Michele Bourda: Everything we know 10 days after Brit vanished from Greek sunbed
Fears are growing for a British woman who vanished 10 days ago on holiday in Greece.
Michele Bourda, 59, from Glasgow, has been missing since she was last spotted on Ofrynio beach in the city of Kavala, Greece on August 1. Her husband, Chris Bourda, 66, fell asleep on a sun lounger and woke to find she had disappeared. Her belongings, including her towel, remained on her sun lounger, but Michele was nowhere to be found - and is yet to be seen since, despite a massive land and sea search by Greek authorities. Here's what we know about Michele's disappearance, 10 days on:
Waiter 'laughed at husband' when he reported her missing
Chris continues his desperate search for his wife in Kavala, Greece.
But on the day of her disappearance, he says he was laughed at by a waiter at a beachside restaurant when he asked him if he had seen Michele. He eventually persuaded a shopkeeper to help him and call the police.
Chris, a pharmacist by profession, said: "Unfortunately I fell asleep and when I woke up she wasn't there... I went back to the waiter to say my wife was missing, have you seen her and he started laughing."
Husband's frustration with 'slow' police investigation
Chris, has criticised the Greek police for their apparent lack of urgency in searching for his wife - and claims he did not see a single police officer on the beach the day she disappeared.
He said: "The police didn't do anything on the day. One guest who was there that day said she didn't see any police and I didn't see any police that day either, not one single policeman at the beach.
"The only thing I saw was a police car driving up and down the road to the beach. Not getting out of the car, just looking in the direction of the sea."
He also says police waited days to review vital CCTV footage. Greek authorities, including the Hellenic Police and Coast Guard, say they have conducted extensive searches on land and at sea but found no trace.
Last seen in swimsuit with yellow beach shoes
Michele, 59, is described as being 5ft 6in, of a slim build with blue eyes and shoulder-length hair. She was last seen wearing a rhinestone-embellished two-piece beaded swimsuit, yellow beach shoes and a pair of red horn-rimmed sunglasses.
Woman matching her description 'seen swimming in deep water'
One witness recalled briefly speaking to a woman matching Michele's description swimming in deep water out at sea - while another claimed to have seen her walking away from the scene. Neither of these sightings have been confirmed.
No evidence of foul play
Police say that while they have not ruled out any possibilities, there is no sign of foul play in their investigation.
On August 2, the day after she was reported missing to police, Greek charity LifeLine Hellas issued a Silver Alert - typically activated for vulnerable adults - warning the public that Michele's life may be at risk.
Anyone in Greece with information has been urged to contact the National SOS Line 1065. The British embassy in Athens confirmed they are supporting Michele's family and assisting local authorities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
DOJ to begin turning over Jeffrey Epstein probe files: GOP chairman
The Justice Department was not immediately available for comment on what records it might turn over. On Aug. 5, Comer issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for records related to Epstein, the longtime Trump friend who died by suicide in 2019 as he was awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. Republicans on the House Committee have also issued deposition subpoenas to former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as well as former top federal law enforcement officials including James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Robert Mueller, William Barr, Jeff Sessions and Alberto Gonzales. Those are scheduled to get underway this month. Those subpoenas seek testimony "related to horrific crimes perpetrated by Jeffrey Epstein," Comer, a Kentucky Republican, said when they were issued. The Oversight Committee voted July 23 to issue the subpoenas and to also seek the DOJ files, answering calls from lawmakers and voters alike for more information on Epstein and who else might have been involved in his underage sex-trafficking ring. While Trump supporters and MAGA influencers have said they want to see the names of prominent Democrats rumored to be in the files, Trump himself is likely in them, at least on flight logs from Epstein's private jet, according to already disclosed court records and other documents. The DOJ promise to hand over files follows weeks of intensifying drama and rare dispute between President Donald Trump, who had a long friendship with Epstein, and his MAGA base. Last month, the DOJ and FBI issued a joint statement saying they would not release Epstein investigative documents in their possession after months of promises by Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel to make that information public. The subpoenas appear to cover when Epstein allegedly sexually assaulted young women with the help of associate Ghislaine Maxwell, which dates back more than two decades. More: Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell quietly moved out of Florida federal prison Maxwell was interviewed over two days last month about what she knows about the case by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former Trump personal defense lawyer. The interviews were held in Tallahassee, Florida, where the former British socialite is serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls. She has since been moved to a minimum-security federal prison "camp" in Texas, prompting criticism from Democrats who charge that the Trump administration is giving her preferential treatment. It's unclear what exactly Maxwell told Blanche during the closed-door interviews, but her defense attorney, David Markus, said his client answered all of the government's questions, including those of about 100 different people. On July 23, a federal judge in Florida rejected a bid from the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony from 2005 and 2007 tied to a federal investigation into Epstein, who hanged himself in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges, an autopsy concluded. Maxwell is seeking to overturn her conviction and has filed a petition with the Supreme Court, which the Justice Department has opposed. Markus said he believes Ghislaine deserves relief and has appealed online to Trump for consideration, but said no such offer has been made. When asked if he would consider pardoning Maxwell, Trump told reporters, "It's something I haven't thought about."
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Farcical mass arrests expose Labour's failings over Palestine
Yvette Cooper has overseen a brittle form of authoritarianism which, far from preserving the status quo, is fracturing it. The Home Secretary is now reduced to suggesting that there are things the public doesn't know about the organisation, which only she does, in defence of the draconian policy. This indicates the central argument has already been lost, and the public have not been persuaded of its merits as criticism grows. The Government miscalculated by thinking the proscription would breed establishment unity and the submission of the movement. READ MORE: Police probe 'kill 'em all' banner outside Scottish asylum seeker hotel Instead, the police are being instructed to carry out farcical mass arrests that cannot be sustained by the prison and legal system. And, we see the emergence of unexpected voices of opposition, combined with a continued expansion of the Palestine movement generally. For many in the old school of the British establishment, there is something distasteful about the ban. The sight of pensioners being rounded up and carted off in police vans for the crime of holding up a sign with the words 'Palestine' and 'action' is a little too much to plausibly defend. Everyone knows that these people cannot be described as 'terrorists' with any credibility. It is absurd, and consequently, Cooper has few allies coming to her aid. But more than distaste, the British state has generally been more strategic when it comes to utilising repression. When it comes to Palestine Action, any such nuance has been thrown out of the window. This is why figures such as Andrew Neil – it is fair to say no friend of Palestine protesters – have condemned the way the episode has been handled, saying: 'Designating them as a terrorist group was just bizarre by this government. Bizarre!' Interestingly, the people who are being arrested in Parliament Square do not look or sound like the stereotype of a direct action activist. One is a retired British army officer, Colonel Chris Romberg. The 75-year-old veteran, dressed in a suit, made the point that in his view Britain was now aiding and abetting a genocide, and this was a stand he was willing to make in defence of democratic and civil rights. Sir Jonathon Porritt, a former adviser to both king and government, was also arrested and carted away. He didn't mince his words: 'This was an absolutely clear case of a government using its powers to crush dissenting voices when it is the government itself that is most reprehensible for what continues to be an absolute horror story in the world. 'What we are seeing now in Gaza has just utterly shocked people and it's completely abhorrent that we are living through a genocide on our TV screens.' We have seen all kinds of people involved in a similar way, from members of the clergy to a former professor of poetry at the University of Oxford and an 89-year-old Jewish refugee. Former Tory MP Rory Stewart has called the proscription 'mad' and points out that the prison system cannot cope with 500 people being arrested and processed – with the threat of a 14-year jail sentence – on a single Saturday afternoon. Now, Defend Our Juries is organising for 1000 people to take part on September 6. Something has got to give. To add to Cooper's woes, it is an issue which is further haemorrhaging support for the Labour Party among its own supporters. According to a recent poll, 71% of Labour members oppose the proscription. What we have then is a lethal combination – the absence of broad support; an intellectually indefensible position; a lack of infrastructure to handle the growing number of dissenters; the continued growth of the Palestine demonstrations; a legal challenge in the works. This is just the latest in a litany of failings around the issue. Under Keir Starmer, Labour have driven the UK Government into an almighty mess. They have participated in providing the political and military cover for what Cooper herself now refers to as, without a hint of irony, the 'crimes against humanity' committed by Israel in Gaza. The foundation for the banning of Palestine Action is weak, because the foundation of the whole approach to the Middle East has been wrong on every level. They know it, and we know it. And it is when a government is in that kind of a fix that they resort to bringing out the repressive functions of the state. In doing so, they have only further weakened their position. Such measures can only hope to have a chance of success if they have overwhelming public support, and a united and cohesive apparatus to see it through. Without these, the Home Secretary cuts an isolated figure. And unfortunately for her, the issue is not going away any time soon. Instead, as the atrocities continue, opposition will grow. We are now in the closing stages of the genocide. Benjamin Netanyahu is instructing the IDF to prepare for the occupation of Gaza City. There is no further argument about what the Israeli state has planned for the people there. More death and more destruction through the methods of siege and starvation, and the obliteration of the means of life. The very last people who should be deemed as terrorists are those doing what they can to stop the horror which has been unfolding daily for nearly two years. Indeed, it is the UK Government which has failed, emphatically, in its duties to prevent genocide, as instructed by the International Court of Justice. History will not be kind to those who were complicit or active in their support for this unfathomable crime. just as it will record all of those who made a stand against it.
Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Police launch major crime review of Nuked Blood Scandal evidence
Top cops say they are taking allegations of a criminal over-up by the British state "very seriously" and have launched a review of the Nuked Blood evidence Police have launched a major crime review to assess evidence of a state cover-up about human radiation experiments on troops. Officers say they are taking "very seriously" allegations that officials at the Ministry of Defence may have hidden a blood testing programme that took place during nuclear weapon trials in the Cold War. Parliament and the courts have repeatedly been told no monitoring of troops took place. Details of blood and urine testing, and chest x-rays, have subsequently been found on a secret database at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, locked from view on the grounds of national security. News of the review comes after the Mirror revealed the names of Boris Johnson, Keir Starmer, and serving government officials had been handed to police as potential witnesses. Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS said: "Veterans have been waiting 70 years to be taken seriously, and it is a relief to know these issues are being looked into at long last. What we need now is a thorough police investigation to expose the MoD's institutional rot to the light." The Nuked Blood Scandal blew open after the Mirror uncovered a 1958 memo discussing the "gross irregularities" found in blood tests of Group Captain Terry Gledhill, who flew through the mushroom clouds. The data collected by weapons scientists was later found to be missing from his medical files. A complaint was made to the Met Police in May, with a 500-page dossier of evidence. The Met refused to investigate, saying it was the jurisdiction of Thames Valley Police, which oversees the county of Berkshire where the AWE is based. Victims Commissioner Baroness Newlove intervened to urged a decision in veterans' interests, as campaigners felt the scandal's connections to government and Whitehall made it the Met's responsibility. Chief Constable Jason Hogg of Thames Valley Police said: "Given the extent and complexity of the material within the dossier, and the seriousness and complexities of the crimes alleged against a range of bodies and individuals, TVP is undertaking a thorough review to assess for the crimes that may need to be investigated and where the ownership of an investigation should most appropriately sit. "Please be assured that TVP is taking this very seriously and that momentum is not being lost; we have our highly experienced head of TVP's Major Crime Review Team personally undertaking the review, reporting into one of my assistant chief constables. This is critical groundwork for circumstances of such significance and scale." He said the force was liaising with the Met "to ensure that, for the victims' sake, the decision on ownership and set-up by policing of any required criminal investigation ensures that it is conducted in the most effective way." It comes as the Lib Dems have urged Labour and the Tories to confirm they will co-operate with any investigation. Defence spokesman Helen Maguire said: "As MPs, we owe it to our veterans to assist them in their pursuit of justice, and do whatever it takes to uncover the truth. As more and more of our nuclear test veterans pass away each week, I urge anyone with information to come forward, and the government must go further and faster in their efforts for the veterans." A ministerial review of the files is underway and the first part of the AWE database is due to be declassified later this year. The government says the criminal allegations are false and there is no evidence to support them.
