logo
US President Donald Trump attends UFC 316 hours after deploying National Guard

US President Donald Trump attends UFC 316 hours after deploying National Guard

News.com.au3 hours ago

He may have just deployed the National Guard, but that hasn't stopped US President Donald Trump from attending his beloved UFC on Sunday (AEST).
President Trump stunned crowds on the other side of the country at UFC 316 New Jersey, appearing at the event less than an hour after deploying 2000 National Guard troops to immigration protests in LA.
Among UFC fans at least, the president appears still very much in favour as he emerged from the bleachers with the promotion's boss Dana White to rapturous applause.
The crowd at Newark's Prudential Centre erupted as Mr Trump took his place in the front row in front of former heavyweight boxing champion Mike Tyson.
Mr Trump was accompanied by his US secretary of state Marco Rubio, as well as Eric Trump, Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner and UFC commentator Joe Rogan.
On notable absentee was Elon Musk, who had attended UFC fights with Mr Trump previously, but recently left his role cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) last week.
Trump has deployed 2,000 National Guard troops amid LA as clashes between federal agents and protesters angry over immigration enforcement raids stretch into a second night.
'President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, blaming California's 'feckless' Democratic leaders.
'The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs.'
About an hour before the White House confirmed the deployment, California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, said he opposed the move.
'That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions,' he said on social media platform X. 'We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need.'
UFC headlined by epic KO
In the main event at UFC 316, bantamweight champ Dvalishvili faces UFC superstar O'Malley in a highly anticipated rematch less than a year after their first encounter.
Mr Trump congratulated Kevin Holland after he defeated Vicente Luque in their welterweight fight.
Earlier on the undercard, Yoo Joo-sang delivered a brutal knockout — landing a left hook on Jeka Saragih that knocked him out cold and sent him falling face first to the canvas.
Main card
Merab Dvalishvili (c) vs. Sean O'Malley — bantamweight title
Kayla Harrison vs. Julianna Pena (c) — women's bantamweight title
Joe Pyfer vs. Kelvin Gastelum — middleweights
Patchy Mix vs. Mario Bautista — bantamweights
Kevin Holland def. Vicente Luque via second-round submission (D'Arce choke) — welterweights
Prelims
Joshua Van def. Bruno Silva via third-round KO — flyweights
Azamat Murzakanov def. Brendson Ribeiro via first-round KO — light heavyweights
Waldo Cortes-Acosta def. Serghei Spivac via UD (29-28 x2, 30-27) — heavyweights
Andreas Gustafsson def. Khaos Williams via UD (30-26 x2, 30-27) — welterweights
Early prelims
Wang Cong def. Ariane da Silva via UD (30-27 x3) — women's flyweights
Yoo Joo-sang def. Jeka Saragih via first-round KO — featherweights
Quillan Salkilld def. Yanal Ashmouz via UD (29-28 x2, 30-27) — lightweights

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why riots erupted in Los Angeles after ICE raids, and what happened next
Why riots erupted in Los Angeles after ICE raids, and what happened next

ABC News

time36 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Why riots erupted in Los Angeles after ICE raids, and what happened next

Los Angeles is experiencing its second day of significant riots, with the National Guard being called in on Saturday night, local time. Here's a quick guide to what is going on: Everything began on Friday when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers executed search warrants at multiple locations, including outside a clothing warehouse in the city's fashion district. A judge had found probable cause that the employer was using fictitious documents for some of its workers, according to representatives for Homeland Security Investigations and the US Attorney's Office. A tense scene unfolded outside as a crowd tried to block agents from driving away. Advocates for immigrants' rights said there were also migration detentions outside Home Depot stores and a doughnut shop. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said the ICE operations in Los Angeles resulted in the arrest of 118 immigrants, including five people linked to criminal organisations and people with prior criminal histories. The president of Service Employees International Union California, David Huerta, was arrested and charged with impeding a federal agent while protesting, the US Attorney's office said. The chief program officer for the Immigrant Defenders Law Centre said the organisation was aware of one man who was already deported back to Mexico. Dozens of protesters gathered on Friday evening outside a federal detention centre in Los Angeles where lawyers said those arrested had been taken, chanting "set them free, let them stay!" Other protesters held signs that said, "ICE out of LA!" while others led chants and shouted from megaphones. Some scrawled graffiti on the building's facade. Officers holding protective shields stood shoulder to shoulder to block an entrance. Some tossed tear gas canisters to disperse the crowd. Officers wearing helmets and holding batons forced the protesters away from the building by forming a line and walking slowly down the street. Protests continued on Saturday. Border Patrol personnel in riot gear and gas masks stood guard outside an industrial park in the city of Paramount, deploying tear gas as bystanders and protesters gathered on medians and across the street. Some jeered at officers while recording the events on smartphones. "ICE out of Paramount. We see you for what you are," a woman said through a megaphone. One handheld sign read, "No Human Being is Illegal." Smoke rose from burning shrubbery and rubbish in the street, and demonstrators kicked at a Border Patrol vehicle. A boulevard was closed to traffic as Border Patrol agents circulated through a community where more than 80 per cent of residents identify themselves as Latino. The California Highway Patrol said Governor Gavin Newsom had directed the agency to deploy additional officers to "maintain public safety" on state highways and roads and the agency will work to "keep the peace." Acting director of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement department, more commonly known as the border czar, Tom Homan told Fox News on Saturday night the National Guard would be deployed in Los Angeles. US President Donald Trump said he would send 2,000 California National Guard troops to the protests. The National Guard is a state-based military force that is part of the military reserves. Typically, they are deployed on state-based missions during natural disasters. California Governor Gavin Newsom called the decision "purposefully inflammatory." Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social: "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Either the state governor or the president or the secretary of Defense can deploy the National Guard. Mr Newson has the primary authority to deploy the guard on a state level, under state active duty or Title 32 status, where the state would bear the cost. An example of this was during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The guard would typically be deployed by the president or defence secretary for national emergencies, homeland defence, or federal missions under Title 10, where they take on the cost. However, they can also control the guard under the 1807 Insurrection Act when a state is unable to manage civil unrest, which former president George HW Bush did during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. Yes. Mr Trump and his administration have promised mass deportations across the country. The White House set a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 immigrants a day. Mr Trump is also trying to remove birthright citizenship, which allows most residents born in the US the right to citizenship, including the children of undocumented immigrants. On top of that, Mr Trump is working to suspend habeas corpus, the constitutional right for people to legally challenge their detention by the government. One man has already been wrongly sent to detention in El Salvador, while an Australian woman was denied entry into the US despite having a valid tourist visa. ABC/Wires

Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together
Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together

Instead, they were animated by issues that weren't so potent back in 2016, like the excesses of the 'woke' left and pandemic-era public health policy or anger at rising prices, crime, homelessness and an influx of migrants. In different ways, Joe Rogan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Musk each epitomise different facets of this enlarged Trump coalition. It seemed possible that vehement opposition to progressives would hold everyone together during the presidency, as it did during the campaign, and that maybe Trump would also do enough to please each group and avoid alienating a constituency. Less than five months into Trump's term, there are indications that this broader coalition is fraying. Polls suggest many young and non-white voters who backed Trump in November now disapprove of his performance. There haven't been as many examples of elite defections, but there have been many signs of queasiness with the excesses of his policies. The extent of Trump's tariffs, his defiance of the courts, his attacks on high-skilled immigration and higher education, and more simply go beyond what many of Trump's backers thought they were signing up to support. Musk's defection is not necessarily representative. His grievances may be personal as much as they're about policy. Still, Trump failed to keep Musk on board, and it seems to have been at least partly because of the challenge in reconciling the ideologically diverse factions in his orbit. And while Musk complained most loudly about how much the Republican tax and spending bill would add to the national debt, the possibility that other policies were a factor – like attacks on international students or reducing support for renewables – shouldn't be discounted. And even if other Trump policies, like deportations or universal tariffs, weren't problems for Musk, they might well erode Trump's support among other members of his coalition. Loading The return of deficit politics For the past decade or so, deficits haven't been a major issue in American politics. This is changing fast. The US fiscal picture has become markedly worse over the past few years. The national debt is projected to be well over 100 per cent of gross national product in a decade. Already, interest payments on the debt have reached nearly one-fifth of federal revenue. The country is projected to have trillion-dollar deficits for the foreseeable future, even during a period of low unemployment and economic growth. High interest rates will make it expensive to finance additional debt. The deteriorating fiscal situation is beginning to affect politics, most obviously in the challenge of passing a big tax and spending bill. In the past, it was easy enough for Republicans to cut taxes. Now, with the deficit and interest rates so high, a nearly $3 trillion ($4.6 trillion) expansion in the debt over the next decade is suddenly not so easy to swallow. Loading This challenge for Republicans won't go away. The alliance between traditional and populist conservatives was much easier when Trump could promise tax cuts while sparing popular entitlement programs. As the burden of the debt mounts, this win-win proposition will be hard to sustain. Less obviously, the same fiscal issues will be a major challenge for the Democratic coalition as well. With all the fighting between progressives and moderates over the past decade, it's easy to overlook that deficit spending made it much easier for the party to stay unified. Mainstream Democrats could bridge the gap between the party's ideological wings by campaigning on investments in infrastructure and renewable energy as well as on modest but significant expansions of the social safety net, like paid family leave. The debt issue might prove to be even a bigger one for Democrats than Republicans. It's hard to say whether the Republican mega-bill is really the reason Musk broke with the president. Still, he called the bill an 'abomination'. And the potential power of this issue over the longer term should not be underestimated.

Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together
Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together

Instead, they were animated by issues that weren't so potent back in 2016, like the excesses of the 'woke' left and pandemic-era public health policy or anger at rising prices, crime, homelessness and an influx of migrants. In different ways, Joe Rogan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Musk each epitomise different facets of this enlarged Trump coalition. It seemed possible that vehement opposition to progressives would hold everyone together during the presidency, as it did during the campaign, and that maybe Trump would also do enough to please each group and avoid alienating a constituency. Less than five months into Trump's term, there are indications that this broader coalition is fraying. Polls suggest many young and non-white voters who backed Trump in November now disapprove of his performance. There haven't been as many examples of elite defections, but there have been many signs of queasiness with the excesses of his policies. The extent of Trump's tariffs, his defiance of the courts, his attacks on high-skilled immigration and higher education, and more simply go beyond what many of Trump's backers thought they were signing up to support. Musk's defection is not necessarily representative. His grievances may be personal as much as they're about policy. Still, Trump failed to keep Musk on board, and it seems to have been at least partly because of the challenge in reconciling the ideologically diverse factions in his orbit. And while Musk complained most loudly about how much the Republican tax and spending bill would add to the national debt, the possibility that other policies were a factor – like attacks on international students or reducing support for renewables – shouldn't be discounted. And even if other Trump policies, like deportations or universal tariffs, weren't problems for Musk, they might well erode Trump's support among other members of his coalition. Loading The return of deficit politics For the past decade or so, deficits haven't been a major issue in American politics. This is changing fast. The US fiscal picture has become markedly worse over the past few years. The national debt is projected to be well over 100 per cent of gross national product in a decade. Already, interest payments on the debt have reached nearly one-fifth of federal revenue. The country is projected to have trillion-dollar deficits for the foreseeable future, even during a period of low unemployment and economic growth. High interest rates will make it expensive to finance additional debt. The deteriorating fiscal situation is beginning to affect politics, most obviously in the challenge of passing a big tax and spending bill. In the past, it was easy enough for Republicans to cut taxes. Now, with the deficit and interest rates so high, a nearly $3 trillion ($4.6 trillion) expansion in the debt over the next decade is suddenly not so easy to swallow. Loading This challenge for Republicans won't go away. The alliance between traditional and populist conservatives was much easier when Trump could promise tax cuts while sparing popular entitlement programs. As the burden of the debt mounts, this win-win proposition will be hard to sustain. Less obviously, the same fiscal issues will be a major challenge for the Democratic coalition as well. With all the fighting between progressives and moderates over the past decade, it's easy to overlook that deficit spending made it much easier for the party to stay unified. Mainstream Democrats could bridge the gap between the party's ideological wings by campaigning on investments in infrastructure and renewable energy as well as on modest but significant expansions of the social safety net, like paid family leave. The debt issue might prove to be even a bigger one for Democrats than Republicans. It's hard to say whether the Republican mega-bill is really the reason Musk broke with the president. Still, he called the bill an 'abomination'. And the potential power of this issue over the longer term should not be underestimated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store