Southern California investment advisor stole over $2 million from elderly clients
A Santa Barbara County investment advisor pleaded guilty on Tuesday to stealing about $2.25 million from her elderly clients – some of whom were receiving end-of-life care.
The Department of Justice announced that Julie Anne Darrah, 52, of Santa Maria admitted to one count of wire fraud and will face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.
According to the DOJ, Darrah stole her clients' money from around November 2016 to July 2023 while running a locally-based investment advisory business called Vivid Financial Management Inc. (VFM).
In order to carry out her fraud scheme, the DOJ said Darrah would first gain her clients' trust – oftentimes by convincing them she would take care of them in their older years like a daughter.
Darrah then used this trust to convince her clients to give her control of their assets.
Then, without the victims' knowledge or consent – the DOJ said Darrah liquidated their security holdings and transferred the proceeds to accounts she controlled.
In addition, down the line, Darrah convinced her victims to sign documents that she then used to steal money from them.
These documents would make Darrah the trustee of the signees' trusts, a signatory on their bank accounts, or the documents would give her power of attorney over their brokerage accounts and allow her – as their investment advisor – to transfer funds from their accounts to other bank accounts, including to her own accounts.
With the stolen funds, the DOJ said Darrah would buy properties for herself, pay other personal expenses, buy luxury vehicles and operate other business ventures.
'Some victims were left in desperate circumstances, without the money to pay for end-of-life care, when the fraud was discovered,' said the DOJ.
The DOJ noted that Darrah also convinced a company – referred to as 'Business Victim 1' in the plea agreement – to acquire VFM.
Darrah gave Business Victim 1 false and misleading statements and concealed material facts, including her theft of individual client funds.
After the fraud was discovered, the DOJ said Business Victim 1 suffered about $5.4 million in losses.
'The defendant took advantage of her clients' trust,' said Acting United States Attorney Joseph McNally. 'Many of them were elderly and she stole from them using their funds as her own. Our seniors should never have to question whether their money is safe.'
In December 2024, a judge found Darrah liable to pay $2,416,511, including interest.
Darrah is scheduled for sentencing on May 19 and is currently free on a $50,000 bond.
The DOJ added that if you or someone you know is 60 or older and has been a victim of financial fraud, help is available at the National Elder Fraud Hotline: 1-833-FRAUD-11 (1-833-372-8311).
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
President Trump responds to return of alleged gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia to US
President Donald Trump responded to the sudden return of Salvadoran illegal and alleged gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia, saying, "he's a bad guy" and that the courts will "show how horrible this guy is." Trump appeared unbothered by Abrego Garcia's return on Friday afternoon, telling reporters aboard Air Force One that the Department of Justice made the decision and that soon the world will see how "horrible" a person he is. Trump expressed confidence in the DOJ and its case against Abrego Garcia. "The DOJ made a decision," he said, adding, "I think their decisions have been very, very good." "Maybe they just said, 'Look, all of these people, these judges, they want to try and run the country.' A local judge trying to run the country," said Trump. "The man has a horrible past, and I could see a decision being made, bring him back, show everybody how horrible this guy is." The president said, "Frankly, we have to do something because the judges are trying to take the place of a president that won in a landslide. That's not supposed to be the way it is. So, I can see bringing him back. I could see. He's a bad guy." The Trump administration deported Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old illegal alien who was living in Maryland, to a high-security prison in his home country back in March on the grounds that he is a member of the violent MS-13 gang. Soon after his deportation, Democrats jumped to advocate for Abrego Garcia's release and return to the U.S., arguing that he was a wrongly deported "Maryland man." Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Friday that Abrego Garcia, 29, has landed in the United States and is set to face federal charges for human smuggling and conspiracy. "Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice," Bondi said. "A grand jury in the Middle District of Tennessee returned a sealed indictment charging him with alien smuggling and conspiracy." According to the indictment, Garcia played a "significant role" in a human smuggling ring operating for nearly a decade. Bondi described him as a full-time smuggler who made more than 100 trips, transporting women, children, and MS-13 gang-affiliated persons throughout the United States. Fox News Digital obtained Tennessee Highway Patrol bodycam footage from a 2022 traffic stop where troopers pulled over Garcia for speeding. Inside his vehicle were eight other men, raising immediate suspicions. "He's hauling these people for money," one trooper said. Troopers found $1,400 in cash and flagged Garcia in the National Crime Information Center, which returned a gang/terrorism alert. ICE was called but never responded. Though Democrats have also pushed a narrative that Abrego Garcia is a "family man," court records show Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, filed a protective order against her husband in August 2020. The order said their shared son and stepchildren needed protection from Abrego Garcia, accusing him of verbal and physical abuse against her and mental abuse against her children. Senator Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who led the charge among Democrats to push for Abrego Garcia's return, released a statement after news of the return broke, saying, "For months the Trump Administration flouted the Supreme Court and our Constitution. Today, they appear to have finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and with the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States."
Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Critics want U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi disbarred, but at what cost?
The Florida Bar on Friday dismissed a complaint brought by a coalition of about 70 liberal-leaning and moderate law professors, attorneys and former Florida Supreme Court justices against U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. The complaint accuses Bondi, Florida's former attorney general, of violating her ethical duties in her current job. As the Miami Herald reported, the complaint claims Bondi 'has sought to compel Department of Justice lawyers to violate their ethical obligations under the guise of 'zealous advocacy.'' While Bondi may have violated ethical rules — that's unclear — disbarring a U.S. attorney general is extreme and could be a slippery slope. The move would no doubt be seen, perhaps rightfully so, as political retribution, and that would only add more fuel to the raging dumpster fire of our partisan politics these days. The complaint outlined three instances in which the coalition said Bondi's conduct violated Florida Bar rules and longstanding norms of the Justice Department. In one instance, they said, she fired a seasoned immigration lawyer who the Trump administration said sabotaged the case in the mistaken deportation of a Maryland man to El Salvador. Another instance cited: A longtime federal prosecutor in the District of Columbia resigned rather than carry out enforcement orders that she said were unsupported by evidence. A third example: Several senior federal prosecutors in New York and Washington resigned after they refused to follow a Justice Department order to drop corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams. The Bar rejected the complaint Friday, as it had done with two previous complaints about Bondi by the same group, and cited a jurisdictional issue. It said it 'does not investigate or prosecute sitting officers appointed under the U.S. Constitution while they are in office.' The group includes two retired Florida Supreme Court justices, Barbara J. Pariente and Peggy A. Quince. Make no mistake: Bondi is deeply political. And she has shown her commitment to carry out President Donald Trump's agenda at all costs. Bondi has made it clear that the president's priorities and the DOJ's mission are, in her view, one and the same. This is a break in the fire wall that has long existed between the presidency and the Justice Department. But politicizing the law — or the Bar — isn't the answer, no matter which side is doing it. Ethical standards must be enforced. That's a cornerstone of the legal profession. But it's hypocritical to condemn Bondi's politicization of the DOJ while attempting a similar act via the Bar. We recognize that Trump's Justice Department is by design, political. And Bondi's actions have been extremely partisan — including when she placed the DOJ attorney on leave in the case of the Maryland man who had been wrongly deported a man to El Salvador. 'At my direction, every Department of Justice attorney is required to zealously advocate on behalf of the United States,' Bondi said in a statement. 'Any attorney who fails to abide by this direction will face consequences.' The Florida Bar exists to ensure the integrity of the legal system is protected – not act as a political referee. It's understandable that some feel justified challenging Bondi's standing as a lawyer. Bondi's conduct does warrant scrutiny, and she holds an enormous amount of power as the U.S. attorney general. But the uncertainty of the times shouldn't be a reason to use the law to punish ideological opponents, even if we think the other side does it, too. Click here to send the letter.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
2 face federal charges in stalking, harassment of L.A. artist critical of Chinese President Xi
Two foreign nationals are accused of stalking a Los Angeles artist who is a critic of Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'Cui Guanghai, 43, of China, and John Miller, 63, of the U.K. and a U.S. lawful permanent resident, were charged with interstate stalking, conspiracy to commit interstate stalking, smuggling and violating the Arms Export Control Act,' the Los Angeles Times reports, citing information from the U.S. Department of Justice. The DOJ said in a news release that the charges of smuggling out military weaponry come from Milwaukee, but the stalking charges relate to an unnamed artist who planned to protest a 2023 appearance by Xi at an economic summit and who made 'artistic statues of President Xi and his wife' to be unveiled this year, prosecutors said. In both instances, Cui and Miller hired a pair of others to do the actual work, prosecutors said, including orders to 'surveil the victim, to install a tracking device on the victim's car, to slash the tires on the victim's car, and to purchase and destroy a pair of artistic statues created by the victim depicting President Xi and President Xi's wife.' A different pair of people was utilized in 2025 to try to dissuade the artist from showing new statues online, the DOJ said. Unfortunately for Cui and Miller, all four of those people they hired for assistance in Southern California were 'affiliated with and acting at the direction of the FBI,' the DOJ explained. In the release, several high-ranking federal officials expressed their support for protecting free-speech rights of U.S. residents against foreign interference, as well as protecting sensitive technology used by the American military. 'This is a blatant assault on both our national security and our democratic values,' said Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. 'This Justice Department will not tolerate foreign repression on U.S. soil, nor will we allow hostile nations to infiltrate or exploit our defense systems. We will act decisively to expose and dismantle these threats wherever they emerge.' If convicted, Cui and Miller could face decades in federal prison. Maximum sentences are as follows: Five years for conspiracy Five years for interstate stalking 20 years for violating the Arms Export Control Act 10 years for smuggling Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
