East Meets West: AdAlta navigates China–US divide to drive biotech value
AdAlta subsidiary AdCella brings cutting-edge cellular immunotherapies from Asia – particularly China – into Western markets
AdCella has backing of SYNthesis BioVentures Fund, which invests in therapeutics development
The biotech fund believes AdCella's East to West strategy is particularly appealing in current US-China trade war
As trade tensions between the US and China escalate, a small-cap ASX biotech could become a strategic gateway for bringing Asia's next wave of cellular immunotherapies into lucrative Western markets.
AdAlta (ASX:1AD) and venture capital firm SYNthesis BioVentures Fund (SYNBV) launched AdCella in 2024 to bring cutting-edge cellular immunotherapies from Asia, particularly China, into Western markets.
SYNBV was co-founded by Professor Andrew Wilks, who, alongside Amplia Therapeutics (ASX:ATX) CEO Dr Chris Burns, received the 2024 Prime Minister's Prize for Innovation for co-inventing momelotinib, an FDA-approved treatment for myelofibrosis.
Until recently AdAlta has been focused on treating fibrotic diseases with its lead asset AD-214 for kidney and lung fibrosis. The drug has demonstrated safety in phase I clinical studies and efficacy in multiple preclinical models of fibrotic disease.
Managing director and CEO Dr Tim Oldham said that while AD-214 remained a valuable asset with potential to be monetised through external partnerships, it became clear that expanding AdAlta's pipeline would require looking beyond its drug discovery efforts.
"Our history of developing assets from scratch was too long, too slow and too expensive to be appropriate for a listed company," he said.
"It was perfect for a private company but not a listed one.
"We needed to find assets we could in-licence that would be in clinical trials relatively quickly, then figure out where we could gain a sustainable edge, how to be competitive in securing those opportunities and add real value in the process."
Rise of East to West cellular immunotherapy strategy
Leveraging Dr Tim Oldham's deep expertise in cellular immunotherapies and extensive operational experience in Asia, AdAlta adopted an East to West strategy, aimed at identifying and advancing promising Asian cancer therapies into regulated Western markets.
Oldham said he'd been fortunate to witness firsthand the rapid evolution of China's biotech sector and the remarkable progress in cellular immunotherapies for cancer treatment over the past 15 years.
He was previously CEO of Cell Therapies, a contract development and manufacturing organisation (CDMO) based at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne.
Cell Therapies has manufactured CAR-T therapies for nearly 20 years, including Novartis's Kymriah, the first FDA-approved CAR-T treatment in 2017.
The East to West cellular immunotherapy strategy for cancer is now a core growth priority for AdAlta and a key driver of future pipeline growth and value creation.
"Cancer is the area where cellular immunotherapies are proving to have the greatest commercial impact and we know that the hotspot of innovation in this space is Asia, particularly China," he said.
Oldham said 60% of global clinical trials into chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy – a type of cellular immunotherapy – was in China.
He said Asia was overweight in its level of innovation in the field, with 40% of companies developing cellular immunotherapy products based in the region.
"The advantage we bring to the table is the ecosystem we have in Australia in cell and gene therapy, particularly CAR-T cell therapies, with decades of developmental experience," Oldham said.
"In Australia we treated the first CAR-T patient in a commercial clinical trial outside of North America, which was for Novartis.
"We supply today as many CAR-T products per million of population as the US and that is five times the market penetration of Europe or Japan, so we've got some advantages here."
Oldham said Australia runs more than 50 cellular and gene therapy trials with good manufacturing capabilities.
"We can also run clinical trials here for a much lower cost than in the US and that is before any available R&D tax incentive."
China innovation meets Aussie expertise
Oldham said AdCella was now positioned to take advantage of a hotspot of innovation in China. It has secured non-binding term sheets for three CAR-T therapies targeting various solid cancer tumours, such as colorectal, lung, gastric, ovarian, and pancreatic.
The therapies have delivered encouraging results in early clinical trials, showing potential to be more effective than current treatment options.
They also include advanced features like safety kill switches, which enable doctors to shut down the therapy if serious side effects occur, secreted checkpoint inhibitor molecules that help overcome immune suppression, and non-viral vector manufacturing – a newer, potentially more efficient way to engineer the cells without using viruses.
"Our business model is to license cellular immunotherapy assets for solid cancers developed in China which are derisked to some degree with clinical data," Oldham said.
"We bring those assets into an Australian legal entity and move manufacturing out of China into Australia because you can't manufacture human cells in China for Western markets.
"We're conducting the first clinical trial under a US Investigational New Drug (IND) application in Australia, which is significant for our Chinese partners, as it demonstrates that their work in China translates effectively to Western patients."
Oldham said they've also removed many of the transaction costs for big pharma if they were to do similar deals, making their East-West projects more attractive.
"They know they'd have to go into China, do the translation of the work, due diligence, move manufacturing and a whole bunch of work which we are eliminating," he said.
"Just as importantly, in the current geopolitical environment the intellectual property is sitting with a Western company that should be more immune to the effects of the Biosecure Act and US-China trade wars."
AdAlta has appointed Dr Kevin Lynch MD as consultant CMO and is working with specialist partners such as Cell Therapies and Dark Horse Consulting to bring further market leading expertise to the opportunity.
As US and China relations deteriorate better strategy looks
SYNBV co-managing director Amir Zalcenstein said the AdCella East to West strategy was appealing to the fund, which invests in therapeutic development.
The fund is putting in $500,000 now and might add $1.5m later to own up to 25% of AdCella (through convertible shares).
They also have the option to put in more money (up to $5.5m) when AdCella raises its next big round of funding, but AdAlta will still own most of AdCella.
"We've been very impressed with the quality of diligence, and it's been a very long and arduous process," Zalcenstein told Stockhead.
"We're convinced that these are the three best projects that matched ours and AdCella's criteria and the management team can execute."
Zalcenstein said the East to West strategy was highly attractive in the current geopolitical environment.
"The strategy itself has a unique element to it which is the worse things get in terms of geopolitics the better it looks," he said.
"The more there's a breakdown of trade relations between the US and China, there will be an increased desperation by Chinese biotech companies to find avenues to bring their therapies to the west.
"You don't necessarily get rich selling medicines in China even if you're Chinese, but you can certainly do that if you have a blockbuster in the west."
Zalcenstein said establishing a conduit where you have a company like AdCella licencing drugs out of China then bringing them to Australia as a mid-way point to other Western jurisdictions makes sense.
Other US venture firms and big pharma companies also considering ways of getting biotech assets out of China for Western development.
"I'm not saying more trouble equals less risk, but I am saying more trouble equals more attractiveness to this strategy and that was a factor for us," Zalcenstein said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Aldi is known for drawing inspiration from big brands. Here's how experts say the retailer does it
It's no secret that Aldi, the supermarket chain that once had the slogan "like brands, only cheaper", sells products visually similar to well-established competitors. In the cereal aisle of each store, brown boxes of Power Grain are reminiscent of their Kellogg's counterpart, and in the snack aisle packets of Blackstone chips appear to draw inspiration from Red Rock Deli. In the US, blue boxes of Aldi-brand cream-filled biscuits are so similar to Oreos that the company behind the snack giant is suing the supermarket for "blatant copying". It's not the first time the chain has landed in legal trouble over its cheaper, duplicated private-label brands. In Australia, there have been several legal cases against Aldi. But intellectual property and consumer experts are not worried about this case creating legal implications for Australian consumers, who they say are largely unphased by Aldi's "phantom labels". "Ultimately the key reason they [Aldi] do this is about visual congruence," retail expert Gary Mortimer said. "So, when we're shopping in a supermarket, it's historically a mundane, habitual, low-involvement decision-making context. 'You walk down an aisle and you think Cadbury is purple. They [consumers] are influenced by pack colour, brand name or packaging shape." Professor Mortimer said when a consumer saw a product similar to another brand's, they might infer it was the same. "What the danger is, is a customer goes, 'Well, actually, their cereal is just as good as the Kellogg's version,'" he said. "Brands themselves spend a lot of money ensuring their brand is high quality. "Then a new player enters with a private label that looks very similar and, therefore, all of that positioning you've done with that product, the private label takes advantage of that position. "Brands would be concerned about that." Professor Mortimer said the private Aldi label was perceived as higher value than, say, the Coles or Woolworths generic-brands. "You won't get Aldi-brand biscuits, you'll get Belmont." In fact, they are so popular, other chains are taking a leaf out of the Aldi playbook, creating their own, cheaper, private brands. He said Woolworths and Coles had created private labels that sold cleaning products and pet food. "To some point, supermarkets understand we won't feed our dog Woolworths pet food but we might feed them a cheaper brand like Baxter's, which is actually Woolworths owned." With Choice ranking Aldi as the cheapest supermarket in Australia in its past five surveys, legal experts say the occasional legal challenges Aldi faces for sailing "close to the wind" with its packaging and branding are largely justified. While Aldi has faced legal challenges in Australia in the past over its packaging and the likeness of its products to rivals, the University of Sydney's Fady Aoun says it is far more challenging to take Aldi to court here. The senior lecturer in intellectual property law said this was because Australia's legal systems were vastly different to those in the US, for instance. "In the realm of trademark law and other forms of forms of policing commercial practices, American law is vastly different to Australian law," he said. "And, in addition to trademark infringement, they have something called unfair competition, which Australian law doesn't adopt "Their trademark law is far more protective of arguably trading interests and goes further than the Australian law in this respect." But there are several ways legal action can be pursued. Last year in Australia the company Hampden Holdings and Lacorium Health Australia successfully sued Aldi Foods for breach of copyright in relation to children's food products. Hampden licenses intellectual property to Every Bite Counts, which sells children's food products under Baby Bellies, Little Bellies and Mighty Bellies, which are sold in Australia. In 2018 and 2019, Aldi engaged the company Motor Design to re-design the packaging for its baby food and product range. The case found that in April 2019, Aldi instructed Motor Design to reuse the Little Bellies brand as the "benchmark" for the re-design of the packaging for its Mamia dry food range. The packaging and labelling were put side by side in court documents to highlight how similar each looked. "Aldi, they sail close to the wind," Dr Aoun said. "They sometimes overstep the mark. Other times they're just short of what is impermissible. "I suspect there is a strong legal department there and that's their business mode." The court found Hampden and Lacorium's owned the packaging designs. Aldi is currently appealing against the court decision. It was approached for comment. "The typical claims in Australia here are trademark infringement, misleading and deceptive conduct and — much more difficult — the common law action of 'passing off'," Dr Aoun said. "Hampden is just a company that holds IP rights and they are the holder of the copyright," Jane Rawlings, an intellectual property barrister said. "So they weren't suing on the trademark; they were suing on the look of the packaging, how it presents itself to consumers. "That was successful because the court had found Aldi had deliberately modelled their snacks on the Baby Bellies." Separately, Aldi won a federal court appeal in 2018 against a deceptive conduct ruling over hair care products brought against the supermarket chain by Moroccanoil Israel. Dr Rawlings said this was harder to prove. "You have to show there is reputational goodwill in the brand, and in this purpose it is by using a similar name, brand or look that misleads consumers and that damages the goodwill of the brand because they're being diverted to a cheaper alternative or because the brand owner is losing sales," she said. "You have to still prove the conduct has been deceptive and what Aldi do is tread a fine line where they've got a lookalike brand but it's not enough to argue consumers are being misled." In the UK in 2023, Cider producer Thatcher's successfully won a legal battle against Aldi, claiming it "copycatted" its Cloudy Lemon Cider in "taste and appearance". This was a lookalike trademark case that argued Aldi's Taurus drink had been "deliberately riding on the coat-tails" of the cider company's reputation as a brand. Dr Rawlings said she believed registering a brand as a trademark was one of the best ways to protect it. "To be honest, and if I were a brand owner trying to protect the look of packaging, I'd be looking very seriously at trademarking registration because it's relatively cheap and then you can basically sue on the trademark registration." Ultimately, experts agree the impact on consumers is relatively low. "What Aldi will typically say is our consumers are not confused [and that] while they may draw inspiration from leading brands there's no confusion people know what they're getting," Dr Aoun said.

Sky News AU
10 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Nationals Leader David Littleproud demand Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rules out kowtowing on US beef imports
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese 'needs to' immediately rule out kowtowing to Donald Trump on biosecurity laws on US beef imports, Nationals Leader David Littleproud has demanded. Government officials reportedly told The Sydney Morning Herald that Australia could alter its biosecurity laws to allow US beef exports without risks to local industry, in a move to appease Trump as he wages his trade war. Australia banned US beef in 2003 after a mad cow disease outbreak before undoing this in 2019 when the outbreak subsided. Cattle raised in Mexico and Canada but slaughtered in the US is still banned, however, this could be changed according to the report. Mr Littleproud raised concerns about Australia's cattle industry on Friday and urged the Prime Minister not to use the sector as a bargaining chip in negotiations with the US President. 'There needs to be certainty. The Prime Minister needs to rule it out immediately,' the Nationals Leader said on Sky News. 'He needs to make sure that he's very clear with Australian producers that our biosecurity standards will not be reduced and that … if we want to get imports that originated from Mexico or Canada, that there's some traceability on it like Australian producers have.' He called for the Prime Minister to be transparent with Australian beef producers as concerns fester about the nation's biosecurity following this report. 'I don't think Australian producers are asking for anything unfair here, they're just trying to protect their production systems, making sure that they can not only feed Australians but feed the world,' Mr Littleproud said. 'The Prime Minister and his department who are mooting these things need to be very, very clear with Australian beef producers that it's not on the table and it won't be on the table at all. 'But when you start getting these reports - you don't start seeing these reports unless there's smoke and when there's smoke, there's fire.' Australia exports more than $4b of beef to the US annually, making it the largest market for Aussie beef exports behind China. After Trump revealed his sweeping tariffs and invited impacted nations to negotiate, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vowed to protect the nation's biosecurity laws, Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and news publishers against tech giants. 'We will not weaken the measures that protect our farmers and producers from the risks of disease or contamination,' he said in a statement. Cattle Australia chief executive Chris Parker issued a statement highlighting the importance of traceability for foreign-produced beef. 'Our position is that the US needs to be able to demonstrate it can either trace cattle born in Mexico and Canada, or has systems that are equivalent to Australia's traceability, before imports of meat could occur from non-US cattle,' Mr Parker said. 'Cattle Australia is in ongoing communication with the Federal Government regarding this issue and the vital importance that our science-based biosecurity system is not compromised as part of trade discussions with any country.' Mr Albanese is expected to have a meeting with Trump either on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada or in the US later in June where the Prime Minister will make Australia's case for tariff exemptions. Australia faces 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium alongside a broad 10 per cent levy on all goods, which is still paused by the Trump Administration.
Herald Sun
17 hours ago
- Herald Sun
The lessons from IDP Education's week from Hell
The student recruiter has been hit by the migration backlash not just here, but in Canada, the UK and the US Other listed colleges are tweaking their business models to focus on domestic students While there's no end of the pain in sight, some brokers reckon IDP Education is a buy at its marked-down valuation It's not unusual for a small cap stock to decline 50% in value or more in one day. But when the top 200 stock IDP Education (ASX:IEL) achieved that this week – erasing more than $1 billion of market value – it was a case of 'class, take note'. The dramatic plunge came after the overseas student wrangler's confession on Tuesday that full-year revenue and earnings would plummet on the back of visa crackdowns. The stock has lost an astonishing 75% over the last year. Arguably the downgrade was years in the making, given the quality issues besetting both the tertiary and vocational sectors for some years. Still, investors were shocked by the scale of the revision or maybe they just hadn't done their homework. IDP guided to a 28-30% decline in student placement volumes, with its language testing arm likely to fall by 18-20%. Adjusted earnings before interest and tax (ebit) are expected at $115-125 million, a circa 50% year-on-year decline and well shy of market expectations of $166 million. Trump-like 'regulation by fiat' The visa crackdown was contained in a bill that the old Parliament did not pass, but government went ahead via a Trump-style Ministerial Directive (MD107). The measure means visa applications are processed on the perceived risk of the education provider and the student's country of origin. Dubbed by college operator Academies Australasia (ASX:AKG) as 'regulation by fiat', the measure compounds the problems of providers with high visa rejection rates. The reasons for the knock-backs are likely to be beyond the colleges' control. Nowhere to hide as migration policies bite IDP's problems don't start and end at home. Half-owned by sandstone universities, the company started out as a local uni recruiter but now touts for colleges in the UK, Canada and the US. Half of the company's revenue deriving from English language testing and teaching. The UK is even more zealous on reducing migration, as is Canada given the backdrop of the recent close election. We'll simply call US a no-go zone, given Trump's order to block Harvard University from admitting international students. Heeding the lessons IDP is not the only ASX-listed, overseas student focused education play feeling the pinch. It's a case of accepting the new reality and adapting. The amalgam of Icollege and Redhill Education, NextEd Group (ASX:NXD) reported a $2.2 million first half loss, amid a 21% revenue decline (to $47 million). However Nexted offset some of the impact of a 52% English language services decline with increased international vocation enrolment. The aforementioned Academies managed to grow half year revenue by 2.8% (to $23.9 million). The company also narrowed a previous $7.5 million loss to a $958,000 deficit. Operator of the Ikon (tertiary) and ALG (vocational) colleges, EDU Holdings (ASX:EDU) gets a gold star by doubling calendar 2024 revenue to $42 million. The company also managed a $2.6 million profit after three years of losses. Gary Burg told last month's AGM the impact of the visa changes remained unclear and the company was focusing on the domestic student market. A free kick of the 'political football'? Despite the IDP sell down there's still a country mile between its $1 billion market cap and the circa $20-40 million valuation ascribed to the other providers. As with all harsh sell-offs, have investors have over-reacted? Broker UBS contends IDP's business model is unbroken and the company 'remains a high-quality business in challenging conditions'. The firm rates the stock a 'buy' with a price target of $4.95, implying around 40% of upside. IDP is undertaking a detailed business review, with an update promised at its August full-year results. At Academies' AGM last year, acting chairman Chiang Meng Heng decried the sector being turned into a political Sherrin. 'Certain comments being bandied about smack of populism, rather than carefully considered positions that are good for the country,' he said. 'The air may not clear until after the federal election.' More than a month after the poll, clarity awaits. Originally published as Criterion: IDP Education's share plunge is a harsh lesson for the overseas student industry