
Janet Yellen is wrong about US manufacturing — and pretty much everything else
Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told the crew at CNBC this week that President Trump's goal of bringing manufacturing back to the United States was a 'pipedream.'
It was an odd remark, given how her former boss, Joe Biden, ran for president on the prospect that he could revive manufacturing in the U.S. — the central pillar of his promise to rebuild the economy 'from the bottom up and middle out.'
Did Yellen not believe Biden's campaign pitch? Was she not on board with the CHIPS Act, which threw tens of billions of dollars at semiconductor firms to encourage their shifting production to the U.S.?
Yellen also claims she does not understand the rationale for Trump's tariff war, which she calls a 'self-inflicted wound.' When Biden ran for president in 2020, he promised to do away with tariffs President Trump had imposed on China. Not only did he keep those tariffs in place, he added to them in 2024, trying to protect America's industries by putting a 100 percent tariff on imports of Chinese electric vehicles and slapping solar panels with a 50 percent duty, among other assorted products. Did Yellen protest those taxes on imports from China?
In short, is Yellen pessimistic about U.S. manufacturing and negative on tariffs because it is Trump at the helm or because she has strongly held convictions that the U.S. cannot compete? If the latter is true, she should have gone public instead of insisting that billions of taxpayer dollars be thrown at an impossible cause.
Ironically, Yellen made her disparaging remarks the same day Nvidia announced that, for the first time ever, it planned to manufacture its AI supercomputers entirely in the U.S. In addition, the powerhouse chip maker announced in a blog post that, 'Together with leading manufacturing partners, the company has commissioned more than a million square feet of manufacturing space to build and test NVIDIA Blackwell chips in Arizona and AI supercomputers in Texas.' Overall, the company said it plans, with its partners, to create up to $500 billion of AI infrastructure in the U.S. within the next four years.
Nvidia is not the only company that has announced new investments in the U.S. since Trump took over the Oval Office again. Just a few of the other firms that have pledged additional investments include:
Johnson & Johnson, promising $55 billion in investment over the next four years;
Softbank, which announced a $100 billion investment over the next four years;
Novartis, which plans to spend $23 billion to build and expand 10 facilities in the U.S.;
Lilly, which will more than double its U.S. manufacturing investment by adding four new pharmaceutical manufacturing sites; and
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ,which will invest an additional $100 billion into its U.S. production facilities.
There have been (and will be) others. Trump's tariffs have created plenty of incentives for companies deciding that the best way to access U.S. consumers, the biggest global market, is to manufacture here at home.
Bringing manufacturing home to the U.S. is clearly not a 'pipedream.' But it will look different than it has in the past.
The AI and robotics revolution means that labor is shrinking over time. Rising domestic production will still create jobs, but not as many as would have been the case a decade ago. Historically, American firms had a tough time competing as U.S. wages were (and are still) substantially higher than they are in, say, China or Vietnam. But, as fewer workers are needed to produce goods in highly automated factories, the wage disparity shrinks.
The other big change that improves U.S. competitiveness is the importance of cheap energy. Germany, Europe's powerhouse manufacturing hub, has endured two years of recession, as the country struggles with, among other things, high energy costs brought about by unrealistic 'green' policies.
In 2024, the average household in Germany paid approximately 40 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for electricity, compared to the U.S. average of about 16 cents per kWh. The price paid by industrial users in Germany has been several times that of the U.S., moving the government to provide subsidies to manufacturers.
Meanwhile, the U.S. is sitting pretty. We have almost unlimited fossil fuels available, and thanks to Trump's pro-energy policies, more is on the way. Abundant low-cost power will be an important inducement for foreign countries looking to lower costs.
Finally, the Trump White House is committed to providing a low tax and light regulatory regime for businesses. This, too, will attract investment.
Because of these advantages, Yellen will likely be proven wrong. This is not a shock. She remains wrong on a host of issues — including inflation, attributing the decades-high price hikes endured during her time in office to supply chain issues rather than the Biden White House jacking up spending way beyond what the economy could handle.
She was also dishonest about enforcement of sanctions on Iran when she said in 2023, 'We have not in any way relaxed our sanctions on Iranian oil.' That was false.
But her major failing as Treasury secretary was not locking in low interest rates on our soaring national debt by raising money via long-term bonds when she had the chance. Famed investor Stanley Druckenmiller in 2023 called the lapse the 'biggest blunder' in the history of America's Treasury, saying, 'When rates were practically zero, every Tom, Dick and Harry in the U.S. refinanced their mortgage … corporations extended [their debt]. … Unfortunately, we had one entity that did not: the U.S. Treasury.'
Druckenmiller added about Yellen: 'She has no right to still be in that job.' He is correct, and American taxpayers are paying the price.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
Canada coach Jesse Marsch condemns U.S. treatment, ‘lack of respect' for Ukraine
Canada men's national team coach Jesse Marsch offered his support for Ukraine and the Ukrainian national team on Friday while also taking aim once again at United States President Donald Trump. 'As an American, the treatment that we have given the President of the Ukraine and the lack of respect really bothers me. Without having to know what it's like to go through something like what these players, this coach and this federation has been through, I am just really excited to be able to show our support,' Marsch said in his opening remarks at a Friday morning event with the Canada Ukraine Foundation. Advertisement Marsch is likely referencing a tense and fiery exchange between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Feb. 28 that made global headlines. Marsch has previously taken aim at Trump, saying in February that Trump should 'lay off the ridiculous rhetoric about Canada being the 51st state; as an American, I'm ashamed of the arrogance and disregard we've shown one of our historically oldest, strongest and most loyal allies.' Due to the Russian invasion, the Ukrainian national team is required to play its matches in neutral venues. 'If you think about the challenges that the players from Ukraine have been through, they haven't played a home match in several years, they've had to play World Cup qualifiers on foreign soil, they've had players playing professionally and internationally with the concern of the safety of their country and their family and their friends,' Marsch said. 'In general, the ability for us to have empathy and sympathy for everything that their team, their nation, their team, their players have gone through is really important at a time like this.' Ukraine's upcoming home matches in UEFA Group D of 2026 World Cup qualification do not yet have a location. 'As the Canadian national team coach, to show how much we are behind them, we are with them, that we want to do everything we can,' Marsch said, noting that one of the beauties of international football is that it 'can take on so much more than what the sport is.' Ukraine is in Toronto to play Canada in the Canadian Shield friendly tournament on Saturday. Ukraine will play its second match of the Canadian Shield friendly tournament on Tuesday against New Zealand, while Canada plays Ivory Coast also on Tuesday. 'It's really a pleasure and an honour to show that friendship and respect are at the core of everything we try to do in this sport,' Marsch said.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Design Firm Dexelance Opens China Office to Fuel Expansion
MILAN — Furnishings, lighting and contract group Dexelance continues to focus on growth despite market challenges worldwide. On Friday, the firm said it opened its first hub in Shanghai as it seeks to build a direct and structured presence in China, forge relationships with local partners and develop commercial opportunities. More from WWD Designer Vincent Van Duysen Opens Antwerp Home for Zara Home+ 4th Collection Lulu Frost's Lisa Salzer Discusses Importance of Providing Joy With Everyday Luxuries Sanlorenzo Gives Venice a New Cultural Space and Piero Lissoni-designed Bridge 'The Chinese market is one we know well, having been present there since 2020 with a branch in Suzhou. In 2024, China represented approximately 4 percent of our turnover,' Dexelance chairman and chief executive officer Andrea Sasso said in a statement. China's economy has slowed, its property market is still in a fragile state and consumer confidence hasn't quite recovered since the COVID-19 pandemic. But the economic doldrums haven't stopped luxury home brands from betting on the world's second-largest economy to fuel growth. Last year, Italy's Molteni&C opened its largest flagship in the world in Shanghai with local partner Domus Tiandi. Dexelance said Vincy Ho was appointed CEO of Dexelance China in January. 'The opening of this new Shanghai office… allows us to further consolidate our connection with China, strengthening the group's presence in the country and aiming to become a global benchmark in high-end design,' Sasso said. Dexelance, which recently changed its name from Italian Design Brands, owns upscale furniture brands Meridiani, Gervasoni and lighting firm Davide Groppi. It also owns luxury contract firms Cenacchi International and Modar, which work with stores, showrooms, offices, hotels and prestigious homes worldwide. In 2024, it also bought a majority share in Turri, a luxury furniture business founded in 1925 in Carugo near Lake Como, and last year increased its stake up to 100 percent in lighting firm Axolight. The new space will host display areas for Gervasoni, Meridiani, Davide Groppi, Saba Italia, and Turri, in addition to the Dexelance China offices. The first Italian design firm to list its shares on the Milan Stock Exchange, Dexelance said in April that it signed a letter of intent with outdoor furniture specialist Roda Group, with the aim to take a majority stake in the firm. In February, the firm's managing director Giorgio Gobbi told WWD the firm was in talks with several potential acquisitions. The company reported its 2024 revenues were up 4.3 percent to 324 million euros. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth could be ‘on the hook' for hundreds of millions on Qatari jet, says Raskin
The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee has warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that he could be 'on the hook' for hundreds of millions of dollars for having accepted a luxury jet from the Qatari government. In a letter sent Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) argued that Hegseth's formal acceptance of the Boeing 747 jetliner last month – a move made so that the Air Force can upgrade its security measures so it may eventually be used as Air Force One – violates the Constitution emoluments clause. The rule bars federal officials from accepting financial benefits from foreign governments without congressional approval. 'I write now to urge and advise you to promptly mitigate these violations—and your own personal legal exposure—by either returning the plane to the Qatari government or promptly seeking Congress's consent to accept it,' Raskin wrote. The Pentagon announced on May 21 that it had officially accepted the 13-year-old luxury jet previously used by the Qatari royal family, a supposed 'free,' gift that could be used to supplement the aging Air Force One fleet, according to President Trump. The transfer has been criticized by U.S. lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, who say it raises ethical and corruption questions in addition to costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit the plane into a secure and working Air Force One. Others have focused on the national security risks of such a gift, saying the aircraft would have to be swept for listening devices. Some have worried that in Trump's push to use the plane before he leaves office, the Air Force will rush security upgrades and cut corners on protection systems. A former professor of constitutional law and former ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Raskin has focused his criticisms on the ethical issues around accepting the Qatari plane, repeatedly arguing that it requires congressional approval. 'The Constitution is perfectly clear: no present 'of any kind whatever' from a foreign state without Congressional permission,' Raskin wrote on X last month after news of the gift broke. Congress has the authority to block federal officials from receiving gifts from foreign governments, as granted in the Constitution, but the government arm has not held any formal vote to accept the plane or not. Democrats largely have been unsuccessful in stopping Trump from accepting the Qatari jet. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) last month attempted to pass a bill that would bar the use of a foreign jet as Air Force One, but that effort failed. Raskin, along with other Democrat lawmakers, have introduced resolutions to condemn the gift but Republicans have blocked them from being considered on the floor. Making matters more complicated, Democrats, given their status as the minority party, can't convene any oversight hearings that would force government officials to testify on the issue, and their colleagues across the aisle have not called any such hearings themselves. In his letter, Raskin says Hegseth is in violation of the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act, which could prompt the Attorney General to bring civil action and penalties against him. Under that law, government officials can accept certain gifts up to $480 in value, and they cannot 'request or otherwise encourage the tender of a gift or decoration' from another country. In violating the act, Hegseth can face a penalty 'not to exceed the retail value of the gift improperly solicited or received plus $5,000.' 'In other words, you may be on the hook for $400 million (plus $5,000) even for a jumbo jet that you accepted on behalf of the President but do not get to personally enjoy,' Raskin writes, referring to the cost of a new Boeing 747-8 jet. 'If you truly believe that there is nothing untoward about the President asking for and receiving a $400 million 'flying palace' from a foreign power, then you should let Congress and the President's Republican colleagues vote to approve the transaction,' he adds. 'If you're unwilling to do that, you must return the plane to Qatar.'