logo
U.S. Lists Group Behind Indian Kashmir Killings As Terrorists

U.S. Lists Group Behind Indian Kashmir Killings As Terrorists

Newsweek6 hours ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The United States designated a Muslim militant group a "foreign terrorist organization" over an attack on Indian tourists in the Kashmir region in April in which 26 people were killed, saying the organization was a front for Pakistan-based Islamists who have been battling Indian forces in the disputed Himalayan region for decades.
The Resistance Front (TRF) initially claimed responsibility for the April 22 attack in Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir, which ramped up tensions between India and Pakistan and sparked a four-day war between the nuclear-armed rivals in May.
The TRF later disavowed responsibility for the attack on Hindu tourists but U.S. and Indian security organizations dismissed the group's attempt to shirk responsibility.
Newsweek reached out to Pakistan's foreign ministry for comment.
An Indian paramilitary soldier on guard on the bank of the Dal lake in Indian Kashmir following an attack on Indian tourists in the region by gunmen on April 24, 2025. The U.S. has designated...
An Indian paramilitary soldier on guard on the bank of the Dal lake in Indian Kashmir following an attack on Indian tourists in the region by gunmen on April 24, 2025. The U.S. has designated the group deemed responsible for the attack a terrorist organization. MoreWhy It Matters
The U.S. listing of the group as a "foreign terrorist organization" and "specially designated global terrorist" upholds U.S. opposition to Islamist militancy and demonstrates support for Hindu-majority India as it tries to end a simmering separatist insurgency in Muslim-majority Kashmir, for which it blames Pakistan.
ThePahalgam attack prompted the worst confrontation between India and Pakistan in decades, with India attacking what it said were terrorist targets inside Pakistan. Pakistan rejected allegations of cross-border involvement in that or other attacks.
What To Know
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the TRF was a "front and proxy" for the Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Pakistani group responsible for some of the most deadly attacks in India over the past 20 years. The United States designated it a terrorist group in 2001.
"These actions taken by the Department of State demonstrates the Trump Administration's commitment to protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack," Rubio said in a statement.
Hindu-majority India and Muslim Pakistan both claim Kashmir and rule over parts of it. Muslim militants, most of whom call for Indian Kashmir to be ruled by Pakistan, have been battling security forces in the Indian part of Kashmir since the late 1980s.
India accuses Pakistan of supporting the militants. Pakistan denies that but says it supports the people of Kashmir in their quest for self-determination. Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar referred to the perpetrators of the April attack as "freedom fighters", drawing criticism in India and the U.S.
India welcomed the U.S. designation.
"A strong affirmation of India-US counter-terrorism cooperation," Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said on the X social media platform.
"Zero tolerance for Terrorism," he added.
The U.S. decision adds the TRF "and other associated aliases" to the Lashkar-e-Taiba designation as a terrorist group, the State Department said, making it illegal for any U.S. individual or entity to knowingly provide material support. The group's U.S.-linked assets, if any, are subject to immediate freeze.
The April attack triggered Operation Sindoor on May 7, an Indian military operation targeting what it described as "terrorist infrastructure" in Pakistani-controlled territory. A ceasefire was brokered on May 10, with Trump publicly claiming a role in the de-escalation.
India has long maintained opposition to any mediation in its dispute with Pakistan over Kashmir and it denied any U.S. role in ending its latest war with its neighbor.
What People Are Saying
Indian government spokesperson: "India has consistently emphasized the need for global cooperation in the fight against terrorism and the dismantling of terror infrastructure. The designation of TRF is a timely and important step reflecting the deep cooperation between India and the United States on counter-terrorism."
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "These actions taken by the Department of State demonstrates the Trump Administration's commitment to protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack."
What Happens Next
The May 10 ceasefire has held but India has vowed to respond to any new militant attack in its part of Kashmir or anywhere else in India.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Colbert announces Late Show cancelled by CBS
Stephen Colbert announces Late Show cancelled by CBS

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stephen Colbert announces Late Show cancelled by CBS

CBS is cancelling The Late Show With Stephen Colbert next May, ending a decades-old TV institution and removing from air one of US President Donald Trump's most prominent and persistent late-night critics. The announcement followed Colbert's criticism on Monday of a settlement between Mr Trump and Paramount Global, parent company of CBS, over a 60 Minutes story. Colbert told his audience at New York's Ed Sullivan Theatre that he had learned on Wednesday night that after a decade on air 'next year will be our last season', adding: 'It's the end of The Late Show on CBS. I'm not being replaced. This is all just going away.' The audience responded with boos and groans. 'Yeah, I share your feelings,' the 61-year-old comic said. Three top Paramount and CBS executives praised Colbert's show as 'a staple of the nation's zeitgeist' in a statement that said the cancellation 'is purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night', adding: 'It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount.' In his Monday monologue, Colbert said he was 'offended' by the 16 million dollar settlement reached by Paramount, whose pending sale to Skydance Media needs the Trump administration's approval. Mr Trump had sued Paramount Global over how 60 Minutes edited its interview last autumn with Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. Critics say the company settled primarily to clear a hurdle to the Skydance sale. Colbert took over The Late Show in 2015 after becoming a big name in comedy and news satire working with Jon Stewart on The Daily Show and hosting The Colbert Report. The most recent ratings from Nielsen show Colbert gaining viewers so far this year and winning his timeslot among broadcasters, with about 2.41 million viewers across 41 new episodes. On Tuesday, Colbert's Late Show landed its sixth nomination for a Primetime Emmy Award for outstanding talk show. It won a Peabody Award in 2021. David Letterman began hosting The Late Show in 1993. When Colbert took over, he deepened its engagement with politics. Alongside musicians and film stars, Colbert often welcomes politicians to his couch. Democratic senator Adam Schiff, of California, was a guest on Thursday night. Mr Schiff said on X that 'if Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better'. Solve the daily Crossword

Trump orders Bondi to seek release of Jeffrey Epstein-related grand jury testimony
Trump orders Bondi to seek release of Jeffrey Epstein-related grand jury testimony

CBS News

time26 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Trump orders Bondi to seek release of Jeffrey Epstein-related grand jury testimony

Washington — President Trump late Thursday ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of grand jury testimony related to Jeffrey Epstein as his administration faces pressure to disclose more details on the late sex offender. "Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval," Mr. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. "This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!" Bondi wrote in a post on X minutes later, "we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts." A judge will need to make the final decision on whether material can be released, which could take some time and is unlikely to be immediate. It's unclear what material the Trump administration will ask to be released. It's not clear how much of the Epstein-related material in the government's possession is grand jury testimony. Epstein was investigated by federal authorities in Florida in the 2000s, which ended in a non-prosecution agreement and a guilty plea on state prostitution charges, and he was later charged with child sex trafficking in Manhattan in 2019. The government also secured a conviction against Epstein's co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell. It investigated the circumstances of Epstein's death in federal custody, which was deemed a suicide. The order from Mr. Trump comes after the Justice Department and FBI released a memo stating that Epstein did not have an incriminating "client list," did not try to blackmail any prominent figures, and died by suicide. The memo drew backlash from across the political spectrum, including from some fervent Trump backers, in part because Bondi and other administration figures had promised to release information on Epstein. The government is generally required to keep grand jury materials secret, and it's common for not all material that is shown to a grand jury — which meets before a person is criminally indicted — to emerge during a criminal case. A request of this kind by the government is unusual, says Mitchell Epner, a partner at the New York law firm Kudman Trachten Aloe Posner, and a former federal prosecutor. "I've been in and around federal criminal cases for over 30 years. I've never heard of this before," he told CBS News. While the scope of the government's request is still unknown, Epner says it could encompass an "enormous quantity of data." Mr. Trump said the government would seek the release of grand jury testimony, which Epner noted may include exhibits that witnesses testified about before a grand jury. "I would not bet against there being anything, from the most interesting thing in the world to the least interesting thing in the world, in that material," said Epner, who told CBS News he believes calls for more information to be disclosed in the Epstein case are warranted. Epner joked: "If we were to find out the location of the corpse of Jimmy Hoffa, I would not be surprised." Material likely will not be released immediately, according to Epner, who said, "weeks would be moving very quickly, months is likely." Under court rules, grand jury material is typically only released under certain circumstances, often when it's needed for some other investigation. The government's grounds for release in this case aren't clear. In this case, both associates and alleged victims of Epstein's may oppose some disclosures. "I would not be surprised if a number of people came forward under pseudonyms to object to the release of grand jury material related to them," Epner said. "I also would not be surprised if some of the victims…came forward and said, 'Yes, we do want things to be revealed.'" Last week's memo on Epstein reignited years of questions — and conspiracy theories — on the disgraced financier, including speculation about the circumstances of Epstein's death in custody, and about whether the federal government was concealing information to shield some of Epstein's famous friends. Bondi had pledged to release files related to Epstein, and suggested in a Fox News interview in February a "client list" was "sitting on my desk right now to review." (She later said she meant generally that material on Epstein was sitting on her desk.) In late February, the Justice Department distributed binders to over a dozen right-wing social media influencers labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1," though the influencers later said many of the materials were already in the public domain. Some Republicans and vocal Trump supporters were dissatisfied with last week's memo, in some cases calling for more disclosures or the appointment of a special prosecutor to look into the Epstein case — which White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president does not support. Mr. Trump, for his part, has scolded some Republicans for buying into what he called the "the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax," calling them "stupid people" and "weaklings" who are "do[ing] the Democrats work." Shortly before pushing for the release of grand jury testimony, the president on Thursday denied a Wall Street Journal report on what the newspaper described as a "bawdy" birthday letter to Epstein — featuring a drawing of a nude woman — that the paper claimed was signed by Mr. Trump in the early 2000s. Mr. Trump and Epstein had crossed paths for years, though Mr. Trump says they had a "falling out." Mr. Trump called the letter a "FAKE" and threatened to sue the Journal, as well as its parent company News Corp and leader Rupert Murdoch. "These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures," he said. CBS News has not independently verified or seen the letter. Dow Jones — the News Corp division that includes the Journal — declined to comment on Mr. Trump's threats.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store