U.K. Authorities Probing Possible Putin ‘Sabotage' After Heathrow Airport Fire
British counter-terrorism police are investigating possible sabotage following a huge blaze near London's Heathrow Airport, according to multiple reports.
The Thursday evening fire at an electrical substation in Hayes, near the airport west of the English capital, wiped out power at the busy travel hub and also knocked out its back-up energy system, causing travel chaos.
Thousands of buildings nearby were also left without power, and 150 people had to be evacuated from surrounding homes. Flames also caught hold of a transformer containing over 6,600 gallons of cooling fluid.
The fire is still burning and the airport, the fifth busiest in the world, is expected to be closed until at least midnight Friday. Firefighters said the cause of the blaze was not immediately known, but specialist cops in the U.K. are not ruling out bad actors, like Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The Times reported that counter-terrorism detectives from London's Metropolitan Police were hastily deployed to probe whether sabotage might have played a part. The paper's chief reporter, Fiona Hamilton, name-checked Russia in a message on X.
'Counter terrorism police put on Heathrow fire investigation to establish whether or not it is foul play,' she wrote. 'Any major incident like this is immediately escalated, particularly given threat of sabotage by Russia. Sources say precautionary and CT police often deployed like this.'
The BBC reported that the Met Police said there was 'currently no indication of foul play' but officers were keeping an 'open mind at this time.'
It is standard practice for several departments, including counter terrorism police, to investigate large scale incidents. Even still, British tabloids were more forthright in their finger pointing at the Kremlin. The Mail Online, the Daily Mail's online offering, asked in their headline: 'Is Russia behind Heathrow Airport closure?'
The publication quoted security expert Will Geddes, director and founder of the International Corporate Protection Group, who said: 'The Russians are looking at everything. They're looking at our fibre optics under the sea, they're looking at our nuclear power stations, we know hostile reconnaissance is going on right now.
'So for this to be taken down so easily and cause such an impact, one has got to say if I was Russia, that's where I would focus my attentions as well.'
Bob Seely, a Russia expert and former Conservative politician in the U.K., said it was 'likely' an accident, but added that Russia could not be ruled out. 'We should be building resilience into our critical national infrastructure, especially given the rise in Russian sabotage operations in Europe,' he told the Mail.
It comes after Richard Moore, head of Britain's Secret Intelligence Service known as MI6, in November accused Russia of waging a 'staggeringly reckless campaign' of sabotage in Europe.
During a speech in Paris, Moore said Putin and his acolytes were attempting 'to sow fear about the consequences of aiding Ukraine.'
And indeed, the incident attack comes after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer pledged ongoing support to Ukraine.
Last week, he hosted an online meeting between Western leaders dubbed the 'coalition of the willing,' those who are intent on seeing a Russia-Ukraine peace deal prevail. This preceded a meeting between European Union and U.K. delegates to discuss 'ways to dial up pressure on Russia.'
At the beginning of March, British and Ukrainian officials also signed the U.K.-Ukraine Bilateral agreement, paving the way for an almost $3 billion loan to bolster Ukrainian defense capabilities.
More recently, The Telegraph reported that the U.K. could send fighter jets to Ukraine to help protect its troops against ongoing aggression from Russia. The Prime Minister has already promised to put British troops on the ground if President Donald Trump is able to successfully negotiate a peace deal.
Russian Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov, meanwhile, said after an EU Summit on Friday that politicians on the continent have an 'obsession' with militarizing Europe. 'Their eyes, at least in public, reveal a fixation on militarizing Europe regardless of the consequences,' he said cryptically, according to TASS.
'The militarization of Europe is a very, very dangerous trend. It certainly does not bring us any closer to an easing of tensions or to the restoration of mutual trust; rather, it undermines security in Europe,' Peskov added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Gabbard Warns Global Nuclear Annihilation Is Closer Than Ever
Tulsi Gabbard, the US director of national intelligence, released a video Tuesday warning that the world is closer to nuclear war than ever and accusing unnamed political elites of trying to foment conflict between world powers. Gabbard didn't cite any countries by name but her remarks echoed longtime claims by Russian officials and, more recently, by far-right commentators in the US who have warned that a Ukrainian drone attack on Russia's strategic bomber fleet earlier this month made nuclear war more likely.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
Plaid Cymru has called for the First Minister of Wales to condemn the UK government for 'betraying Wales' on rail funding. Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.

Miami Herald
39 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Telegram Messenger's Ties to Russia's FSB Revealed in New Report
The Telegram messaging app may have ties to Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB), according to an investigation. Independent Russian investigative outlet IStories said it has uncovered evidence suggesting that the platform's server infrastructure is maintained by companies who have collaborated with Russian intelligence services, raising significant concerns about potential government surveillance. Responding to a request for comment, Telegram's head of Press and Media Relations Remi Vaughn said in a statement to Newsweek: "As a global company, Telegram has contracts with dozens of different service providers around the world. However, none of these service providers have access to Telegram data or sensitive infrastructure. "All Telegram servers belong to Telegram and are maintained by Telegram employees. Unauthorized access is impossible. Throughout its entire history, Telegram never disclosed any private messages to a third party - and its encryption has never been breached." In another auto-message sent after reaching out for comment, Telegram said: "Telegram is committed to protecting user privacy and human rights such as freedom of speech and assembly. It has played a prominent role in pro-democracy movements around the world, including in Iran, Russia, Belarus, Myanmar and Hong Kong. "Pavel Durov is the founder, owner and CEO of Telegram. He left Russia in 2014, after losing control of his previous company for refusing to hand over the data of Ukrainian protesters to security agencies. Pavel Durov lives in Dubai and holds a dual citizenship of the United Arab Emirates and France." Telegram has long held a reputation as a secure messaging app, and it is used globally by journalists, activists, and ordinary users seeking privacy. Its founder, Russian-born Pavel Durov, who was detained by French authorities in August 2024, has cultivated an image that the platform protects digital privacy. The IStories report challenges that image by linking the platform to Russia's FSB, which jails individuals critical of the Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Telegram's infrastructure is managed by Global Network Management (GNM), a small firm registered in Antigua and Barbuda, which provides the platform with over 10,000 IP addresses, according to IStories. GNM's owner, Russian national Vladimir Vedeneyev, previously testified in a U.S. court that he has employees based in Russia. IStories also found that Vedeneyev serves as Telegram's chief financial officer. Many of these IP addresses were previously owned by Globalnet, a St. Petersburg-based telecommunications operator. IStories reported that Globalnet has connections to the Kremlin and Russian intelligence services, including the FSB. Electrontelecom, a St. Petersburg-based company, also reportedly provided Telegram with another 5,000 IP addresses, according to IStories, which identified the firm as an FSB contractor. Electrontelecom has provided services for the installation and maintenance of "a complex system for transmitting classified information from fixed facilities operated by the FSB's Directorate for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region, which is used to carry out operational investigative activities," it said. The investigation comes days after Russian human rights NGO First Department warned that the FSB had gained access to Russians' communication with Ukrainian Telegram channels, which provide vital updates and reporting on Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. "We know that by the time the defendants in cases of 'state treason' are detained, the FSB is already in possession of their correspondence. And the fact that neither defendants nor a lawyer are named in the main case allows the FSB to hide how exactly it goes about gaining access to that correspondence," First Department said. First Department head Dmitry Zair-Bek said that material from Telegram had already been used as evidence in "a significant number of cases." "On most cases, they have been accessed due to compromised devices. ... However, there are also cases in which no credible technical explanations consistent with known access methods can be identified," he said, Novaya Gazeta reported. "This could indicate either the use of undisclosed cyber espionage tools or Telegram's cooperation with the Russian authorities, obvious signs of which we see in a number of other areas," Zair-Bek added. Cybersecurity expert Michał Woźniak told IStories that beyond storing decrypted messages, Telegram also attaches a unique device identifier to each message sent on the platform, known as auth_key_id, which can determine where a user is located and reveal their IP addresses. "If someone has access to Telegram traffic and cooperates with Russian intelligence services, this means that the device identifier becomes a really big problem-a tool for global surveillance of messenger users, regardless of where they are and what server they connect to," Woźniak said. Telegram has not commented publicly on the investigation or the allegations. The company is being paid $300 million to roll out Elon Musk's Grok chatbot on the messaging app. "This summer, Telegram users will gain access to the best AI technology on the market. @elonmusk and I have agreed to a 1-year partnership to bring xAI's @grok to our billion+ users and integrate it across all Telegram apps," Durov announced on May 28. Related Articles Russia Expands Military Cooperation with North KoreaIsrael Denies Envoy's Claim of Patriot Defenses Given to UkraineNATO Ally Scraps Purchase of US Black Hawk Helicopters'Trump Is Losing,' Putin's Top Propagandist Says 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.