logo
White House struggles to find qualified people willing to work for Pete Hegseth

White House struggles to find qualified people willing to work for Pete Hegseth

NBC News2 days ago

Vance, Wiles and others have looked for job candidates in some of the traditional places, including inside the White House and on Capitol Hill, according to the second former U.S. official, a defense official and a congressional aide.
Some candidates have been judged politically problematic, the former U.S. official and others familiar with the process said. For example, the White House personnel office has disqualified some for not being MAGA enough, according to the former U.S. official and a current U.S. official familiar with the process.
In addition to trying to assist him with hiring, the White House has taken multiple other steps to help — and manage — Hegseth.
'Vice President Vance has had Secretary Hegseth's back since the day President Trump nominated him, and he fully supports the incredible work Pete's doing at the Pentagon to improve military readiness and drive recruitment numbers to record highs,' Vance spokesman William Martin said in a statement.
Another White House official it was typical for the White House to be involved in staffing for key roles across government. Anna Kelly, a spokeswoman for the White House, said Hegseth enjoys 'the full support' of Trump.
But last month White House officials directed Hegseth to cancel a trip to the Middle East after they learned he planned a stop in Israel, according to a current and a former official.
Instead, they put Hegseth on Air Force One to travel with President Donald Trump, who did not include Israel in his itinerary.
A different Cabinet official, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, visited Israel several weeks later and met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Trump's request. A person familiar with Hegseth's planning said Noem's trip reflected the White House's desire to have Netanyahu meet with a trusted messenger.
An unexpected purge
When they arrived at the Pentagon early this year, two senior advisers to Hegseth, Dan Caldwell and Darin Selnick, were seen as his close allies — previous colleagues of his, even friends, whom he had brought in to staff key roles. Caldwell was a senior adviser to Hegseth; Selnick was Hegseth's deputy chief of staff.
But in April, security escorted Caldwell and Selnick, as well as Colin Carroll, the chief of staff to Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg, out of the Pentagon in connection with an investigation into allegations of a leak of sensitive information.
In a joint statement, the three men called the way were treated 'unconscionable' and argued that they were not given any information about the investigation, any leak allegations against them or any evidence that had been found.
A little less than a week later, the turmoil around Hegseth worsened. The New York Times reported that he had shared sensitive information about an ongoing U.S. military operation in Yemen on a Signal chat that included his wife, his personal attorney and his brother, along with others close to him.
The revelation came a month after national security adviser Mike Waltz mistakenly added the editor of The Atlantic to a separate Signal group chat with Hegseth, Vance and other senior administration officials focused on the same military operation in Yemen.
Two days after the Times' story was published, Hegseth went on Fox News and accused Caldwell, Selnick and Carroll not only of leaking information while they were employed at the Pentagon, but also of having given the paper the information about the Signal chat. Hegseth did not publicly describe the evidence against them.
The drama continued in May when White House officials removed Hegseth and his personal attorney, Tim Parlatore, also a Navy official, from overseeing the investigations into the three suspended aides, according to a current official and a person familiar with the probe.
White House officials shifted responsibility for the probe to the deputy defense secretary, Stephen Feinberg, with whom such an investigation would normally reside. That move, according to two sources familiar with the investigation, was a sign that there is a growing lack of confidence in Hegseth's ability to objectively oversee the investigation of his former aides.
After no evidence against the former aides emerged and it became increasingly clear that the three men were not guilty of leaking, administration officials began to question whether their firings had been hasty, two former administration officials and a current official said.
Infighting among the Hegseth advisers who remain continued, meanwhile, according to the defense official and a former administration official. And Hegseth himself remains largely isolated, relying on a small group of advisers, the defense official said.
Hegseth now leans heavily on a former military aide, Ricky Buria, who retired from the military in April hoping he could serve as Hegseth's chief of staff, a civilian position. But White House and Pentagon officials view Buria as a political novice who had reportedly been critical of Trump and Vance in private. (A Defense Department spokesman did not respond to a request for comment from Buria.)
As a result, White House officials rejected Hegseth's plan to hire Buria as his chief of staff, one of the defense officials and an administration official said. Despite that, Buria was seen with Hegseth during his recent trip to Asia in a workout video posted on social media.
Successes and setbacks
Since Hegseth joined the administration in January, he has had successes.
He expunged diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, programs from the Pentagon and the military services. Recruiting, particularly in the Army, is up on his watch, continuing a trend that began before Trump's inauguration but gained strength under Hegseth, according to Trump administration officials.
And during his recent trip to Asia, Hegseth was seen as effective in messaging to Beijing to stop any potential aggression in the region, according to current and former administration officials.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Les Miserables actors drop out because Trump is attending show
Les Miserables actors drop out because Trump is attending show

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Les Miserables actors drop out because Trump is attending show

President Trump and Vice President Vance, along with their wives, will attend a performance of Les Misérables at the Kennedy Center, marking Trump 's first visit to the venue during his second term. Trump 's decision to assume control of the Kennedy Center, replacing previous leadership and vowing to eliminate 'woke' programming, has sparked controversy. In response to Trump 's involvement, some cast members of Les Misérables are expected to boycott the performance. Following Trump 's takeover, several high-profile performers and members resigned, and the center has experienced a significant drop in ticket sales, leading to canceled performances. Trump has expressed his fondness for Les Misérables, even suggesting the possibility of extending its run at the Kennedy Center, which is currently scheduled through July 13.

Pentagon launches review of US-UK-Australia Aukus security alliance
Pentagon launches review of US-UK-Australia Aukus security alliance

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Pentagon launches review of US-UK-Australia Aukus security alliance

The Pentagon has launched a review of the Aukus submarine agreement to make sure it is aligned with Trump's 'America first' agenda, throwing the $240bn defense pact with Britain and Australia into doubt The review may trigger more allied anxiety over the future of the trilateral alliance designed to counter China's military rise. 'The department is reviewing Aukus as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the president's 'America first' agenda,' a Pentagon official said. 'This means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defense and that the defense industrial base is meeting our needs.' The 2021 Biden-era agreement – met with mass excitement in Australia's security world – would see Australia acquire nuclear-powered attack submarines, with the US promising to sell up to five Virginia-class vessels from 2032. A new joint submarine class would follow in the early 2040s. But now, the Aukus-skeptic US undersecretary of defense, Elbridge Colby, has called for the review to determine whether the Australia-UK-US security alliance aligns with Trump's 'America first' agenda, a number of anonymous sources told Reuters. Colby posted on X last year that it 'would be crazy' for the US to have fewer nuclear submarines if conflict erupted over Taiwan. The British government responded cautiously to news of the US review, saying: 'Aukus is a landmark security and defence partnership with two of our closest allies. It is one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades, supporting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic, while also delivering jobs and economic growth in communities across all three nations. 'It is understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the UK did last year. The UK will continue to work closely with the US and Australia at all levels to maximise the benefits and opportunities which Aukus presents for our three nations.' Nuclear submarine powers are members of an exclusive club – only six countries currently operate them: the US, the UK, Russia, China, France and India. Aukus would make Australia the seventh. And while generally favored by US lawmakers focused on national security – and as Australia tries to step up its security spending in line with Trump's wishes – the deal's survival now appears to be in the balance. The US president himself does not seem to have made a priority of the pact. Asked about Aukus during Keir Starmer's visit in February, Trump appeared unfamiliar with the acronym, responding: 'What does that mean?' The review follows defense secretary Pete Hegseth's demand last week that Australia increase military spending from 2% to 3.5% of GDP. The country's prime minister, Anthony Albanese, has pledged only 2.4%, insisting Australia will set its own defense priorities. One British government official acknowledged the review to the FT and emphasized their commitment to the partnership. Hours before the news broke, the UK government announced a handsome $7.69bn investment to its nuclear submarine industrial base. Aukus represents the most substantial military cooperation between the three nations in generations, extending beyond submarines to include hypersonic missiles and advanced weapons technology. More details soon …

Trump could scrap Aukus deal
Trump could scrap Aukus deal

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Trump could scrap Aukus deal

The United States is considering ending a nuclear submarine pact with the UK and Australia, in what would be a major blow to a security alliance between the countries. The Pentagon launched a review of the 2021 Aukus submarine deal to decide if the US should cancel the project, the FT reported, citing six people familiar with the matter. The assessment is being led by Elbridge Colby, a defence department official and former Trump campaign aide, who has raised questions about Aukus. It comes after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday insisted the US would supply Australia with a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, amid growing concern that production is not rolling out quickly enough. Under the Aukus deal signed to great fanfare in 2021, Washington, London and Canberra are cooperating on the joint development of cyber warfare tools, artificial intelligence and hypersonic missiles. The agreement commits the United States to building cutting-edge submarines for Australia, an investment with an estimated cost of up to $235 billion over 30 years. Australia plans to acquire at least three Virginia-class submarines from the United States within the next 15 years, eventually manufacturing its own nuclear-powered subs. The US Navy has 24 Virginia-class vessels, which can carry cruise missiles, but American shipyards are struggling to meet production targets set at two new boats each year. Critics question why the United States would sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia without stocking its own military first.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store