FBI lapses, missed leads, and fresh interviews: Trump admin releases Martin Luther King Jr., Hillary Clinton probe files; what do they reveal?
The Trump administration dropped documents on Monday, and no, it wasn't the long-awaited Epstein files. Instead, the release spotlighted two old favourites: the FBI's surveillance of Martin Luther King Jr and his assassination in 1968, and Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server and mishandling of highly classified information during her time as Secretary of State.
More than 6,000 documents — adding up to nearly 250,000 pages — tied to the 1968 assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and 35 pages from Hilary Clinton's file were made public late Monday.
Hillary Clinton, who held the position of secretary of state in Barack Obama's administration between 2009 and 2013, faced an FBI investigation regarding allegations of inappropriate handling of classified information through a private email server.
In 2016, prior to the significant presidential election between Clinton and Donald Trump, the FBI recommended to the Department of Justice against pursuing criminal charges in the matter.
This came after director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's bombshell claims that Obama-era officials reportedly "manufactured and politicized intelligence" to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In
IC Markets
Learn More
Here are some key facts about Clinton's file
"This document shows an extreme lack of effort and due diligence in the FBI's investigation of former Secretary Clinton's email usage and mishandling of highly classified information," Grassley said in a Monday press release.
"Under Comey's leadership, the FBI failed to perform fundamental investigative work and left key pieces of evidence on the cutting room floor. The Comey FBI's negligent approach and perhaps intentional lack of effort in the Clinton investigation is a stark contrast to its full-throated investigation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, which was based on the uncorroborated and now discredited Steele dossier. Comey's decision-making process smacks of political infection," he added.
The Department of Justice Office of Inspector General's Clinton addendum reveals that while the FBI acquired USB drives from an informant during their Clinton investigation, senior officials including Director James Comey, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Special Agent Peter Strzok and colleagues neglected to conduct specific, focused examinations of these storage devices, despite their relevance to the enquiry.
The report demonstrated that due to this oversight, the FBI's investigation of the Clinton matter was incomplete, failing to properly assess the national security implications of Clinton's negligent handling of classified materials. The DOJ OIG noted that these drives contained sensitive data extracted from various US government departments, including State Department files, correspondence from then-President Barack Obama, and possibly congressional materials. Despite a preliminary FBI memo suggesting otherwise, these storage devices never underwent proper scrutiny as part of the Clinton investigation. The DOJ OIG findings additionally indicate that whilst these drives warranted immediate analysis for potential foreign intelligence concerns, this crucial step was overlooked.
"The intelligence reports alleged that the Obama administration took efforts to scuttle the investigation into Clinton and protect her candidacy," Grassley's release reported.
Martin Luther King Jr lost his life to an assassin's shooting in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4, 1968, while broadening his focus beyond the peaceful movement for African American civil rights to encompass economic equality and peace advocacy. His tragic passing sent shockwaves across the United States during a tumultuous year marked by racial unrest, protests against the Vietnam War, and the subsequent assassination of presidential hopeful Robert F.
Kennedy.
Here are some key details from King Jr files:
Gabbard released the documents in partnership with the justice department, central intelligence agency, national archives and the FBI, detail the federal investigation into the shooting at Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tenn., which resulted in 39-year-old King's death.
'Today, after nearly 60 years of questions surrounding the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., we are releasing 230,000 MLK assassination files,' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard wrote on X.
"The American people deserve answers decades after the horrific assassination of one of our nation's great leaders," said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. "The Department of Justice is proud to partner with Director Gabbard and the ODNI at President Trump's direction for this latest disclosure."
The newly released King assassination files contain investigative leads, interviews with associates of James Earl Ray, and previously undisclosed information about international intelligence cooperation during Ray's pursuit, according to US government officials.
A recently disclosed audio recording features a police interview with Jerry Ray, the brother of James Earl Ray. Officials noted that these documents had remained undigitised and neglected in various federal facilities for many years.
The quality of numerous documents has deteriorated significantly due to age and digitalisation. The records encompass diverse aspects of the investigation, including newspaper articles, public information, details about Ray's attendance at dance lessons and locksmith training, and his preference for using pseudonyms inspired by James Bond literature.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Zelenskyy's off-ramp
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day. There are no good options for Ukraine in Trump-Putin talks, but some may be better than others Friday will likely be wet in Alaska when Trump and Putin meet to discuss an end to the Ukraine war. The venue might make Putin wistful, for Alaska, like Ukraine, was once part of the Russian empire, sold to America in 1867 for 2 cents an acre. But the former KGB Lt Col is famously inscrutable, and when asked if he would annex Alaska after Crimea, in 2014, replied: 'What would you need Alaska for?' Alaska's either too cold for Putin, or as a realist, he accepts its status as a fait accompli. Likewise with Crimea. He's held it since a choreographed referendum in 2014, and considers it a fait accompli for the rest of the world. Europe doesn't, but Trump, whose politics are 100% transactional, might for a deal, which has become a matter of prestige for him. In April, he told Time: 'Crimea will stay with Russia…Zelenskyy understands that.' But a Russian Crimea isn't a fait accompli for Zelenskyy. On Saturday, he made it clear that his people 'will not gift their land to the occupier'. It's a position that Indians can appreciate. Although Pakistan illegally occupied a part of Kashmir over 75 years ago, India will never sign it off. There's a very clear distinction between de facto and de jure possession. Ukraine's seal on Crimea's Russian occupation will permanently end its claim on it. And this is a likely sticking point in whatever deal Trump and Putin thrash out. From Zelenskyy's point of view, the fact that he's been left out of the negotiations, is equally problematic. His people have fought Russia at great national cost for over 40 months. To now buy peace on Russian terms – endorsed by Trump – would be galling. But that might be the only peace on offer when Russia has been gaining ground. Putin's reportedly offered to end hostilities if Ukraine gives up Donetsk and Luhansk as well. Zelenskyy's in an unenviable position. If he rejects a Trump-brokered deal, he might find US military and other aid cut off. Fighting has already taken a heavy toll – Ukraine's GDP is where it was in 2008, and one of the lowest in Europe. He can swallow the bitter pill now, and take his country on a path of growth, backed by his Western friends. It's an unpalatable fait accompli, but also a realistic off-ramp for his country. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump slammed as 'insecure' for hiding Obama, Bush White House portraits
US President Donald Trump has ordered that the portraits of Barack Obama and George W. Bush be moved to a less prominent position. Obama's portrait was placed at the White House entryway, prior to this. Donald Trump earlier had Barack Obama's portrait moved across the White House foyer to make space for his photo from when he survived the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania. (Bloomberg) Trump's move underscores the tension that has always been there between the 44th and 47th presidents. Along with Obama, portraits of George Bush and his father George H.W. Bush, have also been removed. They will now be kept on top of a restricted staircase, in an area rarely seen by the public, NBC-affiliate WSAZ reported. Where has Trump kept the portraits? The portraits have been moved to the top of the Grand Staircase, CNN reported, citing sources. This is the chief stairway which connects the State Floor and Second Floor of the White House. The publication further noted that the area is restricted to members of the First Family, Secret Service agents, and some White House and executive residence staff. Also Read | Why does Donald Trump want the Nobel Peace Prize so badly? It's his self-image, and Obama, say analysts Obama's portrait is now firmly out of view of any visitor. The same fate has befallen the portraits of the Bush father-son duo. White House protocol and precedent calls for the portraits of most recent presidents to be placed most prominently – at the entrance of the executive mansion – so guests can see them during official events, and visitors can see them on tours, CNN reported. Notably, this is not the first time the Obama portrait has been moved either. In April, the portrait was moved across the grand foyer of the White House to make way for Trump's own portrait from when he survived the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania. It has also been reported that Trump is involved in almost everything that is done to the aesthetic of the White House – be it big or small. The new ballroom he wants, for which the President has offered to pay $200 million out of his own pocket, and the recent redesign of the Rose Garden are testament to this fact. Trump called 'insecure' over removal of portraits Trump's move was slammed by many on X as 'insecure'. 'Trump has to be the most insecure president in US history,' one person said. Another commented, 'Trump is one of the most insecure presidents in history.' As is the case in such matters, Trump's move also found support from some quarters. 'Good, very good - where they belong, down the pecking order in history,' one X user noted about the decision to remove the Obama and Bush portraits. Trump vs Obama saga continues Trump's recent decision to remove the portraits comes after the President has already launched scathing attacks on his predecessor. Recently, Trump said from the Oval Office 'It's time to go after people', repeating the claim that Barack Obama and other officials had engaged in treason. This came after a new report from his intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, aimed at casting doubt on long-established findings about Moscow's interference in the 2016 election. Trump's attack had prompted a rare response from Obama's post-presidential office. 'Our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' said Patrick Rodenbush, an Obama spokesman. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' (With AP inputs)
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
BJP demands detailed probe in Chandni Chowk irregularities case
A day after the Public Works Department (PWD) flagged irregularities in the Chandni Chowk redevelopment project, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Sunday demanded that a larger probe be carried out in the case, also including the Shahjahanabad Redevelopment Corporation (SRDC). The 1.3-kilometre redeveloped stretch was inaugurated in 2021. (HT Archive) The party demanded the dissolution of the SRDC and a full audit of its 10 years of operations. 'The officers have always viewed Chandni Chowk only as a Mughal-era city, never understanding or appreciating its commercial identity. Ignoring reality, these officers have repeatedly proposed plans to develop Chandni Chowk as merely a tourist centre, often persuading chief ministers to approve impractical schemes,' Delhi BJP spokesperson and general secretary of Chandni Chowk Nagrik ManchPraveen Shankar Kapoor said. After coming to power in 2015, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government began formulating development and beautification projects for Chandni Chowk without understanding or consulting its residents and traders, Kapoor claimed. 'In 2018-19, despite opposition from local trade bodies and the Chandni Chowk Nagrik Manch, the then MLA Alka Lamba pushed the redevelopment project prepared by bureaucrats and had it implemented by the SRDC,' Kapoor added. The 1.3-kilometre redeveloped stretch, inaugurated in 2021 by the then CM Arvind Kejriwal, saw its project cost swell from an initial estimate of ₹65.6 crore to ₹145 crore. The PWD report claimed that the initial cost for civil and electrical works — estimated at ₹27.79 crore — escalated to ₹105.93 crore. Officials from the SRDC did not respond to HT's requests for a comment on the allegations.
