Report: Hegseth had an unsecured internet line set up in his Pentagon office
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly used an unsecured internet line in his office to access Signal, an encrypted messaging app.
The line bypassed Pentagon cybersecurity protocols, posing potential national security risks, according to sources familiar with the matter.
The Department of Defense inspector general is investigating Hegseth's communications, following bipartisan concerns on Capitol Hill.
WASHINGTON - New reporting has raised fresh concerns about Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's handling of sensitive information after two people familiar with his office setup told the Associated Press that he used an unsecured internet connection—commonly referred to as a "dirty" line—to access the encrypted messaging app Signal on a personal device.
The news follows ongoing scrutiny over Hegseth's sharing of military strike details in Signal chats, prompting an investigation by the Pentagon's acting inspector general.
The backstory
According to sources who spoke on condition of anonymity, Hegseth had the unsecured connection installed directly at his desk inside the Pentagon. The line bypassed the Defense Department's secure systems and linked directly to the public internet—leaving it more vulnerable to hacking and surveillance.
Such lines are sometimes used in other Pentagon offices to monitor blocked websites or external information, but experts warn they lack the protections and oversight required for top-level national security officials.
A senior U.S. official familiar with military network security said a key risk of a "dirty" line is that activity isn't linked to a DoD IP address—masking the user while also potentially circumventing federal recordkeeping laws.
What they're saying
The unsecured line was reportedly used by Hegseth to access Signal, an app that has become a flashpoint following revelations that he posted sensitive airstrike details in two separate group chats—one of which included his wife and brother, the other, senior national security officials. Those posts reportedly included classified launch and bomb-drop times.
The Pentagon has not denied the line's existence, but spokesman Sean Parnell said Hegseth "has never used and does not currently use Signal on his government computer." He added that the secretary's communications systems are classified.
Why you should care
The Defense Department uses a tiered system of networks to protect information at varying levels of sensitivity.
These include NIPRNet for sensitive but unclassified data, SIPRNet for classified communications, and JWICS for handling top-secret and compartmentalized intelligence.
NIPRNet: Handles sensitive but unclassified info with firewall protections.
SIPRNet: Used for classified communications.
JWICS: Reserved for top-secret and compartmentalized intel.
Officials are typically required to leave personal devices outside secure areas. In Hegseth's office, a cabinet is available to store electronics—but sources say he used his personal computer at his desk via the unsecured line.
What's next
The House and Senate Armed Services Committees have called for further oversight, and the Defense Department's inspector general is now reviewing Hegseth's Signal usage. The controversy comes amid broader concerns over staffing turmoil at the Pentagon, following a wave of firings and resignations.
Despite the backlash, Vice President JD Vance told reporters: "I have 100% confidence in the secretary. I know the president does and, really, the entire team does."
The Source
This article is based on reporting from the Associated Press, including firsthand details from two sources familiar with the matter. This story was reported from Los Angeles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
America is prepared for a strike on our nuclear weapons
In a recent op-ed for The Hill, ' America Isn't Prepared for a Strike Against our Nuclear Weapons,' freelance journalist Ben Ollerenshaw argued that the U.S. is woefully unprepared for the nuclear threats facing the nation because it relies on a 'single point of failure: the nuclear command, control and communications systems.' He explains that the nation is dependent on highly vulnerable E-6B Mercury command-and-control aircraft that, because they are now on 'ground alert' rather than flying 24/7, make easy targets for a surprise nuclear, drone or missile attack. Should such an attack occur, Ollerenshaw argues that the president could no longer employ the nation's nuclear weapons. Fortunately, this is simply untrue. The nuclear command, control and communications system has far more ways to transmit presidential orders. The system connects sensors and shooters with decision-makers using a detect, decide, and direct framework. Detection harnesses sensors that identify and correlate adversary launches to facilitate warning. Once detection is established and the assessment is made, senior leaders confer, review plans and determine appropriate courses of action during the decision process. Finally, presidential decisions are transmitted through the system to the nuclear forces charged with weapons employment, under any circumstance or environment, guaranteed. To accomplish this audacious mission, the system must be survivable, prompt and flexible. Keep in mind that the nation's nuclear command, control and communications system is essentially a system of systems resembling a spider web. If one strand is broken, there are other strands a president can use to ensure a message is transmitted to forces in the field. Historically, it was thought of as having a 'thick line' during times of peace, and a survivable 'thin line' during times of war, should a Soviet nuclear attack devastate the U.S. In peacetime, the National Military Command Center at the Pentagon and the Global Operations Center at US Strategic Command serve as the primary command and control centers for the nation's nuclear forces. These facilities are not designed to survive direct nuclear strikes, but for the last seven decades, they and their predecessors performed the job in times of peace and crisis. During the Cold War (1961-1990), the country also maintained EC-135 command-and-control aircraft in continuous airborne operations, flying around the clock, seven days a week. The airborne command post mirrored the capabilities of the Global Operations Center, so that if the latter was destroyed in a nuclear attack, the Airborne Emergency Action Officer could take over and perform the duties of commander for the Strategic Air Command. The Looking Glass aircraft were an insurance policy against a surprise Soviet nuclear strike. They enhanced second-strike capability, strengthened strategic stability, and provided a psychological and political signal. The continuous presence of Looking Glass sent a clear signal of American resolve, vigilance and readiness to respond, reinforcing the overall framework of strategic deterrence. This did not, however, mean that the National Military Command Center, Global Operations Center and Looking Glass aircraft were the only ways for the president to command and control nuclear forces. It was, in fact, expected that both the National Military Command Center and Global Operations Center would be destroyed early in a Soviet nuclear strike, and that the command post aircraft would quickly take over. There was, however, always a concern that the aircraft would either be destroyed by Soviet aircraft or missiles or simply run out of fuel for lack of remaining and available aerial refueling capability. So it should come as no surprise that the Air Force devised 'backups to our backups' and spent considerable time working through all plausible scenarios where not only were the National Military Command Center and the Global Operations Center destroyed in an attack, but so were the KC-135s and now E-6B fleet. In our own careers, we have participated in wargames, exercises and working groups where just such events occurred. It is also important to understand that U.S. Strategic Command, the joint staff, and other elements of the national command authority regularly conduct exercises under conditions that mimic catastrophic events. This means the uniformed and civilian personnel who operate the nuclear command, control and communications system regularly train to operate in degraded conditions. The 2022 Nuclear Posture Review, released under the Biden administration, reiterated a longstanding policy that 'while the United States maintains the capability to launch nuclear forces under conditions of an ongoing nuclear attack, it does not rely on a launch-under-attack policy to ensure a credible response. Rather, U.S. nuclear forces are postured to withstand an initial attack.' For decades, the U.S. opted for redundancy to meet its resilience requirement. Redundant systems, redundant command nodes, and redundant communication pathways require consistent resourcing and persistent exercise if America is to retain its noble intent to 'ride out' a first strike. There is no deterrence without a credible threat of existential retaliation. That means America's nuclear command, control and communications systems must always work after a first strike on the homeland. From nuclear arsenal resourcing to force posture and launch policy, America's deterrent cannot depend on hope to survive; it must depend on action. That is exactly how the system is designed. Adam Lowther, Ph.D., is the vice president of research at the National Institute for Deterrence Studies. He spent two decades as a civil servant in the Department of Defense nuclear enterprise. Col. (Ret.) Curtis McGiffin is the vice president of education at the National Institute for Deterrence Studies. He flew nuclear command-and-control aircraft during his career.
NBC News
8 hours ago
- NBC News
Sen. Marsha Blackburn announces she's running for governor in Tennessee
Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., is running for governor, she announced Wednesday, promising to help her state be "America's conservative leader" for generations to come. Blackburn, who would be the state's first female governor if she wins, leaned heavily on her support for President Donald Trump in a short video posted to X announcing her campaign. The first images in the video are of the president, before Blackburn takes over to declare: "Trump is back, America is blessed, and Tennessee — better than ever." "Here in the Volunteer State, we always lead the way. And that's why I am announcing my candidacy for governor," she says, promising to bring more jobs and energy production to the state, adding she plans to "deliver a world-class education for our children by empowering parents, not the deep state." She framed herself as a stalwart of conservative policy who will carry forward those values as governor — promising to deport illegal aliens "whether it takes planes, trains or starships;" promising to "value life;" waving at the debate over transgender athletes participating in women's sports by saying "we'll define our boys and girls the way God made them." "I love Tennessee, I believe in Tennesseans, and I'm ready to deliver the kind of conservative leadership that will ensure our state is America's conservative leader for this generation and the next," she added. Blackburn will join a primary that includes Rep. John Rose, who has loaned his campaign $5 million to boost his bid. The state's current governor, Bill Lee, cannot run again due to term limits. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also discussed the idea of running for political office next year in Tennessee, NBC News reported last week, citing two people who have spoken with him about it. A Defense Department spokesperson denied he was considering a bid and others in Hegseth's orbit told NBC News that he has no plans to run for office. Blackburn is a prominent force in Republican politics in the state, having served in elected office there for a quarter-century, taken high-profile roles in the Senate on issues like abortion and banning transgender athletes from women's sports, and cultivated a relationship with Trump. The president has not yet weighed in on the race. If Blackburn were to win, she would have to vacate her seat to which she was re-elected in November. As governor, she would have the ability to appoint her temporary successor before a special election to fill the seat. Blackburn is the third sitting senator to announce a run for governor this year after Alabama Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville and Colorado Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
US leaves Syrian base where American troops fought Wagner mercenaries
U.S. troops have withdrawn from the outpost in Syria where a handful of American special operators and Marines fought off an assault by Russian mercenaries in 2018, a battle in which the American troops left a force 10 times their size scattered across the desert battlefield. The end of the U.S. presence at Mission Support Site Euphrates came as part of a wider drawdown in Syria in May, with American troops withdrawing from multiple bases used in the fight against ISIS, according to a new quarterly report from the Department of Defense's Office of Inspector General on Operation Inherent Resolve. Mission Support Site Euphrates is an outpost on the eastern banks of the Euphrates River in Khasham, Deir ez-Zor province. In 2018, a small group of U.S. troops and Syrian Democratic Forces, or SDF, were at the base, along a line of demarcation along the Euphrates River meant to help avoid conflict with Russian military elements backing the Assad regime. But in February 2018, the outpost was attacked by a force of roughly 500 pro-regime forces. That included members of the Russian mercenary firm the Wagner Group. What ensued over the subsequent hours came to be known as the Battle of Khasham, or Battle of the Conoco Fields. U.S. Army Green Berets and Delta Force soldiers, Air Force Combat Controllers and Marines held the outpost as American war planes and helicopters poured bombs and rockets onto the Russian and Syrian troops. The Department of Defense — as well as the Wagner Group and the now-deposed Assad regime — have been historically tight-lipped about the events of the battle in the years since, although some details have come out. One of the most revealing reports came from the citation for an Air Force Cross given in 2020 to an Air Force combat controller who participated in the fight. On Feb. 7, 2018, 'a professionally trained and technically proficient combined arms enemy assault comprised of main battle tanks, armored personnel carriers, heavy artillery tubes and a battalion of infantry soldiers' advanced across the river and attacked the outpost. Roughly 30 American special operations forces were there with Kurdish SDF fighters. When Delta Force soldiers and Army Rangers at the outpost came under attack, a platoon-sized force of Marines and Green Berets were about 20 miles away and began making their way toward the fight. But it took them far longer to get to the outpost than they imagined, in part due to poor visibility and damaged roads. Meanwhile, the combat controller called in air support, which arrived in force, with several fighter jets, drones, helicopters and AC-130 gunships pummeling the assaulting enemy. No Americans were harmed and several hundred attackers were killed. Leaked audio recordings from the Wagner Group painted a blunt picture of the battle. 'To make it short, we've had our fucking asses kicked,' one Wagner mercenary was recorded saying. Top Stories This Week News The Marine Corps is looking for 'volunteers' to leave the service early The Marine Corps is looking for 'volunteers' to leave the service early By Patty Nieberg News South Korea tours will now be a year longer as Army cuts down on moves South Korea tours will now be a year longer as Army cuts down on moves By Patty Nieberg Tech & Tactics 'Brutality over precision' — What the Army is learning from Russia in Ukraine 'Brutality over precision' — What the Army is learning from Russia in Ukraine By Kyle Gunn The United States military is currently in the process of reducing its presence in Syria down from roughly 2,000 troops to 1,000. According to the report on the progress of Operation Inherent Resolve, U.S. forces either dismantled and closed the bases or handed them over to the SDF. It's unclear if Mission Support Site Euphrates was closed or handed over. American troops remain active in Deir ez-Zor, with the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a nonprofit monitoring group, reporting frequent exercises with SDF forces in the region in recent weeks. The Deir ez-Zor base has been a frequent target of militants since the Battle of Khasham, taking small mortar and rocket fire from pro-Assad groups over the years. CENTCOM reported in late 2024 that it had been attacked several dozen times since October 2023. American forces have remained focused on ISIS in Syria in recent years, even as the Assad regime was toppled by rebel forces led by Ahmed al-Sharaa in December 2024 after more than a decade of civil war. The U.S. did take advantage of the collapse of the Assad regime to launch major airstrikes on ISIS in central Syria that month. The U.S. has maintained a presence in the northeast of Syria, which is largely under SDF control. Despite the drawdown, U.S. troops remain active in Syria, carrying out operations against ISIS in the country. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights has tracked several raids against militants, including ones that killed a senior ISIS leader in Aleppo. According to the report, the troop reduction in the country is not the end of Operation Inherent Resolve in Syria. 'U.S. forces will work closely to ensure partner forces sustain their abilities to maintain pressure on ISIS and deny it the ability to find safe havens or regain strength,' it notes. Solve the daily Crossword
