EU sanctions Syrian militia groups over ethnic violence targeting Alawites
More than 1,700 people were killed in attacks mostly targeting the Alawite community, which is associated with the clan of ousted ruler Bashar al-Assad, in Syria 's coastal region in March.
Brussels added the three pro-Turkish militia groups – the Sultan Sulaiman Shah Brigade, the Hamza Division and the Sultan Murad Division – to its sanctions list for their role in the killings.
The groups targeted "civilians and especially the Alawite community, including by committing arbitrary killings", the EU's official journal read.
Sultan Sulaiman Shah Brigade's founder Muhammad Hussein al-Jasim and Hamza Division chief Sayf Boulad Abu Bakr were also added to the sanctions list.
The latter was held responsible for "serious human rights abuses in Syria, including torture and arbitrary killings of civilians".
The move comes a week after EU countries gave a green light to lifting all economic sanctions on Syria in a bid to help the war-torn country recover after the ouster of Assad. The decision was officially adopted Wednesday.
US President Donald Trump has also announced the lifting of sanctions on Syria, ending more than a decade of diplomatic freeze.
Syria's new rulers have been clamouring for relief from the crushing international punishment imposed after Assad's crackdown on opponents spiralled into civil war.
But EU diplomats had warned the 27-nation bloc intended to impose new individual sanctions on those responsible for stirring ethnic tensions.
Syria's 14-year civil war killed more than half a million people and ravaged the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
What's the EU country where people can't wait to leave?
More than one in ten European Union citizens wants to leave their region out of choice or necessity, according to the latest Eurobarometer poll. Within the next five years, 7% would like to move out of choice, while 4% would move out of necessity. The highest percentages of people willing to leave were found in Portugal and Hungary, with 16% each, followed by France (15%), and Greece and Poland, at 12% each. On the other side of the spectrum, the highest shares of respondents who ruled out voluntarily moving away from their region soon were found in the Netherlands (94%) and Croatia (90%). People who may pack up and leave—whether by choice or necessity—mainly do so because they can't find quality jobs or have limited economic opportunities (29%). Fed up with politics: Maltese and Slovaks most unhappy However, almost a quarter (23%) of respondents say they feel they are being pushed away by a lack of trust in the political environment of their region or country. The highest levels of discontent among those wishing to leave were reported in Slovakia (50%), Malta (45%), Luxembourg (38%), Croatia and Hungary (both 36%). Spaniards, Greeks and Czechs looking for affordable properties One-fifth (22%) of those planning to leave point to the lack of affordable quality housing, which remains one of the most pressing issues across the continent. The housing crisis is hardest felt in Spain: 40% of people living here say that would be the main reason to migrate. Czechs also reported a high rate, at 30%. According to the latest European Housing Trend report, high housing costs are holding back 64% of potential buyers. Among them, 40% can't save up for a deposit, particularly in the Czech Republic (60%) and Greece (58%). No rent hassles in the Balkans? The European Housing Trend report also indicates which EU countries have the highest percentages of homeowners. Romanians (85%), Croatians (83%), Bulgarians (80%), Brits (75%), Hungarians and Italians (72%) are the most likely to own a property, while Maltese (46%), Germans (34%) and Swiss (30%) are the least likely to be in this situation.
Euronews
9 hours ago
- Euronews
US-led coalition in Syria captures senior IS group commander
US-led coalition forces captured a senior Islamic State commander believed to be the group's leader in a pre-dawn helicopter raid Wednesday near Syria's Turkish border, killing one Iraqi citizen during the operation. The operation took place in Atmeh, a town near the Turkish border, and an IS group commander alleged to be Abu Hafs al-Qurashi was taken away. At the same time, an Iraqi citizen was killed, the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said. The observatory said the man captured had a French-speaking woman with him, and it is not known if she was taken by US forces or Syrian security, who later cordoned off the area. The US military has not responded to requests from the media for comment, and it is not immediately clear if the man captured is IS' main leader. Two years ago, the IS group announced that a man called Abu Hafs al-Hashemi al-Qurashi had been named as its new leader after Turkish authorities killed his predecessor. The IS jihadist group broke away from al-Qaeda more than a decade ago. It attracted supporters from around the world after it declared a self-proclaimed "caliphate" in 2014 in large parts of Syria and Iraq. Despite its defeat in Iraq in 2017 and in Syria two years later, the IS group's militants still carry out deadly attacks in both countries and elsewhere. All previous IS leaders have adopted Al-Qurashi as part of their surname, implying a connection to Quraish, the tribe to which Islam's Prophet Muhammad belonged. The IS group claims its leaders hail from the tribe, and al-Qurashi is used as a nom de guerre -- all part of the terror organisation's propaganda, as it is largely invented and its handful of leaders are unrelated, according to reports. Its first leader, the self-proclaimed emir and caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, did not take on the Al-Qurashi name, despite claiming he hailed from the tribe without providing evidence.
Euronews
10 hours ago
- Euronews
Why Brussels doesn't hate AC — but Europe still struggles with it
In a summer when radio failed to deliver a single memorable hit, one subject managed to keep everyone talking: Europe's troubled relationship with air conditioning. It's not a new debate. Every few years, as temperatures climb, the transatlantic divide on cooling habits resurfaces. But this year, it grew unusually fierce, straining cultural ties between Europeans and Americans almost as much as Trump's tariffs or disagreements over Ukraine's future. Americans, baffled that Europeans can live without constant cooling, defended their beloved AC with the same bitterness Italians judge other cultures' pizza toppings or the French bristle at foreigners mangling 'la langue française'. The numbers of this divide are stark: nearly 90% of US households have air conditioning, compared with around 20% in Europe, with some countries falling far below that figure. In France, the topic has even entered the political arena, with far-right leader Marine Le Pen calling for a major air conditioning infrastructure plan. Meanwhile, international news outlets like the Financial Times and Wall Street Journal warned that Europe's slow adoption of cooling technology is already costing lives. Critics have gone so far as to blame EU regulations (or the flagship environmental policy Green Deal itself) for keeping Europeans sweaty. The myth of the AC ban Like most things in the EU, even air conditioning comes with an acronym. The Brussels bubble doesn't talk about AC like normal people do, but about HVAC, namely heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. But does Brussels really hate air conditioning? Despite what some critics imply, the EU has never banned HVACs. Nor do its rules dramatically restrict installations. What the EU does regulate are the types of systems allowed, imposing limits on harmful refrigerants, requirements for greater efficiency, and guidelines for buildings. The reasoning is straightforward. Europe has committed to becoming climate-neutral by 2050. Left unchecked, a sharp increase in inefficient air conditioners would make that goal impossible. So Brussels isn't opposed to cooling, it just wants the technology to align with climate policy. What the F... gas The centrepiece of this policy adaptation is the recently revised F-gas Regulation, which phases out hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), potent greenhouse gases used in many traditional cooling systems, by 2050. Through these rules, manufacturers are being pushed to adopt cleaner alternatives such as carbon dioxide and ammonia. Some industry players argue this has slowed growth in the heat pump market, a technology that provides heating, cooling, and hot water. Brussels counters that falling gas prices, weaker subsidies, and consumer caution are the real reasons, putting its hope on a wave of new, HFC-free models already hitting the market. The Ecodesign Directive, another piece of the puzzle, sets minimum efficiency standards. This effectively bans the least efficient models and nudges manufacturers toward greener designs. The rules tie into the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, which requires upgrades in Europe's ageing housing stock through better insulation and, indeed, greener heating and cooling Both measures reflect the same principle: the EU isn't trying to kill air conditioning, it just wants it done sustainably. National quirks... Much of the practical regulation on air conditioning comes from member states, though. Spain, Italy, and Greece, for example, limit how cold public buildings can be set in summer, often no lower than 27°C. The aim is to conserve energy, especially during supply crises. Some historic city centres restrict the installation of external AC units for aesthetic reasons. There are environmental concerns, too. Studies show that AC units can raise outdoor temperatures in dense urban areas by several degrees, worsening the so-called 'heat island effect.' But these are exceptions, not an explanation for Europe's overall low uptake. ...and cultural resistance The rest of this story lies in history and culture. Southern Europe built its cities to cope with heat: thick walls, shaded windows, and street layouts designed to maximise airflow. That's also why white paint dominates the picturesque skylines of Mediterranean places like Santorini in Greece or Vieste in Italy: The bright surfaces reflect sunlight and radiant heat, helping interiors stay cooler. In northern Europe, on the other hand, summers were once mild enough that cooling was rarely needed. Air conditioning, when it appeared in Europe, was seen as a luxury or even a health risk. Many Europeans still believe exposure to cold air can make you sick, and the stereotype persists that AC is for rich people. The energy question Then there's the money issue. European electricity is far pricier than in the US, and the 2022 energy crisis only reinforced the point. Even though prices have since stabilised, the extra expense of running an air conditioner remains prohibitive for many households. AC still represents only about 0.6% of household electricity use across the EU, but its share is rising quickly. The heatwaves of June and July 2025 pushed daily demand up by as much as 14%. Prices spiked above €400/MWh in Germany and €470/MWh in Poland, even as solar power hit record highs. That surge in demand underscores the challenge. Europe's power grid, already strained, must prepare for hotter summers and higher cooling needs. What comes next So no, Brussels does not hate air conditioning. But it does want to ensure that cooling technology fits within Europe's broader climate and energy goals. The European Commission has always made clear that member states are best placed to decide on specific energy-saving measures. But it is also preparing the EU energy sector for an era of recurring and more intense heatwaves, focusing on storage, interconnections, and grid resilience. This could not exclude a specific intervention in the sector in the medium term, although nothing has been pencilled for the moment. In the end, Europe's low adoption of air conditioning isn't the result of bans or bureaucratic hostility. It's rather a mix of culture, cost, tradition, and policy. And as summers grow hotter and heatwaves become the new normal, that balance will be tested more with every passing year.
