MPs push for Nkabane's return to Parliament to explain why she picked ANC allies to SETAs
Image: GCIS
Members of Parliament (MPs) are considering calling the now-fired Higher Education Minister, Dr. Nobuhle Nkabane, in her capacity as a private member, to explain what led her to appoint ANC-linked members to the controversial SETA boards.
Nkabane was fired on Monday by President Cyril Ramaphosa.
Ramaphosa has since appointed her deputy, Buti Manamela, as Minister of Higher Education and Training, with Dr. Nomusa Dube-Ncube named as deputy minister.
The reshuffle follows intense scrutiny of Nkabane's alleged role in misleading Parliament about the appointment process of Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) board members.
The appointments included individuals closely tied to the African National Congress (ANC), such as Buyambo Mantashe, son of Mineral Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe, and Dube-Ncube.
Last month, Ramaphosa requested a formal report from Nkabane regarding her conduct.
Even though Nkabane maintained that the appointments were lawful, opposition parties accused her of undermining transparency.
The Department of Higher Education and Training is currently briefing the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education on the alleged 'independent panel' for the selection and recommendation of SETA board appointments under Nkabane.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
IOL reported that Nkabane came under fire again after failing to appear before Parliament to account for the controversial appointments, which included several ANC allies.
Instead, she attended a gender-based violence (GBV) event at a Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) college in the Eastern Cape.
Nkabane sent a last-minute apology to the portfolio committee, citing the GBV event as the reason for her absence.
Her apology was rejected by committee chairperson Tebogo Letsie.
'After receiving the letter, I told her I am not accepting her apology,' Letsie said. 'It does not make sense for her to be absent from the meeting.'
Nkabane had been expected to brief MPs on the SETA board selection process, which was recently reversed.
Although she previously told MPs the selections were made by an 'independent' panel chaired by Advocate Terry Motau, Motau later denied any involvement.
Other members of the selection panel included her chief of staff, Nelisiwe Semane, and adviser Asisipho Solani, both of whom were absent from the previous meeting but have not attended the meeting.
Deputy Director-General Rhulani Ngwenya and Director-General Nkosinathi Sishi also failed to attend the meeting.
Letsie said while the committee welcomed Nkabane's removal, it would make little sense to have panelists read their statements into the record without allowing Nkabane a right of reply.
He said they thanked the panelists for attending and released them before proceeding to the next part of the meeting.
However, MPs disagreed with this move and voiced their legal concerns.
Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) MP Sanele Zondo said it was unfair to block members from expressing concerns.
'I think we got into this matter because there was a public outcry for some inconsistencies and the feeling that processes were flawed,' Zondo said.
'When we were deliberating, it was whether she lied under oath or misinterpreted the facts.'
He added that key players who influenced the minister were present and should be held accountable.
Democratic Alliance (DA) MP Karabo Khakhau demanded to see the legal opinion the committee was relying on.
'Once we all have that, I will call for a caucus break for all parties to consult their legal opinions,' she said.
'There's nothing stopping us from engaging Solani, Ngwenya, and the whole lot. There's also nothing stopping this committee from calling Nobuhle Nkabane back in her capacity as a private citizen to account for the role she played.'
DA MP Désirée van der Walt said: 'Every single person we summoned to appear before the committee was summoned based on their role. It has nothing to do with the previous minister or the new minister. Those who are present must present, and those who are not must still be called to do so. We are not going to let it go.'
Patriotic Alliance (PA) MP Ashley Sauls said: 'The answer is yes, the former minister must be held accountable. The question is whether that accountability should continue in this committee. There are other parliamentary processes where she can appear.'
Letsie reiterated that because Nkabane is no longer part of the executive, she falls outside the committee's jurisdiction.
'Whether she lied or not, there's nothing we will do because she's no longer in our space,' he said.
'There's a different committee that can now deal with that issue - the Ethics Committee.'
Parliamentary legal adviser Phumelela Ngema said there was nothing wrong with members calling on Nkabane to account.
'Chairperson, there is definitely nothing wrong with what the members have indicated in respect of their oversight functions,' she said.
'However, there is a difference between the purpose and the actual intention of the meeting today.'
She clarified that the department is still accountable to Parliament, but Nkabane no longer falls under Section 92 of the Constitution, which governs Cabinet accountability.
simon.majadibodu@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
8 minutes ago
- The South African
US bill to sanction South Africa - and ANC officials
A controversial bill that calls for a sweeping review of US-South Africa relations – including the possible sanctioning of senior ANC officials – has passed a key stage in the United States Congress. The US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 (H.R.2633), introduced by Republican Representative Ronny Jackson, was approved by the House Foreign Affairs Committee this week, with 34 members voting in favour and 16 against. The bill directs the US government to re-evaluate diplomatic, trade, and military ties with South Africa, citing Pretoria's recent engagements with global powers such as Russia, China, and Iran, as well as its controversial interactions with Hamas. In his statement following the vote, Jackson said: 'South Africa made its choice when it abandoned America and our allies and sided with communists and terrorists. My bill gives President Trump the tools to hold their corrupt government accountable.' The bill comes amid heightened tensions between Washington and Pretoria, largely fuelled by: South Africa's joint military drills with Russia and China Engagement with Hamas leadership The International Court of Justice genocide case against Israel, led by South Africa South Africa's decision to downgrade diplomatic ties with Taiwan While supporters of the bill described it as a necessary step to restore 'accountability' in the US-South Africa relationship, critics warned that the proposed measures are disproportionate and could further strain an already fragile relationship. 'Differences between allies should be resolved through diplomacy, not punitive legislation,' said one committee member opposed to the bill. The bill must now be debated and approved by the full House of Representatives, then proceed to the Senate before it can be signed into law by President Donald Trump. However, experts are sceptical about its prospects. This is not the first time such legislation has been proposed. A similar bill introduced in 2023 passed the House, but failed in the Senate. If enacted, the bill could lead to sanctions against ANC officials, disrupt trade talks, and affect South Africa's standing under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a key trade agreement with the US. South African officials have not yet issued a formal response to the committee's decision. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Big move in US Bill's bid to sanction ANC officials
The Bill was introduced by Republican representative Ronny Jackson, who took to social media on Tuesday to celebrate the milestone. US President Donald Trump meets with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 21 May 2025. Picture: AFP A Bill to review the bilateral relationship between the United States (US) and South Africa, and to impose sanctions on government and ANC officials, has made significant progress. The US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 (H.R.2633) was introduced in April and this week moved through US Congress' foreign affairs committee with minor amendments. This paves the way for the Bill to be debated and voted upon. It was introduced by Republican representative Ronny Jackson, who took to social media on Tuesday to celebrate the milestone. 'Today, my Bill to fully review America's relationship with South Africa and give President Trump the tools necessary to hold their corrupt government accountable passed through committee. The days of allowing our so-called 'allies' to walk all over us are over!' Afriforum welcomes the move In reaction, head of public relations at AfriForum, Ernst van Zyl, said the ANC's 'years of reckless and extremist diplomatic actions and rhetoric are now bearing bitter fruit'. 'AfriForum maintains that ordinary citizens of the country should not be punished for the extremism and corruption of politicians. 'AfriForum has never advocated for sanctions that target South Africa as a whole. Therefore, the introduction of targeted sanctions against these politicians will be a welcome development,' Van Zyl added. This is a developing story
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
New minister Bhuti Manamela brings nothing new
Western Cape High Court Judge President Nolwazi Penelope Mabindla-Boqwana conducts the swearing-in of newly-appointed Higher Education and Training Minister Buti Manamela. Image: Kopano Tlape | GCIS NEWLY-APPOINTED Higher Education and Training Minister Buti Manamela's track record contradicts his party, the ANC's claim that his leadership will advance access, equity, and quality in the higher education sector. He has been the higher education and training deputy minister for almost 10 years and it's safe to say that he watched the collapse of entities such as the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS). He was at the helm when poor students were forced to sleep rough on the floor of administration buildings because NSFAS failed to pay for their accommodation. He watched students being attacked by police with stun grenades and tear gas when they demanded to be registered. Manamela had the power to distance himself from his boss, the outgoing Nobuhle Nkabane when she misled Parliament on the controversial appointments of the Sector Education and Training Authorities (SETAs) board members, which included Buyelembo Mantashe, the son of Nkabane's former boss and Mineral Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe. We can go on and on about instances where Manamela chose to take the backseat while Rome was burning, literally. To expect South Africans to believe that he is the right person to turn that ministry's fortunes around is wishful thinking at best or insulting people's intelligence at worst. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ How do we expect a person who was part of the problem to be responsible for solutions? What his appointment signals is an attempt by the ANC to appease the SACP, Manamela's political home, which intends contesting next year's local government election in protest of the ANC governing with the DA in the so-called Government of National Unity. It's also to stabilise the fractured relations between the ANC and the DA coalition. If not, then why has Ramaphosa not fired other ministers implicated in serious corruption allegations? Nkabane's departure was long overdue. Her arrogance was the true reflection of what the ANC has become. No wonder voters continue rejecting it at the polls. The party's continued lip service to ethical leadership that is grounded in truly addressing the pressing needs of the majority of people of this country will see it lose the little power it still has on some of the key metros in the 2026 local government elections. Last year's national elections were just the beginning of an end. CAPE TIMES
