Starbucks struggles to find new identity amid fierce competition in China
Starbucks, they argued, should have smaller stores, employ fewer people and cut prices, according to people familiar with a stake sale process that kicked off in May who asked not to be identified for discussing private matters. These proposals resemble the very model that enabled Luckin Coffee Inc. to overtake Starbucks as China's biggest coffee chain two years ago by selling coffee at one-third of its price.
The stake sale exercise is underscoring Starbucks' identity crisis in China as it tries to salvage a flagging legacy business amid fierce domestic competition — a problem that has afflicted other foreign brands as China's economy undergoes major shifts. What Starbucks chooses to do in China will decide whether it ends up successful like McDonald's Corp., or faltering like Apple Inc.
Starbucks is 'in a tough position,' said Mark Tanner, managing director of consultancy China Skinny in Shanghai. 'Many cost-conscious consumers are opting for cheaper alternatives, but trying to compete on price will be a race to the bottom, destroying any margins they currently hold.'
A spokeswoman for Starbucks declined to comment but referred to comments regarding its China business recovery and stake sale process in its most recent earnings.
Starbucks brought the cafe experience to China in the 1990s, and as China's economic growth soared, its footprint expanded in tandem to bring its total number of stores there to over 7,800. In recent years, however, Western brands have been losing ground to local names amid rising nationalism and reluctance to pay premiums for brands.
The very few American brands that still thrive in China's great consumer pullback made successful adaptations to their business. Yum China Holdings Inc.'s KFC incorporated street food and local delicacies into its menu and offers cost-conscious consumers meal deals all year long. Walmart Inc.'s Sam's Club taps into the middle class's craving for exclusivity and growing health consciousness with high-quality private label snacks and premium meat cuts.
Starbucks seems stuck in between those models. While its 'third place' store format is expensive to upkeep, customers have become less willing to pay higher prices for its drinks since the Covid pandemic and ongoing economic downturn. Compounding the problem was previous China Chief Executive Officer Belinda Wong's tendency to hew more closely to the company's strategy in developed Western markets, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Wong rejected ideas like a lower-price spinoff chain before Covid, as well as more localized campaigns during the pandemic, the people said, citing a belief that they conflicted with Starbucks' brand.
New initiatives have been launched rapidly since new CEO Molly Liu took over in late 2024. These included a cheaper line of tea-based drinks and sugar-free options, and tie-ups with the movie Zootopia and Taiwanese rock band Mayday, all under the aegis of a new chief growth officer. Liu's understanding of the Chinese market enables different ideas to be discussed and approved more easily, the people said.
'Starbucks' new product innovation and marketing campaigns this year show it's digging deeper to explore the demand of Chinese consumers,' said Roolee Lu, Shanghai-based director of consultancy Mintel Group Ltd. 'They want new products, they want emotional connection with brands, they need some comprehensive, immersive experiences.'
There are signs of a turnaround. Based on conversations with three store managers in Shanghai, drinks co-branded with Mayday drove their May sales by as much as 20% in their stores. Overall, the most recent quarter showed sales returning to growth since late 2023 in China, with Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol attributing the success in an earnings call last month to 'beverage innovation' and changes to 'non-coffee pricing.'
Yet the lack of a clear strategy endures, especially around its stores which, depending on who you ask, are either a vaunted part of brand identity or an expensive cost overhang. The Chinese management team is now experimenting with different ways to bring people in. These include making more stores pet-friendly, providing free-to-use study rooms and targeting store openings in heritage or scenic sites, such as a recent one in Yunnan's Yulong Snow Mountain.
From the potential investors' perspective, it isn't necessary to have large stores if Starbucks aims to capture the needs of busy professionals who are unlikely to linger, though some shops should maintain in-store experiences, said people familiar with the proposals. Cutting the number of staff in stores is also an option, the people said, as many local chains only have one employee as orders are mostly taken online.
Jessica Gleeson, a former Starbucks China executive who now runs her own retail consultancy in Shanghai, said the risk is that the new investor doesn't understand Starbucks' positioning in China and turns it into just another 'transactional' coffee chain.
'The low-end of the market is already crowded,' she said.
Whichever direction Starbucks China takes, one thing is clear: It'll regain past glory only if consumers like Jelly Li can be persuaded to become regular customers again.
The 32-year-old musician from Guangzhou was recently at a Starbucks in Shanghai with a view of the Oriental Pearl Tower. She was unimpressed by the orange-flavored ice-shaken espresso she ordered, noting: 'Starbucks taught me how to enjoy coffee when I was in college. Now I need coffee every day but no longer pay for Starbucks.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
No fresh hike in tariff over oil, Donald Trump hints
US President Donald Trump appeared to rule out increased tariffs on China for purchasing Russian oil following his summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, while also suggesting existing penalties on India may not escalate further, providing relief for countries caught in Washington's pressure campaign against Moscow. US President Donald Trump shakes hand with Russian President Vladimir Putin during their meet at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. (REUTERS) Trump indicated that secondary sanctions on major oil buyers were no longer under immediate consideration after his three-hour meeting with the Russian president on Friday. 'Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that,' Trump said of tariffs on China and more severe economic punishment for Russia for continuing the war in Ukraine. 'Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well,' Trump added. The comments came despite the summit failing to produce a deal to end the Ukraine war, which has raged since Russia's invasion in February 2022. Prior to the meeting, Trump said 'he (Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the if I did what's called a secondary sanction, or a secondary tariff, it would be very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it,' offering hints that could be construed positively in New Delhi. Trump's statement came amid talk that had the Alaska Summit not gone well, India could be hit with a harsher levy. 'We've put secondary tariffs on Indians for buying Russian oil. And I could see, if things don't go well, then sanctions or secondary tariffs could go up,' US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said in a television interview on Wednesday. The US has already imposed tariffs totalling 50% on India, including a 25% penalty for Russian oil purchases that will take effect on August 27, making India one of the most heavily penalised US trading partners. Trump's more conciliatory tone followed his earlier revelation that the India tariffs were designed to pressure Russia by cutting off oil revenue, with the president claiming Moscow 'called and wanted to meet' after losing its second-largest energy customer. India welcomed the Alaska summit between the Russian and American leaders, expressing support for dialogue-based solutions to the Ukraine conflict. 'India welcomes the summit meeting in Alaska between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Their leadership in the pursuit of peace is highly commendable,' the Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement released after the summit. 'India appreciates the progress made at the summit. The way forward can only be through dialogue and diplomacy. The world wants to see an early end to the conflict in Ukraine,' it added. Russia currently accounts for more than a third of India's energy purchases, up from less than 1% in 2022 following Western sanctions over the Ukraine invasion. China remains Russia's largest oil customer. India has defended its energy purchases as necessary for economic security, calling US targeting 'unjustified and unreasonable' whilst arguing that Western countries maintain their own trade relationships with Russia. Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin this month, offering Indian diplomatic support to aid the peace process in his call with the former. Modi has consistently called for dialogue and diplomacy since the invasion began, making separate visits to Russia and Ukraine last year whilst urging both leaders to return to negotiations. Trump announced following the summit that he would meet Zelensky in Washington on Monday, potentially followed by a trilateral meeting with Putin, as diplomatic efforts to end the conflict continue.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
10 fastest-growing jobs in America that can earn you six figures
US Dollar. The American job market may be slowing, but certain career streams are surging ahead, reshaping the nation's economic backbone. While July 2025 saw only 73,000 new jobs added, a sharp dip from last year's average, specialized fields in healthcare, technology, and data science are driving a powerful transformation, according to US media reports. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, nearly one in four jobs created over the next decade will carry a six-figure salary, with many roles growing at double the national average. These careers, rooted in advanced skills and fueled by societal demand, point to where the next generation of opportunity lies. Here are the top careers curated according to the data curated through US media reports. Technology Technology remains the undisputed engine of growth. As industries embrace automation and artificial intelligence, demand for workers who can build, protect, and analyze systems is exploding. Software Developers are set to add more than 300,000 jobs by 2033, growing nearly 18%. With median salaries above $133,000, developers are now expected to bring not just technical fluency, but also leadership and business strategy skills. Information Security Analysts , the guardians of the digital frontier, are expanding by nearly one-third. Their role in preventing cyberattacks has made them indispensable across industries, earning around $125,000 a year. Computer and Information Research Scientists are climbing even faster, with a 25.6% growth rate. Working at the intersection of theory and innovation, they pioneer breakthroughs in AI, algorithms, and computational systems—earning median pay of about $141,000. Data Scientists, tasked with decoding massive streams of information, will see a 36% growth rate. Their blend of statistical mastery and technological expertise positions them as key decision-makers in every sector, from finance to health care. Healthcare As America's population ages and health systems stretch thin, healthcare-related careers are rising at unprecedented rates. These jobs not only promise financial security but also play a direct role in sustaining communities. Nurse Practitioners are leading the charge with a staggering 46.3% projected growth, adding more than 135,000 jobs. Their ability to provide primary care, especially in underserved areas, earns them a median salary of nearly $130,000. Physician Assistants follow closely, with a 28.5% increase. Licensed professionals who diagnose and treat under physician supervision are vital to easing America's healthcare bottleneck. Medical and Health Services Managers, also known as healthcare administrators, are projected to add more than 160,000 jobs. Coordinating hospitals and clinics, they form the management backbone of the health industry, with salaries approaching $118,000. Health Specialties Teachers (Postsecondary), training the next generation of doctors, pharmacists, and therapists, are expanding by 18.8%. With nearly 54,000 jobs on the horizon, they ensure a sustainable pipeline of healthcare expertise. Specialized professions Beyond the headline-grabbing roles in tech and health care, a cluster of specialized fields is rising steadily. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo Veterinarians are growing by 19.1%, reflecting America's enduring bond with pets and the rising importance of food safety. With salaries above $125,000, they represent both passion and profession. Biomedical and Chemical Engineers (noted in broader BLS rankings) are benefiting from new frontiers in pharmaceuticals, clean energy, and sustainable materials, standing at the intersection of innovation and necessity. A map of opportunity The common thread across these careers is clear: Advanced education, technical expertise, and adaptability. Whether it is safeguarding sensitive data, developing the next AI breakthrough, or treating patients in rural communities, the proliferating career streams of today are not just jobs; they are pillars of America's future economy. For students and professionals charting their course, the message is unmistakable: the pathways with the greatest growth are those that merge knowledge with impact, science with service, and technology with humanity. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
America's Stock-Market Dominance Is an Emergency for Europe
The London Stock Exchange overhauled the ceremony for welcoming new companies to its ranks last year, adding confetti cannons, slick videos and cinematic music. It has mostly been used for such events as product launches and anniversaries. So far this year, according to Dealogic, six companies have gone public in the U.K., raising $208 million, the lowest level in three decades of data. It isn't much better across the English Channel, despite surging stock markets. Initial public offerings in continental Europe have nearly halved in value compared with last year. Fundraising in the U.S., meanwhile, has jumped 38% to around $40 billion, while IPOs more than doubled in value in Hong Kong after a fallow patch. Tech stars such as the Swedish 'buy now, pay later' company Klarna and the British chip designer Arm are eschewing local markets to list in New York. And stock-market heavyweights are disappearing, either bought out by American companies or moving their listings stateside, where business is growing faster. Examples are Wise, the British payments company, and the sports-betting company Flutter Entertainment. 'For the Europeans who are responsible for the future, this is a material wake-up call,' said Stéphane Boujnah, chief executive officer of Euronext, which owns seven stock exchanges in the region. Europe doesn't want to 'be just a zone between America and Asia,' he added. Amsterdam and London pioneered the creation of public stock trading centuries ago, raising money for ship voyages to Asia, Africa and the Caribbean that forged Europe's colonial empires. Now, Europe's stock markets face a crisis of inactivity. Not only are listing volumes moribund—exchanges are shrinking too. Hastened by a global shift toward greater private ownership of businesses, the number of listings in London has fallen by a fifth in five years, to about 1,600. London's total market value stands at about $5 trillion, while Nvidia alone is worth $4.4 trillion. The exodus looks likely to continue. Next year Wise and the machinery specialist Ashtead are set to move their main listings to the U.S. from the LSE, which is part of the broader London Stock Exchange Group. Speculation has swirled that AstraZeneca—the largest company in the FTSE 100—could do the same. In a recent interview in New York, CEO Pascal Soriot declined to comment on whether he is considering moving the listing. 'We are very committed to the U.K.,' he said. 'But the reality is, over time, the investments are moving to the U.S.' AstraZeneca recently pledged to invest $50 billion in the U.S. by 2030. European leaders see the withering of these historic exchanges as an emergency—and one of the culprits behind Europe's economic stagnation, low productivity, and the widening wealth gap between its citizens and Americans. 'The wealth creation will happen to Texas teachers and California public-sector employees, not to European pensioners,' said Stephan Leithner, CEO of Deutsche Börse, operator of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Politicians fear the continent's inability to finance and keep exciting companies entrenches American domination over financial markets and reduces Europe's strategic autonomy. President Trump's 'America First' stance has added to the sense of urgency. A lack of investment hurts European businesses, and starts long before they go public. Startups struggle to get access to venture-capital funding, and many leave for Silicon Valley or New York. Those who stay in Europe often get investment from American firms, which then want them to go public in the U.S. or shift operations there. Some companies that make the leap have become more American over time simply because their U.S. businesses grew so fast. New listings are in the doldrums as other corners of European finance, such as the debt markets, shine. Trans-Atlantic dealmaking—one reason for Europe's shrinking stock market—is generating big paydays for selling shareholders and advisers, as U.S. acquirers hunt for bargains. Europe's problem isn't a shortage of money, but an underdeveloped and risk-averse system for investing it. European Union households save more than Americans, but their wealth has grown by a third as much since 2009, according to a 2024 paper by former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi on Europe's lack of competitiveness. Europeans hold $12 trillion of their savings, or about 70%, in bank accounts that typically have low yields, according to the European Commission. Unlike in the U.S., which cultivated widespread stock ownership through 401(k)s, they often rely on state pensions, paid out through government budgets, in retirement. Private pension systems—in places such as the U.K., the Netherlands and Denmark—invest mostly in supersafe assets including government bonds, or U.S.-focused global stock funds. Defense-spending pledges and aging populations are straining government budgets. Channeling more savings into high-returning investments would alleviate the pressure. Executives complain that tepid domestic investment results in lower stock valuations. The French oil producer TotalEnergies, its U.K. rival Shell and the mining company Glencore have in recent years raised the possibility of moving their listings, citing valuation gaps with U.S. peers, though none have made the jump. S&P 500 constituents have a forward price/earnings ratio of 22, compared with 13 for the FTSE 100 and 15 for Germany's DAX. Some Europeans argue that the premium on U.S. stocks is illusory, noting that groups such as the plumbing-supplies company Ferguson Enterprises failed to close the discount to American rivals after moving their primary listings to New York. Only three of the 20 U.K. companies that opted for a New York debut in the past decade have seen market value increase, while half have delisted, according to the LSE. Higher pay for U.S. executives is another draw. Peter Jackson, the chief executive of Flutter, which owns the betting platform FanDuel, nearly tripled his compensation after the gambling company moved its main stock listing to New York last year from London. European leaders have tried to reverse the tide, but with little to show so far. The U.K. has moved to deregulate, including by loosening restrictions on supervoting shares favored by tech founders. The government is launching a 'concierge service' to court businesses and backed an advertising campaign to encourage more retail investing. Speaking at a recent investment conference in London, Julia Hoggett, the CEO of the London Stock Exchange, urged attendees to be more confident. 'If we keep talking ourselves down…then we shouldn't be surprised of the consequences,' Hoggett said. The EU, meanwhile, has revived the painstaking work of knitting together its 27 members' capital markets. The project is already a decade and more than 55 regulatory proposals old. Deutsche Börse's Leithner was part of a working group that ended in a list of technical problems, such as tackling differences in national bankruptcy approaches. 'We need to make the leap from talking about technicalities to fundamental change,' said Leithner. 'If this doesn't happen, it will be a major shame. It would be almost a crime on the younger generation.' Write to Chelsey Dulaney at and Joe Wallace at America's Stock-Market Dominance Is an Emergency for Europe America's Stock-Market Dominance Is an Emergency for Europe