
A solution to the child care shortage is hiding in plain sight
Josh Brooks hadn't planned for a career taking care of young children, but in tenth grade he started spending time with his friend's younger brother and discovered that he had a real knack for it.
At 18, Brooks took a job at Common Ground, a child care center in northern Virginia, and enjoyed it so much he kept working there throughout college, where he studied psychology. After graduating, though, he felt pressure to get a 'real grown-up job' and applied to work as a government contractor. He maintained spreadsheets all day and was miserable. 'After nine months I realized how ridiculous that notion was, to keep myself from something that I loved,' he said. And so he returned back to Common Ground.
Josh Brooks.
Brooks, now 28, knows his career path is unusual: In the US, only 3 percent of the preschool workforce, and just 6 percent of the child care workforce, is male. But he works in a progressive part of the country, for an organization that explicitly touts the value of having men in the classroom. Common Ground's executive director, Liz Badley Raubacher, is married to a man who runs another child care center in town.
It also helps that he's not the only male teacher on staff. Brooks works alongside Jordon Farrell, 30, who started volunteering at Common Ground to fulfill a high school requirement and, like Brooks, was surprised by how much he liked it. Farrell's been working there for the last seven years. They both teach alongside Zach Davis, 24, who originally went to trade school for hospitality. When the pandemic hit, most hotels shut down and Davis took a role as a recess attendant at a private school, and realized how much he liked working with kids. But when that school also closed due to Covid-19, he stumbled on Common Ground, and has been happily working there ever since.
Despite severe worker shortages in child care, most centers across America employ no male teachers. Men tend to steer away from a field that's both low-paying and perceived as overtly feminine. They're also heavily deterred by parental suspicion of inappropriate contact; because most convicted sexual abusers are men, many families perceive any man interested in working with children as a threat. Hiring managers at the centers themselves worry about liability and consumer demand, reacting to fears more than data.
Zach Davis, who teaches at Common Ground Childcare.
'I'm not going to say we haven't had those concerns, we've had to navigate those gut reactions with parents,' Raubacher told me. 'We say, 'Listen we understand, it may seem strange until you're here, but we'll help you through it.' We have women doctors, women accountants. And there are a lot of men who really just shine working with younger kids.'
Building a stronger pipeline to recruit and retain men in child care could help bring sorely needed talent into the field. Yet unlike in K-12 education, where there have been national efforts to recruit more men, there's been no similar systemic push to alter the gender ratios in the female-dominated child care space.
Jordon Farrell teaches 3- and 4-year-olds at Common Ground Childcare.
Smaller scale-efforts are starting to emerge, though. In 2023, Hopkins House Early Childhood Learning Institute, a Virginia-based educator training program, hosted a conference to explore the idea.
'Programs are starving for qualified personnel,' J. Glenn Hopkins, the chief executive of Hopkins House, said. 'Looking only at one half of the population is a mistake.'
What it's like to be a man working in child care
Being the sole man in the classroom hasn't always been easy for Julian LaFerla, even as he felt sure that he brought something distinctive and valuable.
LaFerla stumbled into his child care career when he took a college class on early childhood learning. He considered it a quasi-training course for one day becoming a father 'and then I just discovered it felt like a really humane field,' he said. 'You know, the play and the story time, and the snacks, and the singing — it just felt like a nice workplace.'
Josh Brooks, the social-emotional teacher, plays guitar and works with children of all ages at Common Ground Childcare.
Now 48, LaFerla has spent 12 years working across various preschool, child care, and kindergarten settings in St. Paul, Minnesota — plus another 10 years as a stay-at-home father. But unlike the men at Common Ground in Virginia, LaFerla has never had a male colleague or male mentor, leaving him to navigate complex gender dynamics alone.
'In some circumstances with certain kids, the expectation is I should be more masculine, and with others it's to be less masculine,' he said. 'Compared to my female colleagues, I'm just more engaged in high-energy, rough-and-tumble play — picking kids up, wrestling, letting them climb all over me, that sort of thing.'
Nine years into his teaching career, LaFerla decided to pursue a master's in education to better understand his own experiences. Through scouring the literature on men in child care for his thesis, he learned that many of his confusing moments were widely shared: The lack of support from his father for his career choice, the assumption that he could serve as the school's default handyman, and the ongoing tension of when to emphasize gender difference, sameness, or neutrality.
Common Ground Childcare explicitly touts the value of having men in the classroom.
Researchers find that men often feel that they're scrutinized more closely than their female colleagues. Men sense that they're excluded from tasks like diapering or comforting upset children, yet are then expected to take on the role of disciplinarian when kids misbehave. The biggest hurdle men report, though, is the fear that parents will see them as a threat. Unlike other fields where women dominate — like nursing or even elementary school teaching — working with kids under 5 involves a lot of physical contact. For male workers, routine tasks like helping with bathroom needs or soothing crying children become potential liabilities.
'A lot of men I've spoken to are scared of the prospect of accusations or things being taken the wrong way and that just completely puts them off from wanting to do anything involving children,' Brooks, of Common Ground, told me. Until programs can overcome these cultural barriers and biases, schools and programs will keep struggling to recruit men — and to hold on to the few they do have.
And while it's natural to worry about abuse or neglect by anyone, advocates focused on reducing child abuse emphasize that risk should be mitigated through training and rigorous vetting, including criminal background checks, for all staff. Some child care centers incorporate security cameras and windows in interior doors, or have rules about having multiple staff present with children at all times, to help build trust and transparency.
Trying to bring men in
Over the last decade, some child care advocates have started speaking up about the need to better support men in their industry and address the challenges that LaFerla and others face.
'Men, if they're working in early childhood settings, or even fathers if they come into the building, tend to be uncomfortable because the settings don't make them feel comfortable,' said Hopkins, of Hopkins House. 'It's an unintended consequence — it's not a purposeful decision but [reflects] how child care has evolved.'
Jordon Farrell has been at Common Ground Childcare for seven years.
Last November, at a second conference hosted by Hopkins House, participants proposed strategies to recruit more men, including targeted scholarships and mentorship programs. Participants also emphasized the need to challenge gender stereotypes through public awareness campaigns and improve pay to attract stronger candidates.
Their suggestions are in line with researchers who have been advocating strategies like providing mentorship and direct support to new male teachers from other men. Some studies suggest that men may also be more likely to stay in early childhood settings that actively engage with gender — through measures like anti-bias training, curriculum design, or even parent outreach — than in environments that ignore it altogether.
To appeal to men's interest in important work, the group recommended highlighting early childhood education's impact on young minds and communities. Participants suggested emphasizing that teaching and caregiving requires strength, leadership, and creativity, and expanding internship and apprenticeship opportunities to give more men hands-on experience and exposure.
Hopkins said he's part of a new group of men working in early childhood education in Washington, DC, and knows a similar program may launch soon in Virginia. He pointed to growing national interest in supporting employment for young men, which may provide an opportunity to leverage those resources for his work.
Child care and early learning are also fields less susceptible to automation by artificial intelligence than many traditionally male-dominated jobs — a reality noted by several men I interviewed. 'I hold tight to this job because I feel like child care isn't going anywhere,' Brooks of Common Ground told me. 'People will always need other people to watch their children, no matter what.'
'I hold tight to this job because I feel like child care isn't going anywhere,' Josh Brooks said. 'People will always need other people to watch their children, no matter what.'
Davis said the small, everyday moments make his career decision feel simple. 'It's just great working with the kids and watching them grow,' he said. 'Every day I come in and they always say good morning to me, or like, give you a hug or something.'
This work was supported by a grant from the Bainum Family Foundation. Vox Media had full discretion over the content of this reporting.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
Five takeaways as Trump seizes control of DC police, deploys National Guard
President Trump announced on Monday that he was taking control of the District of Columbia's police and deploying the National Guard. Trump portrayed the moves, which will involve around 800 National Guard troops, as a response to high crime rates in the nation's capital. He said it was an attempt to 'rescue' the District from 'bloodshed, bedlam and squalor.' Reporters in a packed White House briefing room received handouts just before the president spoke where the District's murder rate was shown as higher than those of other international cities including Bogota, Delhi and London. Police statistics, however, show that crime rates in the District have fallen sharply over the past two years. Violent crime is down 26 percent when compared year-to-date against 2024. Last year, in turn, saw a 32 percent drop in homicides and a 35 percent drop in overall violent crime compared to 2023. That being said, the total number of homicides last year, 187, was still above the years that immediately preceded 2020's COVID-19 pandemic. Here are the main takeaways from Trump's announcement. A major assertion of federal power — and Trump's power The decision from Trump was more expansive than many people expected. A deployment of National Guard troops had been predicted, in part because the District's status — short of full statehood — gives the president clear control of when the Guard is deployed. The decision to wrest control of Washington's police — the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) — was a significantly larger step. The fact that it came amid falling crime rates makes it even more controversial. So too does the politics of the District. Voters who gave then-Vice President Harris more than 90 percent of their votes last November will have their police force taken over by a notably divisive Republican president. Trump secured fewer than seven percent of the vote in D.C. The Home Rule Act of 1973, which gives the District its current measure of autonomy, provides for a president taking emergency control of the D.C. police for 48 hours. During that period, a president who wishes to extend control is supposed to provide the reasons for that decision to the chairpersons and ranking members of House and Senate committees with responsibilities for the District. Doing this enables presidential control for 30 days. Any extension beyond that, the statute says, can only come if 'the Senate and the House of Representatives enact into law a joint resolution authorizing such an extension.' Whether Trump accedes to those requirements remains to be seen. D.C. mayor offers modulated response District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) was critical of Trump's decision without intensifying her rhetoric as much as she could have. Bowser called the president's move 'unsettling and unprecedented' in a news conference. She also used the move to reiterate her belief that D.C. should be granted full statehood — a long-standing aim for many of the District's voters. In relation to a question about the prospect of military troops being deployed, Bowser said: 'I think I speak for all Americans: We don't believe it is legal to use the American military against American citizens on American soil.' But Bowser struck a fairly restrained tone throughout — including on social media where she wrote: 'Here's where we stand after today's announcement: we will follow the law, work with federal officials, and continue the work we do every single day to keep D.C. safe, beautiful, and the best city in the world.' Not everyone in city government was quite so measured. The District's attorney general, Brian Schwalb (D), said that Trump's move was 'unlawful' and asserted that 'there is no crime emergency in the District of Columbia.' Democrats, liberal groups worry about militarization at Trump's behest Beyond the D.C. government, Democrats, liberals and civil rights groups expressed angst over what they see as Trump's penchant for gratuitous militarization. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) said in a statement that Trump's 'ever-expanding use of the military for domestic matters is beyond alarming.' Reed cited as a precursor Trump's deployment of the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles earlier this year — against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) — saying that this showed a willingness 'to deploy U.S. military forces on American streets for inflammatory and political reasons.' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) accused Trump of being 'an incoherent wannabe dictator who is trying to turn D.C. into his personal police state.' Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) contended that 'using U.S. military forces to enforce a policy agenda on American soil is a gross abuse of power that reeks of authoritarianism.' Among the broader criticism, Monica Hopkins, the executive director of the D.C. chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) called Trump's move, 'political theater and a blatantly phony justification for abuse of emergency powers.' It's unclear where things go from here Even amid all the words on both sides, there is a lot of uncertainty. One obvious question is whether Trump will fulfill the demands of the Home Rule Act, in terms of informing Congress about the reasons for his decision to take control of the police, and in ceding back control of the MPD after no more than 30 days. Another issue is where exactly the National Guard or other federally-commanded troops will be deployed. Trump has focused on tourist-friendly areas being besmirched by crime. But in fact Washington's worst crime rates by far are found in the economically deprived neighborhoods east of the Anacostia River, far from the epicenter of tourism. Another uncertainty hangs over what the president would characterize as success. In a social media post, he insisted that crime — as well as 'Savagery, Filth and Scum' — would 'DISAPPEAR' from D.C. Presumably he doesn't consider literally zero crime to be an achievable goal. Does any crime at all amount in his mind to justification for maintaining federal control? The news conference wasn't all about D.C. During Monday's news conference, Trump took questions on other topics. The most interesting moments came when he discussed his upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, scheduled for Friday in Alaska. Trump's tone suggested a new turn against Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump and Vice President Vance berated Zelensky during an Oval Office meeting in late February but more recently the president had seemed to be putting pressure on Putin. That changed back Monday, when Trump once again appeared to blame Zelensky for the war, which was in fact started by Russia's 2022 invasion. 'I get along with Zelensky but, you know, I disagree with what he's done — very severely disagree,' Trump said. 'This is a war that should have never happened.' A deadline Trump had set for new sanctions on Russia expired on Friday without action being taken.


Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
‘Trump's worst nightmare': Mamdani targets the president in his general election bid
'Every seat matters, every race matters, and who is mayor of New York is crucial,' Nadler said. 'New York City needs a leader who won't give Trump an inch, who won't flinch or bargain away our rights.' Trump has questioned Mamdani's citizenship, vowed to arrest him if he interferes with federal agents' crackdown on illegal immigration and threatened to cut federal funding to New York City if Mamdani doesn't 'do the right thing.' 'Comrade Mamdani is the American people's worst nightmare,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said Monday, charging that the Democratic nominee's policies will tank the economy, increase crime and favor undocumented immigrants over American citizens. 'The American people have repeatedly rejected this Communist agenda and the more Mamdani shares his radical policies, the more the American people will recoil.' Mamdani identifies as a democratic socialist and has said he is not a communist. And Communist Party leaders don't count him as a member. Cuomo, making another bid for mayor after losing by nearly 13 points in the June Democratic primary, has argued that Trump would step all over Mamdani. Cuomo said he already stood up to Trump as governor during the Covid pandemic. 'Trump will flatten him like a pancake,' Cuomo posted on X. 'In 2020, Trump sent the National Guard into other states. Not New York. There's only one person in this race who can stand up to Trump: the one who already has, successfully and effectively.' (Cuomo used another food simile in a June primary debate, saying Trump would cut into Mamdani 'like a hot knife through butter.') Adams, the incumbent mayor, has said he is not beholden to anyone, including the president. He has insisted that he seeks a working relationship with Trump for the benefit of the city. And Sliwa, the longshot Republican making a repeat bid for mayor, has no direct relationship with Trump at all. In fact, the GOP nominee has encouraged Trump to stay out of the race for mayor. Mamdani said Monday he's open to dialogue with Trump if it benefits New Yorkers and that as mayor he would combat the president's agenda by staffing up city agencies, including the Law Department, and investing in legal representation for immigrants subject to deportation proceedings. 'Much of that fight back, that has to be delivered forcefully, rhetorically, through conversations, both public and private,' Mamdani said. 'But there's also the act of governance that is its own fight back, a governance that is actually characterized by competence and by compassion.'

USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump says Washington is unsafe, but the data tells a more nuanced story
In Washington, crime is relatively high, but far from the highest in the country, and it has been on a downward trend. President Donald Trump is deploying the National Guard to Washington to combat what he called 'bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' But crime data paints a much more nuanced picture of what's going on in the nation's capital. Among major cities in the United States, Washington does have relatively high rates of violent crime and murder. But it has a much lower violent crime rate than some cities Trump hasn't spotlighted, such as Memphis, Tennessee. In DC, different types of crime tend to be concentrated in different parts of the city, and crime overall has been on a downward trend in recent years. The murder rate is far below its historic peak. Thaddeus Johnson, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Council on Criminal Justice and a former police officer, said the capital is 'on par' with other big cities. He explained that – like many of its counterparts – DC saw crime increase during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and the years that followed, but it's now seeing a decrease. 'It's not perfect,' Johnson said. 'It's a lot of work to do.' Here's what to know. Washington recently saw murders spike, then drop The Metropolitan Police Department reported a 35% drop in violent crime and a 15% decrease in overall crime from 2023 to 2024. The former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, a position that also serves as the city's local prosecutor, cited these stats in January as a testament to his prosecutorial strategy. Between 2023 and 2024, crime categories went down between 2% (theft not related to cars) and 64% (arson). But 2023 also saw 274 homicides reported, higher than any year since 2005, according to the Metropolitan Police Department. 'We have to be mindful that we had almost historic peaks in these crimes, and so we're going to have to get back to par first,' Johnson said, pointing to lower pre-pandemic crime levels in 2018 and 2019. 'And we're still working that way, and we're coming closer.' Violent crime is down so far in 2025 Violent crime in Washington through Aug. 8, 2025 dropped 26% compared to the same time period in 2024, according to data from the Metropolitan Police Department. This includes a 50% decrease in sex abuse. Overall crime is down 7% so far. Motor vehicle theft is level, and burglary is down 20%. Johnson said 200 or so people tend to be responsible for much of the crime in a city like DC. The crimes tend to be concentrated in Black and brown communities and happen between people who know each other, he said. Violent crime and property crime are concentrated Violent crime in Washington is highest in Ward 8, the southeastern corner of the city that includes the low-income area Anacostia, according to an interactive map on the city government's website, followed by Wards 7 and 5 in the eastern part of the city. Violent crime is lowest in Ward 3 in the affluent northwest part of the city, bordering Maryland and across the Potomac River from Virginia. Property crime is highest in Ward 2, a tourist-heavy area that includes the National Mall, the White House and other landmarks, and Ward 5, an area in the northeast part of the city that borders Maryland. Washington has a comparatively high murder rate Washington's rate of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter was 25.5 per 100,000 people in 2024, according to a USA TODAY analysis of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program data. This puts DC at No. 5 among more than 30 cities with more than 500,000 people. The FBI categorizes crimes differently from the Metropolitan Police Department, so the rate will differ slightly from the police department's data. But the categorization is consistent across the country, and the FBI best source for comparing local crime data nationally. Here is the ranking: Washington, D.C. has the 10th highest violent crime rate among major US cities When other violent crime is factored in, Washington, DC ranks lower among large cities. The city's violent crime rate is 926 per 100,000 residents, according to USA TODAY's analysis of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program data. Violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Here is the ranking: Crime in DC used to be much higher A generation ago, crime in DC was so high that the city earned the moniker the "murder capital." The number of homicides increased steadily from 148 in 1985 to a peak 482 in 1991, according to a report by the Criminal Justice Research Center. Violent crime, especially murder, subsequently dropped dramatically between then and the COVID-19 pandemic.