
ICE walks back limits on raids targeting farms, restaurants and hotels
Law enforcement officers stand guard, as people march through downtown as part of the ongoing protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in Los Angeles, California, U.S. June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. immigration officials have walked back limits on enforcement targeting farms, restaurants, hotels and food processing plants just days after putting restrictions in place, two former officials familiar with the matter said, an abrupt shift that followed contradictory public statements by President Donald Trump.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement leadership told field office heads during a call on Monday that it would roll back a directive issued last week that largely paused raids on the businesses, the former officials said, requesting anonymity to discuss the new guidance.
ICE officials were told a daily quota to make 3,000 arrests per day - 10 times the average last year during former President Joe Biden's administration - would remain in effect, the former officials said. ICE field office heads had raised concerns they could not meet the quota without raids at the businesses that had been exempted, one of the sources said.
It was not clear why last week's directive was reversed. Some ICE officials left the call confused, and it appeared they would still need to tread carefully with raids on the previously exempted businesses, the former officials said.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said ICE would continue to make arrests at worksites but did not respond to questions about the new guidance.
"There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts," she said in a statement on Tuesday.
The Washington Post first reported the reversal.
Trump took office in January aiming to deport record numbers of immigrants in the U.S. illegally. ICE doubled the pace of arrests under Trump compared with last year but still remains far below what would be needed to deport millions of people.
Top White House aide Stephen Miller ordered ICE in late May to dramatically increase arrests to 3,000 per day, leading to intensified raids that prominently targeted some businesses.
Trump said in a Truth Social post on Thursday that farms and hotel businesses had been suffering from the ramped up enforcement but also said, without evidence or explanation, that criminals were trying to fill those jobs.
ICE issued guidance that day pausing most immigration enforcement at agricultural, hospitality and food processing businesses. But in another Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump called on ICE to target the Democratic strongholds of Los Angeles, Chicago and New York and to use the full extent of their authority to increase deportations.
A White House official said Trump was keeping a promise to deliver the country's single largest mass deportation program.
"Anyone present in the United States illegally is at risk of deportation," the White House official said.
Deborah Fleischaker, who held senior roles at both DHS and ICE during Biden's presidency, said the shifting ICE guidance reflects broader turmoil at the agency since Trump took office. The White House has ousted multiple ICE leaders as it pressed for more arrests.
"It has been chaos and confusion since the beginning," she said.
FARMERS PUSH BACK
The intensified ICE enforcement after Miller's late May order renewedlong-running concerns among farmers about ICE operations targeting their workforce. Nearly half the nation's approximately 2 million farm workers lack legal status, according to the departments of Labor and Agriculture, as do many dairy and meatpacking workers.
Farm industry fears escalated last week when ICE detentions and arrests of workers were reported at California farms, a Nebraska meatpacking plant and a New Mexico dairy.
Livestock and restaurant sector representatives said on a press call organized by the American Business Immigration Coalition on Tuesday that raids make operations more difficult in their heavily immigrant-dependent industries.
"The people pushing for these raids that target farms and feedyards and dairies have no idea how farms operate," said Matt Teagarden, CEO of the Kansas Livestock Association.
Michael Marsh, CEO of the National Council of Agricultural Employers, said farm groups had not had enough input into the administration's decision-making so far on immigration enforcement in agriculture.
Marsh said he had not received responses from Agricultural Secretary Brooke Rollins, Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem and other officials to a letter sent last week requesting a meeting.
"We've got a serious issue if we have almost a million of our workers that are going to be subject to deportation," he said. "Because if that's the case, and they are picked up and they are gone, we can't fill those positions."
(Reporting by Ted Hesson and Leah Douglas in Washington; Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Daniel Wallis)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
US Senate passes stablecoin bill in milestone for crypto industry
(Reuters) -The U.S. Senate on Tuesday passed a bill to create a regulatory framework for U.S.-dollar-pegged cryptocurrency tokens known as stablecoins, in a watershed moment for the digital asset industry. The bill, dubbed the GENIUS Act, received bipartisan support, with several Democrats joining most Republicans to back the proposed federal rules. It passed 68-30. The House of Representatives, which is controlled by Republicans, needs to pass its version of the bill before it heads to President Donald Trump's desk for approval. "It is a major milestone," said Andrew Olmem, a managing partner at law firm Mayer Brown and the former deputy director of the National Economic Council during Trump's first term. "It establishes, for the first time, a regulatory regime for stablecoins, a rapidly developing financial product and industry." Stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds between tokens. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say that they could be used to send payments instantly. If signed into law, the stablecoin bill would require tokens to be backed by liquid assets - such as U.S. dollars and short-term Treasury bills - and for issuers to publicly disclose the composition of their reserves on a monthly basis. The crypto industry has long pushed for lawmakers to pass legislation creating rules for digital assets, arguing that a clear framework could enable stablecoins to become more widely used. The sector spent more than $119 million backing pro-crypto congressional candidates in last year's elections and had tried to paint the issue as bipartisan. The House of Representatives passed a stablecoin bill last year but the Senate - in which Democrats held the majority at the time - did not take that bill up, and it died. Trump has sought to broadly overhaul U.S. cryptocurrency policies after courting cash from the industry during his presidential campaign. Bo Hines, who leads Trump's Council of Advisers on Digital Assets, has said the White House wants a stablecoin bill passed before August. Tensions on Capitol Hill over Trump's various crypto ventures at one point threatened to derail the digital asset sector's hope of legislation this year as Democrats have grown increasingly frustrated with Trump and his family members promoting their personal crypto projects. 'In advancing these bills, lawmakers forfeited their opportunity to confront Trump's crypto grift – the largest, most flagrant corruption in presidential history,' said Bartlett Naylor, financial policy advocate for Public Citizen, a consumer rights advocacy group. Trump's crypto ventures include a meme coin called $TRUMP, launched in January, and a business called World Liberty Financial, a crypto company owned partly by the president. The White House has said there are no conflicts of interest present for Trump and that his assets are in a trust managed by his children. Other Democrats expressed concern that the bill would not prevent big tech companies from issuing their own private stablecoins, and argued that legislation needed stronger anti-money laundering protections and prohibitions on foreign stablecoin issuers. "A bill that turbocharges the stablecoin market, while facilitating the president's corruption and undermining national security, financial stability, and consumer protection is worse than no bill at all," said Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, in remarks on the Senate floor in May. The bill could face further changes in the House of Representatives. In a statement, the Conference of State Bank Supervisors called for 'critical changes' to mitigate financial stability risks. 'CSBS remains concerned with the dramatic and unsupported expansion of the authority of uninsured banks to conduct money transmission or custody activities nationwide without the approval or oversight of host state supervisors,' said Brandon Milhorn, president and CEO of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, in a statement. (Reporting by Hannah Lang in New YorkEditing by Rod Nickel)


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
US judge blocks Trump passport policy targeting transgender people
BOSTON: A federal judge on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from refusing to issue passports to transgender and non-binary Americans nationwide that reflect their gender identities. US District Judge Julia Kobick in Boston expanded a preliminary injunction she issued in April, which had allowed only six transgender and non-binary individuals who challenged the policy to obtain passports consistent with their gender identities or with an "X" sex designation while the lawsuit proceeds. Kobick concluded that the policy adopted by the US Department of State, pursuant to an executive order signed by Trump, likely discriminated on the basis of sex and was rooted in irrational prejudice towards transgender Americans. She found that it violated the US Constitution's Fifth Amendment. While her April ruling was limited in scope, Kobick — an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden — on Tuesday granted the case class action status. She also ordered a nationwide halt to the enforcement of the policy as it applies to all transgender, non-binary and intersex US passport holders. Kobick said class action status was appropriate for two different categories of passport holders, as the administration's actions had affected all of them uniformly "by preventing them from obtaining passports with a sex marker consistent with their gender identity." Li Nowlin-Sohl, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the American Civil Liberties Union, described the ruling as "a critical victory against discrimination and for equal justice under the law." The State Department did not respond to requests for comment. The case is one of several stemming from an executive order Trump signed after returning to office on January 20, directing the government to recognise only two biologically distinct sexes: male and female. The order also instructed the State Department to revise its policies to issue passports that "accurately reflect the holder's sex." Shortly afterwards, the State Department changed its passport policy to "request the applicant's biological sex at birth," no longer permitting applicants to self-identify their sex, and allowing only "male" or "female" options. Prior to Trump's return, the State Department had, for over three decades, allowed individuals to update the sex designation on their passports. In 2022, the Biden administration introduced a policy allowing passport applicants to select "X" as a neutral sex marker, in addition to self-selecting "M" or "F" for male or female.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
US judge blocks Trump passport policy targeting transgender people
BOSTON: A federal judge on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from refusing to issue passports to transgender and nonbinary Americans nationwide that reflect their gender identities. U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick in Boston expanded a preliminary injunction she issued in April that allowed just six transgender and nonbinary individuals who challenged the policy to obtain passports consistent with their gender identities or with an 'X' sex designation while the lawsuit moves forward. Kobick did so after concluding the policy the U.S. Department of State adopted pursuant to an executive order Trump signed likely discriminated on the basis of sex and was rooted in an irrational prejudice toward transgender Americans that violated the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment. While Kobick's April ruling was limited in its scope, the judge, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, on Tuesday agreed to grant the case class action status and pause enforcement of the policy as applied to all transgender, nonbinary and intersex U.S. passport holders. Kobick said granting class action status to two different categories of passport holders was appropriate given that the administration's actions affected all of them uniformly 'by preventing them from obtaining passports with a sex marker consistent with their gender identity.' Li Nowlin-Sohl, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the American Civil Liberties Union, in a statement called the ruling 'a critical victory against discrimination and for equal justice under the law.' The State Department did not respond to requests for comment. The case is one of several related to an executive order Trump signed after returning to office on January 20 directing the government to recognize only two biologically distinct sexes, male and female. The order also directed the State Department to change its policies to only issue passports that 'accurately reflect the holder's sex.' The State Department soon after changed its passport policy to 'request the applicant's biological sex at birth,' rather than permit applicants to self-identify their sex, and to only allow them to be listed as male or female. Prior to Trump, the State Department for more than three decades had allowed people to update the sex designation on their passports. In 2022, the Biden administration allowed passport applicants to choose 'X' as a neutral sex marker on their passport applications, as well as being able to self-select 'M' or 'F' for male or female.