NWI environmental groups praise cancellation of plastic waste facility
Just Transition Northwest Indiana and Gary Advocates for Responsible Development were two organizations that praised an April 3 announcement from International Recycling Group that it's canceling its proposed plastic waste facility.
International Recycling Group could not be reached for comment Monday.
The proposed facility would have operated in Erie, Pennsylvania, and collected plastic waste from a 750-mile radius and turned waste into smaller plastic pieces to be burned in steel mills, according to a news release from Beyond Plastics.
Activists believed U.S. Steel's Gary Works facility would have been included in the project, but the company was not specifically named in the project.
In August, a spokesman for U.S. Steel told the Post-Tribune that any announcement of involvement would come from the company, but U.S. Steel never announced its involvement, according to the company's website.
The steel company declined to comment on the project cancellation Monday.
'We are always seeking ways to improve the environment, increase our recycling efforts and reduce fossil fuel use,' said an August statement to the Post-Tribune. 'Opportunities are reviewed and vetted by our operations and environmental teams based on the safety, environmental and operational merits of any individual project.'
Dorreen Carey, GARD president, said in a statement that she was pleased by the decision not to continue the project because of how it might impact Northwest Indiana.
'Burning plastic waste in the blast furnace would have emitted additional health harming toxic emissions to the already polluted air of Gary and surrounding Northwest Indiana communities,' Carey said.
In 2019, four of Indiana's top 10 highest polluting industrial facilities were in Northwest Indiana, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Indiana led the nation in toxic pollution emitted per square mile.
Susan Thomas, director of policy and press for Just Transition Northwest Indiana, said in a statement that the project was a false solution and greenwashing attempt.
'This project would have exacerbated toxic emissions in Northwest Indiana, harming regional health and the environment and furthering the 'sacrifice zone' status,' Thomas said. 'This is a stigma that industrial communities here are working mightily to counter. Just Transition Northwest Indiana is proud to be part of a unified multi-state, multi-organizational effort to stop this scheme and demand real solutions that uplift environmental justice.'
In August, 106 environmental and community groups submitted a letter to former U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, asking her to withdraw a $182.6 million loan guarantee for the proposed plastic waste facility.
Funding for the grant came from climate funding provided through the Inflation Reduction Act, according to Beyond Plastics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
11 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Wind Empire Strikes Back
It's been all of a month since Congress passed its big tax bill, and already some Republicans are trying to undermine its better parts. Behold how Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley and Utah's John Curtis are taking President Trump's Treasury nominees hostage to help their solar and wind friends. The tax bill phases out the Inflation Reduction Act's turbocharged tax credits for solar and wind projects. Many conservative Members wanted to end the tax credits immediately but compromised by letting projects qualify if they begin operating by the end of 2027. Alternatively, they can qualify if they 'begin construction' by next July 4. To pass the bill, Mr. Trump promised to ensure that wind and solar projects couldn't dodge the deadlines. On July 7, he directed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to publish guidance within 45 days 'to ensure that policies concerning the 'beginning of construction' are not circumvented.' Enter Sens. Grassley and Curtis, who have put holds on Treasury nominees Brian Morrissey Jr. (general counsel), Francis Brooke (assistant secretary) and Jonathan McKernan (under secretary) to pressure the department to write a broad rule that lets projects qualify even if they haven't, well, begun construction.
Business Insider
18 hours ago
- Business Insider
Mark Cuban says companies should be taxed more for buying back their own shares
In an X post on Tuesday, the billionaire investor said raising the federal tax on the practice would push companies to reinvest in their businesses and hit wealthy shareholders — including himself — the hardest. The "Shark Tank" star called it "a way to charge the biggest public companies more" while shifting incentives toward long-term growth. Stock buybacks, also called share repurchases, happen when a company buys back its stock from investors, often reducing the number of shares in circulation. This can boost earnings per share and, in turn, the stock price, benefiting remaining shareholders. Critics say the practice can prioritize short-term gains over long-term investment. American companies bought back $166 billion in shares in July — the highest July total on record — bringing the year-to-date tally to $926 billion, surpassing the previous year-to-date record set in 2022 by $108 billion, per data from stock market research firm Birinyi Associates. The US has had a 1% tax on stock repurchases on publicly traded corporations since the Inflation Reduction Act, which took effect on January 1, 2023. Cuban said that a higher tax could encourage firms to use the cash to expand or pay dividends to shareholders, which he said would be tax-free for many Americans. "Married households making under 94k pay no taxes on it," Cuban wrote. "If I own it. I pay full taxes." In a follow-up X post, Cuban suggested exempting companies from the higher tax if they distributed repurchased shares to all employees, from interns to the CEO, based on each worker's share of total annual cash earnings. He said this would be a "baby step" toward reducing income inequality and boosting workers' net worth. A market correction could encourage more buybacks Citi predicted in a March note that there would be $1 trillion in buybacks for the year, up 11% from about $900 billion in 2024. The bank said market declines could spur more repurchases, as companies seize the chance to buy their shares at discounted levels. Citi said large firms like Apple, Alphabet, Nvidia, Wells Fargo, and Visa repurchased roughly $190 billion in stock last year alone. Citi's forecast came before a series of market warnings from Wall Street strategists. Analysts at BTIG, Evercore ISI, Stifel, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo have all flagged the potential for a correction in the S&P 500 in the coming months. They cited stretched valuations, seasonal weakness in August and September, and uncertainty over tariffs' economic impact.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
The EPA wants to roll back climate regulations. Here's how Hoosiers can have a say
Hoosiers have limited time to voice their opinions as the U.S. EPA prepares to roll back rules meant to curb the effects of greenhouse gas emissions. The announcement in Indianapolis last month to rescind a major climate rule was one of the Trump administration's many pushes to deregulate major greenhouse gas polluters — in this case, the transportation industry. And with a rich history of auto manufacturing, Indiana stands to benefit, according to a statement made by U.S. Rep. Jim Baird during the announcement. Meanwhile, Americans will become more vulnerable, said Shannon Anderson, the director of advocacy at Earth Charter Indiana. While greenhouse gas emissions are not directly toxic to human health, they are the driver behind human-caused climate change, which is exacerbating the frequency and intensity of natural disasters across the globe. 'People sometimes feel like climate change is a problem that's coming later, but we're starting to experience it now,' Anderson said. She pointed to extreme heat events and increased flooding across the continent. Sam Carpenter, the executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, warned denial of climate science is bad for individual Hoosiers, communities, and the economy. The EPA has regulated greenhouse gases for over 15 years, but now the agency wants to quash a 2009 ruling that anchors its ability to fight climate change. The agency will no longer regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants or oil and gas operations. And all greenhouse gas standards for new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines will be repealed, according to the EPA. Before the ruling is finalized, the public has until Sept. 15, 2025, to submit comments on the proposal. Indiana's role in greenhouse gas emissions Indiana's greenhouse gas emissions — which come from compounds like carbon and methane — are hefty compared to similar states. Indiana releases the most energy-related greenhouse gases per capita in the Midwest and eighth in the nation, according to the HEC. About 21 percent of Indiana's total emissions come from the state's transportation sector. But as a desire to mitigate climate change impacted consumer choice and federal policy, like the Inflation Reduction Act, Indiana became a leader in electric vehicle manufacturing. Related industries now employ over 240,000 Hoosiers. The repeal of greenhouse gas emission standards could reduce the incentives helping Indiana pursue electric vehicles and battery manufacturing. 'We were starting to get a foothold in the U.S. under the Inflation Reduction Act, and Indiana has benefited mightily from those investments,' said Carpenter of HEC, nodding to the state's push toward clean energy. 'That's all being kind of pushed away through the current stance of denial on climate change. And so, it really has impacts on our health, on our communities, and in our economy.' How to get a word in Despite the agency's new stance on regulating greenhouse gases, 74 percent of Americans think that carbon dioxide should be regulated as a pollutant, according to the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Anderson thinks the EPA will soon have to face the masses during the required public comment period, where the agency must consider input before the ruling is finalized. 'We know there are so many Americans who stand with us on this issue, and it won't even take all of them to speak out on this, but as many as possible that are willing to just take a minute to write a public comment, to send a message to their legislators, that can be tremendously powerful,' Anderson said. The EPA is "going to have to acknowledge that they are flying in the face of overwhelming public consensus.' The public can submit written comments to the EPA through an online portal, email or by mail. Earth Charter Indiana also created a toolkit to help Hoosiers find out how to comment and contact their elected officials. Comments are due Sept. 15, 2025. IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. Sophie Hartley is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach her at or on X at @sophienhartley. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: The EPA is rescinding climate regulations. Here's what that means for you Solve the daily Crossword
