WCT's order book forecast to grow this year
CGS International Research (CGSI Research) highlighted the significance of the award, describing it as its first win for this year and a potential turning point for the group's order book momentum.
'We reiterate 'add' for its compelling valuation of just 0.3 times 2025 price-to-book value, less than mean levels since 2015, and improving construction and property franchises,' the research house said.
However, it lowered its target price to RM1.28 to reflect a smaller order book and enlarged share base after a placement exercise.
MIDF Research also struck an upbeat tone, maintaining its 'buy' recommendation for WCT with a target price of 95 sen.
'This award further strengthens WCT's reputation as a seasoned player in highway and civil infrastructure projects and positions the group well to tap into upcoming public-sector packages including the Penang International Airport expansion and future highway corridor upgrades,' the research house said, noting the contract accounted for over one-third of WCT's job replenishment target of RM1bil this year.
The 36-month project, awarded by Projek Lebuhraya Usahasama Bhd, covers site clearance, roadworks, bridge construction, and utility relocation work from Sedenak to Simpang Renggam, with work commencing towards the end of this month.
With the contract win, WCT's construction order book is expected to rise by 14.6% to RM2.8bil.
Kenanga Research welcomed the award as WCT's first major contract win this year, building on a RM249.7mil contract secured last year for the same highway stretch.
The research house maintained its 'outperform' call for WCT, with a target price of RM1.25, citing the group's exposure to the impending rollout of various public infrastructure projects such as the Penang International Airport expansion project, Pan Borneo Highway, Subang Airport regeneration plan, and various government hospitals.
Public Investment Bank Research said it expects the project to contribute about 2% to 4% annually to the group's earnings over the 36-month contract period' and noted that WCT's unbilled order book had grown 14.6% to RM2.8bil.
It kept its 'outperform' rating and RM1.08 target price unchanged, adding the award fell within its order book replenishment assumptions.
Beyond job wins, CGSI Research pointed to balance-sheet improvement as another rerating catalyst for WCT, following the listing of Paradigm-REIT and reduction in perpetual sukuk.
'We expect its balance sheet to improve to a net gearing of 0.5 times this year from 0.8 times at end-2024. This leaner balance sheet to be reflected when it releases its second-quarter (2Q25) results in August and serves as a rerating catalyst,' it said.
MIDF Research noted that despite a seasonally soft 1Q25, the outlook remained encouraging.
'We have kept our earnings forecasts unchanged, in line with our expectations of stronger job flows ahead. This has been reinforced by the group's recent RM365.2mil contract win, which will progressively support earnings from 2026,' it stated.
While WCT's earlier job replenishment pace had been sluggish, CGSI Research highlighted that it was now broadening tenders and aiming for projects including the Penang LRT, airport expansion, and Middle East civil infrastructure.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
AI researchers are negotiating US$250mil pay packages. Just like NBA stars
SAN FRANCISCO: Over the summer, Matt Deitke got a phone call from Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's chief executive. Zuckerberg wanted Deitke, a 24-year-old artificial intelligence researcher who had recently helped found a startup, to join Meta's research effort dedicated to 'superintelligence,' a technology that could hypothetically exceed the human brain. The company promised him around US$125mil (RM534.7mil) in stock and cash over four years if he came aboard. The offer was not enough to lure Deitke, who wanted to stick with his startup, two people with knowledge of the talks said. He turned Zuckerberg down. So Zuckerberg personally met with Deitke. Then Meta returned with a revised offer of around US$250mil (RM1bil) over four years, with potentially up to US$100mil (RM427.8mil) of that to be paid in the first year, the people said. The compensation jump was so startling that Deitke asked his peers what to do. After many discussions, some of them urged him to take the deal – which he did. Silicon Valley's AI talent wars have become so frenzied – and so outlandish – that they increasingly resemble the stratospheric market for NBA stars. Young AI researchers are being recruited as if they are Steph Curry or LeBron James, with nine-figure compensation packages structured to be paid out over several years. To navigate the froth, many of the 20-somethings have turned to unofficial agents and entourages to strategise. And they are playing hardball with the companies to get top dollar, much as basketball players shop for the best deals from teams. The difference is that unlike NBA teams, deep-pocketed AI companies like Meta, OpenAI and Google have no salary caps. (Curry's most recent four-year contract with the Golden State Warriors was US$35mil/RM150mil less than Deitke's deal with Meta.) That has made the battles for AI talent even wilder. Over the past few weeks, recruiting AI free agents has become a spectacle on social media, much like the period before a trade deadline in sports. As Meta, Microsoft, Google and OpenAI have poached employees from one another, job announcements have been posted online with graphics resembling major sports trades, made by the online streaming outlet TBPN, which hosts an ESPN-like show about the tech and business world. 'BREAKING: Microsoft has poached over 20 staff members from DeepMind over the last six months,' read one recent TBPN post about Microsoft's hiring from Google's DeepMind lab. Jordi Hays, a co-host of TBPN, said that as tech and AI have gone mainstream, more people are following the recruitment fray 'the way our friends from college obsess over sports – the personalities, the players, the leagues.' On Wednesday, Zuckerberg said Meta planned to continue throwing money at AI talent 'because we have conviction that superintelligence is going to improve every aspect of what we do.' Superintelligent AI would not just improve the company's business, he said, but would also become a personal tool that 'has the potential to begin an exciting new era of individual empowerment.' A Meta spokesperson declined to comment. Deitke did not respond to a request for comment. The job market for AI researchers has long had parallels to professional sports. In 2012, after three academics at the University at Toronto published a research paper describing a seminal AI system that could recognise objects like flowers and cars, they auctioned themselves off to the highest corporate bidder – Google – for US$44mil (RM188.21mil). That kicked off a race for talent across the tech industry. By 2014, Peter Lee, Microsoft's head of research, was likening the market to that for up-and-coming pro football players, many of whom were making about US$1mil (RM4.28mil) a year. 'Last year, the cost of a top, world-class deep learning expert was about the same as a top NFL quarterback prospect,' Lee told Bloomberg BusinessWeek at the time, referring to a type of AI specialist. 'The cost of that talent is pretty remarkable.' The leverage that AI researchers have in negotiating job terms has only increased since OpenAI released the ChatGPT chatbot in 2022, setting off a race to lead the technology. They have been aided by scarcity: Only a small pool of people have the technical know-how and experience to work on advanced artificial intelligence systems. That's because AI is built differently from traditional software. These systems learn by analysing enormous amounts of digital data. Few researchers have experience with the most advanced systems, which require giant pools of computing power available to only a handful of companies. The result has been a fresh talent war, with compensation soaring into the hundreds of millions of dollars a year, from millions of dollars a year. In April, Zuckerberg – whose company was struggling to advance its AI research – dived in by sending personal messages to potential recruits, offering them larger and larger sums. His approach was similar to that of sports franchise owners, two Meta employees said. Even if the offers seemed absurd, if the new hires could help increase revenue by even half a percent – especially for a company that is closing in on a US$2 trillion (RM8.56 trillion) market capitalisation – it would be worth it, the people said. 'If I'm Zuck and I'm spending US$80bil (RM342.20bil) in one year on capital expenditures alone, is it worth kicking in another US$5bil (RM22.4bil) or more to acquire a truly world-class team to bring the company to the next level?' Hays said. 'The answer is obviously yes.' Meta's initial offers to engineers varied but hovered in the mid-tens of millions of dollars, three people familiar with the process said. The company also offered recruits something that was arguably more attractive than money: computing power. Some potential hires were told they would be allotted 30,000 graphical processing units, or GPUs, for their AI research, one of the people said. GPUs, which are powerful chips ideal for running the calculations that fuel AI, are highly coveted. Zuckerberg has hired with the help of the List, a document with the names of the top minds in AI, two people familiar with the effort said. Many on the List have three main qualifications: a doctorate in an AI-related field, experience at a top lab and contributions to AI research breakthroughs, one of the people said. The Wall Street Journal previously reported some details of the List. Some researchers on the List have created chat groups on Slack and Discord to discuss offers, two people in the groups said. When someone lands an offer, they can drop the details in the group chats and ask peers to weigh in. (AI is a tight-knit field where people often know one another.) They trade information about which companies to approach for another offer so they can build up their price, the people said. Working with friends can be just as important as the money. After a researcher joins a new lab, the first thing that person often does is try to recruit friends, two people familiar with the process said. The talent wars have started causing pain. OpenAI has changed its compensation structure to account for the shift in the market, employees at the company said, and is asking those approached by competitors to consult executives before immediately accepting offers. 'Are we countering? Yes,' Mark Chen, OpenAI's chief research officer, said at a company meeting this month, according to a recording reviewed by The New York Times. But he added that OpenAI had not matched Meta's offers because 'I personally think that in order to work here, you have to believe in the upside of OpenAI.' OpenAI declined to comment. (The Times has sued OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming copyright infringement in relation to news content related to AI systems. The two companies have denied the claims.) Not all of Meta's overtures have succeeded. The company has been rebuffed by some researchers, two people said, partly because Zuckerberg's vision for artificial intelligence was unclear compared to those at other companies. Still, the frenzy has allowed even little-known researchers like Deitke to chart their own destinies. Deitke, who recently dropped out of a computer science PhD program at the University of Washington, had moonlighted at a Seattle AI lab called the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence. There, he led the development of a project called Molmo, an AI chatbot that juggles images, sounds and text – the kind of system that Meta is trying to build. In November, Deitke and several Allen Institute colleagues founded Vercept, a startup that is trying to build AI agents, which can use other software on the Internet to autonomously perform tasks. With about 10 employees, Vercept has raised US$16.5mil (RM70.6mil) from investors such as former Google chief executive Eric Schmidt. Then came Deitke's back-and-forth with Zuckerberg. After Deitke accepted Meta's roughly US$250mil four-year offer, Vercept's CEO posted on social media, 'We look forward to joining Matt on his private island next year.' – © 2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times
The Star
4 days ago
- The Star
IGB-REIT may see limited upside to unit price
CGSI Research said it remains upbeat on IGB-REIT's ability to sustain high occupancy rates and drive consistent dividend growth. PETALING JAYA: IGB Real Estate Investment Trust 's (IGB-REIT) unit price may have limited upside, according to Maybank Investment Bank (IB) Research. The research house has downgraded its call on the counter to a 'hold' from an earlier 'buy' rating. However, it has lifted its dividend discount model-based target price to RM2.83 from RM2.56 after rolling forward to financial year 2026 forecasts to reflect full contribution from the Mid Valley Southkey segment. Southkey is expected to lift earnings from the financial year 2026 (FY26) onwards. 'While we continue to like IGB-REIT's premium mall assets, full occupancy and resilient income base, we see limited upside for now, given the share price action of more than 10% over the past month. 'At current unit price levels, IGB-REIT is trading at 3.8% and 4.4% for FY25 and FY26 forecast net yields,' it said. Maybank IB Research said IGB-REIT's management is cautiously optimistic for the second half of the year as it anticipates a stronger fourth quarter (4Q) from year-end holiday spending and tourism. The Mid Valley Southkey acquisition remains on track for completion in 4Q25 –assuming a 1.5-month net property income (NPI) contribution for the forecast FY25, it said. Southkey is expected to contribute some 29% of FY26 NPI. IGB-REIT also anticipated mid single-digit rental reversions, supported by healthy leasing momentum and anchor tenant stability, Maybank IB Research said. Meanwhile, CGSI Research retained its 'hold' rating on IGB-REIT with a higher dividend discount model-based target price of RM2.64 per unit. 'While we remain upbeat on IGB-REIT's ability to sustain high occupancy rates and drive consistent dividend growth, its FY26 forecast yields of 4.9% lag behind the sector average of 5.6%. 'This may limit near-term upside potential, in our view,' it said. 'Upside risks include stronger tenants' sales and sooner-than-expected completion of the acquisition of Southkey, while downside risks include non-renewal of existing leases and unexpected hike in interest rates,' it added.
The Star
5 days ago
- The Star
Carbon tax could generate up to RM1bil a year for govt
BIMB Research said it believes Malaysia's carbon tax should start at a low rate and be gradually increased. PETALING JAYA: The introduction of a carbon tax next year could add close to RM1bil to the government coffers annually, analysts say. The sectors with high emissions are energy, and iron and steel, as these are among the largest contributors to the country's carbon footprint, said BIMB Research. The research house said it believes Malaysia's carbon tax should start at a low rate and be gradually increased. The research house said, based on Singapore's example of an introductory rate of S$5 per tonne (assuming S$1 equals RM3.40), Malaysia could potentially collect up to RM980mil in annual revenue. Carbon taxes have been adopted by more than 36 countries and imposes charges on emissions resulting from the consumption of fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas. The tax serves as an incentive for emitters to reduce their carbon footprint to avoid higher costs. The research house said starting modestly allows time to evaluate the economic and environmental impact, while giving industries room to adapt. In 2023, certain sectors in Malaysia, such as the power industry, transport, fuel exploitation, industrial combustion and industrial processes, collectively emitted an estimated 288 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. Malaysia as a whole emitted around 325 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, with the energy sector contributing more than 80% of the total. Per capita emissions stood at nine tonnes, reflecting high fossil fuel reliance. Though accounting for less than 1% of global emissions, the rising trend highlights the need to meet the country's 2030 carbon intensity and 2050 net-zero targets. The power industry was the largest contributor, emitting 117.3 million tonnes, accounting for over 36% of total emissions. This was followed by transport with 67.4 million tonnes, fuel exploitation 43.3 million tonnes and industrial combustion 36.1 million tonnes. Emissions from processes at 23.8 million tonnes, agriculture 14.6 million, waste 13.2 million and buildings 9.6 million were relatively smaller but still notable. Among Asean countries, only Singapore and Indonesia currently have operational carbon pricing systems in place, while Brunei, Vietnam and Thailand have announced similar plans. Malaysia's 2026 rollout of its carbon tax aligns with the commencement of the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, which imposes a carbon tariff on high-emission imports to ensure a level playing field in global carbon pricing, the research house said. Introduced in 2019, Singapore's carbon tax is South-East Asia's first carbon pricing scheme, targeting facilities that emit 25,000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent annually. Initially set at S$5 per tonne, the rate rose to S$25 last year and will increase to S$45 by 2026, with a projected range of up to S$80 by 2030. Covering approximately 80% of national emissions, the tax provides no exemptions or allowances. However, starting last year, emitters could offset up to 5% of their taxable emissions using approved international carbon credits. Tax revenues are allocated to green initiatives in support of Singapore's 2050 net-zero target, the research house said.
