Cocaine haul worth nearly £100m seized in one of UK's biggest-ever drugs busts
A haul of cocaine worth nearly £100m has been seized at a UK port, authorities say.
The haul, weighing 2.4 tonnes, was found under containers on a ship arriving from Panama at London Gateway port in Thurrock, Essex.
It had been detected earlier this year after an intelligence-led operation but was intercepted as it arrived in the UK this week.
With the help of the port operator, 37 large containers were moved to uncover the drugs, worth an estimated £96m.
The haul is the sixth-largest cocaine seizure in UK history, according to Border Force.
Its maritime director Charlie Eastaugh said: "This seizure - one of the largest of its kind - is just one example of how dedicated Border Force maritime officers remain one step ahead of the criminal gangs who threaten our security.
"Our message to these criminals is clear - more than ever before, we are using intelligence and international law enforcement cooperation to disrupt and dismantle your operations."
Container ships are one of the main ways international gangs smuggle Class A drugs into the UK, Mr Eastaugh said.
Meanwhile, cocaine deaths in England and Wales increased by 31% between 2022 and 2023, according to the latest Home Office data.
Elsewhere this weekend, a separate haul of 170kg of ketamine, 4,000 MDMA pills, and 20 firearms were found on a lorry at Dover Port in Kent.
Experts estimate the ketamine's street value to be £4.5m, with the MDMA worth at least £40,000.
The driver of the lorry, a 34-year-old Tajikistan national, was arrested at the scene on suspicion of smuggling the items, the National Crime Agency said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Nottingham dad detained under Mental Health Act before death
A man died in hospital after being detained by police while under "acute mental distress", an inquest has Fletcher died at the Queen's Medical Centre in Nottingham on 3 July 2022 after police were called by a family member over concerns for his Monday, a jury inquest into the circumstances of the 26-year-old's death began at Nottingham Coroner's father-of-two had struggled with addiction and had also been diagnosed with the paranoid personality disorder in the years prior to his death, the court heard. The inquest was told Mr Fletcher had been retrained by police and detained under the Mental Health Act in the early hours on the day he pathologist Dr Michael Biggs said he was told by police Mr Fletcher had been restrained for his own medical cause of death was recorded as "the physiological effects of physical exertion combined with the toxic effects of cocaine and other substances". Mr Biggs said he was told by Nottinghamshire Police that officers had been contacted by a family member "concerned for [Mr Fletcher's] mental health" the day before he was seen by a nurse that day, and it was concluded that he would get an appointment at a later family contacted police in the early hours of the following morning saying he "may have taken drugs" and was displaying symptoms of a mental health "disturbance", Mr Biggs told the pathologist said he was told Mr Fletcher became "more agitated" once outside the house leading to officers trying to restrain was told by police that Mr Fletcher was "headbutting the inside of the police vehicle and attempting to bite his own fingers".He was taken to hospital where he "continued to be distressed" and that required police to remain at the hospital with him, the inquest the course of the morning, Mr Fletcher "deteriorated" and was said to have gone into cardiac arrest. He was pronounced dead at 11:49 pathologist said Mr Fletcher had more than 20 separate injuries including bruising to his arms and wrists, a split lip and head injuries that he said were "consistent with the scenario" he was given.A toxicology report showed Mr Fletcher had cocaine and a number of medications in his system at the time of his death, including medication prescribed for mental health Biggs said on the balance of probabilities, he could not say either physical restraint or the effects of the substances found would be enough alone to cause Kaine's death but agreed that restraining somebody under the influence of drugs and mentally unwell "could be dangerous". Mr Fletcher had been diagnosed with paranoid personality disorder in 2020 and had spent time at a rehabilitation clinic on two occasions, according to family statements read out in was the eldest of eight children to his mum Leah Fletcher and grew up in a "big and close-knit family" with his aunt and grandparents living on the same street in a statement read on Ms Fletcher's behalf, she said he was "the funny one in the family and very boisterous".Ms Fletcher said her son had an interest in mechanics, a passion for rap music – which was "how he expressed his feelings" – and "loved dogs".She added that in Year 10 of secondary school, her son "got into the wrong crowd" and believed it was then he began to "experiment to cannabis". Mr Fletcher and his partner Shannon Wright moved in together and had a son in 2016, followed by the birth of their daughter in 2020. 'Really good dad' In her statement, Ms Fletcher said "upsets within the family were very hard" for her son – including the death of his grandmother when he was 19, his daughter contracting meningitis as a newborn, and Ms Fletcher herself suffering a "traumatic brain injury" in Fletcher began to "self-medicate with cocaine and alcohol" with his mum describing "episodes" when he would become "hard to recognise".His dad, Nathaniel Ameyaw, arranged for him to go to a residential rehabilitation service which had helped Mr Fletcher, but he went on to Fletcher eventually went to stay with his mum, then moved to the young people's charity YMCA before he a statement read out my Mr Ameyaw, on behalf of Mr Fletcher's partner Ms Wright, she said: "Despite his struggles with addiction and his mental health, Kaine did try his best and he was a really good dad."It's heartbreaking to know that [he] won't be there for the big milestones: he didn't get to see [our daughter] start nursery, he will never see them start secondary school, go to prom, graduate from university, get married. "He will never be able to be a granddad. I'm sure that will stay with the children for the rest of their lives." If you've been affected by the issues in this story, help and support is available via the BBC Action Line.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Boy, three, died in a 'furious and prolonged' attack by 'dangerous' 50kg dogs after his parents allowed him to wander into their pen unsupervised, court hears
A three-year-old boy died in a 'furious and prolonged' dog attack at a farm after his parents allowed him to wander into a pen unsupervised, a jury heard today. Daniel Twigg was mauled to death at Carr Farm, in Milnrow, near Rochdale, on May 15, 2022, due to the alleged negligence of his parents Mark Twigg, 43, and Joanne Bedford, 37. The pair are on trial at Manchester Crown Court accused of Daniel's manslaughter. The prosecution claim the toddler was allowed to enter a pen where two large, 'dangerous' 50kg dogs - one a Cane Corsa called Sid and another a Boerboel or Boerboel cross named Tiny - were kept. He entered 'alone and unsupervised', it's alleged, and 'without effective precautions being taken'. John Elvidge KC, prosecuting, said the dogs, which belonged to the farm owner and not Daniel's parents, were used as guard dogs and for breeding and were not family pets. They were 'deliberately kept outside' in enclosed pens, he said, and the jury heard how the RSPCA had warned the dogs were a danger but the warnings were ignored. While steps were taken to stop them escaping, Mr Elvidge said, 'no effective precautions were taken to keep Daniel out'. Daniel's parents Mark Twigg, 43, (left) and Joanne Bedford, 37, (right) pictured arriving for a previous court hearing, both deny charges of gross negligence manslaughter and being in charge of a dog that was dangerously out of control CCTV from a neighbour's property showed Daniel inside the pen at 12.50pm, the jury heard, and he's seen moving around inside for a few moments before disappearing from view. At the same time, a dog in an adjacent pen became 'excited, bouncing up and down in animated fashion'. The prosecution, Mr Elvidge said, say this 'coincides with the beginning of a ferocious and prolonged attack' on Daniel, who suffered catastrophic injuries, principally to his head and neck, which were consistent with the 'predatory behaviour of dogs'. A 999 call was made by Daniel's mother almost 20 minutes later after he'd been inside the dog pen, the jury heard. While it is not known for certain whether both dogs were involved in the attack, Sid was the 'likely' culprit. 'No-one suggests that these catastrophic events were intended or desired by his parents, but this attack and Daniel's death were utterly foreseeable consequences of negligently allowing Daniel to enter Sid and Tiny's pen alone and unsupervised,' Mr Elvidge said. 'It is the prosecution case that his parents were aware that Daniel could enter the pen if he was left unsupervised.' The jury heard how the dog pen, situated at the side of the farmhouse, was accessed through gates secured by a Karabiner clip - rather than a secure lock - that could 'easily' be slipped open. Daniel's parents had a 'long association' with the farm, owned by Matthew Brown, with Twigg working as an odd-job man and Bedford keeping horses there. The couple, who have two other children, leased the farmhouse from Mr Brown in March 2022 after he was remanded to prison when his girlfriend Deniqua Westwood made a complaint to police. Ms Westwood, who operated a puppy breeding business, moved out, and but it was agreed the guard dogs would remain and the couple would look after them. Twigg was paid to attend to the day-to-day security, running of the farm, and the dogs' care. The couple, who also had another eight or nine dogs to look after, including three of their own, stayed on at the farm despite having a home in Manchester when Mr Brown was released on bail, the jury heard. The prosecution case is that they continued to have responsibility for the dogs over weekends when he was away, and that was when Daniel was attacked. Mr Elvidge said the dogs had been kept in 'filthy and disgusting conditions' and the couple were aware of concerns raised by the RSPCA and a warning that Daniel 'might be bitten'. There were a number of incidents involving dogs at the farm escaping, biting people and fighting each other. Police were also aware that 'dangerous' dogs at the farm were being injured and neglected, the jury heard. RSPCA inspectors had expressed specific concerns about Daniel being around the dogs and mentioned a recent fatal attack involving a small child, but they were 'disregarded' by the couple, the court heard. And they were also warned about the dogs being loose and kept locked up in suitable areas. The RSPCA also told police on March 30 that 'something could happen if the dogs started fighting near the child,' Mr Elvidge said, and his parents had been advised to be careful. Rochdale Children's Services visited the farm just three days before the attack and expressed concerns, the jury were told. These included signs of 'neglect' of Daniel and that he was 'in danger' from the dogs. Twigg and Bedford, of Radcliffe, Bury, both deny charges of gross negligence manslaughter and being in charge of a dog that was dangerously out of control. The trial, due to last three weeks, continues.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Palestine Action makes bid to block banning under anti-terror law
Palestine Action today began its legal bid to block the government from putting it on the banned list under anti-terror legislation. An urgent hearing was held in the High Court on Monday related to an application for judicial review on behalf of one of the founders of the direct action group, Huda Ammori. A further hearing will be held on Friday to decide whether the Government can temporarily be blocked from banning the group, pending a hearing to decide whether Palestine Action can bring the legal challenge. A decision on whether the group will be given the green light to bring the legal challenge will be given at a further hearing expected to be held in the week of July 21. It comes after Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act 2000. This would make membership and support for the direct action group illegal - punishable by up to 14 years in prison. It is expected MPs and peers will debate the legislation over Wednesday and Thursday and, if approved, the ban could come into force by Friday. Commenting on the hearing, Ms Ammori said: 'I have been left with no choice but to request this urgent hearing and to seek either an injunction or other form of interim relief because of the Home Secretary's decision to try to steamroll this through Parliament immediately, without proper opportunity for MPs and Peers to debate and scrutinise the proposal, or for legal and human rights experts and civil society organisations to make representations, or for those of us who would be denied fundamental rights as a result and criminalised as 'terrorists' overnight, including the many thousands of people who support Palestine Action.' The Government's decision comes after activists associated with Palestine Action vandalized two planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. Five people have since been arrested on suspicion of a terror offence in relation to the incident. Unveiling her intention to ban the group on June 23, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said it was the latest in a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. The group has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including stealing and beheading a statue of Israel's first President Chaim Weizman, spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising US President Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire. The Home Secretary has the power to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is 'concerned in terrorism'. Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al-Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group. A spokesperson for Palestine Action said: 'Bundling Palestine Action - a domestic civil disobedience protest group - in with foreign neo-Nazi organisations further highlights how unjustified and preposterous the Home Secretary's proposed proscription of Palestine Action is.
