logo
BIG COUNTRY POLITICS: Runoff momentum, HB 1375 debate & one candidate's takeaway from it all

BIG COUNTRY POLITICS: Runoff momentum, HB 1375 debate & one candidate's takeaway from it all

Yahoo19-05-2025
BIG COUNTRY, Texas () – Despite not winning her race, Abilene City Council candidate Tammy Fogle says the campaign trail was a valuable and rewarding journey that deepened her connection to the community and strengthened her voice on issues she cares about, both locally and in Texas legislation. As she reflects on the election, political analyst Dr. Paul Fabrizio offers insight into what shaped voter turnout, while also commenting on the recent election of Pope Leo XIV.
Abilene City Council Election Results: Candidates share reactions
Tammy Fogle recently ran for Abilene City Council Place 6 against incumbent Travis Craver. Despite not securing the seat, she says she learned a lot and enjoyed her campaign experience.
'It's interesting because you never know what part of your life is going to be a linchpin for something that blows up in your face. You try to think, 'What have I done in my life?' And that's probably the scariest part, the unknown; but actually, I had so much fun,' Fogle shared. 'I don't recommend it for everyone, because it is a little grueling, but it was really an amazing experience, getting to connect with citizens and talk with them about what concerns them, and people that I never would have gotten to have conversations with had I not run for office.'
Abilene voters pass $20 million bond for airport upgrades
In the same election, voters approved a $20 million bond for airport improvements — by a slim margin of 52%. While she initially saw the proposal as reasonable, she later questioned the motives behind the push.
'I thought there was some legitimate need for it. As I watched the campaign unfold, the fact that we had the Chamber of Commerce investing advertising into this to promote it caused me great concern, because they have an agenda, and I think the city has a different agenda,' Fogle explained. 'But what was promoted was that we needed to have a beautiful airport, and to me, as a person who pays taxes and wants our taxes to go down, that's concerning, because a beautiful airport is not necessarily one that's going to bring in more airlines… What needs are there, and what wants are there? I feel like it was a want. And on top of all the other taxes that are going to be coming our way, raising our taxes, I think it's concerning that, due to a lack of information, citizens did approve it by a small, small margin.'
Outside of city politics, Fogle has been vocal in her support for House Bill 1375. The bill would hold businesses accountable—particularly bookstores—for distributing what it defines as harmful material to minors.
Big Country Politics: Abilene bookstore owner discuses concerns of House Bill 1375
The bill has sparked debate across the state. Recently, on Big Country Politics, Arlene Kasselman, owner of Seven and One Books, shared her concerns about vague language and the potential legal consequences for independent bookstores.
'I think the education on this has been really stifled by a lot of the conversations that happened through people like the owner of Seven and One Books, who come out and say, This bill is dangerous. It can cause censorship,' Fogle said. 'A group that I follow told me about this, [saying] there's no explanation in the bill. What concerns me most is that I don't even know if the person has read the bill. If you look at the bill, it says the definition is harmful, it says what harmful and obscene material is, and it tells you it's a Texas penal code… It says that it's prurient material, which is basically an excessive interest in sex.'
According to Fogle, the issue isn't new, as the state legislature has been working on this topic for nearly eight years.
'One of the things she failed to even acknowledge in her discussion of it is that this is focused on books of sexual content. Not racism, not the color of your skin, not that kind of thing. In fact, most of the books she listed were not even books about sexual content, which is something that is harmful to children,' Fogle said. 'So this is kind of a last-ditch effort to say, 'whoa, whoa, whoa. We don't want to have to be responsible for making sure we protect children.' I think HB 1375 is a great bill that actually helps people know that even if you don't understand the law, it doesn't mean you're not accountable for it.'
To better understand the bill, Fogle reached out directly to the author.
'They gave me a one-pager that talks about how it creates a civil right to sue over obscenity. It targets companies that distribute porn to minors, and that was one of the things mentioned,' Fogle shared. 'The owner said she wasn't talking about pornography. Well, this is, and there's a clear distinction between things that are sexual. Unlike, you know, Anne Frank is a book she mentioned, Diary of Anne Frank. The only reason that's on a banned book is because it was republished as a graphic novel, and the graphic novel took liberties that weren't in the original book. So we have to be careful that we're informed and understand, and if you hear what I say, I encourage you to go look it up and make sure what I'm saying is accurate. Don't just trust my word for it. We need to make sure we know how to find the sources to be able to validate and have intelligent conversations about these issues.'
However, like many others, HB 1375 will not advance this session. Nearly 4,800 bills in the Texas Legislature didn't make it to the House floor.
Thousands of Texas House bills 'die' at key midnight deadline
Switching gears back to the recent local election, Dr. Paul Fabrizio, a political science professor at McMurry University, noted the low voter turnout in Abilene.
'I would argue that for local elections, it's the responsibility of the candidates to generate excitement for an election. Really, it falls on the challengers to come up with good, valid reasons to toss out the incumbents, and those reasons have to be compelling enough to get voters' attention and to get them to the polls,' Fabrizio explained. 'We have seen elections in this town with a much higher turnout than what we've had this time, and it was because the challengers really got into it. They were talking about issues that voters cared about, and it worked because voters turned out. And so, because of that, the voters responded. Nobody really asked them to come and vote, so they didn't vote.'
Now, in the City Council Place 5 race, incumbent Kyle McAlister and challenger Miguel Espinoza are preparing for a runoff after neither candidate secured the required 50% of the vote. But will turnout improve?
'Again, it comes back to the two candidates in the race, and most especially the challenger, Miguel Espinosa. He has to get voters out. He has the tough job of getting his voters to come out a second time and converting voters who voted for the other candidates, Cynthia Alvidrez, to support him as well if he wants to win this race,' Fabrizio said. 'That's going to be really tough to do. So in the next couple of weeks… he's got to generate that kind of excitement.'
Place 5 race not over yet: McAlister, Espinoza gear up for runoff
Fabrizio added that while runoff elections can favor challengers, the odds may be stacked against Espinoza.
'You look at a race, and there's going to be a runoff, you can make the argument that the challenger has the best chance to knock off the incumbent because the incumbent failed to get a majority of the votes,' Fabrizio shared. 'Kyle McAllister was really, really close to getting that majority, you know, just a handful of votes, and he would have gotten it, so he is almost there. So in that sense, he just has to get his voters to come out, and a few more voters, and he's got this election. So I would argue Miguel has the most difficult road to go, but it's not insurmountable. In the city, we have had other runoffs where the challenger has beaten the incumbent in those runoff races. So it's certainly possible this time, but you've got to get people out… But as I drive around the city, as I talk to people, I'm not having conversations with people about this runoff race. Usually, when there's a runoff election, people are talking about it.'
Fabrizio also weighed in on an international development — the recent election of Pope Leo XIV. He said, like most things, it's deeply political.
'You don't want to think that politics plays a part in it. But all of these people who participate, all these cardinals, have risen up through the ranks to become members of this very, very small body, right? They've all demonstrated political skills to get there, and they're not going to just turn it off once they're with the others to choose a candidate,' Fabrizio explained. 'To me, the big surprise was that they chose an American. Because all along, the story has been that no American would ever be elected Pope.'
According to Fabrizio, Leo XIV isn't your average American cardinal.
'The reason for that is very simple. He spent so little time in the United States. He is really a creature of being a missionary in Peru and then a bureaucrat in the Vatican Curia. He's lived two-thirds of his life outside of the United States,' Fabrizio explained.
Abilene woman marks Jubilee Year at the Vatican, sees Pope Francis in his final days
And while Pope Leo XIV embraces some traditions of papal authority, Fabrizio sees a familiar thread from his predecessor.
'What I see when I look at him is one who is comfortable with traditional styles of liturgy, of worship. You noticed that when he came out, he was wearing the red stole that Pope Francis did not wear,' Fabrizio shared. 'He's moved into the Apostolic Palace, which Pope Francis did not move into. So he's saying, I am comfortable with some of the trappings of Papal power, papal looks, that sort of thing. But then his words, actually, when he talks about immigrants, when he talks about migrants, you look at some of his tweets that he's put out criticizing the Vice President of the United States, you go, okay, he probably has a missionary's heart and is really focused on the people on the margins. In that sense, very much a continuation of where Pope Francis was.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Editorial: Saving lives no more — RFK risks us all in targeting mRNA vaccine research
Editorial: Saving lives no more — RFK risks us all in targeting mRNA vaccine research

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Saving lives no more — RFK risks us all in targeting mRNA vaccine research

Showing that his loyalty to his own anti-vax mentality is greater than his loyalty to President Donald Trump, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the dangerous quack atop the Department of Health and Human Services, has announced that he will be rescinding a half billion dollars in grants and contracts for the development of mRNA technology and vaccines. It was mRNA that was key to both the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna COVID vaccines that were created under Trump in his first term, but RFK does not like life-saving vaccines and so he's pulling the plug. Part of the problem with policymaking at the level of the federal government is that the impacts are often too large, too long-winded, too abstract to really be able to nearly encompass their full breadth, particularly for busy people who have their own immediate concerns to worry about. In this case, though, we can point to very clear, very grim and almost unavoidable repercussions directly caused by this decision: many people worldwide — including in the United States — will die deaths that could have been prevented. Setting aside all of the jargon, at its most basic level a vaccine is about allowing the body to ward off or survive pathogens that would otherwise be extremely dangerous and debilitating or kill a person outright. The model itself is far from new; inoculations in some form of another, including the basic utilization of a dead virus to create antibodies that can attack a live one, date back centuries. What's mainly changed since then is that we have only advanced our understanding and technology to keep infectious diseases from running rampant in our society. One such technological leap was the mRNA process, an innovation so significant that its pioneers won the Nobel prize. The effectiveness and the safety of this process has been well-documented in research settings, but we don't even have to parse the studies to know this because we all collectively lived it. As Trump's Operation Warp Speed produced, the first and most widespread COVID inoculations were mRNA-based vaccines, which enabled us to blunt the rampaging pandemic and much more quickly return our society to a semblance of normalcy. Those COVID vaccines have already been synthesized, but the real issue here are the ones that haven't, or even the inoculations for viruses that we have not even identified or think to be a threat today. Whether we like it or not, our relationship to infectious diseases is something akin to an arms race, in which we are constantly trying to counteract pathogens that, by dint of evolution, are constantly finding ways to elude our defenses and sicken us. We've stayed largely on top of this arms race over the last six decades or so in particular because of constant efforts that have developed sophisticated tools to fight back, including mRNA. A disarmament here for no other reason than ideologically-driven conspiracy that drives Bobby Kennedy is going to mean that we give the diseases an opening, which they will no doubt exploit to sicken and kill us. There are quite simply no two ways about it, and any pause in the research could have dire consequences, even if it is reversed later. Ongoing and sometimes multimonth or even multiyear projects will lose funding and might have to be shut down, with all their efforts wasted. There's no way to really put the genie back in the bottle so we have to stop it in the first place, which means RFK must be fired immediately or impeached and removed by Congress. Many lives hang in the balance. _____

Now Jimmy Fallon Is Using Taylor Swift To Suggest Trump Had Sinister Ties To Epstein
Now Jimmy Fallon Is Using Taylor Swift To Suggest Trump Had Sinister Ties To Epstein

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Now Jimmy Fallon Is Using Taylor Swift To Suggest Trump Had Sinister Ties To Epstein

Jimmy Fallon is on a roll in taunting President Donald Trump with sexual jokes ― and some are making insinuations about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. (Watch the video below.) On Wednesday the 'Tonight Show' host was back at it again, using Taylor Swift songs to sum up the president's Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Fallon got a big response for noting that Americans are worried that Trump isn't ready for the talks to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine 'since his mind is basically a giant 'Blank Space.' ' Then the comedian waded into very sensitive territory. 'Also, he's distracted by the Epstein scandal. He'll tell Putin it's been a 'Cruel Summer' because everyone thinks 'I Did Something Bad' but I swear everyone on the island was '22.′' 'Oooooh,' the audience reacted in he-really-went-there fashion. Fast-forward to 1:50 for the Swift-Trump bit: To be clear, Trump reportedly has never been investigated over anything involving the late Epstein. The sex offender's hobnobbing with celebrities and politicians has generated high interest in what government files potentially contain about them. And while Trump was reportedly told by Attorney General Pam Bondi that he is mentioned in the files, the context is not publicly known. Trump brought some suspicion on himself by suddenly declaring the files to be a hoax. But some Republicans are backing a bipartisan House push for the release of all the files related to Epstein. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) appears to be hindering the process. Fallon has taunted Trump for a while on his about-face on the Epstein front. On Monday the host noted that the president had hoped for a 'trilateral meeting' of peace talks involving Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy. 'Last time Trump had a trilateral meeting was on Epstein Island,' Fallon cracked. On Tuesday, he again parlayed monologue chatter about the summit into another naughty dig at the commander in chief. 'Trump said that in his meeting with Putin, he will know probably in the first two minutes whether a deal is possible,' the host said. 'It's reassuring when a president talks about ending a war like a Tinder date.' 'Yep,' Fallon continued, 'Trump says that he'll know in two minutes, which makes sense because, according to Stormy Daniels, two minutes is plenty.' Related... A Funny Thing Happened To Ratings When Jimmy Fallon Had Fox News Host As Guest Jimmy Fallon Again Talks Dirty About Trump And We're Here For It Jimmy Fallon's Filthy Trump Burn Over Putin Meeting Gets A 'Whoa' From Audience

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store