US is secretly tracking AI chip shipments from Nvidia, AMD, Dell and others: Here's why
US authorities are secretly placing location tracking devices in certain shipments of advanced chips from companies like Nvidia, Dell, AMD, Nvidia among others, reports news agency Reuters. These tracking devices, the report which quotes people with direct knowledge of the matter says, are aimed to prevent these chip shipments from being illegally diverted to China. The tactic applies only to select shipments already under investigation, the sources said.
The trackers are often hidden in packaging and, in some cases, inside the servers themselves. Some are roughly the size of a smartphone. The US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security, Homeland Security Investigations, and the FBI are typically involved, the report says.
They are used to detect whether AI chips are being sent to destinations under US export restrictions. Reuters report quotes officials who say the move is part of broader efforts to enforce curbs on China's access to advanced American semiconductors. The devices, the sources claim, can help build cases against individuals and companies that violate U.S. export rules.
Location trackers have long been used by US law enforcement to monitor exports such as airplane parts. In recent years, they have been deployed to combat the illegal diversion of semiconductors.
How chip makers responded
Super Micro said it does not disclose its 'security practices and policies' and would not comment on tracking actions. Dell, on the other hand, said it was 'not aware of a US Government initiative to place trackers in its product shipments.'
US-China tech tensions
US, a leader in the global AI chip supply chain, has recently tightened export controls on China from 2022 to limit its military development. Similar restrictions apply to Russia. Proposals in the White House and Congress have suggested requiring location verification technology in chips to prevent diversion.
China has criticized the restrictions as an attempt to suppress its growth. Last month, its cyberspace regulator called in Nvidia to discuss concerns over alleged 'backdoors' in its chips, a claim Nvidia has denied.
Some Chinese resellers have reportedly said they inspect diverted shipments for trackers before delivery due to the risk of them being embedded. In a recent US Justice Department case, a co-conspirator told a defendant to 'look carefully' for trackers on servers containing Nvidia chips.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump's conflicting relation with Putin takes spotlight at Alaska summit
Donald Trump's summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday could be a decisive moment for both the war in Ukraine and the US leader's anomalous relationship with his Russian counterpart. Trump has long boasted that he's gotten along well with Putin and spoken admiringly of him, even praising him as pretty smart for invading Ukraine. But in recent months, he's expressed frustrations with Putin and threatened more sanctions on his country. At the same time, Trump has offered conflicting messages about his expectations for the summit. He has called it really a feel-out meeting to gauge Putin's openness to a ceasefire but also warned of very severe consequences if Putin doesn't agree to end the war. For Putin, Friday's meeting is a chance to repair his relationship with Trump and unlace the West's isolation of his country following its invasion of Ukraine 3 1/2 years ago. He's been open about his desire to rebuild US-Russia relations now that Trump is back in the White House. The White House has dismissed any suggestion that Trump's agreeing to sit down with Putin is a win for the Russian leader. But critics have suggested that the meeting gives Putin an opportunity to get in Trump's ear to the detriment of Ukraine, whose leader was excluded from the summit. I think this is a colossal mistake. You don't need to invite Putin onto US soil to hear what we already know he wants, said Ian Kelly, a retired career foreign service officer who served as the US ambassador to Georgia during the Obama and first Trump administrations. Republican Sen Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a longtime Russia hawk and close ally of Trump's, expressed optimism for the summit. I have every confidence in the world that the President is going to go to meet Putin from a position of strength, that he's going to look out for Europe and Ukrainian needs to end this war honourably, Graham wrote on social media. A look back at the ups and downs of Trump and Putin's relationship: Russia questions during the 2016 campaign Months before he was first elected president, Trump cast doubt on findings from US intelligence agencies that Russian government hackers had stolen emails from Democrats, including his opponent Hillary Clinton, and released them in an effort to hurt her campaign and boost Trump's. In one 2016 appearance, he shockingly called on Russian hackers to find emails that Clinton had reportedly deleted. Russia, if you're listening, Trump said, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. Questions about his connections to Russia dogged much of his first term, touching off investigations by the Justice Department and Congress and leading to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller, who secured multiple convictions against Trump aides and allies but did not establish proof of a criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the Trump campaign. These days, Trump describes the Russia investigation as an affinity he and Putin shared. Putin went through a hell of a lot with me, Trump said earlier this year. He went through a phony witch hunt where they used him and Russia. Russia, Russia, Russia, ever hear of that deal? Putin in 2019 mocked the investigation and its ultimate findings, saying, A mountain gave birth to a mouse. He just said 'it's not Russia' Trump met with Putin six times during his first term, including a 2018 summit in Helsinki, when Trump stunned the world by appearing to side with an American adversary on the question of whether Russia meddled in the 2016 election. I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today, Trump said. He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be. Facing intense blowback, Trump tried to walk back the comment a full 24 hours later. But he raised doubt on that reversal by saying other countries could have also interfered. Putin referred to Helsinki summit as the beginning of the path back from Western efforts to isolate Russia. He also made clear that he had wanted Trump to win in 2016. Yes, I wanted him to win because he spoke of normalisation of Russian-US ties, Putin said. Isn't it natural to feel sympathy to a person who wanted to develop relations with our country? Trump calls Putin 'pretty smart' after invasion of Ukraine The two leaders kept up their friendly relationship after Trump left the White House under protest in 2021. After Putin invaded Ukraine in 2022, Trump described the Russian leader in positive terms. I mean, he's taking over a country for USD 2 worth of sanctions. I'd say that's pretty smart, Trump said at his Mar-a-Lago resort. In a radio interview that week, he suggested that Putin was going into Ukraine to be a peacekeeper. Trump repeatedly said the invasion of Ukraine would never have happened if he had been in the White House a claim Putin endorsed while lending his support to Trump's false claims of election fraud. I couldn't disagree with him that if he had been president, if they hadn't stolen victory from him in 2020, the crisis that emerged in Ukraine in 2022 could have been avoided, he said. Trump also repeatedly boasted that he could have the fighting settled within 24 hours. Through much of his campaign, Trump criticised US support for Ukraine and derided Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as a salesman for persuading Washington to provide weapons and funding to his country. Revisiting the relationship Once he became president, Trump stopped claiming he'd solve the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. In March, he said he was being a little bit sarcastic when he said that. Since the early days of Trump's second term, Putin has pushed for a summit while trying to pivot from the Ukrainian conflict by emphasising the prospect of launching joint US-Russian economic projects, among other issues. We'd better meet and have a calm conversation on all issues of interest to both the United States and Russia based on today's realities, Putin said in January. In February, things looked favourable for Putin when Trump had a blowup with Zelenskyy at the White House, berating him as disrespectful. In late March, Trump still spoke of trusting Putin when it came to hopes for a ceasefire, saying, I don't think he's going to go back on his word. But a month later, as Russian strikes escalated, Trump posted a public and personal plea on his social media account: Vladimir, STOP! He began voicing more frustration with the Russian leader, saying he was Just tapping me along. In May, he wrote on social media that Putin has gone absolutely CRAZY! Earlier this month, Trump ordered the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines based on the highly provocative statements of the country's former president, Dmitry Medvedev. Trump's vocal protests about Putin have tempered somewhat since he announced their meeting, but so have his predictions for what he might accomplish. Speaking to reporters Monday, Trump described their upcoming summit not as the occasion in which he'd finally get the conflict settled but instead as really a feel-out meeting, a little bit. I think it'll be good, Trump said. But it might be bad.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Tencent's AI Restraint Shows Risk of Alibaba, JD Food War
(Bloomberg) -- China's biggest tech companies are bouncing back after years on the ropes with outsized ambitions to dominate in everything from robots and smart glasses to cheap meals. But investors want them to focus their spending where it counts — AI. From Meta Platforms Inc. to Google, one topic has dominated the conversation this tech earnings season: how Silicon Valley's leaders will invest to seize the momentum in a game-changing technology. In China, the industry is just as enthralled by a three-way battle to deliver the cheapest meals and knick-knacks, fastest. That conflict between Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Inc. and Meituan — both on social media and in the physical consumer arena — isn't just compressing margins and irking investors — it's risking Beijing's scrutiny. So far this year JD, Alibaba and Meituan have pledged or spent billions of dollars hiring delivery people, creating coupons and plying their millions of daily users with advertising about free milk tea and other instant retail promotions. Investors responded with a sell-off in Meituan and JD, the most exposed to the price war, shedding around a combined $100 billion in market value since late last year. Things came to a head last month when the industry regulator called all three into a private meeting to lay down the law. And days later, the trio coordinated contrite statements promising to end 'disorderly competition.' But in reality, they've no choice but to keep going, analysts say, because they're essentially fighting for the lifeblood of their business: users. With AI still years away from monetization, that's become the central existential problem to China Tech Inc. 'We want less food delivery wars, and more reasons to be optimistic about AI monetization,' said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee. 'Ultimately for tech companies to perform they have to deliver top line growth. Progress on the monetization of AI is one way — whether directly, such as through the provision of cloud services or indirectly by enhancing their respective core businesses.' After years of regulatory scrutiny and Covid-era disruption, the country's biggest tech firms are once again ramping up deals and competing fiercely for users to propel growth. Investors have piled into China's tech resurgence over the past year, betting on the country's biggest firms after a rapprochement with President Xi Jinping's government in February. Those companies are still trading far below their peak. The food wars didn't help. One outlier however has been Tencent — it's outperformed its biggest peers this summer. Tencent on Wednesday kicked off earnings season for China's big tech with revenue that beat estimates and a plan for prudence in AI spending, despite faster-than-anticipated growth across its gaming and advertising businesses. Its shares rose as much as 2.4% in Hong Kong on Thursday, reaching their highest level in more than four years. JD made a sudden foray into food delivery in February, sparking a price war with Alibaba and market leader Meituan. It's what Morgan Stanley refers to as the 'prisoner's dilemma' — three heavyweights locked in a seemingly irrational conflict, none willing to blink first. After making early progress, JD is struggling to attract new users and investors are clamoring for clues about the direction behind the spending spree. 'It's very difficult to guess what JD wants to do. They've been all over the place doing various things, trying to spend a lot of money, but we do not know what they want to achieve,' said Roxy Wong, senior portfolio manager at BNP Paribas Asset Management Asia Ltd. 'All of a sudden they're doing everything at the same time.' Alibaba's margins are expected to take a toll from its massive spending plans, which include splashing $52 billion on AI infrastructure and forking out $7 billion on food delivery subsidies. Investors are also asking tough questions about its strategy. 'For Alibaba, food delivery business may not be that important, but when it comes to the battle, they cannot retreat,' said Li Chengdong, head of Beijing-based internet think-tank Haitun. 'While the recent huge spending is definitely not what investors are keen to see, Alibaba's investment in AI remains an uncertainty as well as the current investment may not necessarily yield results.' Meituan is enjoying fresh momentum off the back of a partnership with Kuaishou, a Chinese live-streaming platform. But like JD it's getting distracted at home as it looks to build an empire abroad. The company's successful Keeta app in Hong Kong has set a template for overseas moves. It launched in Saudi Arabia last September and according to Chinese media outlet LatePost, it's now eyeing expansion into Qatar, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain over the next three years. 'The competition will stop when everyone returns to normal business judgment and rationality,' Wang Puzhong, head of local commerce at Meituan, told LatePost last month. 'Right now we are all in a state of irrational excitement.' —Charlotte Yang, Claire Che More stories like this are available on
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What is Ghislaine Maxwell's net worth? All about Jeffrey Epstein aide's assets and ‘secret' husband
President Donald Trump would commit a 'huge error' if he were to pardon convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, stated late Jeffrey Epstein abuse survivor Haley Robson. Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein in an undated photo. During her arrest in 2020, Maxwell claimed to have a net worth of between $3.5 and $4 million.(AFP) 'I don't think Ghislaine has anything to say. I think it's all rubbish. I think it's dishonesty. It's a huge mistake for her to have the move in the first place, if you pardon her, they'll be making a huge error,' Robson stated in an interview with CNN. In a Newsmax interview earlier this month, Trump claimed he had not been approached about a pardon for Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison on sex trafficking charges. Trump said, 'I'm allowed to do it,' when asked if he would offer mercy to Maxwell, the British socialite and Epstein's longstanding partner, in exchange for her testimony. Last month, Maxwell was surreptitiously moved to a Texas prison camp from a federal jail in Florida. In July, Maxwell appeared for two interviews with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in Tallahassee, Florida, as the Trump administration came under immense pressure to make more Epstein-related materials public. House Judiciary Democrats launched a probe after Maxwell was transferred to Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas, claiming the transfer gives 'the strong appearance that it is attempting to cover up the full extent of the relationship between Trump and Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 in New York as he awaited trial.' Also Read: Ghislaine Maxwell pardon row: Epstein accomplice allowed to 'leave' prison? Fact check What is Ghislaine Maxwell's net worth? Maxwell's wealth is still difficult to confirm. She was a daughter of the late publishing magnate Robert Maxwell and was raised in a wealthy family. The 'opaque' character of her finances has been mentioned several times in judicial hearings. Maxwell 'is a flight risk', stated Judge Alison Nathan said during her bail hearings, adding that she is using secret monies. According to reports, she received more than US$20 million (about £14.8 million) from Epstein-controlled offshore accounts from 2007 to 2011. This includes money from the sale of expensive real estate, like a townhouse in New York that fetched approximately US$15 million (about £11.1 million). Despite the fact that these transactions indicate significant financial activity, her present assets are not clearly recorded. Fox Business claims that even though she inherited money from her father, whose fortune peaked at $1.9 billion, the 1991 fall of his enterprise left a large portion of that estate shackled. Ghislaine Maxwell's statement on her net worth; Who is her alleged 'secret' husband? During her arrest in 2020, Maxwell claimed to have a net worth of between $3.5 and $4 million. When taking into consideration offshore accounts and assets held in trusts, many of which are purportedly connected to her secret husband, Scott Borgerson, a forensic accountant who worked with the FBI testified that her actual net worth was roughly $20 million. Although the precise sources were not disclosed, Maxwell and Borgerson claimed a combined net worth of $22.5 million in assets at bail hearings. In 2020, US prosecutors disclosed that Maxwell had made a reference to a spouse in order to buy a property in New Hampshire. The house, which was purchased through a limited liability company (LLC) for about US$1 million (roughly £0.7 million) in cash, sparked suspicion since the buyer was unidentified, according to TIME. Borgerson is reportedly a tech businessman and member of the Council on Foreign Relations. According to reports, Borgerson put a mansion in Massachusetts worth US$7 million (about £5.2 million) on the market in order to raise money for Maxwell's legal defense fund. Borgerson and Maxwell, however, have not made their legal marriage publicly known.
