
Thousands join Israeli flag march through Muslim quarter of Old City in Jerusalem
The annual march, funded and promoted by the Jerusalem city government, celebrates Israel's capture and occupation of East Jerusalem and its holy sites in the war of 1967. The Israeli takeover is not recognised internationally.
The Jerusalem municipality advertises the procession, known as the flag march, as a 'festive procession', part of a broader programme of events celebrating the 'liberation' of the city.
The march has been marred by racism and attacks on Palestinians for years, and is preceded by a campaign of violence in the Old City that in effect shuts down Palestinian majority areas, particularly in the Muslim Quarter.
From before midday on Monday small groups of young Israeli men attacked and harassed shopkeepers and passersby inside the city, spitting at women in hijabs, stealing from cafes, ransacking a bookshop and entering at least one home by force.
'Shut now, or I can't protect you,' a police officer told cafe owner Raymond Himo, when he protested about teenagers in religious Zionist dress stealing drinks. On Monday shops had mostly closed by 1pm, hours earlier than in previous years, with residents barricaded in their homes.
Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher with the Ir-Amim non-profit that works for an equitable Jerusalem, said: 'It deprives people of their economic livelihood, makes them feel unsafe in their surroundings. Symbolically it sends a message: 'You don't belong here, we are the ones who own this place.''
From midday groups of Jewish men inside the city shouted racist chants including 'may their villages burn', 'Mohammed is dead' and 'death to Arabs'.
Those slogans were picked by larger groups that began arriving in the late afternoon, mostly men. Women approached the Western Wall on a separate march, which is largely divided by gender for religious reasons.
One large group arriving at the Damsacus Gate chanted 'Gaza is ours', and carried a large banner reading 'Jerusalem 1967, Gaza 2025', in effect threatening full military annexation of the strip to echo the capture of East Jerusalem.
Another banner read a 'without a Nakba there is no victory', referring to the forcible expulsion of about 700,000 Palestinians when the state of Israel was created in 1948.
The procession is coordinated by 'Am K'Lavi', a non-profit whose only activity is organising the flag day march. It is chaired by Baruch Kahane, the son of Meir Kahane, a Jewish supremacist Rabbi who founded the Kach party. Banned as a political party in Israel in the 1980s under anti-terror legislation, it is now a far-right movement.
Some marchers wore T-shirts with the party's symbol of a clenched fist in a star of David. Others wore shirts with the names of their high schools, which had organised group outings to the march.
Despite the history of violence at the march there was a relatively light police presence inside the Old City, and they did little to protect many of the Palestinians targeted with violence.
Activists from the group Standing Together, who stood as human shields in front of attackers protected only by purple gilets that identified them as members were often the only barrier preventing the violence escalating.
The far-right national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir was among the crowds arriving at the Old City around sunset. He had earlier made an inflammatory trip to pray at al-Aqsa mosque in its compound, where officially Israel does not permit Jewish believers to carry out religious rituals.
The prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, hosted a cabinet meeting in Silwan, in occupied East Jerusalem. He ignored warnings from the Shin Bet security service that it would be an inflammatory move, Israeli media reported.
The flag march is already seen as a violent and deeply provocative expression of Jewish control of Jerusalem, which has in the past triggered broader conflict. Violence at the same event helped spark the 11-day war between Israel and Hamas in 2021.
Danny Seidemann, an Israeli attorney specialising in the geopolitics of Jerusalem, described Netanyahu's cabinet meeting as political 'pyromania'.
'The ridge to the south of the ramparts of the Old City, literally in the shadow of the Old City, is indeed the location of biblical Jerusalem. But it is also a contemporary Palestinian neighbourhood,' Seidemann said.
'The past is being weaponised by biblically motivated settlers to displace Palestinians, demolish their homes and recreate their vision of a renewed pseudo-ancient Israel. This is the site, the most contested and volatile in Jerusalem, is where Netanyahu has decided to 'celebrate'.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
4 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Israel prepares to move Palestinians to southern Gaza ahead of offensive
Israel announced on Saturday that it is preparing to move Palestinians from combat zones to southern Gaza as plans move ahead for a military offensive in some of the territory's most populated areas. The Israeli military body in charge of humanitarian aid to Gaza, Cogat, said the supply of tents and other shelter equipment to the territory would resume on Sunday ahead of the mass movement of Palestinians to the south. Advertisement The military said it had no comment on when that movement would begin. Meanwhile, anxious families of Israeli hostages called for a 'nationwide day of stoppage' in Israel on Sunday to express growing frustration over 22 months of war. Families of hostages fear the coming offensive further endangers the 50 hostages remaining in Gaza, just 20 of them thought to still be alive. The families and supporters have pressed the government for a deal to stop the war – a call that some former Israeli army and intelligence chiefs have also made in recent weeks. Advertisement 'I want to believe that there is hope, and it will not come from above, it will come only from us,' said Dana Silberman Sitton, sister of Shiri Bibas and aunt of Kfir and Ariel Bibas, who were killed in captivity. She spoke at a weekly rally in Tel Aviv.


Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Now we have proof free speech is a joke in two-tier Britain
After Labour councillor Ricky Jones stood at a demonstration in Walthamstow decrying 'disgusting Nazi fascists' and telling a crowd through a microphone that 'we need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all', a jury of Mr Jones's peers cleared him of any offence. When Lucy Connolly – married to a Tory councillor – posted on social media 'set fire to all the f-----g hotels full of all the b------s for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it', she chose to plead guilty under apparent pressure from the state. Ms Connolly is currently serving a 31-month prison sentence, at times on a 23-hour lockdown confined to her cell with no privileges, for her ill-tempered words. Others, who stood their ground, walked free. The results were still unpleasant – the process is in part the punishment – but better than they might otherwise have been. It is hard not to feel that the difference between the two cases is less a matter of law than politics. Lucy Connolly was denied bail as Sir Keir Starmer and the judiciary worked on their 'shared understanding' that anyone expressing sentiments that could have encouraged last year's riots needed to be made an example of. Sir Keir himself told the nation that individuals would be held on remand. The Home Office openly risked prejudicing trials by labelling those arrested, charged but not yet convicted as 'criminals'. If there's a lesson here, it may well be that people can say stupid things without the world collapsing around them. And that the public – which did not visibly respond to either exhortation – can be trusted, for the most part, to recognise the distinction between genuinely threatening language and idiocy, both on the streets and in jury deliberations. Unlike our American cousins, British people have only a very qualified right to free speech. While the human rights system appears to go out of its way to undermine attempts to control borders or crack down on crime, protection of speech is heavily caveated. And the British state makes full use of these carve-outs in its attempt to maintain its fragile grip on the country it has built. Its most important aim is to prevent tensions between groups. Speech that might inflame them is subject to stringent oversight and exacting scrutiny by officials terrified of what might spiral out from a frank examination of the country as it is. People on the Left, however, can speak with relative security. The result, in the words of Reform's Zia Yusuf, appears to be 'a country in which those who have the correct 'regime' political views can openly call for their political opponents to be brutally murdered, be filmed doing so, and face no criminal consequences'.


The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Man arrested after Bournemouth footballer reported racist abuse at Liverpool match
A 47-year-old man from Liverpool has been arrested on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence. The arrest follows an incident during the Liverpool versus Bournemouth match at Anfield on Friday, where Bournemouth player Antoine Semenyo reported being racially abused. Play was stopped in the 29th minute after Semenyo's report, leading to a spectator being ejected from the stadium. Merseyside Police stated they will not tolerate hate crime and will proactively seek football banning orders against those responsible. Both Liverpool FC and Antoine Semenyo condemned the alleged racism, with Semenyo thanking the football community for their overwhelming support. Man arrested after allegation of racist abuse during Liverpool match