The Closet in Pee-wee's Playhouse
Hosted by Wesley Morris
Produced by John WhiteElyssa Dudley and Janelle Anderson
With Kate LoPresti
Edited by Wendy Dorr
Engineered by Daniel Ramirez
Original music by Dan Powell and Diane Wong
In the new HBO documentary 'Pee-wee as Himself,' Paul Reubens, the creator of the iconic character Pee-wee Herman, comes out as gay. Reubens, who spent most of his career in the closet, had already come out years before but then returned to the closet during his time as the popular Saturday morning children's show host.
On today's episode of 'Cannonball,' Wesley Morris talks with the writer Mark Harris about Reubens's relationship to being closeted, and they discuss what it means for artists to publicly come out.
Cannonball is hosted by Wesley Morris and produced by Janelle Anderson, Elyssa Dudley, and John White with production assistance from Kate LoPresti. The show is edited by Wendy Dorr. The show is engineered by Daniel Ramirez and recorded by Maddy Masiello, Kyle Grandillo and Nick Pitman. It features original music by Dan Powell and Diane Wong. Our theme music is by Justin Ellington.
Our video team is Brooke Minters And Felice Leon. This episode was filmed by Alfredo Chiarappa, and edited by Jamie Hefetz and Pat Gunther.
Special thanks to: Lisa Tobin, Paula Szuchman, and Sam Dolnick.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cosmopolitan
an hour ago
- Cosmopolitan
Pedro Pascal Backlash, Explained
When I first heard there was backlash against Pedro Pascal, I was terrified. Surely, only some disastrous scandal could have prompted any outrage against everyone's current Hollywood crush. Oh, how wrong I was. It turns out the Pedro Pascal backlash isn't due to any offensive joke or impropriety, it's has anxiety and supports LGBTQ rights. Confused? Allow me to explain. The Pedro hate began last week, leading up to the premiere of The Fantastic Four: First Steps, when the actor gave an interview with Men's Health on managing anxiety. In the interview, he said that he tends to rely on others—friends, family—and is 'always one to reach out when I'm facing something that is challenging or making me anxious.' He continued, saying that when he found himself falling into patterns of doom scrolling and anxiety in 2020, 'I had to go back to what was always the comfort for me in my life, which was engagement in my relationships, my friendships, and conversation and shared experience.' Anyone who has ever had any kind of acute mental health issue will tell you that one of the first things a therapist or counselor will instruct you to do is to create an action plan, which usually involves listing at least two people you can call in a crisis. Calling friends or family in times of trouble is not unusual, nor is it inappropriate. Unless you ask anti-trans activist Posie Parker (not to be confused with our White Lotus queen, Parker Posey). 'He never gets the anxiety gropes around men, does he?!' Posie (real name Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull) tweeted last week. She also shared a video of Pedro posing with his Fantastic Four co-star Vanessa Kirby, his hand moving up and down her arm as he looked for the best placement for the photos. While you and I might look at this video clip and think, 'Pedro Pascal is just like me, he also doesn't know what to do with his hands in photographs!' Posie apparently looked at it and related it back to the actor's quote saying he likes to 'reach out' to those close to him when he's anxious. Is it worth pointing out that when Pedro was talking to Men's Health, he was clearly using the phrase 'reach out' to mean that he contacts his loved ones? Or that there is nothing inherently wrong with seeking physical comfort from consenting adults? Yes, but logic is clearly not at the forefront here. A wave of trolls soon followed, hopping on the bandwagon to accuse Pedro of being inappropriately touchy with certain female co-stars. (I have included tweets for proof, not endorsements.) It's worth noting that there have been no public allegations or proof of any unwanted physical affection at all. To my knowledge, Pedro has never been accused of being inappropriate (physically or otherwise) with anyone, on set or off. What Pedro is guilty of, however, is being a vocal advocate for trans rights, which many suspect is why Posie chose to target him in the first place. In fact, TERFs and other anti-trans activists have been trying to get this fake scandal going for months, ever since Pedro called out J.K. Rowling's 'heinous loser' behavior in April after she celebrated an anti-trans ruling UK Supreme Court ruling. As noted by Vanity Fair, following Pedro's comments, fans of the Harry Potter author attempted to smear Pedro using a clip of him reaching for Vanessa Kirby's hand at last year's Comic-Con, accusing him of being inappropriate. 'What happened is we were both incredibly nervous going out in front of thousands of people who love this comic,' Vanessa later told Vanity Fair. 'He wanted me to know that we were in this together, and I found it a lovely gesture and was very glad to squeeze his hand back.' Which brings me to my final point, and the point many Pedro defenders are making online: There is a difference between being openly physically affectionate and groping someone without their consent. By pretending we don't know the difference, you are making it easier for actual harassers to get away with inappropriate, nonconsensual behavior. Now, unless you have any substantial allegations, would you please leave our fave internet daddy alone?
Geek Girl Authority
an hour ago
- Geek Girl Authority
Who Gets To Be a Geek: Unpacking Gatekeeping in the Geek Community
Who Gets To Be a Geek: Unpacking Gatekeeping in the Geek Community by Amanda Boyd The gatekeeping conversation is as old as the geek community itself. We continue to ask, 'Who gets to be a fan?' Even though geekdom has become more mainstream and inclusive than ever, gatekeeping is still very present. At its worst, it's outright discrimination. At its best? Even then, it's often rooted in fear of loss rather than love for the work. When Gatekeeping Is Just Discrimination Many of us have either experienced or witnessed the most unfortunate side of gatekeeping: a woman being asked whether she really knows Star Wars , a BIPOC cosplayer being told their costume isn't 'accurate,' or someone being met with surprise because they don't 'look' like an anime fan. This isn't passion for fandom, it's prejudice wearing a fandom t-shirt. It's discrimination, plain and simple. Some people use fandoms as a shield for their racism, sexism, and other biases. They try to turn communities meant to celebrate creativity and connection into exclusive clubs. However, fandoms thrive when they're open and diverse. Women make up nearly half of the gaming community, and LGBTQ+ fans also have a prominent presence, despite being underrepresented. We're finally living in an age where diverse stories and voices are being recognized and celebrated in geek spaces, and the communities are better for it. RELATED: SDCC 2025: Anne Rice Immortal Universe Panel Unveils Dark Delights for The Vampire Lestat and Talamasca So, when you see someone being targeted online or at a con just for existing in a space they love, speak up. This form of gatekeeping doesn't come from love of the content; it comes from dislike of others. And that's never what fandom should be about. The Emotional Roots of 'Protective' Gatekeeping That said, not all gatekeeping comes from a place of hate. Some of it comes from fear, fear that something meaningful will be changed or lost. For long-time fans, especially those who found a deep personal connection to a show, game, or story before it hit the mainstream, there's a feeling of ownership. You were there at the start. You 'got it' before the world did and saw yourself in the art. Then comes the adaptation. The reboot and the studio cash-in. Suddenly, that once-intimate thing feels mass-produced, rebranded for people who don't love it the way you do. It can feel like watching a cherished memory get turned into a marketing campaign. You can probably name at least three franchises that have gone through this exact trajectory. Many fans can. RELATED: New TV Shows This Week (July 27 – August 2) Wanting to protect that original feeling, the authenticity, is natural. Art helps us express who we are, and when that expression feels diluted or co-opted, it stings. But here's the hard truth… Gatekeeping Doesn't Really Work Despite all the fan debates, trivia battles, purity tests, and cosplay critiques, gatekeeping hasn't stopped fandoms from growing. In fact, geek culture is bigger than ever. There's a constant tug-of-war over who's the 'real' fan: Who's been here longer? Who knows more? Can you quote every line? Do you own the rare collector's edition? But none of that actually controls what happens to the art. Fans rarely dictate whether something becomes mainstream, rebooted, or franchised. Artists themselves know that once their work is out in the world, it stops belonging to them. It takes on a life of its own. Fans, on the other hand, often struggle with that reality. RELATED: Everything Coming to Netflix in 2025 The truth is, the art you love is going to change. The community around it will change too. But change doesn't mean loss. You Will Always Have What You Loved Here's the most important thing to remember: no matter how popular or diluted a franchise becomes, you will always have the version that made you fall in love. No one can take that from you. The original game, book, show, or comic is still there. Even if the new versions don't speak to you, you still own your connection to what once was. We all chase the high of that first time a piece of art really hit us. But that feeling isn't meant to be recreated exactly. Art evolves. Artists evolve. Culture evolves. And while we can mourn what's changed, we can also choose to celebrate the impact the original had on us, and still has. RELATED: SDCC 2025: Star Trek Universe Panel Beams Up With Exciting Franchise Updates Maybe the 'posers' fade away. Maybe the fandom finds its balance again. Or maybe it becomes something entirely new. Regardless, your love for it is real, and it endures. So, instead of guarding the gates, maybe it's time we opened them. With care, with context, and with community. Because the best thing about art is that it brings people together, and there's room for everyone who truly loves it. SDCC 2025: Prime Video Sets Premiere Date for HAZBIN HOTEL Season 2
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Billy Joel sets the record straight on whether he's had multiple DUIs
Billy Joel has had a few car accidents, but not for the reason many people have believed. In his HBO documentary 'Billy Joel: And So It Goes' the 76-year-old seeks to clear up consistent speculation that he has been arrested multiple times for drinking under the influence. (HBO is owned by CNN's parent company.) In 2002, Joel crashed a car in East Hampton, New York and less than a year later, he drove into a tree in Sag Harbor which resulted in him having to be airlifted to the hospital. Two years later he crashed into a house in Long Island. The car accidents have been attributed to road conditions and Joel's depressive mental state, and while he has been in rehab before, the singer maintains that he has never gotten a DUI. 'You know, along with fame comes a lot of gossip, rumors. I didn't like the tabloid kind of press,' he said in the documentary. 'For example, there's this rumor that I have all these DUIs. That never happened, but people keep repeating the myth: 'Oh, he's got so many DUIs.'' Joel went into rehab at the Betty Ford Center in 2005 after he said he was given an 'ultimatum' by his then-wife, Katie Lee. He discussed it in 2013 with the New York Times Magazine, but at that time he again denied ever having a DUI. 'I went to rehab in '05 because, when I was with Katie, she said, 'You're drinking way too much.' I never had a DUI in my life. That's another fallacy. Look at the police records.'
