logo
Mamdani vows to lower costs but his ‘fix' is more lefty policies that drive them up

Mamdani vows to lower costs but his ‘fix' is more lefty policies that drive them up

New York Post6 hours ago

Zohran Mamdani drew support in Tuesday's primary for saying he'd make New York more affordable — yet he's mainly offering more of the policies that have made the city so expensive.
Gotham is unaffordable for many, but that's largely thanks to decades of Democratic policies that Mamdani wants to dramatically expand.
He promises 'to lower the cost of living for working-class New Yorkers,' offering free buses, CUNY tuition, child care, a freeze on rents and more.
That sounds great. Yet in reality, his free stuff would actually make the city worse, particularly for the people most desperate for relief.
Take his rent freeze. Owners of rent-regulated buildings can't keep up with their costs, thanks to lefty Mayor Bill de Blasio's years of rent freezes and restrictions by Albany progressives.
So they're holding apartments vacant rather than leasing them, because the rent they'd collect won't cover the cost of bringing them up to code.
Many landlords are poised to go under — or to walk away from their buildings.
Democrats have also opposed other efforts to boost the housing supply, like Mayor Eric Adams' City of Yes rezoning plan.
Yet Mamdani's rent freeze would only deepen the housing shortage. How will that help anyone seeking affordable housing?
Or take his free buses. The only way the MTA could even hope to run them would be to cut down on bus service and repairs.
Plus, buses would risk turning into mobile homeless shelters, as they have in other cities that tried this.
Riders would suffer big-time.
Are fares too high? Well, if Democrats would enforce farebeating, the MTA might be able to hold them down.
Yet Mamdani wants to defund the police. If he wins, expect farebeating to soar — and paying riders would have to pony up more to offset the lost fare revenue.
Dems are also known for their generous labor deals and regulatory burdens on businesses, which further drive up prices for consumers.
Count on Mamdani to accelerate that trend.
Does anyone truly think the cost of his proposed $30-an-hour wage minimum wage won't be passed along to consumers?
By his (likely lowball) estimates, his city-spending plans would cost a whopping $10 billion, money the city doesn't have and won't likely get.
Were Albany to hit businesses with his tax hikes, prices would rise further still.
Sure, Mamdani's promises of 'lower costs' will resonate in pricey New York if voters don't think through the consequences.
But if New Yorkers really want a more affordable city, they'll need leaders who oppose the Democratic policies that have only fueled Gotham's higher costs. The opposite of Mamdani, that is.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cringeworthy moment socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's rap video played during live interview: ‘Didn't think it would be on CNN'
Cringeworthy moment socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's rap video played during live interview: ‘Didn't think it would be on CNN'

New York Post

time32 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Cringeworthy moment socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's rap video played during live interview: ‘Didn't think it would be on CNN'

Watch as #NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani watches his past performance as a rapper and responds to critics who say he's not ready to run New York. He speaks one-on-one with @ErinBurnett . "I didn't think it was going to be on CNN." That was not music to his ears. Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani's 2019 rap video reached a national audience Thursday night — during an incredibly awkward moment on a live CNN interview that left the New York City mayoral hopeful visibly uncomfortable. Mamdani appeared on 'Erin Burnett OutFront' and the eponymous host used the C-grade hip-hop video as an introduction to the 33-year-old lefty pol who performed under the name 'Mr. Cardamom.' Advertisement 4 A shirtless Zohran Mamdani wears an apron during a 2019 rap video. The Queens assemblyman grimaced and flinched as the video began to play — attempting to laugh off the reminder of his blush-inducing attempt at a music career. 'Once you do it, it's out there,' Burnett said to Mamdani. Advertisement 'It's there. Didn't think it was going to be on CNN,' Mamdani said through a wincing smile. Burnett then pressed Mamdani, offering him a chance to respond to critics who suggest he is 'not ready now' to be mayor of the Big Apple. 'I would say a campaign offers a glimpse into what an administration would look like, and we built a campaign the likes of which the city has not seen in a long time,' Mamdani replied, eliding over Mr. Cardamom's performance entirely. 4 Mamdani dances to the song during a portion of the video. Advertisement 4 A group of children stand in the food truck during the rap video. Mamdani's vanilla rhetoric Thursday was a far cry from the spicy bars he would drop under his sobriquet — including some songs which gave outright endorsement of groups who supported the terror group Hamas. In the 2017 track 'Holy Land Five,' the presumptive Democratic mayoral candidate praised five men — known as the 'Holy Land Five' — from the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development who were convicted in 2008 of donating more than $12 million to Hamas. 'My love to the Holy Land Five. You better look 'em up,' Mamdani as Mr. Cardamom sang in a song called 'Salam.' Advertisement 4 The Queens assemblyman grimaced and flinched as the video began to play — attempting to laugh off the reminder of his blush-inducing attempt at a music career. Those five men — Shukri Abu Baker, Mohammad El-Mezain, Ghassan Elashi, Mufid Abdulqader and Abdulrahman Odeh — were convicted by the US Justice Department on 108 counts including supporting terrorism, tax fraud and money laundering. Mamdani and his paltry rapping chops got an ego-check from a real New York rapper — 50 Cent — who offered the Socialist $258,000 to drop out of the race and leave New York for good.

Rural schools feel the pinch from Trump administration's cuts to mental health grants
Rural schools feel the pinch from Trump administration's cuts to mental health grants

Boston Globe

time37 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Rural schools feel the pinch from Trump administration's cuts to mental health grants

Advertisement The $1 billion in grants for school-based mental health programs were part of a sweeping gun violence bill signed by President Joe Biden in 2022 in response to the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas. The grants were meant to help schools hire more psychologists, counselors and other mental health workers, especially in rural areas. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Under the Biden administration, the department prioritized applicants who showed how they would increase the number of providers from diverse backgrounds, or from communities directly served by the school district. But President Donald Trump's administration took issue with aspects of the grant programs that touched on race, saying they were harmful to students. 'We owe it to American families to ensure that taxpayer dollars are supporting evidence-based practices that are truly focused on improving students' mental health,' Education Department spokesperson Madi Biedermann said. Advertisement School districts around the US cut off training and retention programs Lustica learned of her grant's cancellation in April in a two-page letter from the Education Department, which said the government found that her work violated civil rights law. It did not specify how. Lustica is planning to appeal the decision. She rejected the letter's characterization of her work, saying she and her colleagues abide by a code of ethics that honors each person's individuality, regardless of race, gender or identity. 'The rhetoric is just false,' Lustica said. 'I don't know how else to say it. I think if you looked at these programs and looked at the impact that these programs have in our rural school districts, and the stories that kids will tell you about the mental health professionals that are in their schools, it has helped them because of this program.' The grants supported programs in districts across the country. In California, West Contra Costa Unified School District will lose nearly $4 million in funding. In Alabama, Birmingham City Schools was notified it would not receive the rest of a $15 million grant it was using to train, hire and retain mental health staff. In Wisconsin, the state's Department of Public Instruction will lose $8 million allocated for the next four years. The state had used the money to boost retention and expand programs to encourage high schoolers to pursue careers in school-based mental health. 'At a time when communities are urgently asking for help serving mental health needs, this decision is indefensible,' state superintendent Jill Underly said in a statement. In recent House and Senate hearings, Democrats pressed Education Secretary Linda McMahon on the end of the grants and the impact on students. McMahon told them mental health is a priority and the grants would be rebid and reissued. Advertisement 'Anyone who works or spends time with kids knows these grants were funding desperately needed access to mental health care services,' American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten said in a statement. 'Canceling the funding now is a cruel, reckless act that puts millions of children at risk.' Grant programs put more mental health specialists in schools The strains on youth mental health are acute in many rural school districts. In one upstate New York district, half the students have had to move due to economic hardship in the last five years, creating instability that can affect their mental health, Lustica said. In a survey of students from sixth through 12th grade in one county, nearly half reported feeling sad or depressed most of the time; one in three said their lives lacked clear purpose or meaning. 'We've got huge amounts of depression, huge amounts of anxiety, lots of trauma and not enough providers,' Lustica said. 'School is the place where kids are getting a lot of the services they need.' Some families in the region are unable to afford private counseling or are unable to get their children to appointments given transportation challenges, said Danielle Legg, a graduate student who did an internship as a school social worker with funding from the grant program. 'Their access to mental health care truly is limited to when they're in school and there's a provider there that can see them, and it's vital,' Legg said. In the past three years, 176 students completed their mental health training through the program Lustica oversees, and 85% of them were hired into shortage areas, she said. Advertisement The program that offered training to graduate students at schools helped address staffing needs and inspired many to pursue careers in educational settings, said Susan McGowan, a school social worker who supervised graduate students in Geneva City School District. 'It just feels, to me, really catastrophic,' McGowan said of the grant cancellation. 'These positions are difficult to fill, so when you get grad students who are willing to work hand in hand with other professionals in their building, you're actually building your capacity as far as staffing goes and you're supporting teachers.'

Supreme Court meets Friday to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship
Supreme Court meets Friday to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship

Boston Globe

time37 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Supreme Court meets Friday to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship

The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. Advertisement These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Decisions also are expected in several other important cases. The court seemed likely during arguments in April to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools. Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. Advertisement The justices also are weighing a three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana that is making its second trip to the Supreme Court. Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are considering whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act. Free speech rights are at the center of a case over a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography. Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking. Advertisement

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store