Mass murder, cannibalism and insanity — inside Mao's cultural revolution
What followed was ten years of murderous violence and utter insanity, until Mao's death in 1976.
Children were urged to denounce their parents, teachers were beaten to death in front of howling mobs, youths were 're-educated', the economy was ruined, and so much of the precious cultural heritage of a great, ancient society went up in smoke.
The 'Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution' left such deep scars on China, that subsequent leaders have tried to bury its memory.
But, still some young Chinese people — 'Neo-Moaists' — have a sense of nostalgia for the violent revolution they didn't even live through.
In order to understand what's going on in China today, you need to know what happened in those strange and terrifying years, and how it affected President Xi Zinping, who had a front row seat to the terror.
Further information
Bombard the Headquarters is published by Black Inc.
Find out more about the Conversations Live National Tour on the ABC website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Alarm bells as Russia, China team up in Indo-Pacific
Ukraine's ambassador is warning of a growing threat from China and Russia as Australia marks the end of World War II in the Pacific, saying what happens in his country could 'open a Pandora's box' in the region. On August 15, 1945, the Japanese unconditionally surrendered after the US dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing hundreds of thousands and unveiling the terrifying might of nuclear weapons. The devastating attack came after nearly four years of heavy fighting that saw Japanese planes bomb Darwin – the only foreign attack on Australian soil. Most of the nearly 40,000 Australians who died fighting the Axis powers lost their lives defending the country against Japan's efforts to take the Pacific. In a statement to NewsWire, Veterans Affairs Minister Matt Keogh said August 15 was 'an important opportunity to acknowledge our greatest generation – both the veterans still with us and those long lost'. 'The sacrifices they made shall never be forgotten,' he said. Eighty years on, the spectre of conflict looms large in the region, with Xi Jinping's desires on Taiwan driving fears of an 'imminent' threat, as the Trump administration describes it. China is the big fish, but Russia too has a formidable presence in the region, as it showed just last week with 'routine' war games with the Chinese. Vasyl Myroshnychenko, Ukraine's envoy in Canberra, told NewsWire that Australia should keep a close eye on the deepening defence ties between Beijing and Moscow. 'Indonesia and Russia hosted joint naval exercises in November of last year – why?' he said. 'Why would Russian corvettes would need to be that close to Australia? 'Is there any specific reason why the Russians could be requesting from the Indonesians an air base to locate their strategic bombers? To do what?' 'Pandora's box' Mr Myroshnychenko is no stranger to Vladimir Putin's war schemes. The Russian President ordered the invasion of his country just weeks after his appointment as ambassador to Australia. Mr Putin is set to meet Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday (local time) to discuss a peace deal for Ukraine. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has not been invited. Mr Myroshnychenko was hesitant to pre-empt the talks but said if Ukraine is told to cede territory to Russia, it could be a 'blueprint' for Australia as it manages an increasingly militaristic rivalry with China. 'This is dismantlement of the rules based international system,' he said. 'A permanent member of the UN Security Council, which has nuclear weapons, can change borders by force. 'That's a kind of blueprint which will be in place if the Russians are rewarded for their war of aggression.' He said it would 'open up a Pandora's box in the South China Sea'. 'It will embolden and inspire other authoritarian leaders, of which they all are authoritarian here in the region,' Mr Myroshnychenko said, noting a handful of exceptions, such as New Zealand and Japan. With few democracies around Australia and international norms crumbling, he said 'you need to be strong'. 'You need to have strong military,' Mr Myroshnychenko said. 'You need to have the available capabilities that could deter a potential enemy from taking over Australia, or hurting your interests, or even just projecting power and coercing you. 'That would be a huge win for China and a huge win for other authoritarian leaders.' He said the fact that Russia is a Pacific country means Australia has skin in the game in Ukraine. 'They have a huge Pacific fleet with strategic bombers, nuclear submarines, and they are interested in projecting global power,' Mr Myroshnychenko said. He is not the first to stress the links between events in Europe and the simmering Indo Pacific. China is pumping hundreds of billions into Russia's economy, fuelling the Kremlin's war machine. Meanwhile, growing numbers of North Korean troops are joining Moscow's forces on the front lines in Ukraine. The regional uncertainty is not lost on Canberra. Both Labor and the opposition often caution Australia is facing 'the most strategically challenging circumstances' since the Second World War. With self-evident parallels of warring parties in Europe and tinderbox conditions in the Indo-Pacific, Mr Keogh said Victory in the Pacific Day was a reminder of the 'relationships forged' out of the worst war ever waged. 'This day of commemoration is an important reminder of our place in the world, the importance of the relationships forged in the Second World War – alliances that continue to be important to this day, and the need to ensure stability in our region into the future,' he said.
Daily Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Daily Telegraph
Map shows Australia's new place in the world after bold call on Palestine
Don't miss out on the headlines from Business. Followed categories will be added to My News. A striking map shows Australia's new place in the world after Anthony Albanese made the call to join nearly 150 countries in recognising Palestinian statehood. Australia will formally recognise Palestine when the United Nations General Assembly meets in New York next month. The move is seen as symbolic because Palestinians are living under military occupation and do not have control over their territory or settled borders. The country will join a majority of UN member states – 147 out of 193 – which already recognise Palestine, including most countries in Asia, South America and Africa. In all, those nations make up 75 per cent of the countries in the world. Historically, Western countries have held back from recognising Palestine – but reports of a new Israeli military push in Gaza and famine among Palestinians, coupled with domestic pressure on leaders like Mr Albanese, have resulted in a surge of support. It began when France announced it would recognise Palestine at the UN meeting – the first G7 country to do so. The UK, Canada, and now Australia have followed suit. But there remain some key holdouts. The United States, Israel's biggest ally, does not recognise Palestine and has vetoed past attempts by the Palestinian Authority to join the UN, arguing statehood should come about through negotiations with Israel. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio this week blasted the gesture by Australia and other Western countries as 'largely meaningless'. 'It's symbolic, and they're doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics,' Mr Rubio said. 'The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution. 'It's not going to be decided by some press release by a prime minister or a president from some country. It's going to be decided on the ground.' Anthony Albanese's announcement on Monday was welcomed by some, but it has also received criticism from both sides of the current conflict. Picture: NewsWire/Martin Ollman Mr Albanese's announcement on Monday was welcomed by some, but it has also received criticism from both sides of the current conflict. Jewish leaders argue it lends legitimacy to terrorist group Hamas, while pro-Palestinian voices claim it does not go far enough and Australia should cut all ties with Israel. Middle East analyst Professor Amin Saikal said the recognition of Palestine 'in itself is not necessarily going to make much of a difference on the ground, because the Palestinian territories are still occupied'. 'It is a symbolic act, basically to send a very, very strong message to the Israeli leadership,' Professor Saikal told 'There are ways of enforcing the recognition of the state of Palestine with some practical measures, otherwise it will remain hollow.' Disturbing reports from Gaza and domestic pressure have led to a surge in support for Palestine from Western countries. Picture: NewsWire/Valeriu Campan The practical steps might include boycotts, divestment and sanctions against Israel. Prof Saikal said public opinion was increasingly siding with Palestinians in the conflict. 'Now I think it is very widely recognised what Israel is engaging in is a genocide – this is not just journalists or politicians saying it, it's been confirmed by two humanitarian organisations within Israel,' he said. '(Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu has remained completely defiant of calls for a ceasefire and more humanitarian aid in Gaza.' He said as the conflict dragged on, pressure might build on Donald Trump to change his stance. 'Although Trump is absolutely committed to Israel and it's very unlikely he will cut off arms supply, at the same time public opinion is very much turning against Israel,' Prof Saikal said. 'With Trump his base is very important. If this sort of criticism increases, he may finally decide that look, it's no longer in the interests of the US to continue the level of support for Israel.' Professor Amin Saikal said the gesture would remain hollow if it wasn't backed by practical measures. Picture: Supplied Across the ditch, New Zealand Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters said this week that the government would make a decision on Palestinian statehood next month. That places New Zealand in the diminishing group of countries that have yet to recognise Palestine, including G7 members Germany, Japan and Italy. 'This is an opportunity to deliver self-determination for the people of Palestine in a way that isolates Hamas, disarms it and drives it out of the region once and for all,' Mr Albanese said on Monday. He said the decision was made after he received assurances from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that Hamas would play no role in any future state. The Palestinian Authority controls parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, and lost control of the Gaza Strip to Hamas in 2007. Originally published as Map shows Australia's new place in the world after bold call on Palestine
News.com.au
13 hours ago
- News.com.au
Map shows Australia's new place in the world after bold call on Palestine
A striking map shows Australia's new place in the world after Anthony Albanese made the call to join nearly 150 countries in recognising Palestinian statehood. Australia will formally recognise Palestine when the United Nations General Assembly meets in New York next month. The move is seen as symbolic because Palestinians are living under military occupation and do not have control over their territory or settled borders. The country will join a majority of UN member states – 147 out of 193 – which already recognise Palestine, including most countries in Asia, South America and Africa. In all, those nations make up 75 per cent of the countries in the world. Historically, Western countries have held back from recognising Palestine – but reports of a new Israeli military push in Gaza and famine among Palestinians, coupled with domestic pressure on leaders like Mr Albanese, have resulted in a surge of support. It began when France announced it would recognise Palestine at the UN meeting – the first G7 country to do so. The UK, Canada, and now Australia have followed suit. But there remain some key holdouts. The United States, Israel's biggest ally, does not recognise Palestine and has vetoed past attempts by the Palestinian Authority to join the UN, arguing statehood should come about through negotiations with Israel. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio this week blasted the gesture by Australia and other Western countries as 'largely meaningless'. 'It's symbolic, and they're doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics,' Mr Rubio said. 'The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution. 'It's not going to be decided by some press release by a prime minister or a president from some country. It's going to be decided on the ground.' Mr Albanese's announcement on Monday was welcomed by some, but it has also received criticism from both sides of the current conflict. Jewish leaders argue it lends legitimacy to terrorist group Hamas, while pro-Palestinian voices claim it does not go far enough and Australia should cut all ties with Israel. Middle East analyst Professor Amin Saikal said the recognition of Palestine 'in itself is not necessarily going to make much of a difference on the ground, because the Palestinian territories are still occupied'. 'It is a symbolic act, basically to send a very, very strong message to the Israeli leadership,' Professor Saikal told 'There are ways of enforcing the recognition of the state of Palestine with some practical measures, otherwise it will remain hollow.' The practical steps might include boycotts, divestment and sanctions against Israel. Prof Saikal said public opinion was increasingly siding with Palestinians in the conflict. 'Now I think it is very widely recognised what Israel is engaging in is a genocide – this is not just journalists or politicians saying it, it's been confirmed by two humanitarian organisations within Israel,' he said. '(Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu has remained completely defiant of calls for a ceasefire and more humanitarian aid in Gaza.' He said as the conflict dragged on, pressure might build on Donald Trump to change his stance. 'Although Trump is absolutely committed to Israel and it's very unlikely he will cut off arms supply, at the same time public opinion is very much turning against Israel,' Prof Saikal said. 'With Trump his base is very important. If this sort of criticism increases, he may finally decide that look, it's no longer in the interests of the US to continue the level of support for Israel.' Across the ditch, New Zealand Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters said this week that the government would make a decision on Palestinian statehood next month. That places New Zealand in the diminishing group of countries that have yet to recognise Palestine, including G7 members Germany, Japan and Italy. 'This is an opportunity to deliver self-determination for the people of Palestine in a way that isolates Hamas, disarms it and drives it out of the region once and for all,' Mr Albanese said on Monday. He said the decision was made after he received assurances from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that Hamas would play no role in any future state. The Palestinian Authority controls parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, and lost control of the Gaza Strip to Hamas in 2007.
