logo
In-depth: iQOO, Poco outpaced parents in India. Can sub-brands continue this momentum?

In-depth: iQOO, Poco outpaced parents in India. Can sub-brands continue this momentum?

Time of India17 hours ago

NEW DELHI:
iQOO
and
Poco
have proven beneficial for their parents,
Vivo
and
Xiaomi
, helping penetrate deeper into online channels and certain demographics in the last two to three years. However, a broader market stagnation, demand saturation in urban regions, and flailing online channel sales have impacted nearly all brands, with Vivo being the only outlier.
iQOO, launched in 2020, and Poco, launched in 2018, have a targeted portfolio of smartphones, backed by retail strategies, that cater to niche demographies such as Gen-Z and gamers, discouraging competition with the parent brand.
Vivo primarily operates as an offline-focused brand, selling smartphones at all price points. In contrast, iQOO began as an online-first brand, targeting the mid-premium gaming segment. Xiaomi commenced as an online-centric brand, but it has an omnichannel presence today, and utilises Poco to cater to entry-level online consumers seeking a balance of hardware-to-price performance.
'We're seeing sub-brands outperform their parent brands recently, and that's largely because they are growing from a lower base. But it's not just about scale, it's also about sharper focus. While the parent brands have broader portfolios aimed at multiple price tiers and consumer types, sub-brands are more targeted,' Shubham Nimkar, analyst at
Counterpoint Research
, told
ETTelecom
.
The market tracker's data shows that Poco's shipments grew strongly at 38% year-on-year in 2023, but moderated to 11% year-on-year in 2024. iQOO's volumes were, however, down by 34% year-on-year in 2023, but rose by 69% compared to the previous year in 2024.
Today, both brands cumulatively hold less than 10% market share. In the January-March 2025 quarter, iQOO had a 5% share, while Poco's share stood at 2% only.Counterpoint Research data.
Historically, Poco and iQOO had achieved a peak market share of 4% and 2% in Q2 2022 and Q3 2022, respectively. The latest data from the market tracker then implies that both sub-brands have not been able to take a substantial slice of the volume pie despite the market size primarily hovering between 150-155 million units in the last two years.
The International Data Corporation's (
IDC
) findings paint a more striking picture. Poco's volume share declined from 5.9% in Q1 2024 to just 4.3% in Q1 2025. During the same period, iQOO's share fell from 2.8% to 2.3%.
Poco declined to comment on ETTelecom's queries.
'At iQOO, our focus remains sharp on the ₹20,000 to ₹40,000 smartphone segment—where we cater to youth, young professionals, and heavy multitaskers,' Nipun Marya, CEO, iQOO India, told
ETTelecom
, adding that the brand has launched a variety of smartphones, including the iQOO Neo 10R, iQOO Neo 10, and iQOO Z10, to bring flagship-grade devices to the mass market.
'As we move through 2025, we are doubling down on performance, building smartphones that are optimised for intensive tasks like faster AI image generation, video editing, rendering, running multiple apps simultaneously, and handling office-grade productivity tools,' Marya said.
Mainline expansion crucial for future growth?
With that said, analysts and mainline retailers cautioned that both sub-brands should extensively revamp their marketing and retail strategies to grow substantially in the coming quarters.
"Having operated in the Indian smartphone market for a considerable period, both sub-brands are well-positioned for growth in the coming quarters."Upasana Joshi, principle analyst (smartphones, wearables and smart home research) for South Asia, IDC, told ETTelecom.
'Both iQOO and POCO have proven beneficial to their respective parent companies. Poco, now diversified into offline channels, is a strong contender in the entry-level segment, but needs more marketing efforts to expand further. Meanwhile, iQOO requires increased offline presence and offerings in the low-to-mid price segments,' she added.
IDC estimates that iQOO has an average selling price (ASP) of $220-240 (~₹18,800-20,500), compared to Poco's $115 (~₹9,800) in India.
Kailash Lakhyani, founder chairman of the
All India Mobile Retailers Association
(AIMRA) & founder member of Organized Retailers Association (ORA), told
ETTelecom
that Poco and iQOO are not providing sufficient handset stocks to mainline retailers, thereby impacting buyers.
'They are not bothered whether these stocks are selling through aggregators to the gray market and then to smaller retailers, ultimately reaching consumers,' Lakhyani said. 'Their primary aim is to compete with other online-centric brands such as Motorola, Samsung M & F Series, Vivo T series, and Oppo K series,' he added.
Delhi-based AIMRA represents 1.5 lakh mainline retailers, while ORA counts 20 members. They allege that Poco and iQOO's business practices are causing losses to the national exchequer.
Reshuffle in top 5 brands
Meanwhile, a separate story is playing out among the top five brands.
IDC found that Xiaomi's shipments (excluding Poco) fell by 42% year-on-year, pushing it to the sixth rank in India in Q1 2025, with a market share of 7.8%. First-ranked Vivo's shipments grew by 14.6% year-on-year, holding a 19.7% share.
'Xiaomi's reduced shipments stemmed from a combination of issues, including internal management changes, difficulties within their offline sales channels, a strategic reorganisation of their product portfolio that led to a leaner offering concentrated at the low end and hindered their expansion into mid-to-high price segments, and intense competition from rival brands,' Joshi said.
Counterpoint's Nimkar said that Xiaomi's shipments in the March 2025 quarter were weighed down by elevated inventory levels, with several of its key smartphones logging lower-than-expected sales, which prompted the brand to take a cautious approach by clearing its stock rather than pushing shipments into channels.
Per Counterpoint, Xiaomi had a peak share of 23% in Q1 2022, but has been losing ground to rivals since then, particularly Samsung and Vivo, which continue to retain their market leadership.
'Vivo's growth in the Indian smartphone market over the past three quarters can be attributed to its balanced product portfolio, consistent innovation in areas such as camera, battery, and fast charging, and its strong presence in the mainline retail channel,' he said of Vivo.
According to Counterpoint, Vivo is well-positioned to continue its momentum across all price segments, with a particular push in the premium segment through the expansion of the X and V-series models.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poco F7 to launch in India later this month: Here's what we know so far
Poco F7 to launch in India later this month: Here's what we know so far

Indian Express

time10 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Poco F7 to launch in India later this month: Here's what we know so far

Xiaomi sub-brand Poco on Friday, June 6, announced that it will be launching the Poco F7 in India sometime later this month. The news comes from the Indian e-commerce giant Flipkart, which recently put up a special microsite for the upcoming phone. The Flipkart page does not give away the launch date, but the URL does mention that the phone will be coming sometime this month. As of now, not much is known about the smartphone, but several leaks and rumours have hinted that the smartphone will likely be based on the China-exclusive Redmi Turbo 4 Pro. The Poco F7 is rumoured to be powered by Qualcomm's new Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, the mid-range chipset with flagship-like performance that made its debut on the iQOO Neo 10. This will likely be accompanied by a huge 6.83-inch flat LTPO AMOLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate, 1.5K resolution and 1,800 nits of brightness. If the Poco F7 is the same as the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro, the device will most likely come with HyperOS 2 based on Android 15 and have an optical in-display fingerprint scanner. Coming to the camera, the Poco F7 is rumoured to have a vertically aligned elliptical camera island that houses a Sony LYT-600 50MP primary camera in addition to an 8MP ultrawide shooter. Since this is a performance oriented device, it looks like the phone will be missing out on a telephoto shooter. The phone is also rumoured to come with up to 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM and 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage and will be backed by a 7,550mAh Silicon Carbon battery that changes at 90W. However, it is unlikely to get wireless charging support. While the Chinese variant comes in three colourways – Black, White and Green, it is unclear if these colour options will find their way to India. Like its predecessor, the Poco F7 will be priced somewhere between Rs 30,000 to Rs 35,000, but we will have to wait to know more.

In-depth: iQOO, Poco outpaced parents in India. Can sub-brands continue this momentum?
In-depth: iQOO, Poco outpaced parents in India. Can sub-brands continue this momentum?

Time of India

time17 hours ago

  • Time of India

In-depth: iQOO, Poco outpaced parents in India. Can sub-brands continue this momentum?

NEW DELHI: iQOO and Poco have proven beneficial for their parents, Vivo and Xiaomi , helping penetrate deeper into online channels and certain demographics in the last two to three years. However, a broader market stagnation, demand saturation in urban regions, and flailing online channel sales have impacted nearly all brands, with Vivo being the only outlier. iQOO, launched in 2020, and Poco, launched in 2018, have a targeted portfolio of smartphones, backed by retail strategies, that cater to niche demographies such as Gen-Z and gamers, discouraging competition with the parent brand. Vivo primarily operates as an offline-focused brand, selling smartphones at all price points. In contrast, iQOO began as an online-first brand, targeting the mid-premium gaming segment. Xiaomi commenced as an online-centric brand, but it has an omnichannel presence today, and utilises Poco to cater to entry-level online consumers seeking a balance of hardware-to-price performance. 'We're seeing sub-brands outperform their parent brands recently, and that's largely because they are growing from a lower base. But it's not just about scale, it's also about sharper focus. While the parent brands have broader portfolios aimed at multiple price tiers and consumer types, sub-brands are more targeted,' Shubham Nimkar, analyst at Counterpoint Research , told ETTelecom . The market tracker's data shows that Poco's shipments grew strongly at 38% year-on-year in 2023, but moderated to 11% year-on-year in 2024. iQOO's volumes were, however, down by 34% year-on-year in 2023, but rose by 69% compared to the previous year in 2024. Today, both brands cumulatively hold less than 10% market share. In the January-March 2025 quarter, iQOO had a 5% share, while Poco's share stood at 2% Research data. Historically, Poco and iQOO had achieved a peak market share of 4% and 2% in Q2 2022 and Q3 2022, respectively. The latest data from the market tracker then implies that both sub-brands have not been able to take a substantial slice of the volume pie despite the market size primarily hovering between 150-155 million units in the last two years. The International Data Corporation's ( IDC ) findings paint a more striking picture. Poco's volume share declined from 5.9% in Q1 2024 to just 4.3% in Q1 2025. During the same period, iQOO's share fell from 2.8% to 2.3%. Poco declined to comment on ETTelecom's queries. 'At iQOO, our focus remains sharp on the ₹20,000 to ₹40,000 smartphone segment—where we cater to youth, young professionals, and heavy multitaskers,' Nipun Marya, CEO, iQOO India, told ETTelecom , adding that the brand has launched a variety of smartphones, including the iQOO Neo 10R, iQOO Neo 10, and iQOO Z10, to bring flagship-grade devices to the mass market. 'As we move through 2025, we are doubling down on performance, building smartphones that are optimised for intensive tasks like faster AI image generation, video editing, rendering, running multiple apps simultaneously, and handling office-grade productivity tools,' Marya said. Mainline expansion crucial for future growth? With that said, analysts and mainline retailers cautioned that both sub-brands should extensively revamp their marketing and retail strategies to grow substantially in the coming quarters. "Having operated in the Indian smartphone market for a considerable period, both sub-brands are well-positioned for growth in the coming quarters."Upasana Joshi, principle analyst (smartphones, wearables and smart home research) for South Asia, IDC, told ETTelecom. 'Both iQOO and POCO have proven beneficial to their respective parent companies. Poco, now diversified into offline channels, is a strong contender in the entry-level segment, but needs more marketing efforts to expand further. Meanwhile, iQOO requires increased offline presence and offerings in the low-to-mid price segments,' she added. IDC estimates that iQOO has an average selling price (ASP) of $220-240 (~₹18,800-20,500), compared to Poco's $115 (~₹9,800) in India. Kailash Lakhyani, founder chairman of the All India Mobile Retailers Association (AIMRA) & founder member of Organized Retailers Association (ORA), told ETTelecom that Poco and iQOO are not providing sufficient handset stocks to mainline retailers, thereby impacting buyers. 'They are not bothered whether these stocks are selling through aggregators to the gray market and then to smaller retailers, ultimately reaching consumers,' Lakhyani said. 'Their primary aim is to compete with other online-centric brands such as Motorola, Samsung M & F Series, Vivo T series, and Oppo K series,' he added. Delhi-based AIMRA represents 1.5 lakh mainline retailers, while ORA counts 20 members. They allege that Poco and iQOO's business practices are causing losses to the national exchequer. Reshuffle in top 5 brands Meanwhile, a separate story is playing out among the top five brands. IDC found that Xiaomi's shipments (excluding Poco) fell by 42% year-on-year, pushing it to the sixth rank in India in Q1 2025, with a market share of 7.8%. First-ranked Vivo's shipments grew by 14.6% year-on-year, holding a 19.7% share. 'Xiaomi's reduced shipments stemmed from a combination of issues, including internal management changes, difficulties within their offline sales channels, a strategic reorganisation of their product portfolio that led to a leaner offering concentrated at the low end and hindered their expansion into mid-to-high price segments, and intense competition from rival brands,' Joshi said. Counterpoint's Nimkar said that Xiaomi's shipments in the March 2025 quarter were weighed down by elevated inventory levels, with several of its key smartphones logging lower-than-expected sales, which prompted the brand to take a cautious approach by clearing its stock rather than pushing shipments into channels. Per Counterpoint, Xiaomi had a peak share of 23% in Q1 2022, but has been losing ground to rivals since then, particularly Samsung and Vivo, which continue to retain their market leadership. 'Vivo's growth in the Indian smartphone market over the past three quarters can be attributed to its balanced product portfolio, consistent innovation in areas such as camera, battery, and fast charging, and its strong presence in the mainline retail channel,' he said of Vivo. According to Counterpoint, Vivo is well-positioned to continue its momentum across all price segments, with a particular push in the premium segment through the expansion of the X and V-series models.

iPhone 16e vs OnePlus 13s: Two good phones and you gain some, you lose some
iPhone 16e vs OnePlus 13s: Two good phones and you gain some, you lose some

India Today

timea day ago

  • India Today

iPhone 16e vs OnePlus 13s: Two good phones and you gain some, you lose some

Slowly and steadily, we are witnessing a resurgence of compact smartphones in the market. Two phones launched in recent memory are the iPhone 16e — this one launched about three months ago. While, the other one launched earlier this week — the OnePlus 13s. In fact, Apple is not new to compact phones in a way. While it's true compact flagship phones were the iPhone 12 and 13 Mini, in the modern day and age, when you look at the standard iPhones too — the 6.1-inch models — those are also not big phones. In fact, Android phone makers market a Galaxy S25, S24, Xiaomi 14, 15, and the likes, with displays in the realm of 6.2 inches, as compact unlike iPhones, the common complaint among compact Android phones has been battery life. As good and handy as the Galaxy S25 is, or the S24 was, the battery life isn't among the best. The simple reason is — a compact phone can only fit in a decent-sized when it comes to iPhones, even with batteries ranging between 3,000mAh to 4,000mAh, the battery life has been stellar. And these are the standard 6.1-inch iPhones we are talking about — not even going to the Plus and Pro Max, which have battery life on another level. Read here - iPhone 16e review: Apple Intelligence and Visual Intelligence for the winWhich brings us to the current scenario. The OnePlus 13s is a modern-day Android phone, which is as compact as the iPhone 16e, but comes with a big 5,850mAh battery in a sleek and handy package. By the way, this is one of the first compact phones to come. Vivo is planning to bring its own compact flagship, rumoured to be the X200 FE, and similarly, we are pretty sure more will follow. But, that's a story for a different now, the iPhone 16e and OnePlus 13s are two compact phones, available for under Rs 60,000, from the iOS and Android camps. In both phones' cases, expect to see stellar battery life. And since we have established that both these phones have solid endurance, and this is one area you need not worry about. What are the other factors that you should keep in mind when choosing between the iPhone 16e and OnePlus 13s?As the headline says — two good phones and you gain some, you lose some. Let's break it 16e vs OnePlus 13s: Design and buildBoth the iPhone 16e and OnePlus 13s feature metal and glass sandwich designs. They have an aluminium frame, flat front and rear, and a sleek profile. The OnePlus 13s is a tad thicker and heavier than the 16e, but the difference isn't much. The iPhone also has a better IP68 dust and water resistance rating versus IP65 on the it comes to colour options, the iPhone 16e comes in black and white, while the OnePlus 13s is offered in more lively colours, like olive green, a beautiful pink, and an industrial black here - OnePlus 13s review: This small phone delivers big on every frontadvertisementOf course, looking at the design — from the front — the OnePlus 13s looks more modern, simply because of thinner bezels and a hole-punch cutout for the camera, something you can't say about the iPhone 16e, which comes with a notch. However, that notch has a big functionality advantage in the form of Face ID, aka IR-based face recognition, which is something Android phones design-wise, while it is easy to count the iPhone 16e out, for its notched look, it does have a big advantage. As for the OnePlus 13s, if you are willing to trade in Apple's Face ID system for an in-display fingerprint solution, then there's nothing like are good-looking devices, and it is only a matter of subjectivity — which one you like more. While the OnePlus 13s is definitely more modern looking, along with an extra camera at the back, the iPhone 16e is surely the more robust one with its IP68 16e vs OnePlus 13s: DisplayAs we keep moving up through the segments, it's going to get tougher to choose one over the other. Take for one — the display. The iPhone 16e, in simple words, has a 6.1-inch OLED display with 800 nits support in High Brightness Mode. On the other hand, the OnePlus 13s has a slightly larger 6.3-inch AMOLED display, with double the support in High Brightness Mode at 1,600 nits and double the screen refresh rate at 120Hz. This is, by the way, an LTPO AMOLED display, which supports variable refresh most folks out there, you won't even notice a thing when using both these phones' displays side by side. Honestly, both have nice and vibrant panels, with almost the same FHD+ resolutions. However, truth be told, the OnePlus 13s does have a big advantage in the brightness department, which will definitely show up under the bright sun. On a sunny day, the OnePlus 13s will be the brighter option over the 16e, hands down. As we mentioned, most folks will not even care about the brightness issue, and the 16e's brightness will suffice. However, in reality and in comparison, if a brighter display is what you want, not to mention a smoother one at that — 120Hz on the 13s and 60Hz on the 16e — the OnePlus here does have the upper 16e vs OnePlus 13s: Performance and batteryThis is where things get fascinating. On one hand, there's the iPhone 16e powered by the A18 chip, including a 6-core CPU and a 4-core GPU, paired with 8GB RAM and up to 512GB storage. On the other hand, there's the OnePlus 13s, powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, which is an 8-core CPU, paired with 12GB RAM and up to 512GB storage. Just looking at the numbers alone, you might think the OnePlus 13s has the upper hand. Well, it's not as easy as it be told, both phones offer top-tier performance, whether you are using the devices for casual tasks or for playing graphics-intensive games. Speaking of which, both chipsets come with support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games. This means games such as Asphalt 9: Legends and BGMI can take advantage of realistic-looking lighting effects and course, with all that raw power comes battery consumption. On paper, the iPhone 16e has a much smaller battery (4,050mAh) than the OnePlus 13s (5,850mAh). However, in the real world, because Android is a more resource-hungry OS in comparison to iOS, Android phones have generally used bigger batteries than iPhones. Having said that, one can expect to see a similar kind of battery life from both. A heavy user can easily expect to see at least a day's endurance on both when the choice comes down to which one performs better? This is going to be a hard one because both phones here are pretty evenly matched. However, we will give it to the OnePlus 13s, which comes with faster 80W charging, compared to the iPhone 16e's 20W support. That said, for what it's worth, the iPhone 16e has wireless charging, albeit at 7.5W 16e vs OnePlus 13s: SoftwareiPhone 16e comes with iOS 18 and, as it's seen with iPhones, expect to get at least 6–7 years of software support. For instance, the iPhone 11 from 2019, which is 6 years old, is set to receive the next-gen iOS update, so longevity-wise, Apple never disappoints when it comes to timely the Android world, while phone makers have gotten better with software updates, they are not as good as how Apple promises. For what it's worth, the OnePlus 13s is set to receive four major OS updates and six years of security top of this, both phones are loaded to the brim when it comes to AI features. While the iPhone 16e has the Apple Intelligence features, which include photo search, intelligent emoji creation (Genmoji), and AI processing on devices that focus on privacy. The OnePlus 13s comes with its own suite of AI features, like AI Detail Boost, Reflection Eraser, VoiceScribe, and also a productivity tool called Mind once again these phones are pretty evenly matched and are software-rich. Of course, longevity-wise, just in case you are that person who uses their device for at least five to six years, the iPhone 16e will get timely and assured software see, when it comes to software, there's not really a choice here as to which is better. It's simply a matter of preference — whether you prefer Android or iOS. Both have their own 16e vs OnePlus 13s: CameraStraight up in terms of numbers, the OnePlus 13s has more cameras and higher megapixel counts. There's a dual-camera setup at the back — 50-megapixel primary + 50-megapixel telephoto — along with a 32-megapixel selfie snapper. The iPhone 16e, on the other hand, has a single 48-megapixel rear camera along with a 12-megapixel snapper at the it comes to photography and videography, these phones are definitely not the best out there. But, since these are high-end phones, and high-end phone cameras in general have gotten so good, that in ideal conditions, both phones' cameras will perform they do have an advantage over one another. While the iPhone 16e has better video-recording capabilities, as iPhones are known for, the OnePlus 13s is a more versatile camera with the addition of that 50-megapixel telephoto lens, and not to mention a higher resolution front camera, that does slightly edge out the iPhone 16e in terms of 16e vs OnePlus 13s: Price in IndiaThe iPhone 16e, without any card offers, is officially priced at Rs 59,900, Rs 69,900, and Rs 89,900, for the 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB storage options, respectively. 8GB RAM is standard on all OnePlus 13s, on the other hand, is priced at Rs 54,999 and Rs 59,999, for the 256GB and 512GB storage options, respectively. 12GB RAM is standard on both 16e vs OnePlus 13s: It's a tough pickChoosing between the iPhone 16e and the OnePlus 13s isn't easy, and that's because both of these phones get the fundamentals right. If you're after a compact phone with solid battery life, sleek design, and reliable day-to-day performance, either option will serve you well. The iPhone 16e has the edge in terms of long-term software support, IP68 water and dust resistance, and more polished video recording. It also benefits from the Apple ecosystem, and features like Face ID offer a different level of security and ease. However, the 60Hz display feels a bit dated in 2025, and wired charging speeds are slow by today's the other hand, the OnePlus 13s offers more value on paper — a brighter, smoother display, faster charging, more RAM, and a versatile camera system with a telephoto lens. It also comes with more vibrant colour options and a sleeker front design. That said, it lacks the refinement of iOS, true water resistance, and wireless charging. So, your decision here really depends on what you prioritise more — software longevity and video chops or better hardware value and versatility on the Android side.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store