ABC and SBS gender pay gaps revealed as public sector wage data released for the first time
The gender pay gap at more than 100 commonwealth public sector employers including the ABC has been laid bare for the first time, with the national broadcaster paying men nearly 10% more than women when median total remuneration is compared across the organisation.
Overall, pay gaps at commonwealth public sector employers were significantly better than those in the private sector revealed in March, where the average total remuneration pay gap of 21.1% was more than triple the average public sector gap of 6.4%. While sectors were compared on average, employers were assessed on median gaps.
Nearly half (45%) of all commonwealth public sector employers had pay gaps in the target range (+/-5%), compared with 31% in the private sector.
The median pay gap at the ABC – of 9.8% – puts it ahead of the national median pay gap, but behind other news outlets such as the Guardian (-2.5% – a negative pay gap indicates a pay gap in favour of women), News Ltd (5.6%), Australian Associated Press (5.8%), and Network Ten (6.5%).
SBS's gender pay gap, released for the first time on Wednesday, is 1.9%.
The ABC's pay gap is smaller than Nine's (14.5%) – though so are those at Nine newspaper the Age (7%), Seven West Media (11.5%), Radio 2GB (12.7%) and Win Corporation (14%).
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
A spokesperson for the ABC said: 'The ABC has been conducting a regular gender pay gap analysis since 2019 to ensure we identify, understand and appropriately address any significant pay gaps across our workforce. Meaningful gaps which are found to occur at any pay band are investigated to ensure we understand the cause and can take any action required.'
Despite the public sector's generally strong results when compared with the private sector, there were still many public agencies and employers with large pay gaps favouring men. These were concentrated in areas relating to mining, transport, finance and policing – mirroring industry-level disparities in the private sector.
The largest pay gap was of 50.4% at the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority, meaning the median salary for a male employee was double the median salary for a woman; followed by the Coal Mining Industry Corporation (31.7%), Civil Aviation Safety Authority (30.9%), and Australian Maritime and Safety Authority (30.4%).
The biggest public sector employers to have pay gaps revealed included the Australian federal police (12.2%), the Reserve Bank of Australia (11.5%), CSIRO (11.3%), Australia Post (8.6%), the ATO (4.8%) and the National Disability Insurance Agency (0.7%).
Most federal government departments had neutral pay gaps (+/-5%). Exceptions to this were the department of home affairs (9.3%), the attorney general's department (7.4%), and the department of climate change, energy, the environment and water (7%).
While equal pay for equal work has been the law in Australia for more than 50 years, but gender pay gap data reflects the fact that men are often employed in higher-paid, more senior roles in a company.
'The public sector is not immune from the broader industry trends that we see, and they need to continue to be vigilant and work hard on addressing the areas where it's not traditional to employ women, for example, in senior management,' said Mary Wooldridge, CEO of the Workplace Gender Equality Agency.
'These results show very clearly that there's still a significant amount of work to be done within individual agencies.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Wooldridge said the public sector's generally better results were largely driven by the fact many public service workers are employed under the Public Service Act, which requires employers to have a gender equality strategy and aim for gender balance in management roles.
Public sector workers were also far more likely to work full-time than in the private sector – with 82% of public sector employees employed full-time, including 76% of women, compared with 55% in the private sector (43% of women). This was likely the result of the public service's commitments to flexible work, said Wooldridge.
'There does seem to be the opportunity that where people have the capacity to work flexibly, that they're more able to take on full-time roles, knowing they'll be able to do them in a way that enables them to balance other responsibilities, particularly caring responsibilities,' she said.
Men in the public sector, however, were less likely to take up parental leave than in the private sector. Men accounted for just 11% of all primary carer's leave taken in the public sector, compared with 17% in the private sector.
Wooldridge said changes to the Maternity Leave (Commonwealth Employees) Act introduced in 2024 would hopefully make leave more accessible to men and see more fathers take it up.
'But that environment and even just that language [of the act] … is part of the context for perhaps why we haven't seen such a positive and growing uptake of men [for] primary carers' leave as we would expect.'
The government began publishing the pay gaps at private employers last year.
The publication of pay gaps at individual employers is part of the federal government's pushto bring down the national gender pay gap, which has remained stubbornly high. Wooldridge said if it continued to fall at the current rate, pay equality would not be achieved for more than a century.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Beware moving to the 'wrong' country in retirement... you could miss out on £70k in state pension
Choosing to retire to one of the 150-odd countries around the world where the state pension is 'frozen' could prove a £70,000 mistake, new research reveals. That is the vast sum you stand to lose if your state pension stays stuck at the current £230.25 a week, and misses out on the increases everyone else receives for the next 20 years. Many elderly expats live in a country where their state pensions remain at whatever amount they were set at when they moved - including popular destinations like Canada and Australia. Those people have lost out on an estimated £26,000 over the past 15 years, as attempts to persuade successive governments to unfreeze their state pensions have failed to date. Around 450,000 pensioners are presently affected, according to Interactive Investor, which looked back to work out what this has cost them, and ahead at the potential impact on people retiring abroad now. 'Many pensioners dream of spending their golden years overseas - whether it's for a warmer climate, an improved quality of life or to be closer to family and friends,' says Myron Jobson, senior personal finance analyst at II. 'But while the lifestyle may be appealing, it's vital to consider how such a move could affect your state pension entitlement.' > Beware moving to a 'frozen' country: Scroll down to find a map and a full list Your browser does not support iframes. The Government has struck deals to uprate state pensions with some countries, including the US and all those in the EU, but left many others out in the cold. If you move to a frozen destination, II estimates you face a near £70,000 deficit over 20 years. That is based on a 3.7 per cent state pension rise from April 2026, and a fairly conservative assumption of only 2.5 per cent-a-year increases after that. The full new state pension is currently almost £12,000 a year, and the triple lock means it is increased every year by the highest of inflation, average earnings growth or 2.5 per cent, according to the prevailing economic data each autumn. The Government has promised to stick to the triple lock for the whole of the current parliament, and it will be politically difficult for Labour or any other party to drop it at future elections. II factored in a 3.7 per cent state pension rise for next year because that is the Office for Budget Responsibility's current inflation forecast for September 2025, which is the decisive month. Its figures above show the impact of a frozen state pension over shorter timeframes too, with the loss of £433 over just one year. What is your dream retirement destination? Check your state pension rights before deciding if it's affordable Your browser does not support iframes. II also calculated the effect of a frozen state pension on someone who moved to an affected country in 2010. That was the year before the triple lock was introduced by the Coalition government in 2011/12, meaning they wouldn't have benefited from any uprating under the pledge. Those expats have received nearly £26,000 less than someone with a National Insurance record that also earned them a full basic rate state pension, but who stayed in the UK or moved to an unfrozen country like Spain in retirement. II calculated the 15-year figure based on the old full rate basic state pension, which was reformed in April 2016. This is currently around £9,200 a year - though people on the basic rate also get hefty top-ups, called S2P or Serps, if these were earned earlier in life. II also worked out the impact if you moved to a frozen country 10, 5 years or one year ago, but based those figures on the full rate new state pension for this period. Myron Jobson of II says: 'If you move to a country where the UK has no uprating agreement, like Australia or Canada, your state pension will be frozen at the level you first receive it. 'That means you won't benefit from the valuable triple lock increases that pensioners in the UK enjoy each year, and over time, that can seriously erode your spending power.' Therefore, Jobson says planning ahead is key, and you should check whether your chosen destination is affected (see below) and make financial decisions and arrangements with this in mind. 'Consider topping up any gaps in your national insurance record to maximise what you're entitled to,' he says. 'Deferring your state pension can boost the amount you get, though it won't help with uprating in frozen countries. 'Most importantly, building a strong private pension pot can help provide the financial cushion you'll need to maintain your standard of living abroad, regardless of state pension freezes. 'It is worth considering seeking advice from a financial adviser to fully understand the implications of retiring abroad and plan accordingly.' Last year, a This is Money reader asked whether the then very new Labour government would end the freeze on state pensions if you move to some countries. Well-connected pension industry expert Henry Tapper, chair of AgeWage, replied: 'I'm sorry but I can give you no expectation that the Labour Government will be any more generous on this matter than its predecessors. 'While no civil servant I spoke to ruled out the possibility of rules changing, no one would give you any hope and the Labour party manifesto is silent on this matter.' Tapper noted: 'If you return to the UK or go to live in a country where the UK does pay state pension increases to UK expats, you can have increases for the time you are resident at your new location.' Regarding the 70-year history of state pension uprating overseas, he said: 'Whether you get state pension increases (lately with the triple-lock) or not, depends on a tax-treaty lottery. Some countries, including the US and Switzerland have treaties, some don't.' Tapper quoted a Government response to a petition which put the cost of paying expat pension increases between 2023 and 2028 at over £4.5billion, and a research briefing to MPs which stated: 'The Government has no plans to change the policy on up-rating UK state pensions overseas; the policy is longstanding and has been supported by successive Governments for over 70 years.' Will you get state pension rises if you retire abroad? Where are state pensions frozen? Whether an expat's pension is frozen or not depends entirely on where they move (Source: International Consortium of British Pensioners)
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Rio Tinto in bailout talks for Australian aluminium smelter, AFR reports
SYDNEY, June 7 (Reuters) - Global miner Rio Tinto ( opens new tab is in talks with Australian federal and state governments about a multibillion-dollar bailout for its struggling Tomago aluminium smelter in New South Wales state, the Australian Financial Review reported. The newspaper, citing sources it did not name, reported late on Friday that talks centred on the smelter's electricity contract for 2026 to 2029 and federal production tax credits. Rio and the offices of New South Wales Premier Chris Minns and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment on the report. The future of the facility, majority owned by Rio, has been uncertain for months due in part to spiralling energy costs, according to the report. In February, Rio, the world's largest iron ore producer, said it would decide the smelter's future by mid-year. The facility about 125 km (80 miles) north of state capital Sydney uses around 10% of New South Wales' power supply to produce 590,000 tonnes of aluminium per year. In addition to Rio, it is owned by CSR and Hydro Aluminium. Australia's centre-left government in January pledged A$2 billion in production credits to help support the country's four aluminium smelters, including the Tomago facility, switch to renewable power before 2036.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australian universities urge Albanese to join New Zealand in $170bn Europe fund amid Trump attacks on education
Australian universities are urging the Albanese government to join New Zealand in a $170bn Europe research fund amid US president Donald Trump's sweeping crackdown on higher education and international students. Universities Australia's executive officer, Luke Sheehy, travelled to Brussels this week to meet representatives from the European Commission and the Australian ambassador, Angus Campbell, to discuss the possibility of joining Horizon Europe. The seven-year scientific collaborative research fund, with a budget of €95.5bn ($168bn), has 20 non-European partners – including New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Canada – but the Australian government has so far been reluctant to join. Industry insiders have attributed the government's reluctance to potential costs. New Zealand will pay €19m ($33m) over five years to be part of the program. The EU is drawing up strategies for the next seven-year funding cycle, due to begin in 2028, with a proposal expected to be announced mid-year. About €36bn ($63bn) is still available to the end of 2027. In comparison, Australia's total annual spend on research across all sectors is less than $40bn. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Sheehy said in a rapidly changing global environment, association with the body would give Australian researchers access to a mega-fund and support international collaboration on key sectors, including health and the environment. 'Growing geopolitical uncertainties are threatening to reshape our existing research alliances and we must adapt to remain ahead of the game,' he said. 'If we're serious about building a prosperous and productive economy, we need a seat at the table, particularly in a changing and more complex global environment.' The trade minister, Don Farrell, is in Paris this week restarting negotiations on a trade deal with the EU. Sheehy 'strongly encourage[d]' him to make Australia's involvement in Horizon Europe a focus of conversations. 'There is a strong appetite in Europe to have Australia come on board,' Sheehy said. 'This would remove the biggest roadblock for Australian researchers and scientists working with their European and other counterparts around the world. It's mutually beneficial. 'For what is a relatively modest investment, our best and brightest would gain access to billions of dollars in potential funding to take their work to the next level.' The higher eduction sector has closely focussed on Horizon Europe since the Trump administration was accused of possible 'foreign interference' in Australia's universities in March, pausing funding for programs at more than six universities. Researchers who receive US funding were sent a questionnaire asking them to confirm they aligned with US government interests and promoted administration priorities – including avoiding 'DEI, woke gender ideology and the green new deal'. Australia's Group of Eight CEO, Vicki Thomson, wrote to then-industry minister, Ed Husic, earlier this year on behalf of its member universities and the European Australian Business Council (EABC) CEO, Jason Collins, urging Australia to associate with the research fund. It has prepared a brief for the ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, at his request. Thomson, also the EABC deputy chair, has lobbied the government to join Horizon Europe for more than a decade. She will be meeting with stakeholders for negotiations in the next fortnight as part of an EABC delegation to Europe. Thomson said association with Horizon Europe was 'critical' to boosting productivity and providing essential buffers against negative global trends. 'Like trade, changes to the global research funding environment are also sending shocks around the world,' she said. 'The US is withdrawing from international research collaboration through the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and other agencies as well as defunding research in diversity, equity and inclusion. 'In the face of this, it is imperative that Australia maintains and extends international research collaboration through formal association with Horizon Europe.' The Australian Academy of Science president, Prof Chennupati Jagadish AC, also wants Australia to join the lucrative research fund, pointing to a possible research vacuum in the face of an increasingly unstable US. In April, the body announced a new global talent attraction program to capitalise on academics disfranchised by the Trump administration's research cuts. Americans represent 40% of collaborators in Australian physical sciences publications – including observational systems relied on for cyclone tracking capability and onshore mRNA vaccine manufacturing. Jagadish said the government must 'immediately act to diversify risk' by expanding international research collaborations, focusing on Horizon Europe. The industry minister, Madeleine King, was approached for comment.
