Israel furious as France shuts four weapons stands at Paris Airshow
France shut down the four main Israeli company stands at the Paris Airshow for refusing to remove offensive weapons from display, in a move condemned by Israel and highlighting tensions between the traditional allies.
A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday that the instruction came from French authorities after Israeli firms failed to comply with a direction from a French security agency to remove offensive or kinetic weapons from the stands.
The stands were those being used by Elbit Systems , Rafael, IAI and Uvision. Three smaller Israeli stands, which didn't have hardware on display, and an Israeli Ministry of Defence stand, remain open.
France, a long-time Israeli ally, has gradually hardened its position on the government of Benjamin Netanyahu over its actions in Gaza and military interventions abroad.
French President Emmanuel Macron made a distinction last week between Israel's right to protect itself, which France supports and could take part in, and strikes on Iran it did not recommend.
Israel's defence ministry said it had categorically rejected the order to remove some weapons systems from displays, and that exhibition organisers responded by erecting a black wall that separated the Israeli industry pavilions from others.
This action, it added, was carried out in the middle of the night after Israeli defence officials and companies had already finished setting up their displays.
"This outrageous and unprecedented decision reeks of policy-driven and commercial considerations," the ministry said in a statement.
"The French are hiding behind supposedly political considerations to exclude Israeli offensive weapons from an international exhibition - weapons that compete with French industries."
IAI's president and CEO, Boaz Levy, said the black partition walls were reminiscent of "the dark days of when Jews were segmented from European society".
Two U.S. Republican politicians attending the air show also criticised the French move.
Talking to reporters outside the blacked-out Israeli defence stalls, U.S. Republican Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders described the decision as "pretty absurd", while Republican Senator Katie Britt criticised it as "short-sighted".
The French prime minister's office did not immediately return a request for comment.
Meshar Sasson, senior vice president at Elbit Systems, accused France of trying to stymie competition, pointing to a series of contracts that Elbit has won in Europe.
"If you cannot beat them in technology, just hide them right? That's what it is because there's no other explanation," he said.
Rafael described the French move as "unprecedented, unjustified, and politically motivated".
The air show's organiser said in a statement that it was in talks to try to help "the various parties find a favourable outcome to the situation".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
21 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel's attack on Iran brings the West closer to its day of reckoning
Israel is no longer hiding its crimes. In Gaza, it wages open genocide - razing hospitals, schools, mosques and apartment blocks. More than 55,000 people have been killed. A total siege chokes the demolished territory. Having walked for miles through ruins, exhausted and starving, civilians rush aid trucks for a chance at survival, only to be shot down. Some return with sacks of flour, others with the bloodied corpses of loved ones - gunned down, shelled, as they scrambled for a few grains. And Gaza is just one front. In Lebanon, Israel strikes at will - bombing homes, assassinating across borders, occupying villages it never left. It holds the Syrian Golan Heights, expands deeper into southern Syria, and fires missiles at the edge of Damascus. Borders mean nothing. Laws mean less. Israel moves how it wants, kills whom it wants. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Now it has turned to Iran. After indirect talks between Tehran and Washington in Oman, Israel launched a sudden, unprovoked war. First, assassinations: military leaders, scientists, civilian officials. Then air strikes: on military sites, power plants, airports - even public infrastructure. The excuse? Iran's peaceful nuclear programme, which is fully monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Western hypocrisy The hypocrisy is staggering. French President Emmanuel Macron rushed to Israel's side, asserting that Iran's nuclear programme is a threat to global security - this from the same France that helped secretly build Israel's Dimona nuclear facility in the 1950s and 1960s, enabling the region's only undeclared nuclear arsenal, in violation of international law. No inspections, no oversight, no accountability. Israel is now believed to possess between 80 and 90 nuclear warheads, along with second-strike capability via submarines and aircraft. It refuses inspections and has never signed the Non‑Proliferation Treaty. Yet it relentlessly bombs Iran in the name of nuclear non‑proliferation. The goal has never changed: subjugate the region, extract its wealth, silence its people. But this time, the playbook is failing Britain quickly followed France, sending Royal Air Force jets to the Middle East to back Israel. The US escalated further, moving two destroyers towards the Eastern Mediterranean, boosting weapons shipments, and syncing military operations with Israel in real time. Washington isn't watching; it's in the war. The European Commission followed blindly, repeating the same line: 'Israel has the right to defend itself' - even now, when it is the aggressor, and Iran is defending itself from foreign attack. It's the same script used to justify the genocide in Gaza; the same cover for crimes. International law and humanitarian norms are all suspended for Israel. And so the West continues to arm it to the teeth - not to protect civilians, but to dominate the region. To ensure Israel remains the only nuclear power. To control, crush, expand. Let's be clear: Israel was never just a state. It was created as a western settler colony to replace the retreating empires of Britain and France. Britain withdrew its troops, but not its ambitions. The US stepped in, taking over as regional enforcer by propping up tyrants, securing oil and suppressing resistance. The goal has never changed: subjugate the region, extract its wealth, silence its people. But this time, the playbook is failing. Arab world enraged Israel is now ruled by fanatics, openly and proudly. Ministers threaten annihilation. Settlers chant for genocide. Soldiers film themselves flattening apartment blocks and posing in the lingerie of the women they've displaced and killed. Families buried in concrete, children erased from classrooms - all in the name of 'security'. In Jerusalem, Al-Aqsa Mosque, one of Islam's holiest sites, is stormed repeatedly. Israeli mobs march through the streets chanting: 'May your villages burn.' They celebrate the destruction of schools in Gaza. Genocide is no longer denied; it's declared. And Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the architect of apartheid and war, stands before the cameras claiming to defend the 'free world'. Across the Arab world, people are watching - bitter, disgusted and enraged. Their leaders shake hands with war criminals. They normalise while Israel incinerates. The region has been paralysed, powerless. Until now. Because this time, someone stood up. Iran is not Gaza. It is a sovereign state of around 90 million people, stretching across 1.65 million square kilometres. Its terrain frustrates invasions, its depth absorbs attacks, and its missiles reach deep into Israel. It has been sanctioned, sabotaged, assassinated - and it still stands, still strikes back. For the first time since 1948, Israeli cities are under sustained fire. The illusion of immunity is gone. And Israel cannot claim victimhood - not when it holds the bombs, the nukes, the backing of every western power. Not when it has spent decades attacking others with impunity. Reopening old wounds Indeed, Iran's resistance has shattered illusions: the myth of Israel's invincibility, the silence of the region, the lie of western neutrality. Even those once hostile to Iran on sectarian or political grounds are now cheering - not because Iran is perfect, but because someone finally said: no more. And within Iran, something deeper has awakened. This war has torn open old wounds. Most know 1953, when the CIA and MI6 orchestrated a coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh after he nationalised Iran's oil. Operation Ajax toppled a democratically elected government and reinstated Mohammad Reza Shah, a western-aligned dictator. What followed was 25 years of repression, enforced by the Savak secret police, armed and trained by the West. By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump is pushing Tehran to go nuclear Read More » But the wounds stretch back further. In the early 1890s, a revolt shook the empire after the shah handed a British company control of Iran's entire tobacco industry. Led by clerics like Ayatollah Shirazi, Iranians launched a nationwide boycott, and the concession was ultimately cancelled. The revolt weakened the Qajar dynasty and planted in Iran's collective memory a searing lesson: never again bow to foreign control. That memory still lives - in every chant, every protest, every funeral. Every missile launched today carries the weight of a century of betrayal and resistance. Now, it's raw again. A clip has gone viral: an unveiled Iranian woman, her voice breaking with fury, denounces the genocide in Gaza, the silence of the West, and the decades of degradation inflicted on her country. Then she shouts: 'We want a nuclear bomb.' This isn't about destruction. It's about dignity. It's about saying: we will not be broken again. This is not just a military conflict, but a historical reckoning - a psychological rupture. Iran isn't just retaliating. It's remembering. And the shift is spreading. Clinging to fantasy Pakistan, the only Muslim-majority country with nuclear weapons, has sounded the alarm. Its defence minister has warned that the region is on the brink, and Pakistan could be next. As Israel deepens its alliance with India, Islamabad sees what's coming. Turkey, too, is on alert. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan warned last year that Israel would 'set its sights' on his country if it was 'not stopped'. Then came a chilling retort from Netanyahu in the Knesset: 'The Ottoman Empire will not be revived anytime soon.' This is not a history lesson, but a warning. Turkey knows this is not about Iran alone; it is a campaign to reassert full-spectrum control over the region. Israel, high on western backing and unchecked power, now believes it can subjugate the entire Muslim world: bomb it, starve it, fragment it, humiliate it. Israel thought it could repeat the past: assassinate, bomb, claim victory. But now Tel Aviv, Haifa and Ashkelon are under fire But the region is waking up. This is a war on dignity, on the very idea that anyone in this region dares to stand tall. And still, the West clings to fantasy. The BBC interviews the shah's son, asking if Israeli strikes might help 'liberate' Iran. As if Iranians are waiting to be saved by the son of a dictator - a dictator they themselves overthrew. As if 'freedom' comes from missiles and monarchs. Israel thought it could repeat the past: assassinate, bomb, claim victory. But now Tel Aviv, Haifa and Ashkelon are under fire. The war has entered Israeli soil. The illusion of invulnerability is over. And Iran can endure. It has been preparing for this moment for decades. The dream that Israel could destroy it in days is gone. Tel Aviv has lit a fire it cannot contain. And the West? It stands behind Israel again - mask off. Arming it, shielding it, using it. Not for peace or justice, but for control. But this time, the region is awake. And the reckoning has begun. History is moving. And it may not move in the West's favour. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
The National
41 minutes ago
- The National
Israel's strike on Iran's TV station mirrors attacks on journalists in Gaza and Lebanon
Israel's direct strike on Iran's national TV station in Tehran is the latest in a pattern of deliberate attacks on journalists, echoing similar hits in Gaza and Lebanon. The strike hit the station's building during a live broadcast on Monday evening, packed with journalists and technicians at the time. Iranian state media reported casualties. The attack marks the latest in a series of similar strikes targeting media outlets and journalists in other war zones. In Gaza, more than 165 journalists have been killed by Israeli fire since the war broke out in October 2023, according to the International Federation of Journalists and the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). At least 10 media workers have been killed by the Israeli army and several others injured in Lebanon, too, official sources in the country say. Many of those were killed in daylight, in direct hits. No Israeli military officials have been held accountable. The International Court of Justice condemned what it described as 'a continuation of Israel's decades-long pattern of targeting journalists with impunity'. Monday's strike came after the Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz threatened in a post on X to make the 'residents of Tehran pay the price' after Iran's missile attacks on Tel Aviv and Haifa. He then wrote that the TV station would 'disappear'. Minutes later, footage showed Iranian TV staff with bloodied hands pointing towards the burning building.
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for US importers
John Hamer, president of Rodgers Wade Manufacturing in Paris, Texas, makes store fixtures for big retailers like Ross Dress for Less and Ulta Beauty. He sources many of the goods from China, which until recently meant he paid 70% in tariffs on metal fixtures. "The media was saying it was 30%, but that was never true," he said, referring to the tariff rate for China announced in May as part of a truce between the Trump administration and Beijing as it negotiated a broader deal. That's because Hamer's 30% tariff was stacked on top of existing tariffs, including a tariff on Chinese steel products that varies depending on the amount of steel used in a fixture. When U.S. President Donald Trump adds a new tariff the old ones don't go away. Some companies will pay far more because of a phenomenon called tariff stacking, the latest complication for U.S. importers trying to navigate Trump's on-again, off-again trade war. The reality for many U.S. businesses is that their tariff bills are often far higher than the headline number touted in trade talks. Tariff stacking applies to any country exporting to the U.S., but the most extreme cases tend to be with China, where the U.S. has accumulated a long list of sometimes hefty existing tariffs, implemented under different provisions of U.S. trade law. The latest twist is an announcement that the two sides have agreed to a 55% tariff, but that's in part only an estimate of what the average pre-existing tariffs were. Hamer isn't sure what his tariff total will be now, but he figures it couldn't get much worse. 'Hopefully this will bring the (tariff) number down - and some of the clients who've been sitting on the sidelines will go ahead and place orders,' he said, 'because it's been all over the map.' 'HERE'S THE TARIFF BILL' Hamer is searching for suppliers outside China to avoid his stacked tariffs. He's checked Mexico and is planning a trip to India next month as part of the effort. In the meantime, he is passing through all the tariffs. "The customers pay the tariff," said Hamer. "When it comes in, we say, 'Here's the tariff bill.'" Many businesses are still hoping for a reprieve from President Donald Trump's trade war. Federal courts, including the U.S. Court of International Trade, have ruled that Trump's imposition of tariffs exceeded his authority. A federal appeals court is considering the administration's appeal to that ruling, and the tariffs remain in effect while that plays out, a process expected to take months. Some are counting on tariff exemptions, a popular tool used by companies during the first Trump administration to get goods imported without the taxes. Michael Weidner, president of Lalo Baby Products in Brooklyn, is one of them. 'We believe there should be an exemption for baby products,' he said. 'Same with toys.' The Trump administration has said it will resist creating such carve-outs. And even during the last trade war, it was a complex process. For instance, Lalo imports a 'play table' from China that happens to be classified under a customs category that was subject to a 25% tariff under a part of trade law that aims to fight unfair trade practices. So Weidner has been paying 55% tariffs on those, thanks to stacking. Trump campaigned on a vow to use tariffs to pull manufacturing back to U.S. shores and collect revenue to help fund a major tax cut. His battle with China quickly spiraled into a conflagration with the U.S. imposing a 145% across-the-board tariff that shut down much of the trade between the world's two largest economies. The agreement to curb the tariffs is part of a larger effort to negotiate individual deals with most of the U.S.'s trading partners. PASSING COSTS THROUGH On Wednesday, a White House official said the 55% figure represents a sum of a baseline 10% 'reciprocal' tariff Trump has imposed on goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the U.S.; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term. 'It sounds like that's the way he's thinking of the baseline - 55% - at least for some products," said Greta Peisch, a trade lawyer at Wiley Rein in Washington. Ramon van Meer's business selling filtered shower heads from China may yet survive the trade war, though he's not certain. That depends entirely on whether he can can manage the multiple tariffs placed on his $159 shower heads, which became a viral sensation on Instagram. When the Trump administration trimmed tariffs on China to 30% in May, van Meer's tariff bill was actually 43%. That's because the 30% tariff was stacked on top of an existing 13% tariff. It's an improvement over the 145% tariffs slapped on Chinese imports in April, when he halted shipments entirely. 'At least I can afford to pay it,' said van Meer, chief executive of Afina, based in Austin, Texas, referring to his latest calculations. "And I don't have to raise the price by that much." (Reporting by Timothy Aeppel in New York with additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt in Washington. Editing by Dan Burns and Michael Learmonth)
