Councils given four bin guidelines to end ‘wild west' recycling policies
Under the new plan, local authorities will be told to give residents and workplaces four containers including a non-recyclable waste bin, a food and green waste container, a bin or bag for paper and cardboard and a bin for other recyclables.
Under current legislation, some households are required to separate waste into seven bins.
The four containers may be bins, bags or stackable boxes.
Current legislation introduced in 2021 defined recycling as glass, plastic, food waste, paper and card, resulting in some authorities issuing individual bins for each
The new rules will come into place for business recyclable waste collection from March 31 next year and one year later for residential households.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed said communities have faced an 'avalanche of rubbish' in streets, rivers and seas.
'Today we end the Conservative fiasco that would force households across the country to have seven bins,' he said.
'This Labour Government is ending the Wild West and introducing a streamlined approach to recycling to end to the postcode lottery, simplify bin collections and clean up our streets for good.'
The new guidance also revealed from March 31 2026, all waste authorities should be providing weekly food waste collections from households to allow people to 'dispose of odorous organic waste frequently'.
Household recycling rates in England have stagnated at 45% since 2015, according to Government data.
The Government said the four-bin default requirement is not expected to increase in the future to ensure councils and other waste collectors 'still have the flexibility to make the best choices to suit local need'.
Households in England dumped 5.6 million tonnes of packaging last year, according to analysis commissioned by the Local Government Association (LGA), County Councils Network (CCN) and District Councils Network (DCN).
The report found that 3.2 million tonnes of packaging were put into recycling bins, 2.3 million tonnes were put into residual – or 'black' bins, and 70,000 tonnes were mistakenly put in with food waste.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
4 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Colombia accuses Peru of fully annexing a disputed island in the Amazon river
BOGOTA, Colombia — Colombian President Gustavo Petro stirred up a decades-old border controversy with Peru on Tuesday when he accused it of fully annexing an Amazon river island that has been administered by Peru for decades, but whose legal status is in dispute. Peru maintains it owns Santa Rosa Island based on treaties about a century old, but Colombia disputes that ownership because the island had not yet emerged from the river at the time.
Chicago Tribune
5 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Federal judge rules Trump administration cannot reallocate billions meant for disaster mitigation
BOSTON — A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from reallocating $4 billion meant to help communities protect against natural disasters. U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns in Boston granted a preliminary injunction sought by 20 Democrat-led states while their lawsuit over the funding moves ahead. The states argue the Federal Emergency Management Agency lacks the authority to end the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program and redirect more than $4 billion of its funding. The program aims to harden infrastructure around the country against potential storm damage. FEMA initially announced it was ending the program, but later said in a court filing that it was evaluating it. 'Although the Government equivocates about whether it has, in fact, ended the BRIC program, the States' evidence of steps taken by FEMA to implement the announced termination portend the conclusion that a determination has in fact been made and that FEMA is inching towards a fait accompli,' Stearns wrote in his ruling. 'The agency has cancelled new funding opportunities and informed stakeholders that they should no longer expect to obtain any unobligated funds.' Noting money for the program was allocated by Congress, the states' lawsuit says any attempt to redirect it would run afoul of the Constitution. A lawyer for the government, Nicole O'Connor, argued at a hearing in July that the funds can be used both for disaster recovery and disaster prevention and that FEMA should have discretion to use the money how it sees fit. The program has provided grants for a range of disaster management projects, including strengthening electrical grids, constructing levees for flood protection and relocating vulnerable water treatment facilities. Many of the projects are in rural communities. FEMA said in a news release in April that it was 'ending' the program, but the agency's acting chief, David Richardson, later said in a court filing that FEMA was merely evaluating whether to end or revise it. The states, including California, New York and Washington, argue that the threat of losing the funding alone has put numerous projects at risk of being cancelled, delayed or downsized. And they warn ending the program would be highly imprudent. 'By proactively fortifying our communities against disasters before they strike, rather than just responding afterward, we will reduce injuries, save lives, protect property, and, ultimately, save money that would otherwise be spent on post-disaster costs,' they wrote in the suit filed in July. FEMA said in a court filing an injunction on its use of the funds could hamper its ability to respond to major disasters.
New York Times
6 minutes ago
- New York Times
ICE Offers, Then Quickly Withdraws, Cash Bonuses for Swiftly Deporting Immigrants
On Tuesday morning, Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced in an internal email that it would offer cash bonuses to agents for deporting people quickly, an incentive meant to motivate the staff to speed up President Trump's mass deportation campaign. Less than four hours later, the agency abruptly canceled what was supposed to be a 30-day pilot program. 'PLEASE DISREGARD,' Liana J. Castano, an official in ICE's field operations division, said in a follow-up email to agency offices around the country. Tricia McLaughlin, a Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman, said the program had not been enacted, adding that 'no such policy is in effect or has ever been in effect.' The email canceling the program was sent shortly after The New York Times inquired about its existence. But the short-lived effort underscored the mounting pressure on ICE to meet Mr. Trump's aggressive deportation targets. The agency has offered signing bonuses of up to $50,000, promised to hire as many as 10,000 agents and initiated a vigorous recruiting push on social media. The Trump administration is seeking to transform ICE, infusing it with an enthusiasm for the president's project of carrying out deportations on an unprecedented scale. Under Mr. Trump's signature domestic policy bill, which he signed into law early last month, ICE's annual budget will grow from about $8 billion to roughly $28 billion, making it the highest-funded law enforcement agency in the federal government. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
