supreme Court of Canada considers appeal application from Via Rail terror case
The Supreme Court of Canada is set to decide Thursday whether to hear the appeal of Raed Jaser, who was convicted of planning to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group. It's the latest chapter in a long-running legal saga that began 12 years ago with charges against Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier for plotting attacks, including the planned sabotage of a Via Rail passenger train. The Crown alleged that Jaser and Esseghaier had agreed to kill Canadian citizens to force Canada to remove its military troops from Afghanistan. The Crown's evidence consisted mainly of intercepted communications and the testimony of an undercover US Federal Bureau of Investigation agent assigned to befriend Esseghaier. A jury could not reach a verdict for Jaser on the rail plot charge but found him guilty of three other terrorism-related offences: one count of conspiring to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group and two counts of participating in the activities of a terrorist group. Esseghaier was found guilty on all counts. The two men appealed their convictions. Counsel for Jaser and a court-appointed lawyer for Esseghaier argued the jury at the trial was improperly constituted. In August 2019, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered a fresh trial for the men on the grounds that the jury was chosen incorrectly. The Crown successfully argued in a subsequent Supreme Court hearing that the convictions should not be overturned on the basis of an error in the jury-selection process that did not deny the men fair trial rights. With the jury issue settled, the top court remitted the case to the Ontario Court of Appeal to deal with the men's outstanding challenges of their convictions. While Esseghaier abandoned his appeal, Jaser persisted. Last year, the Court of Appeal dismissed Jaser's challenge of his conviction and life sentence, prompting him to seek a fresh hearing at the Supreme Court. In a written submission to the top court to request a hearing, Jaser's lawyers say there is disagreement across Canada about how to instruct juries in conspiracy cases — a problem they say the court should address. "Jury instructions on the law of conspiracy are too complex," the brief says. "The facts of the proposed appeal present this Court with an ideal opportunity to guide trial judges on simplifying and distilling their instructions." Jaser's lawyers also raise questions about the application of the Canada Evidence Act concerning sensitive information and whether "entrapment-like conduct" should be taken into account upon sentencing. In a response to the Supreme Court, the Crown says Jaser's application should be dismissed. "These issues are not novel and were properly rejected by the Court of Appeal," the Crown's submission says. "Although the facts giving rise to them are unique, they are specific to the circumstances of the applicant and do not raise any issue of public importance."
Global News
06-08-2025
- Global News
Via Rail terror case: Supreme Court to decide whether to hear appeal
The Supreme Court of Canada is set to decide Thursday whether to hear the appeal of Raed Jaser, who was convicted of planning to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group. It's the latest chapter in a long-running legal saga that began 12 years ago with charges against Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier for plotting attacks, including the planned sabotage of a Via Rail passenger train. The Crown alleged that Jaser and Esseghaier had agreed to kill Canadian citizens to force Canada to remove its military troops from Afghanistan. The Crown's evidence consisted mainly of intercepted communications and the testimony of an undercover U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation agent assigned to befriend Esseghaier. A jury could not reach a verdict for Jaser on the rail plot charge but found him guilty of three other terrorism-related offences: one count of conspiring to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group and two counts of participating in the activities of a terrorist group. Esseghaier was found guilty on all counts. Story continues below advertisement The two men appealed their convictions. Counsel for Jaser and a court-appointed lawyer for Esseghaier argued the jury at the trial was improperly constituted. 2:00 Men found guilty in Via Rail terror plot granted new trial In August 2019, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered a fresh trial for the men on the grounds that the jury was chosen incorrectly. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The Crown successfully argued in a subsequent Supreme Court hearing that the convictions should not be overturned on the basis of an error in the jury-selection process that did not deny the men fair trial rights. With the jury issue settled, the top court remitted the case to the Ontario Court of Appeal to deal with the men's outstanding challenges of their convictions. While Esseghaier abandoned his appeal, Jaser persisted. Last year, the Court of Appeal dismissed Jaser's challenge of his conviction and life sentence, prompting him to seek a fresh hearing at the Supreme Court. Story continues below advertisement In a written submission to the top court to request a hearing, Jaser's lawyers say there is disagreement across Canada about how to instruct juries in conspiracy cases — a problem they say the court should address. 'Jury instructions on the law of conspiracy are too complex,' the brief says. 'The facts of the proposed appeal present this Court with an ideal opportunity to guide trial judges on simplifying and distilling their instructions.' Jaser's lawyers also raise questions about the application of the Canada Evidence Act concerning sensitive information and whether 'entrapment-like conduct' should be taken into account upon sentencing. In a response to the Supreme Court, the Crown says Jaser's application should be dismissed. 'These issues are not novel and were properly rejected by the Court of Appeal,' the Crown's submission says. 'Although the facts giving rise to them are unique, they are specific to the circumstances of the applicant and do not raise any issue of public importance.'
