Higher fees planned in popular AZ forest. Here are the new prices and how to comment
Adventures in Arizona's Coconino National Forest could get more expensive soon.
The National Forest Service has proposed recreation fee increases at sites throughout Coconino National Forest, including higher prices for daily, weekly and seasonal passes at picnic areas, day use areas and trailheads.
The plan also creates new fees at some boating sites and cabins that are currently free, the Forest Service said on Monday, May 12.
If the proposed increases take effect, the daily and weekly fees will double and the seasonal fees will triple at most sites that charge fees. The new fees must be approved by the Bureau of Land Management Resource Advisory Committee, and the Forest Service is accepting public comments through Sept. 5.
If approved, it would mark the latest example of outdoor recreation in Arizona getting pricier. Arizona State Parks & Trails raised entry fees in February, while the National Park Service increased campground fees at Grand Canyon National Park in April.
Here's what to know about the proposed fee increases at Coconino National Forest.
Coconino National Forest spans more than 1.8 million acres in central and northern Arizona and encompasses Sedona and Flagstaff, two cities that are top draws for outdoor travelers.
Some sites require a pass, but most of Coconino National Forest − about 67%, by the Forest Service's estimate − is free to visit.
In Sedona, visitors must display a Red Rock Pass or federal recreation pass like the America the Beautiful Pass to park at popular trailheads and picnic areas in Oak Creek Canyon, along Boynton Pass Road and State Route 179 and in other locations.
A Red Rock Pass costs $5 for a day, $15 for a week or $20 for a year. Forest Service spokesperson Randi Shaffer told The Arizona Republic that the proposed fee increase does not affect the cost of Red Rock Passes.
The Forest Service is proposing the following fee increases:
Boating sites: C.C. Cragin Reservoir and Knoll Lake are currently free to use. If the proposal is approved, fees of $10 per day, $30 per week and $60 per season would take effect at both locations. Fees at the Narrows and Upper Lake Mary would increase to $30 per week and $60 per season, up from the current $15 per week and $20 per season; the daily fee at both areas would remain $10.
Picnic sites: Fees per vehicle at the Banjo Bill, Bootlegger, Dry Creek Vista, Encinoso and Halfway picnic areas would increase to $10 per day, $30 per week and $60 per season, up from the current $5 per day, $15 per week and $20 per season.
Midgley Bridge Observation Site: The per-vehicle fee would increase to $10 per day, $30 per week and $60 per season, up from the current $5 per day, $15 per week and $20 per season.
Day use areas and trailheads: It currently costs $6 for a day-use pass within the Fossil Creek Wild and Scenic River corridor during the high season of April 1-Oct. 1. If the proposal passes, the fee would be $25 per vehicle per day plus a $6 reservation fee. The areas that would introduce this fee include the Fossil Creek Bridge, Homestead, Mazatzal, Purple Mountain, Sally May and Tonto Bench day use areas, plus the Dixon Lewis and Irving-Flume Trailheads.
Per-vehicle fees for the Baldwin, Bear/Doe Mountain, Bell, Bell Rock Vista, Boynton Canyon, Bruce Brockett, Cathedral Rock, Courthouse Vista, Fay Canyon, Huckaby, Jim Thompson, Little Horse, Mescal and Yavapai Vista trailheads would increase to $10 per day, $30 per week and $60 per season, up from the current $5 per day, $15 per week and $20 per season.
Interpretive and heritage sites: Per vehicle fees at the Honanki Ruin and Lava River Cave interpretive sites, Crane Petroglyph Heritage Site and Palatki interpretive visitor center would increase to $10 per day, $30 per week and $60 per season, up from the current $5 per day, $15 per week and $20 per season.
Cabins and lookouts: Buck Mountain Lookout and Mormon Lake Guard Station are currently free to use. Under the proposal, a fee of $75 per night for up to four people at Buck Mountain and $100 per night for up to eight people at Mormon Lake would take effect. The fee at Crescent Moon Ranch Cabin would be $235 for a group of up to 10 people, up from the current $200. These sites are available on recreation.gov with an additional $8 reservation fee.
Yes. The America the Beautiful Pass covers sites that charge fees at Coconino National Forest, as well as other federally managed lands that charge admission or day-use fees.
The interagency pass, which costs $80 per year, waives entry fees at public recreation lands managed by several federal agencies, including the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management and others.
Get the Arizona news you need. Sign up for AZ Briefing from azcentral.
There are five ways people can submit comments on the proposed fee increases in Coconino National Forest:
Mail to Coconino National Forest, Attention: Brian Poturalski, 1824 S. Thompson St., Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
Email to comments-southwestern-coconino@usda.gov.
Online comment at arcg.is/1KzWzz.
Comment in person to Brian Poturalski from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday through Friday at the Coconino National Forest office in Flagstaff.
Comment by phone at 928-527-3474; indicate you wish to comment on the proposed recreation fee changes.
The deadline to submit comments is Sept. 5, 2025.
Save on hotels: Best summer 2025 staycation deals in Phoenix. Some are just for AZ residents
Michael Salerno is an award-winning journalist who's covered travel and tourism since 2014. His work as The Arizona Republic's consumer travel reporter aims to help readers navigate the stresses of traveling and get the best value for their money on their vacations. He can be reached at Michael.Salerno@gannett.com.
Subscribe to azcentral.com today.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Coconino National Forest fee increases: What you could pay
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Yahoo
Public Comment Window Opens for Vail's Proposed Lift Upgrades
The White River National Forest Service has opened a public comment period over a proposal for Vail Mountain to replace and upgrade several resort has proposed a replacement of the existing Chair 21 (Orient Express), which is a high-speed quad with a 2,400 person per hour capacity. The lift would be replaced by a 6-seater lift with a capacity of 3,600 people per hour in order to improve access to the Back Bowls, and decrease lift-line wait times. Additionally, Vail wants to replace Chair 15, which is currently a three-seater, with a quad chair to increase capacity from 1,400 to 2,400 people per hour. The replacement of Chair 15 would also allow for upgraded snowmaking infrastructure that would extend the chair's length. Vail's proposal also includes grading six acres of terrain along the Two Elk ridgeline between the top of the new Chair 21 and Two Elk Lodge to improve the flow of skier traffic in the area. This grading would eliminate several flat pitches of mountain and allow for Lift 24, which is currently a platter lift, to be removed. Want to keep up with the best stories and photos in skiing? Subscribe to the new Powder To The People newsletter for weekly updates. All pieces of the proposal are a part of Vail's 2023 Master Development Plan and will take place within the existing boundaries of Vail Mountain Resort. Vail is one of 11 ski areas within the White River National Forest. The Forest Service is seeking public comment on the proposal by June 6, 2025. A decision is predicted to be made by September of 2025 for an estimated project start in June of 2026. Vail Resorts made headlines earlier this week with the announcement that CEO Kristen Lynch would be replaced by former Vail CEO Rob Katz. The resort ownership conglomerate also recently added six new European ski areas to the Epic Pass for 2025/26 including Sölden, Silvretta Montafon, Mayrhofen, Hintertux, Saalbach, and Comment Window Opens for Vail's Proposed Lift Upgrades first appeared on Powder on May 28, 2025
Yahoo
28-05-2025
- Yahoo
Forest Service authorizes operation of Holland Lake Lodge
Holland Lake photographed on Sept. 2, 2023. (Photo by Nicole Girten/Daily Montanan) The Flathead National Forest announced on Friday that it would issue a special use authorization for the operation of Holland Lake Lodge. Under the new ownership of Eric Jacobsen and Thomas Knowles, the historic Holland Lake Lodge, will operate under a new 20-year special use permit within the property's existing footprint, according to a Flathead National Forest press release. No expanded facilities or activities are approved with the new operating permit for the private lodge operating on public land. 'Holland Lake Lodge is a historic lodge that has provided recreation opportunities for one hundred years. Providing a diverse range of recreation services is a valued resource for the community, a driver for the local economy, and helps improve visitor access to the surrounding National Forest Lands – all desired conditions identified in our Forest Plan,' Flathead National Forest Supervisor Anthony Botello said in a press release. 'I look forward to working with the new owners and community to continue this opportunity into the future.' Bortello said the decision was based on a review of public comments and analysis of potential environmental effects. Members of the public submitted more than 300 comments about the project. Many focused on deficiencies within the water and wastewater systems and alleged a lack of enforcement by the Forest Service for problems that occurred under the previous owner. Bortello said in his decision that 'no further actions are necessary to comply with all applicable laws, regulations and policies,' due to there being no proposed changes in activities or facilities under the new permit. Situated on the edge of the Bob Marshall Wilderness, Holland Lake Lodge has been under public scrutiny for several years after the public learned that longtime owner Christian Wohlfeil had proposed a sale to outdoor adventure company POWDR and an accompanying expansion plan would have added an additional lodge and 26 cabin structures on the property. The plan drew public outcry for its rushed timeframe and a determination by the Forest Service the expansion did not need an environmental analysis. The Forest Service also drew criticism for announcing the plan to the public more than one year after it had learned of the potential sale and for misstating information about the scope of the proposal. The Forest Service later rejected the plan, but said it would consider other proposals. Wohlfeil listed the property for sale in October of 2023, and late last year, Jacobsen, a private equity investor, announced he had secured a contract to purchase the lodge. Jacobsen held several public meetings prior to the purchase to meet with local members of the Swan Valley community and conveyed his intention in purchasing the property was to 'Preserve and protect the lodge and the lodge experience in harmony with nature into the future' and not develop the property. Jacobsen grew up in Montana and now splits his time between Whitefish and Park City, Utah. He did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday about the Forest Service decision and potential summer operations. Last year, the lodge was unable to provide public services due to deficiencies in the wastewater treatment system, which services both the lodge facilities and nearby campground. The deficiencies prevented the lodge from operating during its 100th anniversary year. However, the Flathead National Forest has submitted a preliminary report for upgrades to the Department of Environmental Quality. Jacobsen is required to draft and submit an annual operating plan for approval by the Forest Service before the special use permit is finalized. All documents related to the permit will be available for the public to see. More information about the Holland Lake Lodge project can be found online.
USA Today
22-05-2025
- USA Today
Cracks in the facade? Memorial Day a test for Trump's National Park Service
Cracks in the facade? Memorial Day a test for Trump's National Park Service Show Caption Hide Caption Hidden gems, scenic stays and parks worth the trip With more people hitting the road this summer, national parks are expected to see record crowds. But if you're looking to escape the congestion, our Ali Reid has uncovered some hidden gems worth exploring. Americans kicking off summer at national parks and U.S. Forest Service trailheads this Memorial Day weekend will find clean restrooms, well-staffed visitor centers and tidy trails. But longtime public lands advocates say it's only a matter of time before campers, hikers and anglers start seeing cracks in what they believe is a wafer-thin facade, as rangers scramble to keep up following widespread layoffs, retirements and buyouts. Public lands advocates worry the Trump administration will use the subsequent problems as justification for closing, selling or transferring parks and land to private operators. When Trump took office, park service staffing was already 20% lower than it was in 2010, even though 2024 was the busiest year for park visitation in history, with 332 million visitors last year. "It's almost like death by 1,000 cuts is where this is going to lead," said Josh Hicks, The Wilderness Society's conservation campaigns director. "They may be trying to put on the facade that everything is going swimmingly but it's really not, and there will be a slow degradation of our public lands." Park workers compared to 'a rubber band that's pretty stretched thin' The National Park Service manages more than 84 million acres of land, from the tiny Gateway Arch National Park in St. Louis, Missouri, to the sprawling 13.2 million-acre Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve in Alaska. The Forest Service manages another 193 million acres ‒ bigger than the whole of Texas. Since taking office, Trump and his administration have fired thousands of park service and Forest Service employees, implemented a hiring freeze and delayed the planned hiring of seasonal workers critical to staffing visitor centers, maintaining trails and cleaning toilets. But at the same time, Interior Department Secretary Doug Burgum has ordered park managers to keep open campgrounds, visitor centers and toilets. The National Park Service did not respond to a request from USA TODAY to explain summer staffing and maintenance plans. The Interior Department declined to comment on staffing reductions. At Yellowstone National Park, where the wildlife season is well underway, guide service owner Cara McGary said toilets remain clean and well-stocked. McGary, a former park ranger whose partner is a ranger in Alaska, runs In Our Nature Guiding Services. In her 800-person hometown of Gardiner, Montana, almost everyone has a connection to Yellowstone, she said, from park rangers and maintenance workers to schoolteachers who've seen their students vanish after Trump fired their parents. McGary said bookings for her guide services have been up ‒ she suspects some customers are trying to visit before any real Trump-related cuts take effect. Other public lands advocates say bookings have been slower than usual, in part because of Trump's trade war with Canada. "I think it's going to be OK if we can make it through the sprint of spring, but what happens in September?" McGary asked. "We have a legacy of people in the federal government giving more than 100%. They are already a rubber band that's pretty stretched thin. And we're about to push them further." McGary said she's facing decisions about how to handle bathroom breaks if Yellowstone can't keep its toilets clean as she tours clients through the park, seeking wolves, bears and other wildlife. During the 2018-2019 federal government shutdown, McGary and other park supporters held "guerilla" toilet cleanings so things stayed tolerable, but she worries the situation will be worse this summer. "I don't know how screwed we are. But I think there's going to be consequences," she said. "It sucks. There is no win in this." Don't forget to bring your own water Just a few miles from one of the wealthiest ZIP codes in the country, the Maroon Bells Scenic Area sits nestled amidst towering mountains, with aspen trees coating the hillsides and quiet lakes reflecting the sun overhead. But while the five-star hotels of Aspen, including the Little Nell and the Hotel Jerome, offer almost every conceivable amenity, Maroon Bells visitors this year will have to bring their own water from town 26 miles away. Normally, U.S. Forest Service employees make sure that the more than 300,000 annual visitors have access to both toilets and drinking water when they arrive at the Maroon Bells trailhead. "Man, the richest country in the world ought to be fund at a basic level the public lands everyone has access to," said Scott Fitzwilliams, who oversaw the area as supervisor of the White River National Forest. Fitzwilliams quit his job in February as the Trump administration began layoffs and job cuts across the Forest Service. The White River forest is the nation's busiest, home to ski areas including Aspen, Vail and Beaver Creek, along with hundreds of miles of hiking and mountain bike trails, dozens of campgrounds and innumerable sparkling lakes for fishing. Fitzwilliams said he expects that many pit toilets in the forest will only be pumped out once this summer down from as much as four times. He said his successors had also planned to bring in student-workers this summer to help with maintenance and trail-clearing, but approval from Elon Musk's DOGE teams came too late to make it work this year. "It's going to be mid-to late-summer before people begin to see it, but it's going to be pretty profound," he predicted. "We may get one (toilet) pump for the year. It's going to get ugly." Like other public lands experts, Fitzwilliams said he's also worried what will happen during wildfire season. Typically, National Incident Management Teams are made up of public lands workers across the country ‒ people who have other day jobs but get seconded to the fire-management teams during big fires. Trump's reductions have created a dramatic dropoff in the number of both firefighters and firefighting supervisors in both national parks and national forests, he said. "The mid- to long-term impacts from this is not going to be good, and the public is really going to see it and suffer the consequences," he said. Risk to visitors, public lands and economic vitality National parks in particular, and public lands in general, are among the most popular functions of the federal government, polls show. The Trust for Public Land in a recent survey conducted by YouGov found that 74% of Americans oppose closing public lands, 63% oppose layoffs, and 62% oppose funding reductions. TPL noted that with such overwhelming reputations, federal leaders should reconsider budget cuts. "Simply put, there are fewer rangers, wildlife and conservation experts, and stewards on the ground ‒ just when they're needed most," Trust for Public Land CEO Carrie Besnette Hauser told USA TODAY. "This isn't just a risk to visitor experience, it's a risk to the health of our lands and the economic vitality of rural and gateway communities, from Maine down to Florida, to Texas and Hawaii. Our public lands are more than beautiful places. They are economic engines, job creators, and essential spaces for healing, connection, and shared history." Given the reality on the ground, however, Cassidy Jones, a former park service ranger who now works for the nonprofit National Parks Conservation Association, said her friends and former colleagues are all preparing to do their best to serve the public as the summer season ramps up. Like McGary, Jones asked park and forest visitors to be as understanding and prepared as possible this summer, and to be prepared to see things like park superintendents working in visitor centers. Other parks have reported making plans to have wildlife biologists clean restrooms or are cycling office staff into campground management. "While most parks may feel very typical on the surface, there's a lot going on in the background," Jones said. "The unfortunate end of that for visitors is that they will be fed this vision of parks where it's business as usual, but it's going to be very far from that behind the scenes."
