Legislation to decriminalise abortion for women clears the Commons
MPs voted 312 to 95, majority 217 to approve the Crime and Policing Bill at third reading on Wednesday.
This comes after the Commons backed Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment, which will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy.
The issue was treated as a matter of conscience, with MPs given a free vote and the Government remaining neutral.
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi (Chris McAndrew/PA)
Downing Street said the change to abortion laws must be 'workable and safe', following Tuesday's verdict.
MPs voted 379 to 137, majority 242, to back Ms Antoniazzi's amendment.
A No 10 spokesman said: 'We'll look at this in detail, considering whether any changes are necessary to make it workable and safe. But, of course, this would not change the intent of the amendment passed.'
The spokesman added: 'As with all laws, the Government has a responsibility to ensure it is safe and workable.'
The Bill will now undergo further scrutiny in the House of Lords.
It will also introduce a two-step verification process for the sale of knives and crossbows purchased online, and greater protections for emergency workers from racial and religious abuse during house calls are also included in the Bill.
Speaking during report stage on Tuesday, Ms Antoniazzi said she pushed for the change in the law after cases of women being investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions.
The Gower MP said: 'This is the right change at the right time. I implore colleagues who want to protect women and girls and abortion services to vote for new clause one.
'Let's ensure that not a single desperate woman ever again is subject to traumatic, criminal investigation at the worst moments in their lives.'
Medics or others who facilitate an abortion after the 24-week time limit could still face prosecution if the change becomes law.
Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment.
They included Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Defence Secretary John Healey, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, Environment Secretary Steve Reed, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, Wales Secretary Jo Stevens and Commons Leader Lucy Powell.
Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative front bench voted against it but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour.
Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence unless with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability.
It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is under 10 weeks pregnant.
Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th century law, the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Welfare reform marks moment of compassion, says Kendall amid backbench anger
Liz Kendall's words come amid a backlash from some Labour MPs who have criticised the 'awful' cuts to welfare – which the Government hopes can save up to £5 billion a year. The reforms – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – are set to include the tightening of criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), which is the main disability benefit, as well as a cut to the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC) and delayed access to only those aged 22 and over. Ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbench Labour MPs over their plans, with dozens of them last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'. In what could be seen as an attempt to head off some opposition, the legislation – known as the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – will give existing claimants a 13-week period of financial support. The Department for Work and Pensions said this will apply to those affected by changes to the Pip daily living component, including those who lose their eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer's element of UC. But campaigners, including disability equality charity Scope, said the longer transition period, up from an originally expected four weeks, 'will only temporarily delay a cut and disabled people will continue to be living with extra costs when it comes to an end'. Food bank network Trussell said: 'The last-minute details on protections offer something for a small proportion of people, but even they will still see a real-terms cut. 'The reality of this Bill is still record cuts in support for disabled people, and the biggest cuts to social security since 2015.' Contrary to Ms Kendall's words, learning disability charity Mencap accused the Government of having 'confirmed the choice to turn its back on thousands of disabled people and by pushing ahead with these welfare reforms, they are causing a huge amount of anxiety'. Ms Kendall said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. 'This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change.' As the Bill was formally introduced to the Commons on Wednesday, and the question asked as to what the next date for debate will be, Labour backbencher and former shadow chancellor John McDonnell could be heard to say 'Never'. A date has not yet been confirmed. I'll vote against these awful welfare reforms. A Labour government should lift people out of poverty, not put people into it. If you agree, then please write to your MP and tell them that. — Brian Leishman (@BrianLeishmanMP) June 17, 2025 Louise Murphy, senior economist at the Resolution Foundation think tank said the longer period of protection for those affected by Pip cuts is 'a sensible tweak that should ease the blow for those who are no longer eligible for support'. But she criticised extra funding for employment support not coming fully into effect until 2029 at the earliest, saying: 'While ministers have softened the stick of welfare cuts, they have not strengthened the carrot of greater employment support.' Sir Keir Starmer said he was 'determined' to ensure the reforms go through because he feels the welfare system 'doesn't work for anyone'. 'It doesn't work for those that want to get back to work, and it certainly doesn't work for the taxpayer,' the Prime Minister told Good Morning Britain, saying 'those that need to be protected should be protected'. 'If you need help in support to get into work, the Government should be providing that support and help to get into work,' he said. 'If you do have conditions, disabilities that mean it is impossible for you to work, then you need to be properly protected and supported.' Ms Kendall said her 'door was always open' to colleagues but that the Government is 'firm in our convictions' over the changes. 'I'm a reasonable person who wants to talk to my colleagues,' she told BBC Radio 4's PM programme, adding that she will 'always listen' but that 'we are firm in our convictions of the case for reform and confident in the plans that we have put forward'. The latest data, published on Tuesday, showed that more than 3.7 million people in England and Wales are claiming Pip, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion. (PA Graphics) The figures, published by the Department for Work and Pensions, showed there were a record 3.74 million people in England and Wales claiming Pip as of April this year. The figure is up from 3.69 million in January and a jump of 200,000 from 3.54 million a year earlier. Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number stood at 2.05 million. Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall leaves Downing Street after a Cabinet meeting (Stefan Rousseau/PA) An impact assessment published alongside Wednesday's Bill introduction, confirmed previously published estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Ms Kendall previously said there are 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year'. The impact assessment also confirmed a previous estimate that some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/2030, although the Government repeated that this does not take into account the potentially positive impact of £1 billion annual funding by then for measures to support people into work. Changes to UC are expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. But the Government said around 3.9 million households not on the UC health element are expected to have an average annual gain of £265 from the increase in the standard UC allowance. While all of the Bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland. The Government said there are equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland included in the Bill.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Welsh Government urged to invest in apprenticeships
The call comes in response to chancellor Rachel Reeves' announcement of £1.2 billion in annual funding for training and apprenticeships for over a million young people in England. The National Training Federation for Wales (NTFW) wants a similar commitment from the Welsh Government, which is set to receive £23 billion from the UK Government. Data from Medr, the regulator and funder of tertiary education and research in Wales, indicates that 1,880 fewer learners started apprenticeships in Wales between last August and January. The NTFW has consistently raised concerns about the potential impact of not replacing European funding for apprenticeships post-Brexit. Some sectors have been hit harder than others, with construction seeing a 26 per cent decline and health and social care experiencing a 10.5 per cent reduction in apprenticeship starts. Despite funding cuts, Wales has one of the UK's most successful apprenticeship programmes, with a completion rate of 74 per cent, outperforming England (61 per cent) and Northern Ireland (62 per cent). According to the Centre for Economics and Business Research, doubling investment in apprenticeships over the next Senedd term could generate an additional £3.4 billion in lifetime earnings for people in Wales over the next 30 years. The NTFW's call for more investment follows a meeting with Jack Sargent, the Wales minister for culture, skills, and social partnership. Lisa Mytton, NTFW's strategic director, said: "The Welsh Government could achieve crucial economic, health, and education priorities by investing more in apprenticeships and replacing lost European funding. 'Greater investment will create pathways for people of all backgrounds, whether starting their careers or reskilling for new opportunities, to thrive in industries essential to Wales' long-term prosperity."
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Call for action on ‘fleecehold scandal' from Senedd members
Hefin David warned people living on Redrow's Cwm Calon estate in Ystrad Mynach have just had their third increase in as many years. The Caerphilly Senedd member said the management company, Meadfleet, provides a disgracefully substandard service in return. Dr David told the Senedd that residents need an opportunity to change management company and make complaints to get the improvements But he cautioned that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act, which would give people more power to challenge estate management companies, has yet to be operationalised. Dr David pointed to statistics from the Competition and Markets Authority, which show that 80 per cent of new developments are subject to leasehold. He said: 'We need to think about what more we can do to prevent more unadopted estates from becoming the norm before we act. There are too many in Wales… in that position.' He supported a private members' bill, introduced by his Labour colleague Alistair Strathern in Westminster, which would go further than the law introduced by the Conservatives. Quizzing Wales' first minister in the Senedd on June 17, Dr David welcomed the 'very good' recommendations of a petitions committee report on the so-called fleecehold scandal. The politician urged the Welsh Government to press UK ministers, 'so these scandals across Wales and the UK can be prevented from happening in the future'. Eluned Morgan, who has served as first minister since August, acknowledged that leaseholders have faced long-running issues with estate management charges. 'People are struggling with the cost of living… without this kind of thing on top,' she said. Baroness Morgan told Senedd members that housing secretary Jayne Bryant will set out the Welsh Government's response to the petitions committee's recommendations in July. She added that the UK Government intends to go further by introducing a new leasehold and commonhold reform bill by the end of the year to 'plug gaps left by the last government'. Laura Anne Jones, the Conservatives' shadow housing secretary, urged governments at both ends of the M4 to 'get to grips' with the Wales-wide problem.
