logo
U.K. Authorities Probing Possible Putin ‘Sabotage' After Heathrow Airport Fire

U.K. Authorities Probing Possible Putin ‘Sabotage' After Heathrow Airport Fire

Yahoo21-03-2025

British counter-terrorism police are investigating possible sabotage following a huge blaze near London's Heathrow Airport, according to multiple reports.
The Thursday evening fire at an electrical substation in Hayes, near the airport west of the English capital, wiped out power at the busy travel hub and also knocked out its back-up energy system, causing travel chaos.
Thousands of buildings nearby were also left without power, and 150 people had to be evacuated from surrounding homes. Flames also caught hold of a transformer containing over 6,600 gallons of cooling fluid.
The fire is still burning and the airport, the fifth busiest in the world, is expected to be closed until at least midnight Friday. Firefighters said the cause of the blaze was not immediately known, but specialist cops in the U.K. are not ruling out bad actors, like Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The Times reported that counter-terrorism detectives from London's Metropolitan Police were hastily deployed to probe whether sabotage might have played a part. The paper's chief reporter, Fiona Hamilton, name-checked Russia in a message on X.
'Counter terrorism police put on Heathrow fire investigation to establish whether or not it is foul play,' she wrote. 'Any major incident like this is immediately escalated, particularly given threat of sabotage by Russia. Sources say precautionary and CT police often deployed like this.'
The BBC reported that the Met Police said there was 'currently no indication of foul play' but officers were keeping an 'open mind at this time.'
It is standard practice for several departments, including counter terrorism police, to investigate large scale incidents. Even still, British tabloids were more forthright in their finger pointing at the Kremlin. The Mail Online, the Daily Mail's online offering, asked in their headline: 'Is Russia behind Heathrow Airport closure?'
The publication quoted security expert Will Geddes, director and founder of the International Corporate Protection Group, who said: 'The Russians are looking at everything. They're looking at our fibre optics under the sea, they're looking at our nuclear power stations, we know hostile reconnaissance is going on right now.
'So for this to be taken down so easily and cause such an impact, one has got to say if I was Russia, that's where I would focus my attentions as well.'
Bob Seely, a Russia expert and former Conservative politician in the U.K., said it was 'likely' an accident, but added that Russia could not be ruled out. 'We should be building resilience into our critical national infrastructure, especially given the rise in Russian sabotage operations in Europe,' he told the Mail.
It comes after Richard Moore, head of Britain's Secret Intelligence Service known as MI6, in November accused Russia of waging a 'staggeringly reckless campaign' of sabotage in Europe.
During a speech in Paris, Moore said Putin and his acolytes were attempting 'to sow fear about the consequences of aiding Ukraine.'
And indeed, the incident attack comes after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer pledged ongoing support to Ukraine.
Last week, he hosted an online meeting between Western leaders dubbed the 'coalition of the willing,' those who are intent on seeing a Russia-Ukraine peace deal prevail. This preceded a meeting between European Union and U.K. delegates to discuss 'ways to dial up pressure on Russia.'
At the beginning of March, British and Ukrainian officials also signed the U.K.-Ukraine Bilateral agreement, paving the way for an almost $3 billion loan to bolster Ukrainian defense capabilities.
More recently, The Telegraph reported that the U.K. could send fighter jets to Ukraine to help protect its troops against ongoing aggression from Russia. The Prime Minister has already promised to put British troops on the ground if President Donald Trump is able to successfully negotiate a peace deal.
Russian Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov, meanwhile, said after an EU Summit on Friday that politicians on the continent have an 'obsession' with militarizing Europe. 'Their eyes, at least in public, reveal a fixation on militarizing Europe regardless of the consequences,' he said cryptically, according to TASS.
'The militarization of Europe is a very, very dangerous trend. It certainly does not bring us any closer to an easing of tensions or to the restoration of mutual trust; rather, it undermines security in Europe,' Peskov added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia's lead negotiator in Istanbul claims Russia's terms at 2022 talks with Ukraine were "softer"
Russia's lead negotiator in Istanbul claims Russia's terms at 2022 talks with Ukraine were "softer"

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Russia's lead negotiator in Istanbul claims Russia's terms at 2022 talks with Ukraine were "softer"

Vladimir Medinsky, the head of the Russian delegation at recent peace talks in Istanbul, has said that if Ukraine had agreed to Russia's terms in 2022, its terms would have been less harsh. Source: Medinsky in an interview with RT, the Russian state-controlled international news television network, as quoted by Russian media Details: Medinsky claimed that if Ukraine had been ready and "if it had been making its own decisions", a peace agreement could have been signed as early as 28 February 2022 and would have had "softer" terms than in 2025. After all, the pseudo-historian claimed, "all they wanted was for Ukraine not to join NATO and to say no to the deployment of foreign military bases on its territory". There had also been discussions about making Russian an official language in Ukraine, recognising the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (UOC-MP) and officially recognising Crimea as Russian, because, in Medinsky's fantasies, "that was the most democratically held referendum imaginable". Medinsky said that after the Russian delegation presented the draft treaty in 2022, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy "kept silent for two weeks" and met with representatives from the UK and the US during that time. The Russians were then told "Our foreign partners are opposed to us entering into the agreement – which we had already agreed on," Medinsky claims. Background: After the second round of talks on 2 June, Russian state news agencies published the text of Russia's "memorandum of settlement" with proposals for a ceasefire. In the memorandum, Russia has demanded the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, Luhansk and Kherson oblasts. It also calls for Ukraine's neutrality, a ban on the deployment of foreign troops on the territory of Ukraine, and its rejection of nuclear weapons. The New York Times reported, citing sources and the relevant draft agreements, that in April 2022, Russia effectively disrupted peace talks with Ukraine by inserting a clause in the draft agreement stating that it would have the right to veto the international community's response in the event of a repeat attack on Ukraine. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

Trump meant for National Guard deployment to act as a deterrent, White House says
Trump meant for National Guard deployment to act as a deterrent, White House says

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump meant for National Guard deployment to act as a deterrent, White House says

President Trump's tense, late-night phone call with Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday night came with a warning: 'Get the police in gear.' The president was being shown evidence by his staff of theft at a 7-Eleven and of federal law enforcement with lacerations. His patience would last less than 24 hours before federalizing the National Guard in a historic action. 'He told the governor to get it under control and watched again for another full day, 24 hours, where it got worse,' Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, told The Times in an interview. 'The assaults against federal law enforcement upticked, the violence grew, and the president took bold action on Saturday evening to protect federal detention spaces and federal buildings and federal personnel.' The president did so, Leavitt said, 'with the expectation that the deployment of the National Guard would hopefully prevent and deter some of this violence.' Read more: President Trump suggests Gov. Newsom should be arrested; Newsom decries 'step toward authoritarianism' The opposite occurred. The worst violence yet took place on Sunday, with some rioters torching and hurling concrete at police cars, hours after National Guard troops had arrived in Los Angeles County. The protests had been largely peaceful throughout Friday and Saturday, with isolated instances of violent activity. Leavitt said that Newsom and Karen Bass, the mayor of Los Angeles, have 'handicapped' the Los Angeles Police Department, "who are trying to do their jobs." Local leaders 'have refused to allow the local police department to work alongside the feds to enforce our nation's immigration laws, and to detain and arrest violent criminals who are on the streets of Los Angeles,' she said. The president and his so-called immigration czar, Tom Homan, have suggested that political leadership — including Newsom himself — could face arrest over 'obstructive' behavior. "It is a basic principle in this country that if you break the law, you will face a consequence for that," Leavitt said. "So if the governor obstructs federal enforcement, or breaks federal laws, then he is subjecting himself to arrest." Leavitt said she would not get ahead of Trump on whether he will invoke the Insurrection Act, a law that allows the president to suspend Posse Comitatus, which prohibits the military from engaging in local law enforcement. Read more: Downtown L.A. hit by widespread vandalism, damage as city struggles to calm unrest But she took note that, on Monday, the president referred to some of the rioters as insurrectionists, potentially laying the groundwork for an invocation of the law. 'The president is wisely keeping all options on the table, and will do what is necessary to restore law and order in California,' she said, 'and protect law-abiding American citizens. And federal immigration enforcement operations will continue in the city of Los Angeles, which has been completely overrun by illegal alien criminals that pose a public safety risk and need to be removed from the city.' The president's order, directing 2,000 National Guard troops to protect federal buildings in the city, allows for a 60-day deployment. Leavitt would not say how long the operation might last, but suggested it would continue until violence at the protests ends. 'I don't want to get ahead of the president on any decisions or timelines,' she said. 'I can tell you the White House is 100% focused on this. The president wants to solve the problem. And that means creating an environment where citizens, if they wish, are given the space and the right to peacefully protest.' 'And these violent disruptors and insurrectionists, as the president has called them, are not only doing a disservice to law-abiding citizens, but to those who wish to peacefully protest. That's a fundamental right this administration will always support and protect.' Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

No Russians on border of Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk oblasts
No Russians on border of Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk oblasts

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

No Russians on border of Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk oblasts

The Khortytsia Operational Strategic Group has denied Russian claims that they have reached the border of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. Source: Viktor Trehubov, spokesperson for the Khortytsia Operational Strategic Group, on the national joint 24/7 newscast on 9 June Quote from Trehubov: "No, there are no Russians on the border of Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk oblasts. Yes, there is fighting in the west of Donetsk Oblast, but the Russians have not reached the administrative border. Their reports about this are not true; they are lies." Details: Trehubov said there is significant Russian pressure along the entire length of the front line on the Pokrovsk front. There are always more than 50 combat engagements per day, whereas on other fronts there are fewer. He added that the Pokrovsk front has been Russia's main front for more than two years. Background: On 9 June, the Russian Ministry of Defence claimed that its units are "continuing to advance deep into the enemy's defence and have increased the area of liberated [sic] territories in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast". Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store