
Jim Lovell, commander of Apollo 13 moon mission that inspired a movie, dies at 97
Nasa
said on Friday.
Hollywood star Tom Hanks played Lovell in director Ron Howard's acclaimed 1995 film. It recounted Nasa's Apollo 13 mission, which was planned as humankind's third lunar landing but went horribly wrong when an on-board explosion on the way to the moon put the lives of the three astronauts in grave danger.
Lovell and crewmates Jack Swigert and Fred Haise endured frigid, cramped conditions, dehydration and hunger for 3½ days while concocting with mission control in Houston ingenious solutions to bring the crippled spacecraft safely back to Earth.
'A 'successful failure' describes exactly what Apollo 13 was – because it was a failure in its initial mission – nothing had really been accomplished,' Lovell told Reuters in 2010 in an interview marking the 40th anniversary of the flight.
READ MORE
The outcome, the former Navy test pilot said, was 'a great success in the ability of people to take an almost-certain catastrophe and turn it into a successful recovery.'
The Apollo 13 mission came nine months after Neil Armstrong had become the first person to walk on the moon when he took 'one giant leap for mankind' during the Apollo 11 mission on July 20, 1969.
There was drama even before Apollo 13's launch on April 11, 1970. Days earlier, the backup lunar module pilot inadvertently exposed the crew to German measles but Lovell and Haise were immune to it. Ken Mattingly, the command module pilot, had no immunity to measles and was replaced at the last minute by rookie astronaut Swigert.
The mission generally went smoothly for its first two days. But moments after the crew finished a TV broadcast showing how they lived in space, an exposed wire in a command module oxygen tank sparked an explosion that badly damaged the spacecraft 200,000 miles (320,000km) from Earth. The accident not only ruined their chances of landing on the moon but imperilled their lives.
'Suddenly there's a hiss-bang. And the spacecraft rocks back and forth,' Lovell said in a 1999 Nasa oral history interview. 'The lights come on and jets fire. And I looked at Haise to see if he knew what caused it. He had no idea. Looked at Jack Swigert. He had no idea. And then, of course, things started to happen.'
Swigert saw a warning light and told mission control: 'Houston, we've had a problem here.' In the movie, the line is instead attributed to Lovell and famously delivered by Hanks – slightly reworded – as: 'Houston, we have a problem.'
With a dangerous loss of power, the three astronauts abandoned the command module and went to the lunar module – designed for two men to land on the moon. They used it as a lifeboat for a harrowing 3½ day return to Earth.
The astronauts and the US space agency experts in Houston scrambled to figure out how to get the crew safely home with a limited amount of equipment at their disposal.
Kevin Bacon, Tom Hanks and Bill Paxton in the 1995 film Apollo 13. Photograph: Universal/Getty Images
Electrical systems were turned off to save energy, sending temperatures plummeting to near freezing. Water was drastically rationed, food was short and sleep was nearly impossible. The crew had to contrive a filter system to remove high levels of carbon dioxide that could have proven deadly.
'The thought crossed our mind that we were in deep trouble. But we never dwelled on it,' Lovell said in the Nasa interview. 'We never admitted to ourselves that, 'hey, we're not going to make it'. Well, only one time – when Fred looked at . . . the lunar module and found out we had about 45 hours worth of power and we were 90 hours from home.'
People worldwide were captivated by the events unfolding in space – and got a happy ending. The astronauts altered course to fly a single time around the moon and back to Earth, splashing down in the Pacific Ocean near Samoa on April 17th, 1970.
Lovell never got another chance to walk on the moon after Apollo 13, which was his fourth and final space trip.
His first trip had been the Gemini 7 mission in 1965, featuring the first link-up of two manned spacecraft. His second was Gemini 12 in 1966, the last of the programmes that led to the Apollo moon missions.
Lovell's third mission was Apollo 8 in December 1968, the first to orbit the moon. During a telecast to Earth from their spacecraft on Christmas Eve, Lovell and crewmates Frank Borman and William Anders read verses from the Bible's Book of Genesis.
Lovell, who later had a moon crater named in his honour, retired as an astronaut in 1973, working first for a harbour towing company and then in telecommunications.
He co-authored a 1994 book, Lost Moon: The Perilous Voyage of Apollo 13, that became the basis for Howard's film. Lovell recalled a meeting with Howard in which the director asked the astronaut which actor he would want to play him.
'I said Kevin Costner,' Lovell said. 'And Hanks never lets me forget that...But Hanks did a great job.'
Lovell made a cameo appearance in the film as the commander of the US Navy ship that retrieves the astronauts and shakes hands with Hanks.
James Lovell was born in Cleveland on March 25, 1928. He was five when his father died and his mother moved the family to Milwaukee. He became interested in space as a teenager. He graduated from the US Naval Academy in 1952 and became a test pilot before being selected as a Nasa astronaut in 1962.
He had four children with his wife, Marilyn. – Reuters
(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Materialists review: This non-romcom has the welcome oddness of a future classic
Materialists Director : Celine Song Cert : 15A Starring : Dakota Johnson, Chris Evans, Pedro Pascal, Zoë Winters, Martin Ireland, Dasha Nekrasova, Emmy Wheeler, Louisa Jacobson, Eddie Cahill, John Magaro Running Time : 1 hr 57 mins In recent years the world has got confused as to what constitutes a romantic comedy. Every second review of last year's One Day described that David Nichols TV adaptation as such – most often abbreviating to 'romcom' – despite it plainly not being any sort of comedy. Did Richard Curtis accelerate this upending of cinematic taxonomy? At any rate, here we are. Celine Song 's gorgeous, intelligent follow-up to her Oscar-nominated Past Lives offers a particularly knotty source of further confusion. The director herself places Materialists within the genre. She lists pictures such as Annie Hall and Broadcast News as influences. It certainly has the shape of a romantic comedy. Dakota Johnson, still boasting the best hair this side of Renata Reinsve, stars as Lucy, a matchmaker plying her trade amid the dentists and lawyers of New York. Attending a wedding, she bumps into a hugely wealthy – and, crucially as it transpires, tall – financier in the currently unavoidable form of Pedro Pescal. This Harry offers the perfect answer to a question she encounters every day. Every female client wants someone over 6ft; each wants someone as loaded as her new pal. But Lucy half-accidentally decides – rather than making merchandise of Harry – to keep him for herself. Meanwhile, John (Chris Evans), her likable, impoverished ex-boyfriend, an actor and waiter, lurks in the background with sad Basset-hound eyes. READ MORE They could once have made a cracking Doris Day flick from that scenario. Doris as the no-nonsense professional. Rock Hudson as Pedro Pescal. Tony Randall as Chris Evans. Okay, that last swap doesn't really work, but you get the idea. Except Song doesn't really seem that interested in generating laughs. Her script is consistently smart, but, rather than trading in quips, it relies on sharp, often cynical, observations on this society's commodification of human relations. 'He makes you feel valuable ,' says Lucy at one point. The client can do what she wants with that last word. The audience will suspect, deep down, the matchmaker means it more literally than she pretends. Harry is a 'luxury good'. Marriage is a 'business deal'. Matchmakers exist in all societies – Barry Fitzgerald played one in Hollywood's most famous romanticisation of Ireland – but the current version speaks to the very American notion that, with the right personnel and the right equipment, a dedicated professional can achieve anything. Get a man to the moon. Land on the beaches of Normandy. Find a white man who makes over 250K a year for a thirtysomething psychoanalyst from Brooklyn Heights. A shocking late plot development – one that has irritated some US critics – presses home how uneasy Song (who once worked as a matchmaker) is with this way of thinking. It is not just that the film dodges gags for socio-economic philosophising. For all the surface beauty here – Shabier Kirchner cinematography is to die for – the film is cooler and stiller than the regulation romcom. As in Past Lives, Song surrounds her New Yorkers with an attention-focusing mantle of silence. Gaps in the dialogue offer us opportunities to take the characters more seriously than we otherwise might. So maybe Materialists is not quite a comedy. It is, however, hopelessly, delightfully Romantic (my capitalisation). We are, surely, not giving much away by admitting that the film – as anything in this genre must – ultimately sides with emotion over financial objectification. It does so without compromising the integrity of its rigorously drawn characters or inviting its fine leads to soften their disciplined performances. Materialists has received the odd puzzled review in its home territory, but it has the welcome oddness of a future classic. Just don't go expecting There's Something About Mary. Opens on Friday, August 15th, with previews in selected cinemas


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
What have your online dating experiences been like? Share your stories
The first online dating website, was 30 years old this year. After three decades of online dating, we would like to hear your experiences of dating websites and apps – the good, the bad and the ugly – for an upcoming article. Perhaps you met your lifelong partner online? Or have you used the apps just for hookups? Have you been ghosted, catfished, lovebombed, or sent inappropriate or offensive content? Or have you quit the apps to search for love IRL (in real life) after suffering from dating app fatigue? Use the form below to share your story. A selection of responses may be published. If you wish to remain anonymous please indicate this in your submission.


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Taylor Swift announces imminent release of new album
Taylor Swift has announced her next album, The Life of a Showgirl. Ms Swift is known for dropping hints and clues for her fans before announcements and this one was no different. On Monday night, a countdown to 12.12am eastern time on August 12th appeared on her website, transformed to a glittering orange. On Instagram, Taylor Nation – a branch of Ms Swift's official marketing team – shared a carousel of 12 images from the Eras Tour, writing in the caption: 'Thinking about when she said 'See you next era ... '' It was also announced that Ms Swift will appear on her partner NFL player Travis Kelce's podcast New Heights on Wednesday. At 12.12am Swift's website briefly crashed, before reappearing with scant details about The Life of a Showgirl. The album has no confirmed release date. Ms Swift's website says it will be shipped before October 13th, with the caveat: '**THIS IS NOT THE RELEASE DATE, OFFICIAL RELEASE DATE TO BE ANNOUNCED**.' Taylor Swift album reveal. Screenshot from video on social media The New Heights podcast later shared a clip of Ms Swift's appearance, in which she opens a briefcase and takes out a blurred vinyl. 'This is my brand new album, The Life of a Showgirl,' she said, while Mr Kelce's brother and co-host Jason screamed. The 35-year-old is among the world's bestselling musicians, selling an estimated 200 million records globally and holds the record for most No 1 albums in the US by a female artist in history. Her global Eras tour became the first billion-dollar tour in history, selling 2.4 million tickets in a single day, and made more than $2 billion over 21 months. Forbes estimated Ms Swift earned $10 million-$13 million (€8.6 million-€11.1 million) a night. Her last album, 2024's The Tortured Poets Department, set a streaming record on Spotify – 300 million in one day and 1 billion in five – and made her the first artist in history to secure the top 14 spots on the Billboard Hot 100. In May, Ms Swift bought back the master recordings to her first six albums, giving her control over her entire catalogue for the first time. The singer signed with her first label, Big Machine, in 2005, at the age of 15, giving them the rights to her master recordings. In 2019, label head Scott Borchetta sold those six albums to music executive Scooter Braun, who sold them to the private equity firm Shamrock Capital for a reported $300 million. [ All of Taylor Swift's albums ranked, from worst to best Opens in new window ] To regain control over her catalogue after the sale to Mr Braun – and to devalue his investment – Ms Swift embarked on a project to re-record all six albums, rebranding each one as '(Taylor's Version)' and adding 'From the Vault' tracks from the original songwriting sessions that had not made it on to the original albums. 'I almost stopped thinking it could ever happen, after 20 years of having the carrot dangled and then yanked away,' she wrote in a letter to fans in May, after buying her catalogue back from Shamrock Capital. 'But that's all in the past now. All of the music I've ever made ... now belongs ... to me.' Reputation and Ms Swift's self-titled debut album, from 2006, are the only albums not to be re-recorded, with fans speculating as to their possible release dates for years. – Guardian