Conspiracy Theorists Think the Elon-Trump Feud Is Just a Ruse to Expose the Real Pedophiles
Conspiracy theorist Dinesh D'Souza, the director of the discredited 'documentary' 2000 Mules, posted to X on Thursday that perhaps the fight between these two men was actually the start of something much bigger.
'Is this some sort of perverse scheme to force the release of the Epstein files?' D'Souza wrote. 'How great it would be to have a horde of bad guys publicly exposed. Then Trump and Elon break out the champagne. Elon says, 'Told you I could get Democrats to scream for that list.' Laughter!'
Obviously, D'Souza's logic here doesn't make any sense. The Trump administration doesn't need Democrats to get upset for any files to be released. The attorney general said they would be released, and instead, she invited a bunch of far-right weirdos to the White House back in February to hold up binders with no new information in them.
D'Souza was granted a pardon by Trump in 2018 after he was convicted for illegal campaign contributions, but he's one of the relatively mainstream pundits who all think Musk and Trump are playing 10D chess. There's also an army of absolute dipshits who believe in the QAnon conspiracy theory currently insisting on social media that it's all a ruse. And they're pointing to tweets from Democrats as proof that it's the other side who should be worried.
The Democratic Party's X account seized on the dispute Thursday, writing, 'What is Trump hiding? Release the Epstein files.' And that caused people like Liz Crokin, a journalist-turned-QAnon lunatic, to insist, 'They already took the bait hook line & sinker!' In another tweet, Crokin called it the 'fake Trump-Elon feud' referring to it as kayfabe, the wrestling term for portraying staged events as real.
Crokin joined the likes of fellow conspiracy theorist Alex Jones in arguing that there's no evidence Trump was doing anything nefarious with Epstein: 'I've also been investigating President @realDonaldTrump ties to Jeffrey Epstein for the past decade and came to the same conclusion @AlexJones has. There's zero evidence implicating Trump in any crimes!'
Jones initially seemed open to the idea that Trump was doing something sketchy with Epstein on Thursday but later framed his tweets as just asking questions. By Friday, Jones was on his show InfoWars putting his finger to the wind trying to defend both men, while insisting the Democrats were the real criminals.
'Almost everybody was asking are you on Trump's side or Musk's side and I said I'm on neither side. I'm on team humanity, which means I'm on the side of truth,' Jones said on his show Friday. 'If the Democrats had any real proof of Trump involved with underage girls with Epstein you'd heard about it nine years ago.'
The people who believe in conspiracy theories like QAnon are firmly planted in the MAGA camp and need to accomplish some incredible feats of mental gymnastics to hold the beliefs that they do. Jeffrey Epstein was well known as a friend of Trump's when the two lived in Palm Beach. And Epstein told a journalist over the course of 100 hours of discussion that he had photos of Trump with 'young girls' who were 'topless.'
The way Trump supporters rationalize all of this is they insist Trump distanced himself from Epstein because the late pedophile tried to hit on the daughter of a club member at Mar-a-Lago. But other reports suggest their friendship actually ended over a real estate deal that went south. Whatever happened, there's no question that Trump and Epstein were very close, something the president has previously acknowledged in a 2002 interview that he was 'fun' and a 'terrific guy.'
Conservative media has long tried to distance Trump from Epstein, with a Fox News segment in 2020 even editing the president out of a photo with the notorious sex criminal. And Fox News was clearly off balance on Thursday night, unsure who to root for.
Musk also has his connections to Epstein, even if they're not quite so direct as an open friendship. Business Insider reported back in 2020 that Epstein set up Musk's brother Kimball with a girlfriend. And, of course, there's that infamous picture of Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell with Musk at a party in 2014. The billionaire has tried to say she just photobombed him but it's not clear what was actually happening there, since other reports have come out that they talked. For his part, Trump said in 2020 that he 'wished her well' when Maxwell was found guilty of sex trafficking.
But people who have previously celebrated both Musk and Trump seem to be forced into choosing a side. One of the things that's getting lost in the fight between Trump and Musk is that Musk seems to be admitting he somehow had access to tightly held files at the U.S. Department of Justice. And that's certainly believable, given Musk's access to the private data of American citizens over recent months.
Among all the conspiracy theories online, there were also jokes. So many jokes. As social media's most legendary account @dril put it, 'the president wont see your cheap dunks against jeffery epstein. But your friends who have ties to state sponsored pedophilia will.' And then there were the memes. Just endless memes.
It remains to be seen what impact this fight may have on the real world, from Musk's contracts with the federal government to all those DOGE staffers who've wedged themselves into the nooks and crannies of the federal government. As Wired reported this week, guys like 19-year-old Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine went from Special Government Employees to full-time government staff raking in some of the highest possible salaries.
There are plenty of people who are insisting Trump and Musk could quickly reconcile and all of this could be old news by next week. And that's entirely possible. But it's really hard to just go back to being best friends after you play the pedo card, something that Musk likes to do frequently.
Remember when Musk got upset at the cave diver in Thailand after that soccer team got stuck in a cave? The diver said Musk's idea for a rescue submarine wouldn't work, which incensed the billionaire. Incredibly, Musk won a defamation suit filed by the diver after the Tesla CEO said he didn't literally mean to call him a pedophile.
It doesn't seem like either man is going to file any lawsuits over their current spat, but they're both extremely litigious. And if Trump makes good on his threats to pull NASA contracts from SpaceX, you can bet Musk will try to retaliate in any way he can. These guys love their retribution, which is good for them when they're working together on the same team. But aiming that hatred at each other could get messy very quickly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mike Tyson Sued For Using JAY-Z, DMX, And Ja Rule Song To Promote Jake Paul Fight
Mike Tyson is being sued for allegedly using a song to promote a fight without permission. The track in question is JAY-Z, DMX, and Ja Rule's song 'Murdergram,' which was played in a social media clip about his Jake Paul fight that was posted on Tyson's pages. Filed on Thursday (Aug. 7), the new suit was brought by Ty Fyffe, the producer of the record. 'Murdergram' was featured in JAY-Z's 1998 film Streets Is Watching, and none of the three rappers or their reps are involved in the suit, per Billboard. Although the alleged video has since been deleted from the legendary fighter's page, Fyffe's lawsuit includes screenshots of the post, including its caption: 'You know what time it is #PaulTyson.' 'Neither plaintiff nor any of his representatives granted defendant Tyson permission to use the song title 'Murdergram' to promote his boxing match with Jake Paul,' reads the filing. 'By listing the song title 'Murdergram' on his Instagram post, defendant Tyson misled viewers to believe that plaintiff endorsed, or was affiliated or associated with, him and/or his participation in the match.' The complaint argues the use of 'Murdergram' played a part in helping drive viewership of the massive fight, which broke Netflix viewing records. It also alleges Tyson was fully aware of the producer'c copyright in the song. He is seeking a portion of Tyson's earnings from the event and is requesting royalties for the use of the song. 'Defendant Tyson's conduct was intentional, willful and with full knowledge of plaintiff's copyright in the song,' says the complaint. 'As a consequence of defendant Tyson's infringement, plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, economic losses and damage to his copyright in the song.' The bout took place on Nov. 15, 2024, at the AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas. Paul won via unanimous decision. Check out highlights below. More from Claressa Shields Compares Potential Laila Ali Fight To Mike Tyson Vs. Jake Paul Mike Tyson Gets Carried On Jake Paul's Shoulders At Donald Trump's Inauguration Mike Tyson's Life Story To Be Focus Of Upcoming Netflix Docuseries Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas redistricting fight goes national as GOP, Dems prepare for more battles over future House maps
The battle over redistricting in Texas has been one of the biggest stories in politics over the past week. Republicans in the Lone Star State are hoping to approve new congressional maps that could secure the GOP five additional seats in the House of Representatives if they're in place in time for the 2026 midterms. That plan is stalled at the moment, however, because dozens of Democrats have fled the state in order to prevent the legislature from having enough representatives present to consider the proposal. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to have the absent Democrats arrested or remove them from office, but so far, they have remained committed to staying away. The partisan battle over redistricting that started in Texas has quickly spread across the country. Republicans are eyeing other red states where they might be able to collect a few additional seats with new maps. Blue-state Democrats have promised to counterbalance any gains the GOP makes by redrawing the lines in their own states. Here's a breakdown of where things stand in states other than Texas that are considering redistricting and what it might mean if those plans become a reality. Republican targets Ohio Potential swing: Two or three more seats for Republicans Where things stand: Unlike most states, Ohio is obligated to redraw its congressional districts because of unique laws in the state. Republicans already hold 10 of the state's 15 seats in the House, but the experts say they could pick up at least two more by targeting Democratic districts in Akron and Toledo. Some Republicans reportedly have eyes on a third seat in Cincinnati, but state laws could make that a trickier task, according to the Columbus Dispatch. Ohio has until Nov. 30 to approve its new map if it's going to be in use for the 2026 midterms, but there are important procedural deadlines before then that could limit how dramatically the GOP is able to redraw the state's congressional lines. Missouri Potential swing: One additional seat for Republicans Where things stand: Though they haven't officially started the process yet, Republicans in Missouri appear open to redrawing the state's congressional maps. Currently, the GOP holds six of the eight seats in the state. Only one of the remaining districts, centered in Kansas City, seems to be in play. The other Democrat-led district covers St. Louis, an overwhelmingly blue city that would be very difficult to break up into multiple districts because of protections in the Voting Rights Act. Indiana Potential swing: One or two more seats to Republicans Where things stand: Vice President JD Vance traveled to Indianapolis on Thursday to urge Republican Gov. Mike Braun and state legislative leaders to move forward with redistricting. Braun has not publicly committed to redrawing the state's district lines, telling reporters only that he and other GOP leaders had listened to Vance's pitch. Even if Republicans do get fully on board, there's only so much that the GOP can gain in the Hoosier State. They already control seven of the state's nine congressional districts. Both of the remaining districts have a dense Democratic voter base. One of them, which includes a number of Chicago suburbs, could be made more favorable to Republicans with some changes to district lines around the edges, experts told CNN. Flipping the other one would be a much harder task. Incumbent Democrat Andre Carson won that seat, which includes most of Indianapolis, by 40 points in last year's elections. Florida Potential swing: Three additional seats for Republicans Where things stand: The GOP speaker of Florida's House of Representatives announced Thursday that he's forming a select committee to look into redrawing the state's congressional districts with the backing of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. Republicans hold 20 of Florida's 28 congressional seats, in part because of a map DeSantis signed into law three years ago that flipped four blue seats to red. Republicans are reportedly eyeing three districts in South Florida, a region that has been steadily shifting toward the GOP in recent years, as their primary targets for increasing their representation in Congress. State laws could complicate their efforts, though. An amendment added to the Florida Constitution in 2010 prohibits lawmakers from drawing districts for partisan gain or in a way that deliberately diminishes the voting power of minorities. Democrat targets California Potential swing: Up to five additional seats for Democrats Where things stand: California Gov. Gavin Newsom has pledged to 'fight fire with fire' and push to redraw his state's maps if Texas goes through with its redistricting plan. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 congressional seats. Newsom shared a map on social media that theoretically could turn the entire state blue, but reports suggest that a draft plan under consideration by state lawmakers would match Texas Republicans by flipping five seats to their favor. Under current law, California's congressional map is drawn by a nonpartisan independent committee. Voters would have to approve any proposal to give that power back to the state Legislature. Newsom has said he's willing to call a special election to put the issue on the ballot, but only if Texas passes its new map first. New York Potential swing: Unclear Where things stand: New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has been equally adamant that her state should redraw its maps to counter the GOP's moves in Texas and elsewhere. Democrats currently hold 19 of the state's 26 congressional seats. Though analysts say there are ways Democrats could manipulate the map in their favor, so far it's uncertain how they might do that or how many seats they'd attempt to flip. Like California, Hochul's state's districts are drawn by an independent commission. But New York's laws would require a much lengthier process to give that ability back to lawmakers, making it highly unlikely that the new maps would be in place in time for next year's midterms. Illinois Potential swing: Unclear Where things stand: Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker has been one of the most prominent faces in the Texas redistricting battle because of his support for Democrats in their effort to block Republicans from approving their new map. Pritzker has said that redistricting in his own state is 'on the table.' Unlike in California and New York, lawmakers in Illinois do have the power to redraw maps on their own. But the GOP only holds three of the state's 17 congressional seats under current district lines, which are among the most heavily gerrymandered in the country, according to rankings by 538. That could make it hard for Democrats to draw up maps that gain them any additional seats. Maryland Potential swing: One additional seat for Democrats Where things stand: The Democratic leader of Maryland's House of Delegates has proposed a bill that would trigger new maps if any other state redistricts outside of the normal 10-year cycle. The problem for Democrats, though, is that they already hold seven of Maryland's eight congressional seats. Turning that lone red district blue could be difficult because any new map would have to navigate around Chesapeake Bay to connect Democratic areas in the west to the Republican-dense areas in the east.
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump boots IRS commissioner after just months on the job: Names Treasury Secretary as interim head
Billy Long, the ex-auctioneer turned Missouri congressman who was confirmed to lead the Internal Revenue Service just over two months ago, is going once, going twice, gone after President Donald Trump removed him from his position on Friday. The White House confirmed Long's firing to The Independent and announced that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will serve as acting commissioner until a replacement is nominated and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. It is understood that Trump intends to nominate Long, a Republican who represented Missouri's seventh district from 2011 to 2023, to an as-yet unspecified ambassadorship. Long's ouster means the country's tax collection apparatus will be on its seventh leader since January. The former House member was an unusual pick to lead the IRS. During his time in Congress he did not ever serve on the primary tax law-writing panel, the House Ways and Means Committee, and he had no real background in tax issues other than a stint as a financial adviser promoting a tax credit that has often been claimed fraudulently. During his time in the House, he also promoted legislation that would have abolished the IRS entirely. He did not appear to make much of an impression during his short tenure at the agency. According to The New York Times, he often gave workers permission to leave early on Fridays including today. An email sent to IRS employees yesterday afternoon offered them a '70-minute early exit' today and noted that his 70th birthday is this coming Monday. He has also reportedly spent much of his time atop the IRS traveling the country to meet with employees, though he did place two high-ranking officials on administrative leave while posting on social media about the need to 'purge' the agency. Long, who once owned an auction house and is in both the National Auctioneers' Association Hall of Fame and the Professional Auctioneers' Association Hall of Fame, gained a measure of notoriety in 2018 when he responded to activist Laura Loomer's disruption of a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing with a mock auction chant while police officers escorted her from the hearing room.
