&w=3840&q=100)
Israel to establish 22 new Jewish settlements in occupied West bank
Israel said Thursday it would establish 22 Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, including the legalisation of outposts already built without government authorisation.
Israel captured the West Bank, along with the Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem, in the 1967 Mideast war and the Palestinians want all three territories for their future state. Most of the international community views settlements as illegal and an obstacle to resolving the decades-old conflict.
Defence Minister Israel Katz said the settlement decision strengthens our hold on Judea and Samaria, using the biblical term for the West Bank, "anchors our historical right in the Land of Israel, and constitutes a crushing response to Palestinian terrorism.
He added it was also a strategic move that prevents the establishment of a Palestinian state that would endanger Israel.
Israel has already built well over 100 settlements across the territory that are home to some 500,000 settlers. The settlements range from small hilltop outposts to fully developed communities with apartment blocks, shopping malls, factories and public parks.
The West Bank is home to 3 million Palestinians, who live under Israeli military rule with the Western-backed Palestinian Authority administering population centres. The settlers have Israeli citizenship.
Israel has accelerated settlement construction in recent years long before Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack ignited the war in Gaza confining Palestinians to smaller and smaller areas of the West Bank and making the prospect of establishing a viable, independent state even more remote.
During his first term, President Donald Trump's administration broke with decades of US foreign policy by supporting Israel's claims to territory seized by force and taking steps to legitimise the settlements. Former President Joe Biden, like most of his predecessors, opposed the settlements but applied little pressure to Israel to curb their growth.
The top United Nations court ruled last year that Israel's presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is unlawful and called on it to end, and for settlement construction to stop immediately. Israel denounced the non-binding opinion by a 15-judge panel of the International Court of Justice, saying the territories are part of the historic homeland of the Jewish people.
Calls for settlements in war-ravaged Gaza Israel withdrew its settlements from the Gaza Strip in 2005, but leading figures in the current government have called for them to be re-established and for much of the Palestinian population of the territory to be resettled elsewhere through what they describe as voluntary emigration.
Palestinians view such plans as a blueprint for their forcible expulsion from their homeland, and experts say the plans would likely violate international law.
Israel now controls more than 70 per cent of Gaza, according to Yaakov Garb, a professor of environmental studies at Ben Gurion University, who has examined Israeli-Palestinian land use patterns for decades.
The area includes buffer zones along the border with Israel as well as the southern city of Rafah, which is now mostly uninhabited, and other large areas that Israel has ordered to be evacuated.
The war began with Hamas' October 7 attack, in which militants stormed into Israel, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251.
Hamas still holds 58 hostages, around a third of them alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements. Israeli forces have rescued eight and recovered dozens of bodies.
Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed over 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
11 minutes ago
- India Today
26/11 warranted a response, times have changed now: S Jaishankar on Op Sindoor
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Friday said that those who "sponsor, nurture and utilise terrorism for their ends" must pay a high price, and the same should have been given after the 26/11 Mumbai 2008 attacks. Speaking at the convocation of a private university in Gujarat's Vadodara, he reiterated Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'new India' vision, saying that times have changed and the country's resolve is "much stronger now".advertisement"The barbarity of the killings required an exemplary response, which was delivered... It is imperative that those who sponsor, nurture, and utilise terrorism for their ends are made to pay a high cost. That it warranted a forceful response, even after the 26/11 attack in Mumbai in 2008, is widely acknowledged. But times have changed, and our resolve is much stronger now. Terrorism epicentres are no longer immune. India's zero tolerance for terrorism has been manifested today through its actions," Jaishankar said, referencing Operation Sindoor, which was in retaliation to the Pahalgam massacre, in which Pakistan-backed terrorists killed 26 Minister also said that India will never cave in to nuclear blackmail and terrorism epicentres are no longer immune. "We will never give in to nuclear blackmail. Whatever decisions have to be taken in India's national interests are taken and will continue to be taken," the minister said while speaking at the convocation ceremony of a private university in Vadodara, Gujarat. advertisementPakistani ministers and officials had been launching nuclear threats even before Operation Sindoor was conducted by India, as the situation between the two countries remained volatile following the Pahalgam massacre, in which Pakistan-backed terrorists killed 26 also spoke about the "transactional" policies of some nations while noting the difference between diplomacy practised by India and others."In the international community of almost 200 nations, we do have national interests, and naturally seek to advance them, but this ought to be done with mutual understanding and mutual benefit as guiding principles. It has become a fashion in some quarters to be openly transactional when it comes to dealing with other nations. Bear in mind that some are actually practising it in reality while preaching the opposite," he said, appearing to be taking a dig at Turkey, which has openly supported Pakistan and also supplied drones to the however, also highlighted that it has been "heartening" to see the understanding from several countries on India's "right to defend ourselves against terrorism"."In some societies, sentiments and values count a lot and India belongs to that category," he said, adding that India has kept in mind its larger obligation to the international community. "Our resources may be limited, but India has a large heart."advertisementJaishankar echoed PM Modi, who in his first address to the nation after Operation Sindoor, affirmed that India won't endure any nuke blackmail."Any nuclear blackmail won't be tolerated by India. Terror infra operating under nuclear blackmail will be targeted by India," the Prime Minister had InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Subrahmanyam Jaishankar#Operation Sindoor

Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump Does it AGAIN! Claims Credit for India-Pak Peace, Averted Nuclear War with Trade Offer
Donald Trump Does it AGAIN! Claims Credit for India-Pak Peace, Averted Nuclear War with Trade Offer Source: In a joint media appearance with Elon Musk at the Oval Office, former US President Donald Trump claimed the U.S. defused tensions between India and Pakistan, potentially preventing a nuclear disaster. While praising the cooperation from both nations, Trump also tied it to U.S. trade interests, saying 'We can't trade with people who are shooting at each other.' However, India has firmly rejected any claims of U.S. mediation, asserting that the ceasefire was a direct bilateral decision through DGMO-level talks and had nothing to do with trade or any third-party intervention. This comes as India steps up its global outreach post Operation Sindoor, with Shashi Tharoor clarifying in Colombia that India's anti-terror stance and military actions are based purely on national interest—not foreign mediation.#donaldtrump #indiarejectsmediation #operationsindoor #trumpmusktalks #indiapakceasefire #india #pakistan #thirdpartyrole #shashitharoor #modidoctrine #nuclearconflict #usindiarelations #toibharat


Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
United Nations to cut 20% jobs amid funding shortfall - What US contributes and how UN budget works?— EXPLAINED
Over 60 offices, agencies, and operations of the United Nations have been asked to submit proposals by mid-June to reduce their staff by 20%. This initiative is part of a significant reform effort aimed at consolidating operations due to a severe funding shortfall, AP reported. The UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, highlighted that the proposed job cuts are a result of diminishing UN resources over the past seven years, as several member countries either fail to pay their annual dues or do not pay them on time. A funding shortfall is compelling the UN to reduce expenditure and freeze recruitment, affecting its capacity to implement mandated programmes and exposing the it to increasing 'reputational risk,' the fifth committee (Administrative and Budgetary) of UN discussed on May 19, 2025, while exploring the possible solutions as well. Guterres also denied any connection between the job cuts and the withdrawal of foreign aid and other programmes by US President Donald Trump. Notably, the proposal to reduce the workforce comes after President Trump announced funding cuts to the global organisation. After entering the White House for the second time, Trump issued an executive order seeking a general review of all US contributions to the UN. Following this, the administration announced it would not resume funding for UNRWA. Additionally, Trump issued an executive order halting most US foreign aid for ninety days and also announced withdrawal from the WHO, stating it 'continues to demand unfairly onerous payments from the United States.' The US was expected to pay 22% of the regular budget of the UN. In 2024, of the 193 member countries, 152 paid their dues in full, including China, while 41 countries, including the United States, did not. Since its founding in 1945, the US has remained the largest contributor to the UN. In 2023, the US contributed almost $13 billion, making up over a quarter of the total funding for the collective budget of the global body, according to the latest available data on the UN Chief System Executives Board for Coordination. Nearly 24 per cent of this total was assessed, 75 per cent was voluntary, while the rest came from other activities. According to the UN Charter, all 193 member states of the United Nations must make payments to specific sections of the organization as a requirement for membership. This amount, paid annually, is known as the assessed contribution, which differs across countries based on a formula that considers gross national income, debt burden, and population and other factors. These payments fund the regular budget of the UN, covering the administrative costs and expenses of core activities such as special political missions and peacekeeping operations. In addition to these mandatory payments, countries can also make voluntary contributions. Several UN organisations, including the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and the World Food Programme (WFP), primarily depend on these contributions, which are viewed as discretionary funding. The job cuts include nearly 14,000 posts under the regular budget or 2,800 posts, AP quoted UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric. This includes staff in the UN political and humanitarian offices, along with its agencies that assist refugees, promote gender equality, and address issues related to international trade, the environment, and urban development. UNRWA, the agency supporting Palestinian refugees is also included. Multiple UN agencies were preparing to reduce their workforce or implement other cost-cutting measures. Officials have highlighted funding cuts primarily from the United States, cautioning that essential relief programs will be significantly impacted as a consequence. The World Food Programme (WFP) may reduce its workforce by up to 30%, while the head of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) informed of plans to cut costs by 30% and reduce senior-level positions by 50%, according to internal memos obtained by the AP. In addition to WFP and UNHCR, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) are expected to make cuts, the report said.