
Autism community fears RFK Jr. would set back decades of progress
But now, autism advocates say they are fearful that if Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is confirmed as health and human services secretary, it could undermine years of progress in unlinking autism and vaccines, while potentially diverting precious research dollars to a theory already discredited by hundreds of studies worldwide. They warn he would wield vast influence over who sits on committees and steer policy.
And some condemned Kennedy's past rhetoric around the disability, calling it stigmatizing and insulting.
Alison Singer, founder of the Autism Science Foundation, said she welcomes an examination into potential causes of autism, but focusing on vaccines could be dangerous for children.
'A new crop of parents will be afraid, who may believe that vaccines could harm their children, potentially cause autism, and those parents might withhold life saving vaccines from their children,' Singer said.
She said the concern is that 'funds are spent re-examining what we know does not cause autism, and are directed away from looking in new potential areas of what's causing autism. There's so much that we need to fund when it comes to autism research.'
Kennedy is scheduled to begin his Senate confirmation hearings on Wednesday. He's expected to face tough questions about the misinformation he has promoted around public health over the years, including his claims about vaccines.
Kennedy, who founded an anti-vaccine nonprofit and grew into one of the most prominent anti-vaccine activists in the world –– a crusade from which he and associated groups have made millions of dollars –– has prominently advanced a false contention that vaccines cause autism.
'I do believe that autism comes from vaccines,' Kennedy asserted to Fox News in 2023.
He went on to say that his position was misunderstood; he just wants to test the science behind them. But it's Kennedy who rejects the science in front of him, critics say.
'Are we [also] reviewing the question about whether the earth is flat? This is settled science,' said Rep. Kim Schrier, a Washington Democrat who previously worked as a pediatrician. 'We already looked into vaccines. They don't cause autism, but let's look elsewhere. And elsewhere might be genetics. It might be the fact that now we're putting a lot more kids under the umbrella of autism who never would have fallen under that umbrella before … It could be a lot of things, but bringing up settled science is only going to undermine confidence in vaccines, decrease immunization rates and put the entire population at risk.'
As the head of HHS, Kennedy would hold massive sway on the direction of health policy in the United States. He would lead number agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. President Donald Trump's pick for the CDC, former Florida Rep. David Weldon, is further fueling fears because of his own past statements doubting vaccine safety.
Colliding with history
Kennedy often begins his argument that vaccines cause autism by spinning a narrative that he didn't know severely autistic children when he was growing up, and he doesn't know any at his age now. The increased incidence, he concludes, coincides with the prevalence of childhood vaccinations.
'I bet you've never met anybody with full-blown autism your age,' Kennedy told podcaster Joe Rogan in 2023, launching into a script he often uses in public appearances. 'You know, head-banging, football helmet on, nontoilet trained, nonverbal. I mean, I've never met anybody like that at my age, but in my kids' age now, one in every 34 kids has autism. And half of those are full blown.'
However, people with developmental disabilities were for decades institutionalized — and, in Nazi Germany, worse — or otherwise kept out of the public eye, a far cry from the integrated schools many public systems attempt to achieve today.
The practice of institutionalizing children with disabilities was particularly prevalent in post-war America, and often in facilities with poor conditions.
One example of the gap between public understanding of kids with disabilities came in 1965, when Kennedy was about 11 years old. His father, then a U.S. senator from New York, denounced the treacherous conditions at Willowbrook State School. In one of the most shameful exposés in U.S. history, disabled children were found to be living in filth, amid abuse and overall horrific conditions, sparking nationwide outrage.
'I think all of us are at fault and I think it's just long overdue that something be done about it,' Robert F. Kennedy Sr. said at the time of Willowbrook.
Zoe Gross, director of advocacy with the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network, noted that the autism diagnosis was still evolving in the '60s. She held up Willowbrook as an example of how those with developmental and other types of disabilities were once hidden from society.
'If you look at the video of the conditions that the people in Willowbrook were in, you'll see the people that RFK Jr. describes as having been missing through his childhood. And you'll see where they went, where they were forced to go,' Gross said.
Ignoring science
Autism diagnoses have risen from about 1 in 150 children in 2000, to 1 in 36 today. In that period, the definition of who is autistic broadened considerably, capturing a dramatic span of abilities. It now ranges from individuals who live independent lives, to individuals who are nonspeaking or who face serious medical challenges like seizures.
Researchers point to a strong genetic link to the complex disorder and have said there's much more research needed to determine what, if any, environmental factors play into it. Autism Speaks, one of the nation's largest autism research organizations, is one group that has called for more research into the role that factors like exposure to chemicals and parental age potentially play.
'We know autism is highly heritable, so the most needed research is on how genes and the environment interact. Genetic variations may lead to changes in underlying biology, making those individuals more resistant or susceptible to different exposures,' Singer, from the Autism Science Foundation, said. Those exposures could include toxicants, like insecticides or plasticizers; pharmacological, like medications; and possibly sociological, such as low socioeconomic status or not receiving adequate medical care, Singer suggested.
'Genetics research is far ahead of environmental research mostly because we don't have good ways of measuring what we are exposed to in the environment,' she added. 'That needs to improve. We also need to understand how environmental factors affect DNA structure and DNA expression.'
In Kennedy's conversation with Rogan in 2023, he contended that it was others who ignored scientific studies in the field.
'And everybody will say, 'Oh, there's no study that shows autism and vaccines are connected.' That's just crazy. You know, that's people who are not looking at science,' Kennedy said.
Others say that a refocus on vaccines as a cause for autism could divert funding from needed areas of research. Because of the last vaccine scare, some facets of autism research are behind, including how to help autistic individuals who have sleeping complications, gastrointestinal issues, bathrooming delays or seizures or whether there's a link between autism diagnoses and the development of Parkinson's later in life, Gross said.
'Our concern is, it's already so difficult to direct funding to these understudied topics,' she said. 'We don't want to see vaccines become a stranglehold on funding and choke off this very limited funding that these really critical questions are already getting.'
Parental concerns about a tie between vaccines and autism spiked after a 1998 study by Andrew Wakefield deeming a link between the MMR shot and autism. It was later found to be fraudulent and retracted years later. Among the issues, Wakefield failed to disclose financial conflicts of interest in the study.
In the intervening years, fears swept through the world of intellectual disabilities, not just prompting vaccine hesitancy but steering research dollars toward potential links between vaccines and autism. That put the community behind on research-based treatments for autism and interventions, advocates say.
Hundreds of studies done across decades and around the world have found vaccines to be safe.
These studies followed fluctuating theories about what in the vaccines may be potentially unsafe. The predominant hypotheses shifted from blaming the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine to homing in on the preservative thimerosal that is used in some vaccines to looking at the volume of vaccines children are given at one time. Each of the theories was tested and dismissed in scientific studies, which included research comparing the incidence of autism among vaccinated children to those who had not received certain vaccines.
Despite those findings, Kennedy supports the theory that ingredients in vaccines or the battery of vaccination schedules have triggered the rise.
In a 2023 podcast interview, Kennedy was asked if he thought any vaccine was effective. His response: 'I think some of the live virus vaccines are probably averting more problems than they're causing. He then added: 'There's no vaccine that is safe and effective.'
A spokesperson for Kennedy did not respond to a request for comment.
Stigmatizing language
Trump himself suggested late last year on NBC News' 'Meet the Press' that in choosing Kennedy to lead HHS, he wanted him to look at the discredited link between vaccines and autism. Trump previously told Fox News — more than once — that he personally knew a family who 'had a beautiful child' before receiving a 'monster shot' of vaccinations then 'got very, very sick, now is autistic.'
Among the concerns in the autism community is that the kind of language both Trump and Kennedy use to describe the complex neurological condition is disparaging.
'He uses this belief that vaccines cause autism to spread a very stigmatizing and negative image of autism, where he says, for example, someone has a vaccine and their 'brain is gone,'' Gross said of Kennedy. 'And by saying their brain is gone, he means they're autistic.'
Gross, who is autistic, was referencing a 2015 remark by Kennedy in which he compared vaccinating children to the Holocaust. He later apologized for his remarks.
'They get the shot, that night they have a fever of 103 [degrees], they go to sleep, and three months later their brain is gone,' Kennedy said then. 'This is a Holocaust, what this is doing to our country.'
Gross called it 'fearmongering,,' stating: 'The idea behind making this link is that it's better to die of pertussis as a baby than to live as an autistic person.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
MTG cashed in on ICE contractor's big win but Trump goes after ‘disgusting degenerate' Nancy Pelosi over stocks
Donald Trump's decision to wade into the debate over a congressional stock-trading ban could end up making things awkward for some of his closest allies in the House and Senate. While stock trades by members of Congress and their families have long been controversial, the sustained push for new restrictions on lawmakers is new. Supported by members of both parties, the effort to push back against an image of corruption and decadence in the chamber is growing in popularity particularly among younger members. But the prospect of making it to the president's desk with legislation that would ban congressional stock trading has now caused Trump to weigh in. The issue was glaring as he went on a late-night rant on Truth Social Saturday night against Democratic former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — after reports about one of his own MAGA faithful, Marjorie Taylor Greene cashing in on a stock deal tied to an ICE contractor. 'Crooked Nancy Pelosi, and her very 'interesting' husband, beat every Hedge Fund in 2024. In other words, these two very average 'minds' beat ALL of the Super Geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them. It's all INSIDE iNFORMATION! Is anybody looking into this??? She is a disgusting degenerate, who Impeached me twice, on NO GROUNDS, and LOST! How are you feeling now, Nancy???' he raged in his posting. Pelosi's office hadn't responded publicly as of Sunday morning. Taylor Greene has drawn criticism after she purchased stock in Peter Thiel-owned Palantir in April, three days before the company won an ICE contract. The company's stock has since surged. That's not even the first time this year Greene, who maintains that all of her trades are managed without her input by a financial adviser, has been called out by stock-trading watchdogs for highly-lucrative trading activity. 'After many successful years of running my own business, I ran for Congress to bring that mindset to Washington. Now that I'm proudly serving the people of Northwest Georgia, I have signed a fiduciary agreement to allow my financial advisor to control my investments,' Greene told the fact-checker site Snopes in May. 'All of my investments are reported with full transparency. I refuse to hide my stock trades in a blind trust like many others do,' she added. 'I learned about my Palantir trades when I saw it in the media.' The California Democrat Pelosi, once her party's leader in the House of Representatives, is one of a few senior members of the chamber who has come out publicly against restrictions on congressional stock trading. 'We're a free market economy,' Pelosi said in 2021. 'They should be able to participate in that.' But her stance shifted over time and earlier in 2025 she came out in favor of legislation that would restrict such activity. The HONEST Act, a bill sponsored by Republican Sen. Josh Hawley, advanced through a Senate committee in late July. 'While I appreciate the creativity of my Republican colleagues in drafting legislative acronyms, I welcome any serious effort to raise ethical standards in public service. The HONEST Act, as amended, rightly applies its stock trading ban not only to Members of Congress, but now to the President and Vice President as well. I strongly support this legislation and look forward to voting for it on the Floor of the House.' Pelosi supports the bill, despite it previously bearing her name: Hawley originally dubbed it the the 'PELOSI Act', a reference to the trading activity primarily conducted by Pelosi's husband Paul. She is one of the wealthier members of Congress; her family controls more than $127m in publicly-traded assets watched by stock-trading analysts. Its advancement drew opposition from Trump, which Hawley characterized in a rare public shot at his own colleagues as the result of Republican senators supposedly having called up the president and lied to him about what was in the bill. 'I wonder why Hawley would pass a Bill that Nancy Pelosi is in absolute love with — He is playing right into the dirty hands of the Democrats,' Trump wrote on Truth Social in late July. Hawley responded, telling reporters: 'He said, senators, I don't know who, had called and told him yesterday afternoon that the bill had been changed at the last minute and would force him to sell all of his assets, sell Mar-a-Lago, sell his properties. So, I said, 'Well, that's just false. I mean, it explicitly exempts you and all your assets.'' The senator's response referred to a provision stuck in aimed explicitly at winning Trump over. The ban affects future presidents and vice presidents, but not Trump or his no. 2, JD Vance. It's unclear whether Hawley will succeed in winning over the president, but the ban at least has the potential to make it through both chambers of Congress with bipartisan support. Members of Congress on key committees are often scrutinized for their trading activity as in some cases lawmakers are privy to information that is not yet public or widely known, but could still affect markets. Some members of Congress were caught up in a scandal over such activity in 2020, at the onset of the Covid pandemic, when they triggered selloffs of their own stock shares ahead of a market collapse. One former North Carolina senator, a Republican, sold more than $1 million in stock one week before the market crashed.


Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The most suspect stock trades by politicians revealed including the Republican who can't STOP flipping shares
Members of Congress aren't technically allowed to use insider knowledge to trade stocks while in office, but a couple of well-timed trades have raised eyebrows among eagle-eyed critics. Momentum to ban members of Congress from trading stocks is swelling even as lawmakers make major profits from the turbulent stock market. Right now, existing law allows legislators sitting on military committees buy defense stocks while financial regulators can snap up crypto and bank shares. Though trading on inside information is forbidden, there's little enforcement - and the practice appears rampant on Capitol Hill. Senate proposals would bar even the president and vice president from trading, but wealthy lawmakers claim restrictions would strip incentives and force unfair divestment of their holdings. Others complain they can't survive on their $174,000 salaries alone, fueling a trading bonanza that's generating handsome profits just as ban proposals gain steam. Here the Daily Mail highlights the top most suspect stock trades of the year: Rep. Rob Bresnahan, R-Pa., a 34-year-old freshman legislator has been one of the most scrutinized traders. He was the former CEO of Kuharchik Construction, Bresnahan's family company, where he is credited with expanding the family business. The Pennsylvania Republican campaigned on banning members from trading, but he has reported more transactions than practically every other lawmaker. 'Bresnahan has filed more stock trades than almost any other member of Congress since entering office this year,' Quiver Quantitative's co-founder Christopher Kardatzke told the Daily Mail. Since being sworn in this January and August 8, the Republican has made at least 617 trades, according to federal disclosures data compiled by Quiver Quantitative. The Republican has repeatedly claimed his financial advisors manager his trades, but when pressed recently by a local radio station on why he doesn't instruct them to halt the transactions he deflected. 'And then do what with it?' the lawmaker told WVIA. 'Just leave it all in the accounts and just leave it there and lose money and go broke?' Bresnahan introduced a bill earlier this year to ban members and their spouses from stock trading, even as he's continued to make transactions. According to federal data retrieved by Quiver Quantitative, Bresnahan has traded a total volume of over $7 million since January. He has sold $4 million in stock and purchased $3 million in the past eight months Right before Trump's signature domestic agenda the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' passed Congress, Bresnahan reported sale in Centene, a healthcare company that later lost over half of its share price because of Medicaid cuts contained within the legislation. Democratic attack ads have shredded him for voting for the cuts. 'Honestly I found out about it in real time but the key takeaway is I follow the STOCK Act and I follow the rules,' Bresnahan said when pressed on the stock sale by WNEP. Bresnahan has been widely criticized for being hypocritical about his stock trading. He's claimed his advisors are forbidden from trading in companies held by foreign adversaries, however his disclosures show that he has bought and sold shares in Alibaba, a Chinese e-commerce company. Bresnahan has also indicated he will put his money in a blind trust, where it is managed by someone else and he has no clue about the individual transactions. But setting up such an account takes time, he has claimed. 'The whole process has been excruciating,' he told the Washington Examiner recently. Nearly 170 of the Pennsylvanian's trades occurred just after Trump's early April tariff announcement, dubbed 'Liberation Day' by the White House. In one instance in February, the lawmaker even disclosed a day trade, showing the purchase and sale of Palantir stock on the same day. 'Even if the portfolio is managed by a financial advisor, as Bresnahan has claimed, we're left to wonder why an advisor is day-trading Palantir stock in a U.S. Congressman's account,' Kardatzke said. Firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has also gained attention for trading the same stock around the same time - a transaction that has netted her thousands. The Georgia Republican made a flurry of stock purchases around the exact time that Trump instructed the nation that it was 'a great time to get rich, richer than ever before,' on Truth Social. After the market dipped around Liberation Day, Green heeded the president's warning and loaded up on discounted stocks. She purchased tech stock Impinj on April 4, which has since rocketed up over 100 percent in the last few months. And after buying Palantir on April 8, the Georgia Republican has doubled her investment, locking in a return over 115 percent. The tech company provides AI solutions and software to the federal government, including the Pentagon and more recently the Department of Homeland Security. Greene currently sits on the House Homeland Security Committee, the congressional panel that approves funding for DHS and ICE. She also claims her portfolio is managed by a financial advisor. 'Prior to this year, we had only seen one member of Congress ever buy Palantir stock. In the first two months of 2025, we saw six different members buy in,' Kardatzke noted. 'Maybe they all share the same financial advisor. The stock is up 148 percent so far this year.' Legislation to ban trading among members has even received backing from former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who has become notorious for scoring winning trades during her decades in Congress. When she led Congress in 2021 she famously brushed off questions about implementing a stock trading ban for members, citing 'a free market economy.' Though her disclosures show that these trades are done by her husband, Paul Pelosi, it does raise questions as to how he can so frequently beat the market, and by such massive margins. 'Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks and has no knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,' her spokesperson told the Daily Mail. Between 2023 and early July 2025, over 70 percent of Pelosi's trades were profitable, according to Capitol Trades. The Bay Area couple has also reported call options on AI-focused companies like Nvidia, Alphabet and others. 'I think it's a little bit sketchy just because of how high-risk high-reward option contracts are,' Christopher Josephs, co-founder of Autopilot, a congressional investing app, told the Daily Mail. 'No average everyday person trading does that.' The 85-year-old Democrat got defensive recently when asked by CNN's Jake Tapper to respond to Trump's attacks on her trading practices. 'Why do you have to read that?' Pelosi interrupted when Tapper began asking about members' trading.


Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
Is Hollywood's woke era ending?
On reading that Dean Cain (the actor who played the television Superman) had become an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent, I felt a thrill of insurrection – so hot on the heels of the revelation that naughty Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican! I imagined Rosie O'Donnell crying into her morning decaf, Lizzo swearing at her gender-fluid cat, Ellen DeGeneres taking it out on the help from sheer liberal frustration. Because celebrities aren't allowed to be right-wing ('right-wing' now being dunce-speak for anyone against limitless illegal immigration and transvestite men colonising women's spaces.) Undaunted, Cain told Fox News: I'm actually a reserve police officer…so now I've spoken with some officials over at ICE, and I will be sworn in as an ICE agent, ASAP. This country was built on patriots stepping up, whether it was popular or not, and doing the right thing. I truly believe this is the right thing. We have a broken immigration system. Congress needs to fix it, but in the interim, President Trump ran on this. He is delivering on this. This is what people voted for. It's what I voted for and he's going to see it through, and I'll do my part and help make sure it happens.' Cain has previous on stepping up, whether popular or not. I think we can safely say that being a 'liberal' (a liberal in the modern sense, being a censorious nag, rather than the old sense, one who is inclined to live and let live) has been for a long time the only political stance acceptable in showbusiness and entertainment, especially in Hollywood. Often, especially when used by men, this is merely a 'wokescreen' – think of Harvey Weinstein, of whom Rebecca Corbett (the journalist who oversaw the New York Times investigations into allegations of rape and sexual abuse by Weinstein) said in the 2020 Reuters Memorial Lecture: At the beginning of the Weinstein investigation, we had no idea whether the producer had done anything wrong. He cast himself as a champion of actresses, a Democratic Party fundraiser, a feminist who joined marches —a man considered reliable enough that Barack Obama's older daughter had worked as a summer intern at his studio. Dean Cain needs no wokescreen from behind which to conduct evil deeds and is therefore refreshingly honest. He recently came out as a Hollywood outsider for mocking the latest Superman film as 'woke' after director James Gunn described the character as an immigrant, telling TMZ: 'How woke is Hollywood going to make this character? We know Superman is an immigrant – he's a freaking alien… the 'American way' is immigrant-friendly, tremendously immigrant-friendly. But there are rules… there have to be limits, because we can't have everybody in the United States.' Cain is an interesting man. He's partly of Japanese descent, a Democratic voter as a youngster, teenage boyfriend of Brooke Shields when they were at university, dater of Playmates and swimsuit models, he also trolled Dylan Mulvaney in a spectacular fashion when he commented on a video of Mulvaney and another cross-dresser, saying 'Neither of you are girls.' 'You were never Superman either,' snarked an 'ally'. 'Correct. I pretended,' Cain replied. In 2021 he gave a sparky interview after DC Comics had Superman's son come out as a bisexual: I say they're bandwagoning…Robin, of Batman & Robin, just came out as bi or gay recently. And honestly, who's really shocked about that one? The new Captain America is gay. My daughter in Supergirl where I played the father, she was gay… So I don't think it's bold or brave or some crazy new direction. If they had done this 20 years ago, perhaps that would have been bold and brave. Brave would be having him fighting for the rights of gay people in Iran, where they'll throw you off a building for the offense of being gay… They're talking about him fighting real-world problems like climate change, the deportation of refugees and he'll be dating a 'hacktivist', whatever a 'hacktivist' is… Why don't they have him fight the injustices that created the refugees whose deportation he's protesting? That would be brave.' Cain has a hinterland, it's fair to say. What he doesn't have – unlike most celebrities, are 'luxury beliefs', the phrase created by Rob Henderson as 'ideas held by privileged people that make them look good but actually harm the marginalised.' These can be found in many professions, but it's probably when they're propagated by the massively-privileged showbiz 'community' that they irritate most, preaching defunding of the police from their privately-policed gated communities. Regrettably, the stars who aren't left-wing these days are a mixed bag. I was cheered to hear that we have Kelsey Grammar, Chris Pratt, James Woods, Alice Cooper, Gary Sinise (who, in parts both poignant and amusing, started up Friends of Abe, a support group for Hollywood Republicans) and the iconic ex-Runaways singer Cherie Currie. I am less happy with Mel Gibson, Kid Rock and Vince Vaughn. Still, beggars can't be choosers, and Pratt and co. are a veritable banquet compared to what we've got over here in the UK. Who of a certain age can forget cringing when Kenny Everett, at a 1983 pro-Thatcher rally, shouted 'Let's bomb Russia!' as well as suggesting that Michael Foot's walking stick should be manhandled? It was the polar opposite of Tony Blair managing to attract the ineffably cool Noel Gallagher to No. 10. At least now we've got the gorgeous Holly Valance, who fundraises for Reform and has said with admirable Aussie forthrightness: 'Everyone starts as a leftie and then wakes up at some point after you start either making money, working, trying to run a business, trying to buy a home, and then realise what crap ideas they all are – and then you go to the right.' While those two great working-class renegades Lydon and Morrissey have been vocal on their dislike for what passes as left-wing politics today. But does which way entertainers swing politically really matter anymore? The last American election indicated not. As I wrote here in May, 'How dim would a political party need to be to understand that not only do celeb endorsements/involvements not work, but have an actual repelling effect? Beyonce and 'The Boss' sure helped cook Kamala's goose; when the rich and famous swank around telling hoi polloi who to vote for, the masses have a habit of doing exactly the opposite.' When that wily old fox the tax-avoiding Mick Jagger allegedly said 'My heart is Labour but my money is Conservative' he was being honest in a way most pop stars (see the financial behaviour of U2) would never dare to, lest their fans turn on them. Entertainers follow the path they do because they want attention and they want to be rich. If they really cared about making things better for people, they'd have trained to become nurses or firefighters. Still, celebrity Democrats could learn a lesson from Republicans like Cain and Sweeney, who don't see the non-famous as Deplorables put on earth to be preached at.