logo
UK to Fast-Track First New Reservoirs as Water-Supply Risks Loom

UK to Fast-Track First New Reservoirs as Water-Supply Risks Loom

Bloomberg28-05-2025

The UK is fast-tracking the approval process for new reservoirs — the first in 30 years — as it seeks to secure water supplies for housing projects.
The move means central government has taken control of the planning process from local authorities for two reservoirs in East Anglia and Lincolnshire, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said Wednesday. The development is part of a broader plan to build nine new reservoirs to supply water to 1.5 million new homes in Britain by the end of the current parliament.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top Tory Left Red-Faced After Unearthed Clips Shows Him Backing Liz Truss's Mini-Budget
Top Tory Left Red-Faced After Unearthed Clips Shows Him Backing Liz Truss's Mini-Budget

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Top Tory Left Red-Faced After Unearthed Clips Shows Him Backing Liz Truss's Mini-Budget

A senior Tory has been left embarrassed after an unearthed clip showed him defending Liz Truss' mini-Budget. Chris Philp was chief secretary to the Treasury when the former prime minister's unfunded tax cuts caused economic chaos. The shadow home secretary has since repeatedly insisted that he made clear his concerns about the plans behind the scenes. But an interview from the time has now emerged showing Philp denying there had been any 'mistakes' in the mini-Budget, even after its disastrous repercussions was becoming clear. Appearing on Sky News on Sunday, Philp said the mini-Budget 'obviously had a bad impact'. He said: 'I opposed the way it was constructed, I was arguing for spending restraint. Those warnings were sadly not listened to.' But back in September 2022, in the aftermath of the economic crisis sparked by the mini-Budget, Philp was asked by BBC Breakfast's Charlie Stayt whether 'there were any mistakes' in it. He replied: 'No, I don't think so. Let me be clear; no, I don't think so.' Chris Philp now says "he was arguing for spending restraint in the mini-budget." 🤔Charlie Stayt(29/09/22): Were there any mistakes in Kwasi Kwarteng's mini budget? Chris Philp(Chief Secretary to the Treasury): No.#TrevorPhillips# — Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) June 8, 2025 Chris Philp Tried To Attack Labour's Response To Immigration – But There Are Receipts Chris Philp Has Criticised Liz Truss's Mini-Budget And People Are Making The Same Point Labour Minister Destroys Chris Philp With 1 Devastating Reminder About The Tories' Approach To China

Why is the Mayor turning back the clock on e-vans?
Why is the Mayor turning back the clock on e-vans?

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why is the Mayor turning back the clock on e-vans?

London has made huge strides in cleaning up its air since Oxford Street was named the world's most polluted road as recently as 2013. Notorious pollution hotspots such as Putney High Street once breached annual legal limits for diesel-related emissions just a few days into January but now stay compliant all year round. For that the Mayor can rightly take some credit, for greening London's bus fleet and for encouraging and supporting black cab drivers to swap diesel for electric taxis. But in one area there has been much more painful progress — delivery vans. The UK lags behind other western European countries in the uptake of electric vans. According to Oliver Lord, who leads the Clean Cities Campaign in the UK, diesel freight vehicles — especially vans — are now the biggest road transport contributor to harmful NOx emissions in central London. Progress in persuading the legions of small and medium-sized enterprises that are the backbone of London's economy to convert to green alternatives has been slow. That some have begun to do so is in no small measure down to the exemption from the congestion charge that electric vehicles have enjoyed since 2019. For companies operating vans zipping in and out of central London daily the savings can run to thousands of pounds a year. So at a time when they are being crushed by the burden of a multitude of extra costs — rents, rates, energy bills, the rising minimum wage and many more — the 100 per cent discount on the congestion charge is a welcome relief. But in just over six months it will be gone — and with it the biggest single fiscal incentive to switching to electric. Transport for London last week launched a consultation on plans to end the exemption for electric vehicles, known as the Cleaner Vehicle Discount, from the New Year. Under its proposals owners of electric vans and other commercial vehicles will instead get only a 50 per cent discount from the new headline daily rate of £18, in itself a 20 per cent rise. That will result in the daily charge for vans shooting up from zero to £9. Small business owners contacted by the Standard have expressed their dismay at this extra cost at a time of tiny wafer-thin margins. At best it will slow up the conversion of van fleets from diesel to electric even further. At worst, some SME bosses who have gone green are considering reverting back to diesel when their lease deals expire. Matt Jaffa, the London spokesman for the Federation of Small Business, said: 'We urge the Mayor to maintain a zero charge for small businesses that use electric vans. The higher upfront costs for new electric vehicles and the uncertain residual values for second-hand electric cars and vans already put them out of the financial reach of many small businesses. Still, the lower charges they are subject to in congestion zones act as a strong argument in their favour. Significantly reducing this benefit will de-incentivise small business fleets which would otherwise have given serious consideration to swapping over to a greener vehicle.' Cleaner Cities' Lord said: 'We have a very clear message to the Mayor. He needs to keep the 100 per cent EV discount and maximise the help to those who need it the most. And that is the smaller companies.' Anoma Radkevitch, owner of florists Bloomsbury Flowers, fears the changes proposed by TfL could cost her as much as £6,500 a year. She currently operates three diesel vans, one electric van and an electric car. Her vehicles buzz in and out of central London every day as she and her staff deliver bouquets and refresh blooms. She said: 'Now that incentive has gone I don't think I can afford to change over to electric. The congestion charge exemption was the big draw before. 'Because electricity prices are so high I wasn't making a big saving on the diesel. I am considering going back to diesel.' Other small business bosses made the same plea in a video released by Cleaner Cities. Matthew Connolly, founder and CEO of laundry delivery service Ihatelaundry, said: 'My message for the mayor on this issue is please please do the right thing. We can't afford to pay their congestion charge.' Paul Arrigo, CEO of seed importer Seeds of Italy, said: 'We like our electric van because it's convenient, it's environmentally friendly, it reduces costs for us as well. We need this little gesture to be able to continue.' TfL's consultation began on May 27 and runs through to August 4 with a final decision expected in the early autumn. TfL has been adamant its proposed new regime will continue to keep a lid on congestion in central London while providing 'ongoing support to those who need to drive in the zone to make the switch to an electric vehicle'. But for thousands of small businesses that did the right thing by converting to electric vans and now face paying an extra £9 a day to make unavoidable road journeys into central London it is just another unwelcome burden. Leading The Charge is supported by commercial partners, which share the project's aims, but our journalism remains editorially independent Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Slurry lagoon plans raise smell and access concern
Slurry lagoon plans raise smell and access concern

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Slurry lagoon plans raise smell and access concern

Concerns have been raised over plans for a slurry lagoon in Cornwall. A Cornwall Council planning committee is set to review the application from Richard Best - which is seeking permission for an earth-banked slurry lagoon at a farm site in Hatt, near Saltash. The lagoon would provide up to five months of storage and lie approximately 280m (918.6ft) to the south west of the nearest neighbouring residential property, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. The plans have been objected to by Botus Fleming Parish Council, which had concerns about the smell, potential contamination of a water course and highways impact. Slurry is a mixture of water and animal manure, which is spread on the land as a natural fertiliser. A council planning report said the scheme would not result in any significant adverse impacts to the living conditions currently enjoyed by neighbours and had been earmarked for approval. In its objection, Botus Fleming Parish Council said it was not clear how the slurry would be transported to the site. The land is just off the A388, but concerns about large tankers driving down narrow rural roads locally used by walkers, horse riders and other motorists were raised by the council. It added residents currently suffered from the stench of slurry across the wider farming site. "They suffer headaches and coughs from the air pollution that is generated around their homes, their eyes sting and they have good reasons to fear the long-term consequences for their health," the council said. More news stories for Cornwall Listen to the latest news for Cornwall An odour impact assessment had been submitted and the council's public protection team had raised no objections from a consultation. The Cornwall Wildlife Trust has also been consulted as the site is near the Villaton Wood County Wildlife Site, with the charity making recommendations to ensure wildlife is protected during construction. The Environment Agency (EA) had no objection to the plans, which it said would ensure the farm operated with sufficient storage for slurry. "Nonetheless, the proposal must operate in accordance with the relevant regulations," the agency added. Follow BBC Cornwall on X, Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to spotlight@ Warning as slurry pollutes stream near beach Cows rescued from slurry pit in Cornwall Shetland pony rescued from slurry pit Cornwall Council

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store