logo
Autism community fears RFK Jr. would set back decades of progress

Autism community fears RFK Jr. would set back decades of progress

NBC News29-01-2025

For decades, the scientific community has worked to dispel a thoroughly debunked theory that vaccines cause autism and finally shift its focus to find true potential causes.
But now, autism advocates say they are fearful that if Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is confirmed as health and human services secretary, it could undermine years of progress in unlinking autism and vaccines, while potentially diverting precious research dollars to a theory already discredited by hundreds of studies worldwide. They warn he would wield vast influence over who sits on committees and steer policy.
And some condemned Kennedy's past rhetoric around the disability, calling it stigmatizing and insulting.
Alison Singer, founder of the Autism Science Foundation, said she welcomes an examination into potential causes of autism, but focusing on vaccines could be dangerous for children.
'A new crop of parents will be afraid, who may believe that vaccines could harm their children, potentially cause autism, and those parents might withhold life saving vaccines from their children,' Singer said.
She said the concern is that 'funds are spent re-examining what we know does not cause autism, and are directed away from looking in new potential areas of what's causing autism. There's so much that we need to fund when it comes to autism research.'
Kennedy is scheduled to begin his Senate confirmation hearings on Wednesday. He's expected to face tough questions about the misinformation he has promoted around public health over the years, including his claims about vaccines.
Kennedy, who founded an anti-vaccine nonprofit and grew into one of the most prominent anti-vaccine activists in the world –– a crusade from which he and associated groups have made millions of dollars –– has prominently advanced a false contention that vaccines cause autism.
'I do believe that autism comes from vaccines,' Kennedy asserted to Fox News in 2023.
He went on to say that his position was misunderstood; he just wants to test the science behind them. But it's Kennedy who rejects the science in front of him, critics say.
'Are we [also] reviewing the question about whether the earth is flat? This is settled science,' said Rep. Kim Schrier, a Washington Democrat who previously worked as a pediatrician. 'We already looked into vaccines. They don't cause autism, but let's look elsewhere. And elsewhere might be genetics. It might be the fact that now we're putting a lot more kids under the umbrella of autism who never would have fallen under that umbrella before … It could be a lot of things, but bringing up settled science is only going to undermine confidence in vaccines, decrease immunization rates and put the entire population at risk.'
As the head of HHS, Kennedy would hold massive sway on the direction of health policy in the United States. He would lead number agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. President Donald Trump's pick for the CDC, former Florida Rep. David Weldon, is further fueling fears because of his own past statements doubting vaccine safety.
Colliding with history
Kennedy often begins his argument that vaccines cause autism by spinning a narrative that he didn't know severely autistic children when he was growing up, and he doesn't know any at his age now. The increased incidence, he concludes, coincides with the prevalence of childhood vaccinations.
'I bet you've never met anybody with full-blown autism your age,' Kennedy told podcaster Joe Rogan in 2023, launching into a script he often uses in public appearances. 'You know, head-banging, football helmet on, nontoilet trained, nonverbal. I mean, I've never met anybody like that at my age, but in my kids' age now, one in every 34 kids has autism. And half of those are full blown.'
However, people with developmental disabilities were for decades institutionalized — and, in Nazi Germany, worse — or otherwise kept out of the public eye, a far cry from the integrated schools many public systems attempt to achieve today.
The practice of institutionalizing children with disabilities was particularly prevalent in post-war America, and often in facilities with poor conditions.
One example of the gap between public understanding of kids with disabilities came in 1965, when Kennedy was about 11 years old. His father, then a U.S. senator from New York, denounced the treacherous conditions at Willowbrook State School. In one of the most shameful exposés in U.S. history, disabled children were found to be living in filth, amid abuse and overall horrific conditions, sparking nationwide outrage.
'I think all of us are at fault and I think it's just long overdue that something be done about it,' Robert F. Kennedy Sr. said at the time of Willowbrook.
Zoe Gross, director of advocacy with the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network, noted that the autism diagnosis was still evolving in the '60s. She held up Willowbrook as an example of how those with developmental and other types of disabilities were once hidden from society.
'If you look at the video of the conditions that the people in Willowbrook were in, you'll see the people that RFK Jr. describes as having been missing through his childhood. And you'll see where they went, where they were forced to go,' Gross said.
Ignoring science
Autism diagnoses have risen from about 1 in 150 children in 2000, to 1 in 36 today. In that period, the definition of who is autistic broadened considerably, capturing a dramatic span of abilities. It now ranges from individuals who live independent lives, to individuals who are nonspeaking or who face serious medical challenges like seizures.
Researchers point to a strong genetic link to the complex disorder and have said there's much more research needed to determine what, if any, environmental factors play into it. Autism Speaks, one of the nation's largest autism research organizations, is one group that has called for more research into the role that factors like exposure to chemicals and parental age potentially play.
'We know autism is highly heritable, so the most needed research is on how genes and the environment interact. Genetic variations may lead to changes in underlying biology, making those individuals more resistant or susceptible to different exposures,' Singer, from the Autism Science Foundation, said. Those exposures could include toxicants, like insecticides or plasticizers; pharmacological, like medications; and possibly sociological, such as low socioeconomic status or not receiving adequate medical care, Singer suggested.
'Genetics research is far ahead of environmental research mostly because we don't have good ways of measuring what we are exposed to in the environment,' she added. 'That needs to improve. We also need to understand how environmental factors affect DNA structure and DNA expression.'
In Kennedy's conversation with Rogan in 2023, he contended that it was others who ignored scientific studies in the field.
'And everybody will say, 'Oh, there's no study that shows autism and vaccines are connected.' That's just crazy. You know, that's people who are not looking at science,' Kennedy said.
Others say that a refocus on vaccines as a cause for autism could divert funding from needed areas of research. Because of the last vaccine scare, some facets of autism research are behind, including how to help autistic individuals who have sleeping complications, gastrointestinal issues, bathrooming delays or seizures or whether there's a link between autism diagnoses and the development of Parkinson's later in life, Gross said.
'Our concern is, it's already so difficult to direct funding to these understudied topics,' she said. 'We don't want to see vaccines become a stranglehold on funding and choke off this very limited funding that these really critical questions are already getting.'
Parental concerns about a tie between vaccines and autism spiked after a 1998 study by Andrew Wakefield deeming a link between the MMR shot and autism. It was later found to be fraudulent and retracted years later. Among the issues, Wakefield failed to disclose financial conflicts of interest in the study.
In the intervening years, fears swept through the world of intellectual disabilities, not just prompting vaccine hesitancy but steering research dollars toward potential links between vaccines and autism. That put the community behind on research-based treatments for autism and interventions, advocates say.
Hundreds of studies done across decades and around the world have found vaccines to be safe.
These studies followed fluctuating theories about what in the vaccines may be potentially unsafe. The predominant hypotheses shifted from blaming the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine to homing in on the preservative thimerosal that is used in some vaccines to looking at the volume of vaccines children are given at one time. Each of the theories was tested and dismissed in scientific studies, which included research comparing the incidence of autism among vaccinated children to those who had not received certain vaccines.
Despite those findings, Kennedy supports the theory that ingredients in vaccines or the battery of vaccination schedules have triggered the rise.
In a 2023 podcast interview, Kennedy was asked if he thought any vaccine was effective. His response: '​​I think some of the live virus vaccines are probably averting more problems than they're causing. He then added: 'There's no vaccine that is safe and effective.'
A spokesperson for Kennedy did not respond to a request for comment.
Stigmatizing language
Trump himself suggested late last year on NBC News' 'Meet the Press' that in choosing Kennedy to lead HHS, he wanted him to look at the discredited link between vaccines and autism. Trump previously told Fox News — more than once — that he personally knew a family who 'had a beautiful child' before receiving a 'monster shot' of vaccinations then 'got very, very sick, now is autistic.'
Among the concerns in the autism community is that the kind of language both Trump and Kennedy use to describe the complex neurological condition is disparaging.
'He uses this belief that vaccines cause autism to spread a very stigmatizing and negative image of autism, where he says, for example, someone has a vaccine and their 'brain is gone,'' Gross said of Kennedy. 'And by saying their brain is gone, he means they're autistic.'
Gross, who is autistic, was referencing a 2015 remark by Kennedy in which he compared vaccinating children to the Holocaust. He later apologized for his remarks.
'They get the shot, that night they have a fever of 103 [degrees], they go to sleep, and three months later their brain is gone,' Kennedy said then. 'This is a Holocaust, what this is doing to our country.'
Gross called it 'fearmongering,,' stating: 'The idea behind making this link is that it's better to die of pertussis as a baby than to live as an autistic person.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tax bill would add $2.4tn to US debt, says non-partisan analysis
Trump's tax bill would add $2.4tn to US debt, says non-partisan analysis

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump's tax bill would add $2.4tn to US debt, says non-partisan analysis

Donald Trump's signature tax bill would blow a $2.4tn hole to America's national debt over the next decade, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis. The non-partisan budget office said on Wednesday that Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' would decrease federal revenues by $3.67tn while cutting spending by $1.25tn through 2034, as the national debt currently stands at $36tn. The analysis comes as the legislation faces criticism from within Republican ranks, threatening Trump's fragile Senate majority. The recent disapproval has been led by Elon Musk, who denounced the measure as a 'disgusting abomination' on his X platform on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' The House speaker, Mike Johnson, acknowledged tensions with Musk, telling reporters he had spoken with Trump about the criticism. 'He's not delighted that Elon did a 180 on that,' Johnson said. The legislation extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts while making deep spending reductions, primarily through cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs, and passed the House by a single vote last month with no Democratic support. On Tuesday, the Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor-Greene admitted she had missed a section of the bill text that was meant to regulate AI over the next 10 years, something she says would have made her vote against it. The week prior, the Nebraska representative Mike Flood said he glossed over another part of the bill about federal judges enforcing contempt orders. The CBO analysis found the bill would leave 10.9 million more Americans without health insurance by 2034, including 1.4 million people 'without verified citizenship, nationality, or satisfactory immigration status' who would lose coverage under state-funded programs. The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, dismissed the projections, claiming the budget office has become 'partisan and political'. She alleged CBO staff members have not contributed to Republican candidates since 2000 while many have donated to Democrats. Johnson had a similar take on the CBO, and defended the legislation, claiming it represents unprecedented spending cuts. 'No government in the history of mankind has ever cut $1.6tn in a piece of legislation,' he told reporters. Earlier in the week, he said 84% of its budget analysts were 'partisan Democrats' who donate to 'Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren'. The Senate is expected to consider modifying the legislation in coming weeks, with Republican leaders hoping to pass a final version by early July.

Electricity costs are already jolting Americans - Trump's bill could hike them another $400 a year
Electricity costs are already jolting Americans - Trump's bill could hike them another $400 a year

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Electricity costs are already jolting Americans - Trump's bill could hike them another $400 a year

Amid already high, and rising, electricity prices, President Donald Trump 's broad domestic policy bill, which is up for debate in the Senate, could make the situation even worse. If the legislation passes as it currently stands, it would remove federal tax credits from the Biden presidency for sources of electricity such as solar, wind, batteries and geothermal power, The New York Times noted. Several studies from this year reveal that the energy bill of the average family could rise as much as $400 annually. For the first time in decades, demand for electricity is on the rise, in part because of the construction of data centers required for artificial intelligence. And power companies are having difficulties keeping up with the rising needs. The removal of tax breaks for wind turbines, solar panels, and batteries would make such sources of power more expensive, and their availability would decrease. As a result, the demand for power from natural gas would rise. This could lead to a rise in gas prices, which at the moment is responsible for 43 percent of U.S. electricity. The Trump administration has also taken action to sell more gas abroad, which could lead to further price rises. Additionally, Trump's levies on steel, aluminum, and other construction materials would increase the cost of transmission lines and other kinds of electrical equipment. The Clean Energy Buyers Association, which represents companies that have committed to buying renewable energy, commissioned a study that found that the repeal of clean energy credits would lead to a 13 percent increase in electricity in states such as New Jersey, North Carolina, Arizona, and Kansas. It could also lead to the loss of thousands of jobs by 2032. Trump administration and gas industry officials push back on such claims, arguing that the president's measures to make it cheaper to drill and build pipelines will lead to a decrease in electricity prices. They also argue that wind and solar have received subsidies for decades and that their continuing expansion could make the electric grid less dependable. A spokesperson for the Department of Energy told The Times that the president's 'agenda is to lower the cost of oil production in the United States, lower the cost of natural gas production in the United States — that ultimately will lead to lower average prices and at the same time profitability for businesses.' 'Prices are going to move up and down in the short term,' he added, however, noting that the administration would be focusing on policies 'that will deliver long-lasting prosperity.' Four Republican Senators wrote in a letter in April that, because of the rising demand for energy, 'it is imperative that any modifications to the tax code avoid worsening the economic pressures that American households and businesses already face.' 'For energy credits that provide a direct passthrough benefit to ratepayers, repeals would translate into immediate utility bill increases, placing additional strain on hardworking Americans,' they added. The Energy Information Administration found that since 2022, U.S. residential electricity prices have increased by 13 percent on average. In Ohio, prices are on the rise as data centers are being built in the state. Meanwhile, in California, wildfires are a source of rising costs. One of the major reasons behind rising prices is the unstable nature of natural gas prices, which rose sharply following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. After falling to record lows in 2024, gas prices are set to almost double this year and rise even more next year. This comes as demand is on the rise domestically, even as the U.S. is selling more gas overseas. Since 2022, the cost of building gas power plants has almost tripled. Gas companies are now in the midst of wait times of up to half a decade for new gas turbines. Meanwhile, drilling for natural gas has grown more expensive amid rising equipment costs due to tariffs. As of 2020, 34 million households stated that they struggled to pay their energy bills and kept their homes at unsafe temperatures because of worries about costs. This comes as the Trump administration has vowed to end the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which helps 6.2 million people pay for high energy bills. The executive director of the National Energy Assistance Directors Association, Mark Wolfe, told The Times that 'We've got millions of families that are already struggling to pay their bills.' 'Now you bring in extreme temperatures, record heat, and it's a very bad situation,' he added.

Trump's crypto empire is a brazen hustle
Trump's crypto empire is a brazen hustle

New Statesman​

time2 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Trump's crypto empire is a brazen hustle

Photo byThat Donald Trump has turned his second presidency into a personal enrichment scheme is not exactly surprising. What has been unexpected, however, is one of the avenues he is using for that brazen accumulation: cryptocurrency and meme coins. The president is engaging in what many financial experts say is a scam industry, more akin to a pyramid scheme than a real currency. The Trump family's net worth has increased by an estimated $3bn thanks to various crypto schemes and investments. One overlooked aspect of the Maga movement is that while Trump is its leader, he is almost as influenced by its minions as they are by him. The degree to which Maga devotees seem willing to blindly follow Trump is more reminiscent of a cult than a political movement (one Maga diehard told the New York Times that he wasn't bothered by Trump's tariffs crashing the economy because he would 'eat a rat' for the president if he had to). But Trump also shape shifts according to what his followers seem to want. Do we really believe that this president, who seems happiest surrounded by billionaires on the golf course, has harboured a long-held passion for MMA fighting? Do we believe that a man whose favourite songs are 'Ave Maria' and 'YMCA' truly appreciates the musical stylings of Kid Rock? Of course not. But he likes power and he likes money. And by embracing the cultural preferences of his working-class base, he secures their fealty and adoration. This loyalty is particularly useful to Trump when he can profit from it. The Trump family's crypto schemes are now multiple, including a crypto exchange and meme coins. These funnel money directly into their pockets, beyond the reach of campaign finance laws. A recent dinner hosted by Trump, for which invitees were chosen based on how much of the $TRUMP meme coin they purchased, was seen as such a blatant attempt to use the presidency as a piggy-bank that a congressional Democrat opened an investigation. But the constitutional mechanism to deal with this kind of behaviour is impeachment. And with Republicans controlling Congress, that's not going to happen. There is something particularly American about all of this. For much of the country, the real American dream is less of hard, steady work and more getting rich quick. One in eight buy a lottery ticket at least every week. The proliferation of casinos, especially as revenue generators for Native American communities, has fed the country's gambling addiction (casinos are another tool Trump has long used to enrich himself). The legalisation of sports betting has also sent problematic gambling into overdrive. Thanks to the smartphone, millions can bet on sporting events 24 hours a day from devices designed to capture attention and not let go. One research paper found that legalising sports betting has translated to a 25-30 per cent increase in bankruptcy rates. Young men in low-income areas are most likely to face financial ruin due to gambling. It is perhaps not surprising that get-rich-quick schemes like gambling, sports betting and crypto seem to appeal primarily to isolated, uneducated young men. In contrast, the now female-dominated sphere of multi-level marketing businesses – which work not by gambling one's resources but by pulling in others to sell the same products, giving you a cut of the proceeds and encouraging your new partners' own underlings to do the same – create a structure that resembles a pyramid. These companies have thrived in religious communities where many women don't have full-time jobs and social ties are deep. The schemes seemingly most appealing to young men don't require having friends at all – just a phone and a dream. Many don't have attractive financial prospects, yet live in a culture that still ties masculine value to earning power. It's notable that one of the men helming Trump's crypto empire has described the industry thus: 'This space is run by a bunch of middle-aged men, you know, like, the mid-30-year-old men who understand the power of social media. And you can literally sell shit in a can, wrapped in piss, covered in human skin, for $1bn if the story is right, because people will buy it. And that is what is going on in the crypto space.' A long-animating question in American politics is to what degree the government should protect people from themselves. How much should we regulate vice? What rules should govern risky financial endeavours? Young men, for reasons both cultural and biological, are typically history's greatest risk-takers. Sometimes this brings a small number fame and fortune. More often it brings ruin. Now, the world's crypto bros have an American president who claims not just to be advocating for them but to be one of them. Except he won't offer any protection from magical thinking, and he certainly isn't the guy emptying his own bank account to buy virtual coins with cartoon dogs on them. He is, instead, a man who sees an opportunity to exploit others' naivety and penchant for risk-taking in order to profit handsomely, with little to no risk to himself. A man who we might say is inordinately talented at selling shit in a can. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: How Putin will respond to 'Russia's Pearl Harbour'] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store