
Con men use race to distract from society's most glaring division
Stephen Yaxley was born to an immigrant Irish mother in England, but for some reason has always been ashamed of his Irishness. That led to him forming an 'English Defence League'. After leaving school he worked for a time at Luton Airport, but lost that job when he was sentenced to a year in prison for a drunken, violent assault on a police officer. Ever since then, he's never really had what most folk would consider an honest job. His activities always seem to involve raising funds by some sort of con.
READ MORE: SNP call out BBC over 'unacceptable' Hamilton by-election programme
Perhaps in an attempt to cover up this criminal record, Yaxley started using the alias 'Tommy Robinson'. He has also used a range of other aliases. Imagine being so ashamed of your own identity you've got to use so many different false names, trying to hide who you are!
In September 2011, 'Robinson' was convicted of another assault, for headbutting a fellow member of the English Defence League. Yaxley-Lennon has just been released from his latest stint in prison. He said thank you to Elon Musk for getting him out. This petty crook gives thanks to the richest man on Earth. That's fascism for you; the filthy rich linked with small-time crooks using race to direct everybody's attention away from the real glaring divide in society: class Despite their pride, Trump,
Musk, and Fromage are all failures. What they fail at (and, of course, those nearest to them, including their own families, realise this, even if most of them think it's probably safer to keep quiet) is being even slightly decent human beings. Forget hatred; what they deserve is our contempt. As for that posturing puppet Yaxley-Lennon/'Robinson', yes, he's also contemptible, as well as being pathetic.
Dave Coull
Findowrie
A GP appointment costs £129. An MRI scan is £457. Calling an ambulance sets the NHS back £1045. An A&E visit averages £1368. A life-saving coronary bypass operation costs £71,996. Crucially, every penny of this is covered upfront for every UK citizen through National Insurance. No bills at the hospital door. No crippling invoices. Treatment is guaranteed when you need it.
Now consider the private, profit-driven model Farage tacitly endorses. In the US – where healthcare is a market commodity – 600,000 people are bankrupted by medical bills every single year. Countless others die preventable deaths, denied care either by empty wallets or insurers who profit by refusing to pay claims. The system is structurally perverse: it rewards denial of treatment.
READ MORE: Nigel Farage: Don't take Nigel Farage's threat to abortion rights lightly
This is the grim future Nigel Farage and his Reform party would drag Britain towards. Farage – a man whose contempt for Scotland drips from his poisonous 'subsidy junkies' slur – represents the worst kind of nativist grift. His vision is one of division and dismantled security. Voting for Reform in Scotland isn't just misguided; it's akin to sleepwalking into self-inflicted disaster, ignoring every historical warning about empowering demagogues who peddle hate.
Those tempted by Farage's facile lies must understand the brutal arithmetic. The choice is simple: defend the NHS – that rare, tangible embodiment of collective solidarity that actually works – or surrender to a predatory American-style system where illness means financial ruin. To choose Reform is to choose cruelty over care, profit over people. It is an act of profound self-harm.
Alan Hinnrichs
Dundee
OUR NHS hits the headlines once again this week, and opposition parties once again attempt political point-scoring at the expense of those suffering and waiting. Yet those very opposition parties have been in charge of the NHS in other parts of the UK and unfortunately for those NHS areas and Scotland, a solution to long waiting lists has not been realised, only criticism. No constructive ideas, no examples of better practice, only criticism which demoralises NHS staff who are loyal and dedicated.
But where do we go with the future of our NHS and for all who are often in pain and misery awaiting treatment? Unfortunately, a magic wand won't fix it. We all need to take some responsibility for the system. For instance, no missing appointments, using the fully joined-up approach of perhaps a visit to the pharmacy first, taking pressure off other services further down the line.
READ MORE: John Swinney: Nigel Farage 'has peddled Russian propaganda for years'
NHS nurses and doctors in Scotland are the best paid in the UK and I am sure most would agree we want to continue this practice. The Scottish Government's latest accepted pay offer continues this theme with 'Agenda for Change' staff – including nurses, midwives, paramedics, and porters – receiving a 4.25% pay rise this year, backdated to April 1, and a further 3.75% increase in 2026/27. This is the SNP in government recognising and valuing our dedicated NHS employees, taking action.
Going forward, the government has invested massive amounts in our NHS, yet services still demand more. Perhaps a tax increase of 1p in the pound ring-fenced for our NHS is one to put on the table.
This option would be more palatable here in Scotland than UK Labour's approach of back-door privatisation.
Catriona C Clark
Falkirk
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer loss in Hamilton by-election could set the dominoes falling
It was a by-election in Hamilton, South Lanarkshire, where the SNP made its breakthrough onto the national political stage in 1967. The party had only held one parliamentary seat before – and only for three months in the 1940s – but a 38 per cent swing away from Labour propelled Winnie Ewing to the House of Commons and gave the SNP a UK-wide platform. Next Thursday, when the area goes to the polls for a Scottish Parliament by-election, Nigel Farage is hoping to repeat the trick in reverse. With attention focused on Reform's high-profile defections and victories in the English local elections last month, Mr Farage's slow creep north of the border has been unnoticed by many in Westminster. But a poll last month found that if a Scottish election were to be held, the SNP would sweep back to power in Holyrood and Reform would emerge as the main opposition party, with 21 per cent of the popular vote. Thursday's by-election is a chance for Mr Farage's party to show it can seize hold of anti-establishment, anti-nationalist sentiment in Scotland and sell its brand of punchy opposition politics to non-traditional Reform voters. But it also represents a significant threat to Sir Keir Starmer, whose party became the largest in Scotland last year for the first time since 2010. Labour's path to a majority has historically run through Scotland, and Sir Keir's chance of winning another victory at the next general election will partly depend on his ability to keep hold of those seats. John Swinney, the SNP leader, has said that the Hamilton by-election is a 'straight race' between his party and Reform, but it is Sir Keir who has the most to lose if Mr Farage wins. Already there are Left-wing MPs, including in Scotland, who think the Prime Minister has gone too far on benefit cuts, and fear he will go further still in this autumn's Budget. At the last Scottish elections in 2021, Labour increased its vote share by 4 per cent in Hamilton and looked on course to challenge the SNP. The constituency's Westminster seat, Hamilton and Clyde Valley, is represented by Imogen Walker, who is married to Morgan McSweeney, Sir Keir's chief of staff. A third-place finish in Hamilton next week would be a serious knock to the Labour leader's credibility, and could open a rift between him and Anas Sarwar, the charismatic Scottish Labour leader. In a sign of Labour's woes, Angela Rayner was forced to abandon a campaign stop on Friday because of protests. She denied 'doing a runner' after pro-Palestinian demonstrators shouted 'Rayner, Rayner you can't hide, you're supporting genocide'. A group of protesters stationed themselves by what appeared to be Scottish Labour's campaign office holding Palestine and Scottish Socialist Party flags. If the Labour Left moves against Sir Keir, it is clear that two goals will emerge. The first is a change of personnel at the top – with target number one being Rachel Reeves. The 'iron chancellor' has angered the party's Left-wing grass roots with a series of spending cuts that are set to continue next month with her spending review. But what is far less clear is whom those people would accept as a replacement, given that the Cabinet is stacked with centrist Starmerites. Ms Rayner may be the only face on the current front bench who could win Sir Keir Left-wing support. More realistic, perhaps, would be a change in course on fiscal policy ahead of the Budget. The two-child benefit cap, winter fuel allowance cuts and changes to disability benefits have all led to complaints about the direction of Sir Keir's government. An about-turn on those policies, likely with a watering down of Ms Reeves's fiscal rules, would be popular with some on the Labour Left but unpopular with the markets. For now, these threats are far off, and Sir Keir's control of his party is holding. Ms Reeves's spending review is likely to pass without a major rebellion in the Commons or resignation from the Cabinet. But should Reform win on Thursday, Mr Farage may find the constituency acts once again as the first domino to fall for a challenger party. Then, the test for Downing Street will be far greater indeed.


Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Farage's flirtation with Bitcoin will cost him his credibility
Nigel Farage's entire political career has been coupled with the pursuit of credibility. From those early days of Ukip, unsuccessfully soliciting the backing of Enoch Powell, through his incendiary years in the European Parliament culminating in Brexit, to his return to Reform ahead of last year's general election, Farage has been a vocal and powerful figure in politics – but always outside the realm of serious contender. Lately, however, the story has changed. Reform comfortably leads the polls, overturned a near 15,000-vote majority to win a by-election and was the emphatic winner of recent local elections. Farage is an MP and widely considered the unofficial opposition, despite heading only the seventh-largest party in Parliament. Even the Prime Minister was forced to declare Farage the 'main challenger' to his government. His credibility is no longer in question. Or at least it shouldn't be. But, just hours after Sir Keir Starmer conceded that Reform had replaced one of the most successful political parties in history as the focus of his attention, Farage took the stage in a foreign country to announce a new policy that could torch his hard-won recognition. Playing to the crowds of the annual Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas, Farage committed the UK to a variety of crypto proposals in a move that smells more of his time in the political cold between Ukip and Reform than it does of a potential prime minister-in-waiting. While policies such as allowing Reform to accept political donations in Bitcoin are irrelevant (I honestly believed they already accepted crypto cash), and a new rate of capital gains tax just for the world's most insufferable zealots will be forgotten by both party and people, Farage laid out a dangerous precedent at his fireside chat. In declaring the Bank of England will be forced to establish a 'Bitcoin digital reserve', à la Donald Trump, Farage has made two key errors. The first threatens his credibility with markets and the mysterious 'bond vigilantes' – a relationship that has already been strained by his other recent policy announcements. It's not even the ridiculous notion itself of a nation state buying a bunch of Bitcoin that rankles, but the inherent threat to the independence of the central bank which is foolhardy. Just ask Liz Truss. Even Trump has (somewhat) backed down from his fight with 'loser' chairman of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell, understanding that, like it or not, an independent central bank is sacrosanct in the 21st century. There are fair arguments to be made on both sides regarding Farage's £90bn tax cuts. They simply cannot all be instated and do ring of 'fantasy economics' in some regards, but I think you would struggle to find any supporters of 'fiscal drag', that most euphemistic of persistent tax burdens. But, even more vital to Farage's credibility is his perception from the polling station, not Threadneedle Street – and right now he seems more concerned with winning votes in the US than he does the UK. Crypto is not a serious issue for voters here: a recent YouGov survey found that just 11pc of people in the UK have a positive view of crypto, which correlates with the amount of people who own any. More than a third of people either don't know or don't care. It strikes anyone paying attention as a tickbox exercise designed to emulate the American Right rather than built from his own sincere belief. A brief look at the comments confirms it: 'Farage is making a big mistake here. He is copying Trump on this but the involvement of Trump and his DJT company and of his two sons in this is rather murky, to say the least.' 'Sorry Nigel, not a good idea, total gamble and the sort of thing Trump does, but should not be for a stable central bank to do…' Perhaps Farage is hoping for a boost to the (unaffiliated) $FARAGE coin he once shilled for (currently down 96pc on its peak). Or maybe he is being paid for the promotion (like his £189,000 pay cheque from Direct Bullion for four hours' work promoting gold). He may even sincerely believe these policies will drag Britain into a prosperous future. But he must consider whether all of this is worth that hard won and easily lost prize of credibility. He'll have to make up his mind soon. The most liked comment under the news of his Bitcoin bill is simple: 'Successfully turning me off Reform day-by-day.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
SNP's Swinney willing to debate Farage before crucial Holyrood contest
John Swinney accused Labour of having 'given up' on winning a crucial Holyrood by-election as he said he would be willing to hold a debate with Nigel Farage, Reform UK's leader, ahead of next week's vote. The Scottish First Minister was speaking as the campaign for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse vote entered its final weekend. With the 'crucial' vote taking place on Thursday June 5, Mr Swinney said backing the SNP candidate means people in the area will 'elect an MSP who will deliver on their priorities'. He insisted the battle is a 'straight contest' between the SNP and 'the ugly, divisive politics of Nigel Farage' and said he is willing to debate the Reform leader following a similar challenge laid down by Anas Sarwar, Scottish Labour leader. Labour insisted the by-election – taking place after the death of Scottish government minister Christina McKelvie – is a 'chance to call time on SNP failure and choose a new direction'. Dame Jackie Baillie, the Scottish Labour deputy leader, insisted only her party can defeat the SNP as Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, visited a factory in the constituency. She said Reform UK 'can't win' the seat, while adding that the SNP 'does not deserve' to do so. Dame Jackie said: 'We can see the consequences of SNP incompetence right across this community – people languishing on NHS waiting lists, high-street shops struggling to stay open, and kids not getting the education they deserve. 'It's clear the SNP does not deserve to win this by-election and only Scottish Labour can beat them.' She added that Reform UK, led by Mr Farage, 'can't win here', declaring: 'This is a direct fight between Scottish Labour and the SNP, no matter how much Reform and the SNP want to pretend otherwise. 'This weekend, Scottish Labour campaigners will be talking to voters the length and breadth of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse so we can deliver a new direction for this community and elect local champion Davy Russell.' Mr Swinney accepted 'things are really tough right now for many people, with the cost of living a real issue'. But the First Minister insisted that 'while others shout, the SNP is acting'. He pointed to action his party is taking at Holyrood to scrap peak-rate rail fares, to pay winter fuel payments to pensioners, and to end the two-child cap on some benefits – a move expected to come in next year. Mr Swinney added: 'Labour have let people across Scotland down, and they have quite clearly given up on this by-election. 'Thursday's vote is now a straight contest between the SNP and Nigel Farage, and I am urging people to reject the ugly, divisive politics of Nigel Farage and to unite behind the SNP.' He added: 'I would, of course, debate with Nigel Farage. 'But what's important is that we've got a contest on Thursday, which is an attempt by Farage to insert his politics of racism and poison into Scotland. 'I want to make sure the SNP wins the two-horse race in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election.' Mr Farage is expected to visit the constituency next week to support Reform's candidate, Ross Lambie. The 41-year-old architect said he believed people were fed up with years of broken promises from opposition parties, which he said were 'panicked' by indications of growing support for his party. 'There's a real sense of urgency among people that things need to change quickly. But what they hear from Labour is that they might turn things around and start cutting taxes in 10 years. 'The SNP released its 19th annual programme for government a few weeks ago and there was nothing exciting in that. So people are actually a bit panicky. 'They feel there's been a lost generation – if you're in your 30s in Scotland, your whole adult life has been in a country with limited economic growth and falling standards in health and education.' Katy Loudon, the SNP's candidate for the seat, declared if she is voted into Holyrood, she will 'get on with the job from day one'. She said: 'This by-election is an opportunity to put the priorities of people in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse first, and my promise to local people is this: I will always stand with you, fight for you and deliver for you.'