logo
‘Pc Predator' jailed for second time after having sex with crime victim

‘Pc Predator' jailed for second time after having sex with crime victim

Rhyl Journala day ago
Stuart Trentham, 41, was jailed for 18 months on Wednesday by the same judge who sent him to prison for nine months earlier this year for an 'almost identical' offence.
Sheffield Crown Court heard how Trentham was a South Yorkshire Police officer who responded to a report of burglary in 2020, during the pandemic lockdown.
Prosecutor Joseph Bell said the officer began to exchange increasingly 'flirtatious and sexualised' messages with the woman complainant.
Mr Bell said they then had consensual sex when Trentham attended at her house.
But the prosecutor said the woman 'saved his number on her mobile phone as Pc Predator'.
Mr Bell said the woman's friend encouraged her to report the matter to the police at the time but she was worried about alienating her local police.
He said it was only after she saw a documentary about the Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens, who murdered Sarah Everard in 2021, that she decided to make a complaint.
He said she was finally prompted by the publicity which surrounded Trentham's jailing for nine months in February for sending inappropriate messages to a vulnerable woman after she reported that sexual images of her had been posted on the internet without her consent in 2022.
On Wednesday, Judge Jeremy Richardson KC jailed father-of-three Trentham, who appeared in court on bail, for a further 18 months.
He told him: 'You abused the responsibility reposed in you.
'Police officers have a high position in society and are an essential component of a civilised country.
'The public place confidence in a police officer to do the right thing and behave with propriety.
'You betrayed that trust and you have betrayed that trust now twice.'
The judge said: 'This is a grotesque breach of trust by a police officer.'
He told him: 'You are a disgrace to the police force.'
Judge Richardson said: 'It must be made clear that if anyone indulges as a police officer in this form of misconduct, they fall to be punished.
'There has to be an element of deterrent.'
The judge said: 'Your conduct twice over in almost identical circumstances is outrageous.'
Earlier, Curtis Dunkley, defending, said his client had struggled serving his prison sentence earlier this year as a former police officer, saying it was a 'living hell'.
Mr Dunkley said Trentham, of Wakefield, West Yorkshire, had autism and suffered with PTSD.
The defendant admitted misconduct in a public office when he appeared in court on Wednesday.
He sat in the dock wearing a blue suit and with his head in his hands.
Trentham resigned from South Yorkshire Police in 2023.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sheffield woman hit by e-bike left in critical condition
Sheffield woman hit by e-bike left in critical condition

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Sheffield woman hit by e-bike left in critical condition

A woman has suffered life-threatening injuries after being hit by an e-bike in Sheffield, South Yorkshire Police have woman, aged in her 80s, was walking along Wisewood Lane when she was hit by the black e-bike at about 17:00 BST on rider of the bike, a 37-year-old man, stayed at the scene and was arrested on suspicion of driving while unfit through drugs. He has since been released on bail while inquiries continue, officers force urged witnesses or anyone with footage of the collision to get in touch. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds or catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

Facial recognition cameras set for Notting Hill Carnival ‘breach human rights'
Facial recognition cameras set for Notting Hill Carnival ‘breach human rights'

Metro

time4 hours ago

  • Metro

Facial recognition cameras set for Notting Hill Carnival ‘breach human rights'

The Metropolitan Police's plan to extend the use of live facial recognition (LFR) cameras breaches human rights law, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has said. The watchdog said the use of the cameras could have a 'chilling effect' on individuals' rights if and when deployed. It comes as London's police force finalised plans to roll out the technology at Notting Hill Carnival this weekend. Last year's event was 'marred by unacceptable violence', senior officers said, after Cher Maximen died after being stabbed in front of her three-year-old daughter. Mussie Imnetu, a Dubai based chef, was randomly attacked and sustained fatal head injuries. Officers hope the cameras, which are mostly attached to vans, will help control crime at the event as they scan faces and match them to criminal databases. Officers say the use of LFR has led to 1,000 arrests and 773 charges, but campaigners say the UK's capital is entering a new era of total surveillance. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The EHRC has been given permission to intervene in a judicial review over the cameras, brought by Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother Watch and Shaun Thompson. Shaun, an anti-knife crime campaigner, was wrongly identified as a criminal by the cameras, describing it as 'gross mistreatment'. John Kirkpatrick, the EHRC's chief executive, said: 'The law is clear: everyone has the right to privacy, to freedom of expression and to freedom of assembly. 'These rights are vital for any democratic society. As such, there must be clear rules which guarantee that live facial recognition technology is used only where necessary, proportionate and constrained by appropriate safeguards. The process starts by identifying a face in a still image or video – picking out which pixels make up a face and which are the body, background or something else. It then maps the face, such as measuring the distance between certain features, to create a 'numerical expression' for an individual. This can then be quickly compared to large databases to try to find a match from faces that have already been mapped. 'We believe that the Metropolitan Police's current policy falls short of this standard. 'The Met, and other forces using this technology, need to ensure they deploy it in ways which are consistent with the law and with human rights.' But not everyone is displeased at the thought of the cameras. Just last year, Croydon was named as the violence hotspot of London – with more than 10,000 violent crimes recorded in a single 12-month period. And it has now been named as the first spot in democratic world to have permanent LFR cameras. Akosua Murphy, 60, has lived in the borough for 17 years, is relieved more is being done to make the area safe once again. The cleaning lady told Metro: 'Every day I pray my grandchildren come home safe, crime is out of control – we saw what happened to Elianne Adnam and she was just an innocent girl. 'I used to work at East Croydon station, and I've seen young people stabbing each other. 'It's only getting worse, the high street is a mess.' Shannon Kirwin, 20, helps run her family's food van Old Skool Food, said she welcomes the crime reduction after seeing so many youths 'go for each other'. She told Metro: 'I have sat in this food van, and I have seen gangs just pull out weapons on each other right in front of me – the place has gone down massively over the last decade. 'But all the ones who are committing crimes are wearing balaclavas and face coverings, is there even any point to the cameras if they can't see through that.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Russian anti-war protester found dead in London after asylum claim was rejected MORE: Moment 'murdered' ice cream man 'argues with customer' before stabbing MORE: US hitwoman Aimee Betro who wore niqab in botched assassination jailed for 30 years

Met Police handling of Caroline Flack assault case was ‘reasonable and proportionate', watchdog finds
Met Police handling of Caroline Flack assault case was ‘reasonable and proportionate', watchdog finds

The Independent

time7 hours ago

  • The Independent

Met Police handling of Caroline Flack assault case was ‘reasonable and proportionate', watchdog finds

A probe into the Metropolitan Police's handling of allegations against presenter Caroline Flack before her tragic death has been quietly closed by the police watchdog. The Love Island host was accused of assaulting her then-boyfriend, Lewis Burton, with a lamp at her flat in Islington, north London, in December 2019. The Crown Prosecution Service had initially chosen not to charge the 40-year-old star, but this was appealed by officers at the Met, and the decision was overturned. Ms Flack took her own life several weeks before she was due to stand trial over the incident. Following her death, her mother complained about the force's handling of the investigation, claiming her daughter's celebrity status had influenced the decision to charge her and labelling the court proceedings a 'show trial'. At an early court hearing, it emerged Mr Burton did not support the prosecution, and the pair remained a couple. The Met referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) in March last year. However, a review of the Met investigation was closed by the watchdog in January this year, the IOPC has now confirmed. A spokesperson said the complaint contained a 'a number of allegations' about the force's investigation into the alleged assault, but they found the majority required no further action because they had already been investigated by the Met and the findings reviewed by the IOPC. However, they did direct the force to investigate the actions of the officers who appealed the initial decision by the CPS not to charge Ms Flack. It found 'no new evidence that would alter any previous outcomes'. This finding was reviewed by the IOPC, which in January concluded it was 'reasonable and proportionate'. 'We received a complaint referral from the Met Police on 7 March 2024 containing a number of allegations about the force's investigation into an alleged assault involving Caroline Flack in December 2019,' an IOPC spokesperson said. 'We determined the majority of the allegations had already been investigated by the force and later reviewed by the IOPC, so no further action was required. 'On the basis there may be new witness evidence available, we directed the Met to investigate one aspect of the complaint. This related to the actions of officers in appealing an initial decision by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) not to charge Ms Flack. 'Five allegations were returned to the force to resolve in a proportionate manner. Outcomes were provided to the complainant by the Met in June and in July, which found no new evidence that would alter any previous outcomes. 'The complainant asked the IOPC to review the outcome. Following that review, in January 2025 we found that outcome to be reasonable and proportionate.' An inquest into Ms Flack's death concluded she had taken her own life on 15 February 2020. Coroner Mary Hassell said the television star struggled with her mental health and having her case 'played out in the national press … was incredibly difficult for her'. 'I find the reason for her taking her life was she now knew she was being prosecuted for certainty and she knew she would face the media, press, publicity – it would all come down upon her,' she added. The Metropolitan Police has been contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store