Trump 'craziest ever' proposal for Gaza will ‘die on its own': Thomas Friedman at Cairo conference on Gaza - Foreign Affairs
Renowned New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman described President Donald Trump's proposal to 'clean out' Gaza as the 'craziest ever' presented for the Arab-Israeli conflict, stressing that it will 'die on its own.'
Friedman made these remarks on Wednesday in a speech before the "Gaza and the Future of Peace and Stability in the Middle East" conference in Cairo, which is organized by the Egyptian Centre for Strategic Studies (ECSS) and the Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs (ECFA).
During the conference's third session, "The US Stance on the Gaza War and Its Regional Implications," Friedman assessed the impact of Trump's Gaza proposal on Middle East peace prospects.
He noted that realizing the recklessness of his proposal, Trump had already begun to backtrack.
"Trump abandoned his relocation proposal after realizing its irrationality, but tensions remain," Friedman said.
He criticized the proposal as "illogical," "impractical," and "unreasonable," emphasizing the crucial role of Arab states in Gaza's reconstruction and security.
Earlier in February, Trump proposed that Washington take control of Gaza, forcibly displace its native Palestinian population, and build a "Middle East Riviera." Trump's proposal sparked a global outcry.
The US president had cited Egypt, Jordan, and other Arab countries as possible destinations for the Palestinians.
Egypt, Jordan, and other Arab nations, in return, immediately rejected the idea, which they perceived to be an unacceptable injustice that infringed on the historical and legitimate rights of the Palestinian people and threatened regional stability.
Furthermore, Friedman predicted a "political conflict" between the US president and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
"There will be a political conflict between Trump and Netanyahu, as US interests rely on preventing China's expansion in the Middle East and establishing a broad alliance network stretching from East Asia through India to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, and Europe," he said.
Friedman reaffirmed his support for the two-state solution, warning that the alternative, "no state," would be "disastrous."
He also stressed that preparations for a Palestinian state should involve a Palestinian constitution and institutional reforms, a halt to Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and reduced pressure on Palestinians.
In addition, he warned that Trump's insistence on pushing through his proposals would "destabilize Egypt and Jordan," contradict US regional interests, and, therefore, trigger a "diplomatic rift".
"With the Middle East serving as ground zero for failed states, Egypt's resilience and strength stand out as an increasingly rare and vital force in the region," Friedman concluded.
The conference kicked off earlier on Wednesday to dismantle and refute the American vision of forcibly displacing Palestinians from Gaza. It also highlights regional and international experiences in post-conflict reconstruction without displacing populations.
Egypt is preparing a comprehensive plan for the reconstruction of the heavily devastated Gaza Strip without displacing the Palestinians.
The plan will be presented on 4 March at the Cairo Emergency Arab Summit.
Follow us on:
Facebook
Instagram
Whatsapp
Short link:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily News Egypt
2 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Egypt sets rules for foreign delegations visiting Gaza border
Egypt has announced regulatory controls for foreign delegations wishing to visit the border area with the Gaza Strip, stating that prior approval must be obtained through official channels. In a Wednesday statement, the government said the only way it would consider such requests is through a formal application to an Egyptian embassy abroad, or via requests submitted by foreign embassies in Cairo or representatives of organisations to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It said that no requests or invitations received outside this specified framework would be considered. The statement emphasised the importance of adhering to these regulations to ensure the security of visiting delegations, citing the delicate security situation in the border region since the beginning of the crisis in Gaza. It noted that many visits for foreign government and non-governmental delegations had been arranged previously under this process. The government also stressed the importance for citizens of all countries to adhere to the laws and regulations governing entry into Egyptian territory, including obtaining the necessary visas or permits. In the statement, Egypt said it welcomes international and regional positions that support Palestinian rights and reject what it described as the 'siege, starvation, and flagrant and systematic Israeli violations' against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. It affirmed that Egypt continues to work at all levels to end the war on the Strip and the humanitarian disaster affecting more than two million Palestinians. The statement reaffirmed Egypt's steadfast position in support of the Palestinian people on their land and its rejection of Israeli violations of international law and international humanitarian law. It also stressed the importance of pressuring Israel to end the siege on the Strip and allow humanitarian access through all land crossings from Israel.
Daily News Egypt
2 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
123 Palestinians killed in 24hrs as UN experts accuse Israel of genocide in Gaza
At least 123 Palestinians were killed in the past 24 hours as Israeli military operations continued across the Gaza Strip, amid mounting international accusations that Israel is committing crimes against humanity. In a report released on Tuesday, United Nations experts accused Israel of conducting 'a systematic campaign to erase Palestinian life,' citing the targeting of civilians sheltering in schools and places of worship. According to Gaza's Civil Defense, 31 people were killed on Wednesday morning by Israeli fire while attempting to reach a food distribution centre. Similar incidents have claimed dozens of lives near aid points run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation since late May, according to the Red Cross and local emergency services. Gaza's Government Media Office accused Israel of deliberately fostering chaos through starvation and of 'directly targeting starving civilians using drones, helicopters, and tanks.' On the diplomatic front, Israel's Channel 12 reported on Tuesday that US President Donald Trump had urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to 'end the war now' during a phone call held Monday evening. Citing unnamed sources, the channel said Trump used unusually strong language, telling Netanyahu: 'I want you to end the war.' In a bid to ease the escalating crisis, Netanyahu stated in a video posted to his Telegram account on Tuesday that 'significant progress' had been made in negotiations with Hamas over a potential prisoner exchange. However, he cautioned that it was 'too early to raise hopes.' Senior Hamas official Mahmoud Mardawi dismissed Netanyahu's remarks as 'deception,' accusing him of misleading the Israeli public and obstructing a genuine deal that could secure the release of captives. Mediated talks, led by Qatar and Egypt, are ongoing in Doha, though prospects for a ceasefire remain uncertain amid conflicting signals from the parties involved. On the ground, fighting persisted in southern Gaza. The Al-Quds Brigades, the armed wing of Islamic Jihad, said its fighters were engaged in fierce clashes with Israeli forces in the city of Khan Younis. The Al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas, also claimed responsibility for the sniper killing of an Israeli soldier in the nearby town of Abasan al-Kabira. Israeli media reported heavy combat in the area, with the Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation confirming that four soldiers were wounded in separate incidents during the latest battles. Two were injured when an anti-tank missile struck a tank from the 74th Armoured Battalion, while two others were wounded in a separate shooting.
Daily News Egypt
2 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Culture remains enduring constant at heart of resistance: Mohamed Salmawy
'Palestine is not merely a political cause; it is the mirror in which the Arab self is reflected.' In a candid and incisive conversation, renowned Egyptian writer Mohamed Salmawy reflects on memory, resistance, cultural identity, and the enduring responsibility of the intellectual in turbulent times. In an era where genuine insight is increasingly drowned out by the clamour of instant commentary and disposable opinion, Mohamed Salmawy remains one of the Arab world's most luminous voices of moral clarity and cultural stewardship. For decades, Salmawy has occupied a rare position at the confluence of literature, cultural advocacy, and public life. His career is distinguished not only by literary excellence but by an unwavering commitment to intellectual integrity and moral courage. At a moment when shifting regional dynamics and successive crises have driven the Palestinian question to the margins of political discourse, Salmawy insists that it endures—not merely as a geopolitical concern, but as the moral and existential cornerstone of Arab identity. Despite persistent attempts to sideline it, the Palestinian cause remains deeply embedded in the Arab collective imagination. In this expansive and contemplative exchange, Salmawy opens both heart and mind, meditating on Palestine's persistent centrality in Arab consciousness, the resilience of a generation once presumed indifferent, and the undimmed ember of solidarity that continues to burn. He speaks of resistance movements that have reshaped history, of the thinker's sacred duty to preserve memory in the face of cultural erasure, and of the enduring necessity of resistance—not solely through arms, but through words, reflection, and cultural guardianship. Drawing on a rich personal journey, Salmawy explores the concept of a 'culture of resistance,' the Arab world's contemporary crisis of awareness, his relationship with power, and a hopeful vision for the future of Arab culture. The result is a dialogue of rare philosophical depth—one that refuses despair and reaffirms the enduring power of memory, truth, and moral resolve. You recently explored the concept of a 'culture of resistance.' In light of the ongoing crises sweeping the Arab world, what does this phrase mean to you? The culture of resistance is far more than a reaction to occupation or political oppression; it is a deeply rooted civilisation force woven into the very fabric of our history. Resistance begins with the word—through ideas, poetry, theatre, storytelling. We inhabit a region in perpetual flux, and so our culture must remain vigilant, engaged, and unyielding in the face of domination or dependence. For the intellectual, the word is a weapon—no less powerful than any firearm. Do you believe the Arab intellectual today is fulfilling his responsibilities adequately? The intellectual is the architect of collective awareness—politicians often lag behind or exploit that awareness. But where do intellectuals stand today? There are indeed sincere efforts, but we live in an age marked by confusion and fragmentation. The issue is not a lack of cultural production, but the absence of real influence. Books are published, plays performed—yet how many truly resonate? How many genuinely reach the public? Despite the abundance of output, we are failing to forge meaningful engagement. And what, in your view, lies at the heart of this issue? The media bears much of the responsibility. Rather than acting as a bridge between culture and society, it has become a barrier. Superficiality now dominates the airwaves. Serious cultural programming is increasingly rare, often relegated to late-night hours, while trivial entertainment and escapism dominate prime time. This dynamic gravely undermines efforts to cultivate genuine public consciousness. Let us return to the beginning—when did you first come to realise that writing was your irrevocable destiny? From a very young age. I was writing and staging plays in school and began composing poetry and short stories around the time of adolescence. My father, although a businessman, was a voracious reader. Our family library housed the works of giants like Taha Hussein, Al-Hakim, and Naguib Mahfouz. Within that intellectually rich environment, I came to see writing not as a diversion but as a calling, a solemn responsibility. Later, I studied English literature and had the privilege of studying at Oxford University—an experience that significantly shaped and deepened my intellectual and creative outlook. You have held distinguished cultural appointments both within Egypt and internationally. How have these roles shaped your vision of cultural endeavour? I had the honour of presiding over the Egyptian Writers' Union and subsequently the Union of Arab Writers and Intellectuals. Yet, throughout, I have remained a writer above all else. Titles are fleeting—only the written word endures. These roles revealed to me that the challenges facing culture across the Arab world are largely similar: chronic underfunding, a weak translation infrastructure, and the consistent relegation of culture beneath political and economic concerns. Yet, even in such adversity, I have encountered extraordinary talents—creators with nothing but their art, yet undeterred in their resolve. It is they who keep the flame of hope alive. And how would you describe your experience with translation? Translation has long been a personal and professional priority—not simply a tool, but a cultural obligation. Sadly, we fall short both in translating the world into Arabic and in exporting our own intellectual and artistic output. What we need is a strong, permanent national institution dedicated to translation as a vehicle for cross-cultural understanding. I fought hard for this, and it was a personal triumph to witness the creation of the National Centre for Translation. But founding it was just the beginning—it must be properly funded, institutionally empowered, and culturally autonomous to fulfil its mission. Ours is not a quest to mimic the Other, but to understand—and in that understanding, to better know ourselves. The relationship between the writer and authority has always been fraught. You were at times close to the corridors of power. How did you manage that proximity? Proximity to power is not inherently problematic; the danger lies in forfeiting independence. Yes, I was close to decision-making circles—I even helped draft significant documents, including Egypt's 2014 Constitution, in which I wrote the chapter on culture. But I was never a follower. I wrote articles critical of the authorities and was removed from a position because of one such piece. An intellectual must guard their freedom of thought; once that is lost, they cease to be a voice of conscience and become an instrument of the state. Do you consider the present climate conducive to genuine freedom of expression? No climate is ever perfect. Freedom is not a fixed state—it is an ongoing struggle. A true writer finds ways to speak even in adverse conditions. Today we have tools our predecessors could not imagine—digital platforms, social media—yet these too can mislead as easily as they can enlighten. The challenge is to use them wisely, with ethical conviction. Freedom, after all, is hollow without accountability. And what final counsel would you impart to the rising generation of writers and artists? You are the torchbearers of tomorrow. Ignore those who claim culture has lost its relevance. The written word remains mightier than any weapon. Resist the allure of instant fame—pursue meaning, not celebrity. Read widely, think deeply, and fully engage in the moral and intellectual struggles of your time. For it is from life—in all its chaos and beauty—that enduring art is born. How do you situate the Palestinian question within its wider Arab context? The Palestinian cause has never been a passing political episode or local conflict. It stands as a powerful symbol of the Arab world's historical dispossession—the stripping away of resources, sovereignty, and cultural identity. It transcends borders and nationalist sentiment. Palestine is the prism through which we see the struggles of the Arab nation. It is not just a land under occupation, but a symbol of every injustice, every silenced voice, and every stolen future. It is the crucible of our collective striving for freedom. And do you believe the present generation retains a cognisance of this profound connection? Candidly, I once feared the opposite. There were signs that younger generations were growing distant from the cause—perhaps due to its diminishing presence in public discourse or the pressing distractions of modern life. At times, it felt as though Palestine was being consigned to the margins. And then Gaza erupted, and the narrative shifted dramatically. What precisely do you mean by 'Gaza erupted'? Are you alluding to the most recent assault? Precisely. The recent events in Gaza—a defiant stand against inhuman savagery—marked an irreversible rupture. The scale of brutality was staggering, unmatched in recent memory. One might have expected the region to retreat into silence. Yet the opposite occurred. A renewed political consciousness emerged, reclaiming Palestine from the periphery. This awakening did not stem from official declarations but from the people, particularly the youth, who embraced the cause as their own. Do you discern a substantive transformation in the consciousness of Arab youth towards the Palestinian cause? Absolutely. The intensity of youth engagement on digital platforms—calls for boycott, cultural campaigns, protest art, slogans, and anthems—has been extraordinary. Arab youth are no longer passive witnesses; they are active agents of change. They didn't wait for leadership—they led. This is no passing moment, but a deeper reawakening of cultural and political awareness. The fire of the cause continues to burn brightly in their hearts. And how do you assess the role of the Arab intellectual in this milieu? Has the intellectual sphere fulfilled its historic duty? Without the enduring efforts of Arab intellectuals, the Palestinian cause would not have retained its central place in our consciousness. I, too, contributed with my novel 'Coloured Beads.' Since the Nakba, Arab writers and thinkers—from the Maghreb to the Gulf—have produced an immense and powerful body of work. Palestinian literature, especially, remains vital: Ghassan Kanafani's 'Men in the Sun' and 'Returning to Haifa,' the poetry of Mahmoud Darwish and Samih Al-Qassem—these works form the cultural spine of resistance and remembrance. What of the representation of the Palestinian cause in the realm of visual arts? Visual art has proven one of the most evocative mediums for conveying the Palestinian experience. I recently attended an exhibition by Khaled Samahi, where one striking piece showed a masked youth with a gaze that proclaimed: 'I am here… I remain.' I was moved to acquire it. My wife, Nazli Madkour, a prominent visual artist, and I have assembled a collection captured in the book 'Jabal Al-Narjis' (Mount Narcissus), curated by Dr Magda Saad El-Din and photographed by Emad Abdel-Hadi. These works do not merely depict—they bear witness. Art becomes resistance. Do you perceive a genuine shift in the portrayal of Palestine within the global media landscape following the recent hostilities? Without question. For the first time in decades, the dominant Zionist narrative appeared visibly shaken. Global media could not ignore the sheer scale of the atrocities. The most powerful images—of children beneath rubble, bombed hospitals, devastated schools—emerged not from major networks but from Arab youth. Alternative media proved that truth, when persistently and fearlessly articulated, cannot be silenced. In one of your essays, you characterised the Palestinian child as the 'Personality of the Year.' What inspired that poignant declaration? Because no image this year has been more searing than that of the Palestinian child—dust-covered, traumatised, searching the rubble for a mother or a glimmer of hope. These children, robbed of innocence and safety, have become the living embodiment of a seventy-year struggle. When the world is finally shaken by the bombing of a sleeping child, something in the collective conscience irrevocably shifts. Lastly, what does Palestine signify to Mohamed Salmawy, both on a personal and symbolic plane? Palestine is not simply a national cause—it is a matter of existential identity. It is not just a place on the map, but the repository of memory, dignity, and spirit. It is the ultimate measure of one's moral compass. Those who turn their backs on Palestine renounce their very essence. To deny it is to reject our past and betray our future. Palestine is the mirror through which we see ourselves—and if that image is shattered, so too is our reflection.
