Trump denies Iranians moved nuclear materials before US strikes
President Trump on Wednesday maintained that nuclear materials were not moved prior to U.S. strikes on Iranian facilities, despite an internal preliminary assessment that indicated otherwise.
'We're just the opposite. We think we hit them so hard and so fast, they didn't get to move,' Trump said during a press conference at the NATO summit when asked if U.S. intelligence was able to assess whether materials were relocated from the sites.
'If you knew about that material, it's very hard and very dangerous to move. It's called—many people, they call it dust— but it's very, very heavy. It's very, very hard to move. And they were way down. You know, they're 30 stories down. They're literally 30 to 35 stories down in the ground,' the president added.
Trump's remarks came as he and his top national security brass hit back at his administration's initial assessment that damage to the three nuclear facilities only set the Iranians back a few months when it comes to their nuclear program.
Trump has insisted it has actually set it back decades.
Whether Iranians managed to move some nuclear materials ahead of the US strikes appears to be in question.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi has said the agency does not know the location of 900 pounds of enriched uranium from the sites.
'We do not have information of the whereabouts of this material. So, this is why I'm asking. We are making an assumption, which is not speculative or pure speculation, because Iran officially told me, we are going to be taking protective measures, which may or may not include moving around this material,' Grossi said on FOX News Channel's 'The Story.'
He added, 'So it is quite obvious, you are asking me about it, that there is a question there. Where is this? So, the way to ascertain that is to allow the inspection activity to resume as soon as possible. And I think this will be for the benefit of all.'
Vice President JD Vance on Sunday, just hours after the U.S strikes, suggested at the time that officials are working to handle Iran's uranium batch after the U.S. strikes.
'We are going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel and that's one of the things that we're going to have conversations with the Iranians about,' Vance told ABC's 'This Week.'
Earlier Wednesday, Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly hit back on reporting on the administration's internal assessment, insisting that 'the site is obliterated.'
He opened his press conference by reading a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission, that said the strikes 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years.'
'This is an official letter and they're very serious people as you know,' Trump said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
20 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
U.S. strikes crippled Iran's nuclear program, Israeli analysis finds
THE HAGUE — Israel's preliminary analysis of the damage caused by U.S. strikes on Iran's main nuclear facilities — based in part from on-the-ground assessments — shows the attacks inflicted widespread destruction, a senior Israeli official said. The official, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said that Tehran has been 'actively trying to hide the damage' from the attacks, which President Trump said in The Hague on Wednesday had all but eliminated Iran's enrichment program. Trump, who repeatedly defended the effectiveness of the strikes at the NATO Summit, made reference to individuals who had been on the ground to assess the damage, without providing details. 'I can't say it's a final assessment, because we're less than a week after. It's not like we can send officers openly. But that's the indication we have now,' the official said. A spokesperson for Iran's foreign ministry on Wednesday said the bombing raid 'badly damaged' the nuclear sites, but the Iranian government has said it will continue its nuclear efforts, which it insists are for peaceful purposes. A full review of the mission could take weeks, and experts have expressed skepticism of declarative statements by Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that the U.S. operation was a success within mere days of the attack. 'Battlefield damage assessment is an imprecise art, with initial estimates frequently being way off,' said Patrick Clawson, an expert on Iran and director for research at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 'I would be very suspicious of any claims — by Iran, by Trump, by Israel — about what has happened to Iran's enriched uranium stocks or to its centrifuges.' Israel's preliminary findings come after an initial assessment from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency cast doubt on the effectiveness of the American strikes, stating with low confidence that Iran had retained the core elements of its nuclear program despite the attacks, one U.S. official familiar with the findings told The Times. The DIA assessment was first reported by CNN. The U.S. attack followed nine days of an Israeli military campaign that decimated Iran's air defenses, its military leadership and its ballistic missile stockpiles, while degrading its nuclear facilities. Israeli intelligence has also monitored the reaction to the campaign among Iranian leadership, which has struggled to comprehend the extent of the damage itself, the Israeli official said. 'We don't believe everyone in the leadership knows what really happened, because the whole program was compartmentalized — they weren't sharing a lot of information, and a lot of the officers who were highly involved on the ground level were eliminated,' the official continued. 'So a lot of the top leadership hasn't fully begun to understand what's happened.' The developing intelligence picture comes as Trump defended the U.S. mission, called Operation Midnight Hammer, during multiple appearances at the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday. 'It's been obliterated, totally obliterated,' he said of Iran's nuclear facilities. Addressing the DIA report, he added, 'They did a report, but it was like, if you look at the dates, it's just a few days after.' The U.S. deployment of massive, 'bunker-buster' munitions targeting Iran's main nuclear sites — including six dropped on Fordo, a facility burrowed deep into the side of a mountain — was intended to bury its most advanced equipment and most highly enriched uranium, which can be used to build nuclear warheads. Initial assessments of the damage were unclear, but since then, Trump said, 'we've collected additional intelligence. We've also spoken to people that have seen the site, and the site is obliterated.'
Wall Street Journal
21 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How ‘Daddy' Trump Learned to Love NATO
THE HAGUE—What a difference one night in a Dutch palace can make. President Trump departed Washington early Tuesday in a bad mood, swearing at Israel and Iran for endangering the cease-fire he had brokered and sweating from a heat wave blanketing the capital.
San Francisco Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump voters cheer his move against Iran. MAGA leaders had warned the bombing could backfire
FRONT ROYAL, Va. (AP) — As President Donald Trump prepared to order the bombing of Iran's nuclear sites, many prominent leaders of his 'Make America Great Again' movement warned he was making a grave mistake. Tucker Carlson accused Trump of abandoning his pledge to keep the United States out of new wars. Charlie Kirk said an escalation would be too divisive. Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief strategist, said intervention would thwart the Republican's most important priority, mass deportations. But interviews with Trump voters across the country this week and early polling suggest Trump's decision has been welcomed by his political base. While some said they were weary of the U.S. becoming embroiled in a protracted war, most cheered the move and said they did not see it as running counter to Trump's 'America First' approach. Ken Slabaugh, a retired Air Force veteran from Warrensburg, Missouri, said he was '100% supportive' of the strikes. Speaking Sunday near Whiteman Air Force Base, home of the B-2 bombers used in the attack, Slabaugh said it was clear to him that negotiations and attempts to strike deals with Iran were futile, and Trump had to act. The Iranians, he said, 'can't be trusted and they certainly can't have a nuke.' The response was exactly what he expected from the president. 'What he said was he's not gonna start new wars. He doesn't start wars. He finishes them,' Slabaugh said. 'It's pretty obvious that when the situation requires it, he don't monkey around with it. He gets in it and gets it done." MAGA's enthusiastic response More than 1,000 miles away, at an American Legion post in Brunswick, Maryland, Denny Bayer said the attacks were 'awesome.' 'He wants global peace," the Army National Guard veteran said Tuesday. 'He gave them 60 days' to make a nuclear deal. Bayer, 72, is not concerned about possible retribution because he said Trump had made clear what would follow: 'If you hurt one hair on an American's head I'll rain hellfire down on you." In Front Royal, Virginia, about 70 miles (112 kilometers) from the nation's capital, retired drywaller Stacey Roles said Trump's decision was 'the right one." Roles, 77, described himself as part of Trump's 'MAGA" movement. 'Trump's got my support,' Roles said Tuesday. Targeting 'a bully' Pam Pollard, 65, a longtime GOP leader in Oklahoma, said her first thought upon hearing the U.S. had dropped bombs was that the action would be supported by 'the entire world, save a very small few.' Presidents going back multiple administrations have talked about Iran's nuclear buildup, Pollard said, calling Iran a bully in the region. 'President Trump isn't someone to be bullied,' she said. Pollard was not worried about a military escalation. She does worry about the possible activation of 'terrorist cells.' 'I am very fearful of that all over the world, not just in America,' she said. In La Grange, Kentucky, on the outskirts of Louisville, Donna Williamson, a Republican from nearby Carrollton, said she worries about the U.S. being drawn into a protracted war in the Mideast. 'I hope and I pray that Trump is doing the right thing, but I will reserve judgment,' she said Monday. What early polling shows Early polls suggest Republicans are far more supportive of the military action than are Democrats. A Quinnipiac University poll Wednesday found that about 80% of registered voters who are Republicans back the U.S. joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear sites. Overall, however, about half of those polled say they disapprove of the strikes, and 75% of Democratic voters were opposed. The poll found that 80% of Republicans believe the strikes will make Americans safer, while nearly as many Democrats believe the strikes will make Americans less safe. Meanwhile, nearly 8 in 10 voters are either very concerned or somewhat concerned about the possibility the U.S. will get drawn into war with Iran. A Fox News poll conducted immediately after Israel attacked Iran, but before the U.S. became involved, found that about 8 in 10 registered voters were 'extremely' or 'very' concerned about Iran getting a nuclear bomb. Trump has a history of foreign intervention Trump won the presidency in 2016 in part due to anger over the 'forever wars' in Afghanistan and Iraq, but he has never been opposed to foreign intervention. In 2019, U.S. special forces killed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the shadowy leader of the Islamic State group, during a raid in Syria, as part of a campaign that involved U.S. troops on the ground. A year later, Trump ordered the assassination of Gen. Qassem Soleimani, a top Iranian general, and some worried that strike would lead to full-blown war. In March, Trump ordered airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen. He promised to use 'overwhelming lethal force' until the Iran-backed rebels ceased their attacks on shipping along a vital maritime corridor. Trump has brushed has off the suggestion that his base would be put off by the attacks on Iran, telling reporters, 'My supporters are more in love with me today.' 'He should finish the job' Bill Cantle, a Republican from Clearwater, Florida, said he thinks Trump is 'doing the right thing" on Iran. 'I just think he should finish the job. Not leave it half-done," Cantle said while he and his wife explored downtown La Grange, Kentucky, during a visit. Republican Peter Espinosa, a retired Army sergeant who was born in Cuba and lives in the Miami suburb of Doral, said he sees Iranian officials as 'the bad guys" and views Trump as 'disciplined.' 'I truly believe he's a peacekeeper," he said. "We just need to fight the hostility that's going on in the Middle East right now and take care of it, because if we don't, our country is going to be jeopardized.' At a GOP fundraiser Tuesday in Lima, Ohio, headlined by Vice President JD Vance, Clark Spieles said he has faith in the administration's actions. 'Nobody likes war, everybody wants peace,' said Spieles, a Shawnee Township, Ohio, trustee, adding "I have confidence that they're doing the right thing.' Gomez Licon reported from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Schreiner from La Grange, Kentucky and Colvin from New York. Associated Press polling editor Amelia Thomson DeVeaux in Washington, and AP Writers Nicholas Ingram in Knob Noster, Missouri and Julie Smyth in Lima, Ohio, contributed to this report.
