Workers evacuated after fire at brake factory
Dozens of firefighters were called to the Federal Mogul Friction Products site in Hayfield Road at 06:42 BST on Sunday.
The fire service said all site employees at the manufacturer had been safely evacuated, and there had been no reported injuries.
Six fire engines, a water carrier, command unit and aerial ladder platform were deployed to the scene to help extinguish the flames.
Follow BBC Derby on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor 1
an hour ago
- Motor 1
‘I'll Keep My 4Runner:' Expert Says Millionaires Don't Buy Cars. Here's Why—And What They Do Instead
A property investment enthusiast claims that millionaires exclusively lease cars because they're depreciating assets. Abi Hookway ( @abihookwayproperty ) claims that if you're buying a car, you're missing out on building wealth via assets. She breaks down her logic in a viral TikTok that's accrued over 6.8 million views. The clip begins with her standing in front of a parking lot with myriad vehicles before launching into a monologue urging folks to always lease their rides. Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . 'Rich people do not buy cars. This is my staff car park. And I guarantee 90% of the cars in this car park are owned,' she says at the top of her clip. Hookway continues, 'They've been bought with money or loans and they're owned. Millionaires don't do that. Millionaires lease cars. So what millionaires do is they go and they buy assets. Assets that give them passive income.' Lease Cars With Your Investment Capital According to her, appreciating assets will offset the cost of a new car lease. 'And with the passive income they use it to lease a brand new nice car,' she says. 'Why are they leasing instead of buying? Because a car is a depreciating asset—it goes down in value. So why would they invest in something going down in value?' Following this, she explains what the uber-wealthy do for their transportation needs. 'What they do instead is they invest in things going up in value that give them a passive income and lease the car,' Hookway says. 'Say it with me: We lease liabilities, we buy assets.' 'Now rich people won't tell you this stuff because they keep it hidden. But I will,' she says at the end of her video. Never Buy a New Car Trending Now 'Worst Feature Ever:' Houston Woman Buys F-150. Then She Tries to Return it 30 Minutes Later After Discovering Annoying Feature 'I Got Home Around 7pm:' Woman Gets Her Truck Towed. Then She Claims the Tow Truck Company Stole Her Car Outright Other financial analysts do seem to echo some of the points made in Hookway's social media post. CNBC reports that self-made millionaire David Bach said that purchasing a brand new vehicle 'is the single worst financial decision millennials will ever make.' This same logic is echoed by GoBankingRates in a separate article from 2024. The piece touches on the same fundamental downside of car purchasing: depreciation. However, the level of depreciation depends somewhat on how new the car is. For instance, if you buy a car right when it comes out, it can lose as much as 20% of its value within the first 12 months of purchase. And depending on the make and model of the vehicle one buys, depreciation rates can hit as high as 60% after just five years. Bach recommends that those shopping for a new car should consider looking for used models between 3-5 years old. Often, these models will still have some of their original manufacturer's warranty. It's also true that recalls may have already been issued for a vehicle that's been around for a few years. More importantly, however, is that in buying a lightly used car, drivers can bypass eating the cost of its heftiest depreciation years. Lease or Buy? Some financial experts swear by the ' one-percent rule ' when it comes to leasing a vehicle. Basically, this car leasing strategy works as follows: Take the monthly payment then divide it by the total cost of the vehicle, including applicable taxes. If the monthly lease payment is equal to or close to 1% or less of the total cost, it's considered a great lease deal. But there are other factors to consider with leasing a vehicle. First: Mileage. Many leases come with a standard 12,000-mile per year limit, with more miles incurring greater costs. Road warriors may need additional breathing room on their odometers, so this option could end up costing them more money down the road. Moreover, if one purchases a lightly used car from a manufacturer renowned for its reliability, then that could ultimately be a more cost-effective solution. However, others may want to consistently have the newest vehicles with the latest features, so they may prefer a lease. Motor1 has reached out to Hookway via email for further comment. We'll update this if she responds. More From Motor1 duPont Registry Launches New Car Leasing Platform for Luxury & Exotic Vehicles Tesla Prevented Lease Buy Outs to Sell Used Cars at a Profit Dodge Is Already Pushing Cheap Charger Lease Deals The $0-a-Month Fiat 500e Lease Deal Is Real, But There's a Catch Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk seeks to sell power to UK households within months
Elon Musk's Tesla is preparing an assault on Britain's energy market in the coming months, with plans to launch a household electricity supplier. The company has applied to Ofgem for a licence that would allow it to take on the likes of Octopus and British Gas by selling power to households. It suggests Tesla could start providing electricity as soon as next year, in a major expansion of its energy ambitions in Britain. Tesla Electric, as the supplier will be called, is likely to integrate closely with Mr Musk's electric cars and Powerwall home batteries with a promise to save on household bills. The company already runs an electricity supplier in Texas that allows Tesla owners to charge their cars cheaply and pays them for selling excess solar power or electricity stored in its home batteries back to the grid. Tesla Energy Ventures, the company's energy subsidiary, applied to Ofgem for an electricity supply licence on July 25. The application was signed by Andrew Payne, a Tesla veteran who runs the company's energy operations in Europe. The Telegraph revealed in 2023 that Tesla was gearing up to launch a household energy supplier. The company has been steadily hiring for operations and policy staff as it prepares to enter the market. Tesla already has some of the elements that would give it a leg up when taking on energy incumbents. It has sold tens of thousands of 'Powerwalls' – home storage batteries that can be charged by solar power or at off-peak times – to British homes. It also sells home chargers for electric cars, and has hundreds of thousands of cars on the road, a major potential customer base to tap into. Tesla has sold more than 250,000 cars in the UK. This could also put it in a prime position to take advantage of 'vehicle to home' technology in which the car's battery powers the house. Energy companies have been conducting trials of the technology. The company is also a significant part of the wholesale energy market, with mega battery installations and its Autobidder software used to buy and sell electricity stored in batteries. It has had a generation licence from Ofgem since 2020. While the company does have some advantages, Tesla sales have slumped in the UK in recent months amid growing competition in electric cars and controversies over Mr Musk's comments, including support for Donald Trump and far-right figure Tommy Robinson. Industry figures show UK sales slumped by 60pc in July. Tesla launched an electricity supplier in Texas three years ago. It charges a flat fee for unlimited charging of Tesla cars at certain hours of the day. Customers with Powerwall batteries connect them to the grid and are paid when the company uses electricity from them to power other homes, in what it calls a 'virtual power plant'. While it is unclear what its UK proposition would be, job adverts have suggested the company will apply the same virtual power plant idea, in which a network of home batteries balances out inconsistent energy sources such as wind and solar, storing energy when it is abundant and putting it back into the grid at times of peak demand. Tesla launched an energy plan with Octopus Energy in 2020 but ended the partnership three years later as it stepped up its own plans. The company has since worked with Octopus to allow Powerwall owners to use the energy provider's software to sell electricity at peak times. Receiving an electricity supply licence from Ofgem can take as long as nine months although in some cases licences can be granted within weeks. Stricter requirements were introduced after the energy crisis of 2021 in which a series of providers went bankrupt. Tesla has not applied for a gas supply licence, meaning households that use electricity and gas – the vast majority in the UK – would have to choose a different gas supplier. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man's anger over number plate mix-up parking penalty
A man was wrongly issued with a parking charge after his car was mixed up with another vehicle with a nearly identical number plate. Richard Lynn said that on 18 March 2024, he paid £1.70 to park for about 30 minutes in Rushton's Yard car park in Ashby, Leicestershire, but later received a demand for £165 from solicitors representing private firm Horizon Parking. The 53-year-old said photographic evidence, provided by the company, showed his Hyundai entering the car park - but a Kia with an identical number plate bar one letter leaving nine hours later. Horizon Parking said it wrote to Mr Lynn on 25 July to say the issue was rectified, but he said he had not received confirmation of this. Reflecting on the situation, Mr Lynn said: "It's ridiculous. They have clearly different cars with similar but different plates but they just haven't checked properly. "The result of this is that I received a pretty nasty letter, threatening me with legal action if I didn't pay a fine I should not have been issued with in the first place." On 25 March 2024, Mr Lynn was sent a letter demanding £85 - £51 if he paid within 14 days. However, he said he only became aware of the matter in July this year - when he received a letter from solicitors acting on behalf of Horizon Parking demanding £165. Mr Lynn said he moved house in December 2022 but said he had, in error, not notified the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) of his change of address until some time in "early 2024". He said his address had subsequently been updated, but believed earlier correspondence could have been sent to his old house. Horizon Parking said it originally wrote to Mr Lynn, to the address provided by the DVLA, on 25 March 2024, then sent reminder letters on 24 April and 24 May last year. 'I'm pretty angry' Mr Lynn added: "The fact remains none of those letters should have been sent in the first place. "There has been no humanity in the way this has been dealt with, either in terms of having a person look at those number plates and spot the mistake - or in the aggressive letter they sent. "I almost paid them to make them go away, but I pushed back because it was a clear mistake. "All they had was ANPR [automatic number plate recognition] evidence and they had not spotted the plates - while alike - were different. It beggars belief nobody checked. "My fear is that lots of errors like this get made but that most people just pay up because they are scared about being dragged to court and having to pay huge legal fees even if they haven't committed the offence. "I'm pretty angry about the whole thing." A Horizon Parking spokesperson told the BBC the matter had been rectified when it was brought to their attention. The BBC asked the firm to clarify if that meant the charge had been cancelled, and that potential legal proceedings had been halted, but it declined to say. It said it had written to Mr Lynn, from Ashby, to inform him, but he said he had not received a letter from the company. "We do make every effort with our processes to issue correct parking charges," a statement from Horizon Parking said. "We'll investigate to see how we can improve, but would encourage drivers to appeal in circumstances where the parking charge may be incorrect, to enable the matter to be resolved at an early stage. "Unfortunately, we didn't receive an appeal and the parking charge therefore proceeded via our recovery methods. "Once the matter was brought to our attention, it was rectified." Follow BBC Leicester on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@ or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210. More on this story Government code aims to stop unfair parking charges Drivers taken to court over car park keying errors Parking firms should not regulate themselves - MPs Government code aims to stop unfair parking charges Related internet links Horizon Parking
