Why would Trump's EPA shut down the successful Energy Star program?
Nevertheless, during Donald Trump's first term as president, the Republican White House unveiled a budget plan that eliminated the Energy Star program, for reasons the administration struggled to explain. The industry backlash was swift: Exactly eight years ago this week, The Associated Press reported that more than 1,000 U.S. companies, including some of the nation's largest manufacturers, urged policymakers to preserve the program.
The AP's report added at the time, 'The program costs about $50 million per year to administer, while saving consumers more than $34 billion per year in reduced energy costs.'
In 2017, the lobbying campaign succeeded, and the Energy Star program lived to see another day. Eight years later, as The New York Times reported, Trump and his EPA are apparently eager to finish the job:
The Environmental Protection Agency plans to eliminate Energy Star, the popular energy efficiency certification for dishwashers, refrigerators, dryers and other home appliances, according to agency documents and a recording of an internal meeting. E.P.A. managers announced during a staff meeting on Monday that divisions that oversee climate change and energy efficiency would be eliminated as part of an agency reorganization. That includes the E.P.A.'s climate change office as well as the division that oversees Energy Star.
According to a recording obtained by the Times, Paul Gunning, the director of the EPA's Office of Atmospheric Protection, told employees, 'The Energy Star program and all the other climate work, outside of what's required by statute, is being de-prioritized and eliminated.' (The reporting has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News.)
An EPA spokeswoman did not confirm that the program was being eliminated. She told the Times that the EPA had announced 'organizational improvements to the personnel structure that will directly benefit the American people and better advance the agency's core mission.'
Note, eight years ago, the Republican administration set out to zero out the Energy Star program through the budgetary process. In 2025, however, Team Trump is apparently taking a more direct and unilateral approach, overhauling the EPA's structure and scrapping the offices that oversee the project.
There is no constituency for such a move. Support for the Energy Star program has long been bipartisan — it was created under George H.W. Bush's presidency — and it's one of only a handful of landmark energy policies that have been celebrated by environmentalists and industry advocates alike. It costs almost nothing to administer, and it's delivered massive annual savings every year for decades.
The Times' report added that Energy Star 'has helped households and businesses save more than $500 billion in energy costs and to get rebates and tax credits, according to the program's 2024 report. At the same time, it has also prevented four billion metric tons of greenhouse gases from being released into the atmosphere.'
Even from a conservative perspective, this is precisely the kind of public-private partnership that the right has championed for many years. No one, in other words, would benefit from this kind of change.
So if the Times' reporting is correct, why in the world is this happening? By all appearances, it's because much of the modern Republican Party has embraced the idea that taking energy efficiency seriously is ridiculous. We've seen overwhelming evidence of this among GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill in recent years — see the 'Refrigerator Freedom Act,' the 'Liberty in Laundry Act,' the 'Stop Unaffordable Dishwasher Standards Act,' the 'Clothes Dryers Reliability Act,' et al. — and the same perspective has clearly been embraced at the White House.
There was a time when the so-called 'culture war' focused on abortion and LGBTQ+ rights. In contemporary politics, however, energy efficiency has been added to the list.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil climbs on EU trade deal, potential US-China tariff truce extension
By Anjana Anil (Reuters) -Oil extended gains on Tuesday, lifted by hopes of improved economic activity after the U.S.-EU trade deal, a potential U.S.-China tariff truce and President Donald Trump's shorter deadline for Russia to end the Ukraine war. Brent crude futures were up 24 cents, or 0.34%, to $70.28 a barrel by 0000 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $66.93 a barrel, up 22 cents, or 0.33%. Both contracts settled more than 2% higher in the previous session, and Brent touched its highest level since July 18 on Monday. The trade agreement between the United States and the European Union, while imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods, sidestepped a full-blown trade war between the two major allies that would have rippled across nearly a third of global trade and dimmed the outlook for fuel demand. Oil prices were also supported by news of a possible extension of the trade truce between the U.S. and China, with top economic officials from both countries having met in Stockholm on Monday for more than five hours of talks. The discussions are expected to resume on Tuesday. Meanwhile, Trump set a new deadline on Monday of "10 or 12 days" for Russia to make progress toward ending the war in Ukraine or face sanctions. Trump has threatened sanctions on both Russia and buyers of its exports unless progress is made. "Trump's comments reignited fears that Russia's oil flows would be impacted," ANZ senior commodity strategist Daniel Hynes wrote in a note. "This also comes on the back of the latest sanctions package by the EU against Russia, including a lower price cap on the country's crude and the import of refined products made from Moscow's oil in other countries," Hynes added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Everyone Donald Trump has threatened since the Jeffrey Epstein scandal blew up in his face
July 2025 sparked a fresh new wave of Jeffrey Epstein controversy, thanks to none other than President Donald Trump. US Attorney General Pam Bondi said she had the Epstein client list "sitting on her desk" on February 21. At a MAGA influencer event held at the White House on February 27, she and her team revealed a "Phase 1" binder for the release. Fast-forward to July 7, when the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a memo saying there was "no incriminating 'client list.'" MAGA began collapsing immediately, and #PedoPresident started trending on X (and hasn't stopped.) Petitions demanding transparency circulated, and Republican House Representative Thomas Massie introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act to enforce a vote among the House of Representatives to release the government's full files on the Epstein case, saying, 'We all deserve to know what's in the Epstein files, who's implicated, and how deep this corruption goes.' Trump responded by calling Massie the 'worst Republican Congressman.' Other outspoken Trump supporters like Marjorie Taylor Greene, Laura Loomer, Alex Jones, and Megyn Kelly started to criticize the president, with MTG echoing Massie's call for truth. Then, a bombshell Wall Street Journal scoop dropped on July 17, where investigators had found a bawdy 2003 birthday note, allegedly penned by Trump, in Epstein's personal files. Five days later, the DOJ admitted the president's name appears 'multiple times' in federal evidence—but then insisted there were 'no further Epstein files' to release. Instead of mollifying supporters, Trump has inserted himself into the conversation surrounding the pardon of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's alleged co-conspirator. When asked if he would pardon her, he said he was "allowed to" if he wanted, but that "nobody's asked" him about it. This move detonated his online base, whose Q-adjacent lore casts Maxwell as queenpin of a global trafficking ring. Overnight, some of Trump's most die-hard supporters turned their backs on him. His response has been to launch (or threaten) legal action in every direction as part classic countersuit strategy and part headline-scrambling fog machine. Below is a who's-who list of his current targets, and what each feud is really about. The Wall Street Journal FeatureFlash Photo Agency/Shutterstock On July 18, Trump lodged a $10 billion libel complaint in federal court, saying the Journal 'fabricated' the birthday letter and smeared him as Epstein's pal. Trump's lawyers immediately asked the judge to depose [owner Rupert] Murdoch 'within 15 days.' 'I hope Rupert and his 'friends' are looking forward to many hours of depositions and testimonies they will have to provide in this case,' Trump said in a Truth Social post. Apart from Murdoch, the suit names the Journal's Publisher, Dow Jones & Company, alongside its parent, News Corporation. The Dow Jones CEO, Robert Thomson, is also on there, as are the two reporters on the Epstein story bylines, Joseph Palazzolo and Khadeeja Safdar. Former President Barack Obama ZB Photos/Shutterstock Growing tired of blaming everything on Biden, Trump turned back to his 2016 tactics of blaming everything on former President Barack Obama. At a July 22 press talk, Trump urged the DOJ to 'go after' Obama, claiming he 'buried' evidence tying Bill Clinton to Epstein and engineered the original Russia probe to retaliate. He later shared a photo across his social media channels depicting O.J. Simpson's car chase, with Obama in Simpson's driver's seat and Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance driving two cop cars behind him. In doing so, Trump also inadvertently trolled Vance by using the digitally fattened face photo that many people use to make fun of him. Former President Bill Clinton Lev Radin/Shutterstock The second former president Trump went after was Bill Clinton, who has long faced conspiracy theories from MAGA over his relationship with Epstein. During a meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer while visiting Scotland, Trump said he'd never 'had the privilege' of going to Epstein Island and that it was one of his 'very good moments' turning down the invite. However, he took it a step further, saying, 'Bill Clinton went there supposedly 28 times. I never went to the island, but [former Treasury Secretary] Larry Summers, I hear, went there, he was the head of Harvard. And many other people that are very big people, nobody ever talks about them.' For the record, Clinton, like Trump, was also found on the Epstein flight logs. However, even Democrats and Clinton supporters are just as willing to hang him as they are Trump, but if he says his name being on there is a lie, who's to say the same isn't true for Clinton? Former Vice President Kamala Harris OogImages/Shutterstock As if two former presidents weren't enough, Trump's also turning his gaze to former Vice President and 2024 challenger Kamala Harris, who he now says ran a campaign 'funded by illegal celebrity payments.' He's hinted that the DOJ should indict her based on 'wire fraud.' In another Truth Social rant, Trump said he was 'looking at the large amount of money owed by Democrats, after the Presidential Election,' saying they'd admitted to paying, 'probably illegally,' for celebrity endorsements. He later emphasized, 'YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO. Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them.' Beyoncé, Al Sharpton, and Oprah Photo by; Jaguar PS/Shutterstock; Ovidiu Hrubaru/Shutterstock In the same Truth Social post targeting Harris, Trump also went after Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey, and Al Sharpton for various reasons. As for Queen Bey, he (falsely) said she was paid $11 million for 'an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!)' Oprah allegedly took $3 million for 'expenses,' while Sharpton, whom he called 'a total lightweight' and 'low rated TV 'anchor,'' allegedly took $600,000 for…something. Sharpton refuted the claims on MSNBC, saying, 'This is the second or third time lawyers for National Action Network are looking at whether we can sue him for defamation because he had knowledge this time that there was no endorsement and that I didn't get any money. This went to the nonprofit I'm connected to.' ABC News and NBC News Creative Salim; bangoland/Shutterstock Every news that doesn't worship the ground he walks on is Fake News in the Trump world, and neither ABC nor NBC is safe from his wrath. Fresh off a $16 million settlement from Paramount, the owners of CBS, Trump called for the networks to lose their licenses for being 'political pawns for the Democratic Party.' He first attacked their viewership and management, then doubled down on his stance that networks 'aren't allowed to be political pawns,' but only for the Democratic Party. Shockingly, following the settlement with Paramount, Trump has done nothing to bring any legal action against South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone for that epic takedown of him on the most recent season premiere, showing him in bed with Satan and making fun of his small penis. So, can the lawsuit blitz bury the Epstein story? Photo byHopefully not. The $10 billion WSJ case will crawl through discovery; Obama and Clinton enjoy presidential immunity from most civil claims; campaign-finance prosecutions would require evidence the FEC says it hasn't seen; and broadcast licenses can't be yanked just because he says so. What this strategy does do however, is keep conservative media focused on Trump's counter-punches instead of the potential impending pardon and withholding of the actual files. You know, his usual 'distract and deflect' MO. Whether the president's scatter-shot legal barrage can recapture these voters—or will simply keep Epstein in the headlines—is an open question. For now, the only certainty is that the defendant list keeps growing, and it's not likely to stop anytime soon. And here we were, hoping they'd simply release the files. This article originally appeared on Pride: Everyone Donald Trump has threatened since the Jeffrey Epstein scandal blew up in his face
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Goodbye stagflation: 3 reasons BofA sees the US economy avoiding a worst-case scenario
Bank of America thinks the global economy is leaning away from the worst-case scenario: stagflation. Factors like Trump's policies & AI investment could support an economic boom instead, the bank said. Stagflation, where inflation rises while growth slows, is thought to be even harder to remedy than a recession. The US economy may have successfully steered clear of a dire outcome many observers were warning of just a few months ago. That's according to analysts at Bank of America, who said they believe the US economy could be more on track for a cyclical boom rather than an episode of stagflation, a nightmare situation in which inflation rises while economic growth slows. Stagflation is commonly thought of as even worse than a typical recession, as policymakers are prevented from cutting interest rates to boost the economy. For a while, that scenario was one of the biggest fears on investors' minds as they weighed the impact of Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs. But strategists said they think the economy is now leaning away from such a situation, even as many global fund managers surveyed by the bank said in June that they thought the global economy would slip into stagflation over the next 12 months. "The latest fund manager survey shows a small increase in investors expecting a Boom rather than the base case of Stagflation," analysts wrote, defining a "boom" as above-trend economic growth and above-trend inflation. "We agree with this building minority, and present below corroboration from our quantitative work," they added. Here are three reasons the bank sees stagflation risk fading. 1. Trump's pro-growth agenda President Donald Trump's America-first economic agenda is expected to act as a tailwind to the US economy, BofA strategists said. The bank pointed to stimulus measures included in Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," as well as the push to boost activity in US manufacturing. "Moreover, with mid-term elections a few quarters away, it behooves the current administration to implement pro-growth policy now," the bank's strategists added. 2. Big spending Companies and the public sector are spending big on artificial intelligence, infrastructure, and manufacturing, BofA said. For AI in particular, analysts said they were expecting $700 billion in capex from the so-called hyperscalers through 2025 and 2026, with "upward revisions each quarter." "The number of companies outside of the US planning to expand manufacturing capacity in the US continues to increase. Municipalities have also refocused on infrastructure with aged capital stock fraying as domestic activity increases," they added. 3. Economic recovery mode Bank of America's US Regime Indicator, a gauge for where the US currently is in the business cycle, looks to be "on the brink" of an economic recovery, analysts said. The US Regime Indicator ticked lower in June, which indicates that the economy is still in a "downturn" phase. Downturn phases are typically followed by economic recovery phases, the bank suggested. The US Regime Indicator saw six inputs from the economy improve last month, strategists noted, which also suggests that the economy could soon be on the uptrend. Here were the six positive changes analysts saw: Earnings per share revisions. Earnings revision breadth bottomed out around -25% in April, according to Morgan Stanley data. Since then, it's improved to -5%, the bank said in a June note, implying that the market is growing more optimistic on corporate earnings. GDP forecasts. Despite a contraction in the first quarter, real GDP was projected to expand 2.8% year-over-year in the second-quarter, according to advanced estimates from the Commerce Department. Manufacturing strength. The Institute for Supply Management's Production Index, one measure of activity in manufacturing, rose to 50.3 in June, which signals that production moved into expansionary territory. Leading Economic Indicators. A collection of economic indicators showed signs of improvement on a year-over-year basis, BofA said. Capacity Utility. The use of "installed productive capacity" in the goods and services sector also improved on a year-over-year basis, strategists added. High-yield credit spreads. Credit spreads—which is the yield paid over a benchmark—have narrowed, which signals higher investor confidence and lower levels of financial stress among companies. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio