RNC Accused of Keeping Email Hack From FBI to Avoid Bad Press
The Republican National Committee allegedly failed to notify the FBI that its email systems had suffered a serious breach by Chinese hackers for fear of bad press during Donald Trump's 2024 campaign for the presidency.
Citing excerpts from a forthcoming book by Politico's Alex Isenstadt, Revenge: The Inside Story of Trump's Return to Power, the Wall Street Journal reports the attack allegedly committed by hackers with ties to the Chinese government, was likely carried out in an effort to assess the GOP's internal view of tensions between China and Taiwan.
Insiders told Isenstadt that Microsoft had alerted the RNC to the breach just days before the attempt on President Trump's life at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Beijing, for its part, has denied any role in the breach, with a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C. telling the Journal that China 'firmly opposes and combats cyberattacks and cyber theft in all forms.'
There's apparently nothing in Isenstadt's book to suggest quite how far hackers made it into the GOP's internal systems, or just how many emails might have been compromised.
It's nevertheless thought the attack came at roughly the same time as a separate hack targeting the Trump campaign carried out by cyber operatives tied to the Iranian regime, who obtained a number of documents that were later flogged to a variety of U.S. media outlets. Most of those publications declined to make use of the leak out of concerns for its origin.
Intelligence officials have long-warned that U.S. presidential campaigns serve as prime targets for espionage operations by hostile states, with internal communications in particular offering not only valuable insights into the foreign policy priorities of potentially-incoming administrations, but also opportunities to sow chaos by leaking otherwise sensitive data.
Both the RNC and the White House have been approached for comment on the allegations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., was ebullient Tuesday afternoon. The South Dakota Republican just concluded a lengthy lunch meeting with fellow GOPers and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about the Big, Beautiful Bill. "Good afternoon. Everybody having fun yet?" Thune asked the Congressional press corps as he approached the microphone in the Ohio Clock Corridor of the Capitol for his weekly exchange with reporters. "Ask us around 3:45 Sunday morning," suggested yours truly. Reporter's Notebook: Marathon Weekend Awaits Senate As Johnson Prepares House For 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Battle If you are an insomniac… Read On The Fox News App Or don't want to see the National Symphony Orchestra Pops perform Dolly Parton's musical canon at the Kennedy Center… Or you don't have tickets to see the Savannah Bananas play at Nats Park this weekend… The U.S. Senate may be the place for you. Action on the Big, Beautiful Bill could happen at any time of the day or night this weekend. The Senate is attempting to pass the Big, Beautiful Bill sometime on Saturday or Sunday. Maybe even early Monday. Presuming Senate Republicans can pass the bill. "If the bill is going to pass, do you expect that you at least have two or three members on your side who would vote no?" I asked Thune. "Could be," replied Thune. "Why?" I countered. "Well, we've got a lot of very independent thinking senators who have reasons and things that they'd like to have in this bill that would, in their view, make it stronger," answered Thune. "Hopefully when push comes to shove and everybody has to say yes or no, we'll get the number of votes that we need." House Conservatives Go To War With Senate Over Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' There's more political pushing and shoving in the U.S. Senate than there is in a line of fourth graders waiting for the water fountain after recess. And senators may advance beyond pushing and shoving to actual fighting as Republicans grouse about the bill's contents. It's about the math. Senate Republicans can still lose three votes and pass the bill with a tie-breaking vote by Vice President Vance. Fox was told that the bill was in trouble if there are ten potential noes now. But if the universe of prospective nays is only five, they can probably whittle that down enough to pass the bill. Here are the GOP senators worth keeping an eye on because of possible problems they could have with particular provisions in the legislation: Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., Rick Scott, R-Fla., Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Thom Tillis, R-N.C., Mike Lee, R-Utah, John Kennedy, R-La., Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Susan Collins, R-Maine, John Curtis, R-Utah and Jim Justice, R-W.V. That's 11. And many of those on the list could vote yes. They may hold out until the end to either score a provision in the bill they want. Or, they want to understand the final product. "We don't know what's in the bill. The parliamentarian has thrown out some provisions," said Kennedy. "Look, I'm labor. I'm not management. But I got one vote, the same as management does. And I'm willing to work nights. I'm willing to work weekends. But what I'm not willing to do is have someone pat me on the head and say 'shut up and just vote for it.'" Kennedy said he unearthed "a few things in this bill that we weren't told about. And I'm not happy." With hat tips to boxing analysts Al Bernstein and Larry Merchant, Thune reverted to discussing the physicality of senators. "When push comes to shove, you're looking at whether or not you're going to allow the perfect to become the enemy," said Thune. "You have to recognize that this is a process whereby everybody doesn't get everything they want." Senate Gop Aims To Approve Major Legislation Next Week As Trump Touts Party Unity One of the most outstanding issues remains SALT, the deduction for state and local taxes in high-tax states. "We'll have a solution on that in 24 to 48 hours," said Bessent after his huddle with GOP senators. "I know that there are a lot of conservatives who don't like it," said White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Fox Business. "A lot of very important people in the House, who want it as big as it can be. And, Secretary Bessent is in there working with people to find exactly the right number that'll land the bill." So when does the Senate finish? "The question of when will the Senate get it done, that's a great question," said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo. "They've had it for over six weeks. I'm waiting." The Senate will likely take a procedural vote to formally get on the bill on Friday. If the Senate votes to get on the bill, 20 hours of clock time starts to run under special Senate budget rules. The procedural vote only needs a simple majority. The 20 hours of time is split. Democrats will probably burn all 10 of their hours. Republicans will use a few of their hours. So, the Senate probably begins its "vote-a-rama" on the bill late in the wee hours of Saturday morning. A "vote-a-rama" is where the Senate takes hours and hours of consecutive roll call votes on amendments to the package. It would culminate with passage of the Big, Beautiful Bill in the Senate late Saturday or early Sunday. Senate Republicans Look To Sweeten Medicaid Pot To Silence Dissent On Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Note that it is impossible to game out when this could happen. But frankly, a final vote could come at any time of the day or night all weekend long – if not early Monday. Also, this scenario presumes everything goes swimmingly. The most recent vote-a-rama ran just under ten hours earlier this year. A 2021 vote-a-rama consumed 14 hours and 48 minutes, with the Senate considering a total of 40 amendments. We believe this vote-a-rama might be on the longer end. Here's the other wild card: How fast can the House pivot to pass the bill and align with the Senate? House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., signaled the House may aim to vote on Tuesday. Also, the "72-hour rule" to allow the House to read the bill before voting does not apply. The Senate is sending back to the House an "amendment" to the original House plan. Thus, the "72-hour rule" is not in play under these circumstances. However, the question is if Johnson faces pressure to let the bill marinate for a few days. Trump Pressures Congress To Pass 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Insisting 'No One Goes On Vacation Until It's Done' But some House conservatives aren't happy with the Senate measure. "We're not going to get jammed on this. We're just not," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, believes the Senate should just accept the House measure – since the House could barely pass its version in May. "We did the hard work of threading a very tight needle with this legislation. So it does not need to come back looking too much different from what we ended up passing out of the House," said Pfluger. So the question is whether the Senate can pass its bill. And if the House can accept whatever the Senate passes. So, as I said, if you don't have a lot to do this weekend, Capitol Hill may be the spot to be. Especially at 3:45 Sunday article source: A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump posts video with ‘Bomb Iran' song amid ceasefire
President Trump posted a new video on Truth Social featuring a compilation of videos of B-2 stealth fighter jets dropping bombs along with the 1980 song 'Bomb Iran' by Vince Vance & the Valiants. The song, a parody of the 1961 song 'Barbara Ann' by the Regents, plays over a video of various B-2 stealth fighter jets, which were used to drop 14 GBU-57 bunker busters bombs in Iran. The jets were specifically used on the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and the Natanz Enrichment Complex, key nuclear sites in Iran. The U.S. also hit Iran's Isfahan nuclear site. The song continues with the lyrics, 'Went to a mosque, gonna throw some rocks, tell the Ayatollah, 'Gonna put you in a box!' Bomb Iran.' The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment. Trump posted the video Tuesday night on Truth Social amid rising tensions between Iran, Israel and the U.S. after the U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. The video is just the latest post from the president on the rising conflict in the Middle East, one of which even singled out Israel in a rare move, advising them against dropping more bombs. Trump came down on the Iranians and Israelis earlier in the day at the White House, voicing his displeasure at continued fighting between the two adversaries. 'We basically — we have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f‑‑‑ they're doing,' Trump told reporters at the White House earlier Tuesday. While Trump hailed the strikes against the nuclear facilities as a success, an early intelligence assessment reportedly found that Tehran's nuclear program was set back by only months. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
CNN
41 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump claims the press is demeaning the military. But questioning power is patriotic
Journalists ask questions, vet the answers and report the results to the public. That's pretty much the job description. But the Trump administration is claiming that it's unpatriotic to do so. Several days after the US conducted airstrikes in Iran, as the public awaits a clearer picture of the strikes' impact, President Trump is attacking CNN for reporting on an early US intel assessment that undercut his claims about Iran's nuclear enrichment sites being 'totally obliterated.' The New York Times is also being targeted by Trump because it matched CNN's reporting. 'They tried to demean the great work our B-2 pilots did,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday. CNN and The Times have not demeaned any pilots. But the administration is casting 'any questioning of the success of an incredibly difficult military operation as fake, as unappreciative, and as disrespectful to servicemembers,' CNN's Jake Tapper said on 'The Lead' Wednesday evening. Tapper cited past examples of government deception and said, 'history has taught us that the most pro-servicemember action we can take is to ask questions of our leaders, especially in times of war. That, for journalists, is the height of patriotism.' Indeed, history is replete with proof that it is imperative to ask for evidence of presidential assertions. It is necessary to question official accounts; to wonder if the public is being misled; and to do so regardless of which party is in power. When President Joe Biden ordered the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan in 2021, CNN was at the forefront in documenting and scrutinizing the chaos that followed. One headline at the time stated, 'Biden's botched Afghan exit is a disaster at home and abroad long in the making.' When lives are on the line, government officials often have an incentive to hide or obscure the truth — and reporters have a duty to uncover it. 'The truth, which literally hurts, is that every administration lies about war, particularly (though not only) about its reasons for initiating deadly force,' Matt Welch wrote for Reason magazine in 2020. Welch warned that 'too many people turn off their brains once the battle bugle calls' when the opposite response is actually needed. Trump clearly thinks it is politically advantageous to claim that scrutiny of the Iran strike's outcome is insulting to the US military and to the country. At a NATO summit press conference on Wednesday, Trump asserted that the B-2 pilots were 'devastated' by Tuesday's reports about the early intel assessment. 'You should be proud of those pilots and you shouldn't be trying to demean them,' Trump said in response to a question from NBC's Kelly O'Donnell. 'There's a difference, sir, between asking about an assessment' and doubting the pilots, O'Donnell responded, although she was barely audible over the president's mic. 'No one is questioning the skill of the US military,' O'Donnell added. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth took the same tack as Trump at the press conference, charging the press with trying to 'spin' the airstrike outcome 'for their own political reasons to try to hurt President Trump or our country.' Later in the day, Trump announced that Hegseth would hold a Thursday morning news conference at the Pentagon 'to fight for the Dignity of our Great American Pilots.' Their dignity is not in question, however. 'No one is questioning whether this was a heroic and valiant effort on behalf of the United States,' Tapper said Wednesday evening. The key questions are 'about the degree of success of the operation, and the current state of Iran's nuclear weapons program, and what the intelligence — not the politicians — what the intelligence reveals.' 'Our obligation as journalists,' Tapper continued, 'is not to praise President Trump, or protect his feelings, or to disparage him,' it's 'to report facts.' The Times responded to Trump's all-caps assertion that it teamed up with CNN to 'demean one of the most successful military strikes in history' by pointing out the White House's inconsistency on the subject. 'Yesterday,' The Times said, 'President Trump called this 'fake news.' But he and his entire national security team subsequently confirmed that the Defense Intelligence Agency did in fact produce the preliminary assessment described in a report by The Times and others. So their statement was fake, not The Times's reporting.' CNN also issued a statement after Trump called for Natasha Bertrand, one of three correspondents who broke the initial story, to be fired. 'We stand 100% behind Natasha Bertrand's journalism and specifically her and her colleagues' reporting of the early intelligence assessment of the U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear facilities,' the network said. 'CNN's reporting made clear that this was an initial finding that could change with additional intelligence. We have extensively covered President Trump's own deep skepticism about it.' 'However,' CNN said, 'we do not believe it is reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest.'
