Hong Kong home prices post tiny gain in April, bolstering case for end of long slump
Hong Kong's lived-in home prices posted a small gain for the second straight month in May, according to official data, fortifying hopes of a sustained recovery in the city's property market.
Advertisement
An official index measuring secondary home prices inched up by 0.03 per cent in May from a month earlier, the Rating and Valuation Department said on Thursday. In April, the gauge rose 0.35 per cent from March.
In the first five months of the year, second-hand home prices declined by 0.9 per cent. They are down 28 per cent from a peak in September 2021.
'While residential prices are bottoming out, significant rises are not expected in 2025,' said Eddie Kwok, executive director for valuation and advisory services at CBRE Hong Kong.
'Given the improvement in market sentiment coupled with low financing costs, we maintain our forecast of 0 per cent to 5 per cent growth in residential prices for 2025. This may also call an end to the residential market correction since 2021.'
Advertisement
Prices retreated slightly in Class E segment – homes with saleable area of at least 160 square metres (1,722 sq ft) – while four other housing categories were either unchanged or posted small gains, the data showed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
13 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Public stablecoin adoption a top priority in Hong Kong with new digital asset blueprint
The Hong Kong government has pledged to promote the public adoption of licensed stablecoins, unveiling a broad set of new digital asset (DA) policies as the city seeks to cement its role as a global cryptocurrency hub while serving as a test bed for Beijing's fintech aspirations. In the 'Policy Statement 2.0 on the Development of Digital Assets in Hong Kong' released on Thursday, the government called for market proposals to test stablecoin applications in public scenarios and a legislative proposal to expand tax concessions on profits from blockchain assets. The blueprint set a 'vision for digital asset development and showcases the practical use of tokenisation through application, with a view to boosting the diversification of use cases', said Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po. Starting from the 2025-26 financial year, privately offered funds and family-owned investment holding vehicles could claim tax breaks on profits from transactions involving cryptocurrencies and tokenised securities – bringing digital assets into parity with traditional assets such as stocks and bonds – pending approval by the Legislative Council. Under the plan, the government would support testing new stablecoin use cases given the strong corporate interest, especially in cross-border trade and settlement, according to the document. The government-backed start-up incubator Cyberport would also launch a new funding scheme to support high-impact blockchain and digital asset projects. The government said that regulators, law enforcement agencies and technology providers would collaborate to develop digital asset infrastructure.
Asia Times
17 minutes ago
- Asia Times
US missing the point on China's industrial cyberespionage
The United States is attempting to decouple its economy from rivals such as China. Efforts toward this include policymakers raising tariffs on Chinese goods, blocking exports of advanced technology and offering subsidies to boost American manufacturing. The goal is to reduce reliance on China for critical products, in the hope that this will also protect US intellectual property from theft. The idea that decoupling will help stem state-sponsored cyber-economic espionage has become a key justification for these measures. For instance, then-US Trade Representative Katherine Tai framed the continuation of China-specific tariffs as serving the 'statutory goal to stop [China's] harmful … cyber intrusions and cyber theft.' Early tariff rounds during the first Trump administration were likewise framed as forcing Beijing to confront 'deeply entrenched' theft of US intellectual property. This push to 'onshore' key industries is driven by very real concerns. By some estimates, theft of US trade secrets, often through hacking – costs the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars per year. In that light, decoupling is a defensive economic shield – a way to keep vital technology out of an adversary's reach. But will decoupling and cutting trade ties truly make America's innovations safer from prying eyes? I'm a political scientist who studies state-sponsored cyberespionage, and my research suggests that the answer is a definitive no. Indeed, it might actually have the opposite effect. To understand why, it helps to look at what really drives state-sponsored hacking. Intuitively, you might think a country is most tempted to steal secrets from a nation it depends on. For example, if Country A must import jet engines or microchips from Country B, Country A might try to hack Country B's companies to copy that technology and become self-sufficient. This is the industrial dependence theory of cyber theft. There is some truth to this motive. If your economy needs what another country produces, stealing that know-how can boost your own industries and reduce reliance. However, in a recent study, I show that a more powerful predictor of cyberespionage is industrial similarity. Countries with overlapping advanced industries, such as aerospace, electronics, or pharmaceuticals, are the ones most likely to target each other with cyberattacks. Why would having similar industries spur more spying? The reason is competition. If two nations both specialize in cutting-edge sectors, each has a lot to gain by stealing the other's innovations. If you're a tech powerhouse, you have valuable secrets worth stealing, and you have the capability and motivation to steal others' secrets. In essence, simply trading with a rival isn't the core issue. Rather, it's the underlying technological rivalry that fuels espionage. For example, a cyberattack in 2012 targeted SolarWorld, a US solar panel manufacturer, and the perpetrators stole the company's trade secrets. Chinese solar companies then developed competing products based on the stolen designs, costing SolarWorld millions in lost revenue. This is a classic example of industrial similarity at work. China was building its own solar industry, so it hacked a US rival to leapfrog in technology. China has made major investments in its cyberespionage capabilities. Crucially, cutting trade ties doesn't remove this rivalry. If anything, decoupling might intensify it. When the US and China exchange tariff blows or cut off tech transfers, it doesn't make China give up – it likely pushes Chinese intelligence agencies to work even harder to steal what they can't buy. This dynamic isn't unique to China. Any country that suddenly loses access to an important technology may turn to espionage as Plan B. History provides examples. When South Africa was isolated by sanctions in the 1980s, it covertly obtained nuclear weapons technology. Similarly, when Israel faced arms embargoes in the 1960s, it engaged in clandestine efforts to get military technology. Isolation can breed desperation, and hacking is a low-cost, high-reward tool for the desperate. There's no easy fix for state-sponsored hacking as long as countries remain locked in high-tech competition. However, there are steps that can mitigate the damage and perhaps dial down the frequency of these attacks. One is investing in cyber defense. Just as a homeowner adds locks and alarms after a burglary, companies and governments should continually strengthen their cyber defenses. Assuming that espionage attempts are likely to happen is key. Advanced network monitoring, employee training against phishing, and robust encryption can make it much harder for hackers to succeed, even if they keep trying. Another is building resilience and redundancy. If you know that some secrets might get stolen, plan for it. Businesses can shorten product development cycles and innovate faster so that even if a rival copies today's tech, you're already moving on to the next generation. Staying ahead of thieves is a form of defense, too. Ultimately, rather than viewing tariffs and export bans as silver bullets against espionage, US leaders and industry might be safer focusing on resilience and stress-testing cybersecurity firms. Make it harder for adversaries to steal secrets, and less rewarding even if they do. William Akoto is assistant professor of global security, American University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
South China Morning Post
28 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Buyer linked to HSBC's ‘taipan' Wong puts down US$15.9 million for a Hong Kong luxury flat
A person connected to veteran HSBC banker Peter Wong Tung-shun bought a luxury unit in Hong Kong's Southern district for HK$125 million (US$15.9 million), as sentiment in the city's property market improves gradually. Two connected units with a total area of 4,616 sq ft were sold for HK$27,080 per square foot to Lion Rock (HK), according to Land Registry records. The property was handed over on Tuesday. The sole director of Lion Rock, Jeremy Wong Ka-chun, is also one of the three directors of Energy World; the other two are Peter Wong Tung-shun and his wife Camay Wong Ng Kam-mie, according to another Land Registry record. Peter Wong, 73, is the chairman of HSBC Asia-Pacific. HSBC declined to comment. The transaction came as Hong Kong's property market was showing signs of recovery, with lived-in home prices recording a small gain for the second straight month in May, according to official data. In the first five months of the year, second-hand home prices declined 0.9 per cent. They are down 28 per cent from a peak reached in September 2021.
