Koran burner's conviction sparks warnings of 'backdoor blasphemy laws' as Robert Jenrick says the case is another example of two-tier justice
Hamit Coskun, 50, shouted 'f*** Islam', 'Islam is religion of terrorism' and 'Koran is burning' while holding up a flaming copy of the holy text.
He had been protesting against the Turkish government earlier this year.
Yesterday he was ordered to pay £240 and a £96 statutory surcharge after being found guilty of a public order offence motivated by 'hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam'.
Last night Mrs Badenoch said the case should go to appeal while a coalition of politicians and free speech campaigners accused the courts of reviving blasphemy laws via the backdoor and of suppressing free speech.
Mrs Badenoch said: 'De facto blasphemy laws will set this country on the road to ruin. This case should go to appeal.
'Freedom of belief, and freedom not to believe, are inalienable rights in Britain. I'll defend those rights to my dying day.'
Mrs Badenoch was echoed by Tory justice spokesman Robert Jenrick who said the case was yet another example of two-tier justice.
He added: 'Two-Tier Keir used to defend free speech, but he's been reduced to a bystander as a blasphemy law is brought back by the back door.
'A man alleged to have stabbed Mr Coskun is on bail, free to roam the streets for another two years, while he is swiftly prosecuted for non-violent acts.
'Free speech is under threat. I have no confidence in Two-Tier Keir to defend the right of the public to criticise all religions.'
Tory MP Nick Timothy said: 'We now have a blasphemy law in this country. Parliament never voted for it. I will introduce a Bill to put a stop to all this next week.'
During his protest outside the Turkish Consulate in Knightsbridge on February 13 Mr Coskun – who was born in Turkey but is half Armenian and half Turkish – was attacked by a man who was allegedly holding a knife and threatening to kill him.
Although he has admitted to assaulting Mr Coskun, the man has denied using a knife. He will go on trial in 2027.
Since his controversial protest, Mr Coskun has reportedly received death threats and has been moved to a safe house after it was alleged two men broke into his home and attacked him.
He is a committed atheist who has claimed asylum in Britain after fleeing Turkey two and half years ago.
The National Secular Society and the Free Speech Union, which paid his legal fees, have announced they plan to appeal against the judgment and 'keep appealing' until it is overturned.
When asked about the case last night the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'We have no blasphemy laws in England, and there are no plans to introduce any. Obviously, individual cases are a matter for the courts.'
Following the verdict, Mr Coskun told reporters: 'Christian blasphemy laws were repealed in this country more than 15 years ago.
'Would I have been prosecuted if I'd set fire to a copy of the Bible outside Westminster Abbey? I doubt it.'
In court last week, his lawyer Katy Thorne KC argued that the charges effectively criminalised the public burning of religious texts.
She said Mr Coskun's actions were not motivated by hostility towards Muslims, just the religion of Islam itself.
But district judge John McGarva told Mr Coskun that his actions were 'motivated, at least in part, by hatred of followers of the religion'.
Stephen Evans of the National Secular Society said: 'The outcome of this case is a significant blow to freedom of expression and signals a concerning capitulation to Islamic blasphemy codes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
Kneecap rapper mobbed by supporters as he appears in court over ‘Hezbollah flag' terror charge
A KNEECAP rapper was mobbed by supporters as he appeared in court charged with a terror offence. Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of supporting a proscribed terror organisation. 6 6 6 The 27-year-old allegedly displayed a Hezbollah flag at a gig in London. He spoke only to confirm his name, date of birth and address when appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court today. The court heard three hours of legal arguments, with the performer listening to proceedings through an Irish language interpreter. O hAnnaidh was supported by his bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh. He was released on conditional bail until September 26. Crowds of supporters had gathered outside to show their support for the performer. Fans held signs which read "Free Mo Chara" while others waved Palestine and Irish flags. O hAnnaidh is accused of displaying the flag during a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, North London, in November. Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove previously told the court: "It's not about Mr O hAnnaidh's support for the people of Palestine or his criticism of Israel. "He's well within his rights to voice his opinions and solidarity, as is anybody else. "The allegation in this case is a wholly different thing and deals with a video recording showing that, in November of last year, Mr O hAnnaidh wore and displayed the flag of Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist organisation, while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah'. "Of course, support for the one is not the same as support for the other. "So the issue in this case, and the reason it has come to court, it centres on the apparent support by Mr O hAnnaidh of a proscribed terrorist organisation." In a statement following his charge, Kneecap said: "We deny this 'offence' and will vehemently defend ourselves." O hAnnaidh and fellow band members Naoise O Caireallain and J J O Dochartaigh were greeted by loud cheers and chants of "Free Palestine" at a previous court appearance. The Metropolitan Police imposed conditions limiting where a planned demonstration outside the court could take place today. In response, the rap group described this move as a "calculated political decision" that was "designed to try and portray support for Kneecap as somehow troublesome". Kneecap have courted controversy with their provocative lyrics and merchandise in the past. The group, which was formed in 2017, displayed messages about the war in Gaza during their set at US music festival Coachella in April. A criminal probe was also launched into comments made my the group during their performance at Glastonbury in June. The investigation was later dropped after the Crown Prosecution Service chose to take no further action. 6 6 6
BreakingNews.ie
25 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Accused shouted ‘trick or treat' before throwing petrol bomb in bar, court hears
A man facing attempted murder charges after an arson attack on a busy bar in Armagh allegedly shouted 'trick or treat' before throwing a lit petrol bomb directly at two people inside, a court has heard. John Patrick Nixon (38) appeared before a district judge in Newry, Co Down, on Wednesday accused of two counts of attempted murder in relation to the incident in Armagh city on Monday evening. Advertisement Nixon, who spoke briefly to confirm his name, date of birth and that he understood the charges, is also charged with several other offences alleged to have been committed on the same day, including criminal damage to property and a vehicle elsewhere in Armagh earlier that evening. No defence application for bail was made at the remand hearing in Newry Magistrates' Court on Wednesday and Nixon, who is from Irish Street in Armagh, was remanded into custody to appear before a judge again next month. Nixon appeared at Newry Courthouse on Wednesday (PA) During the hearing, a detective constable told the court that the Toby Jug bar on Irish Street had a significant number of people inside, including children, when the attack unfolded shortly before 9pm. Customers were watching a football match on TV and traditional music was also being played when the incident occurred, the court heard. Advertisement 'Police attended and spoke with victims and witnesses who stated that a male entered the pub, shouted 'trick or treat' and then threw a lit petrol bomb directly towards two people in the bar,' the officer said. Two men, one aged in his 30s and one in his 60s, were taken to hospital with burn injuries described in court as 'significant'. The detective constable told the court that CCTV from outside the bar showed a man taking something from a plastic bag, walking across the road, then lighting a rag protruding from a bottle. He said the CCTV showed a flash and orange flames and glow of fire coming through the doorway of the pub shortly after the man walked inside. Advertisement 'The male suspect walks calmly out of the bar, walks across the street whilst removing an item from the waistband of his trousers,' he added. 'As a number of children and an adult came running out of the bar, he brandishes this item, which appears to be a large knife.' District judge Eamonn King was told that Nixon was arrested later that evening at an address on Chapel Lane in Armagh. The court heard that a petrol bomb and a plastic bag containing a knife were located at the same property. The detective constable said officers had also obtained CCTV footage from a local filling station at around 7.50pm that evening that allegedly shows the accused filling up a plastic bottle with £2.03 worth of petrol. Advertisement As well as two counts of attempted murder, Nixon is also charged with arson with intent to endanger life; possession of a knife in a public place; and three counts of criminal damage. The criminal damage charges relate to incidents on the Keady Road in Armagh in the early evening of Monday. At around 5.30pm, police received a report that a brick had been thrown through the window of a home on the road and the window of a car had been smashed at the same property. A short time later, another 999 call was made reporting that a brick had been thrown through the kitchen window of another property nearby. Advertisement CCTV from the area showed a bald man wearing dark clothing walking up the drive of one of the properties at the time. The detective constable told the court that a local resident had identified the male in the CCTV as Nixon. The officer said detectives had established that the description of the male who had caused the damage to the windows matched that of the male who had thrown the petrol bomb. The court was also told that Nixon made no reply to questions asked by detectives while in police custody. He will appear before Armagh Magistrates' Court on September 2nd via video-link.
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Increased betting tax would be a hurdle that horse racing may not overcome
The Treasury is currently consulting over plans to replace the existing structure of online gambling duties, which is comprised of three bands, to a catch-all Remote Betting and Gaming Duty. At present, there is a 15 per cent duty, but there are grave concerns that the government-induced changes could see it brought into line with the rate of tax on games of chance, such as online casino and slot machines, which is six per cent higher. Economic analysis commissioned by the British Horseracing Authority showed that the sport could lose £66m in income through the levy, media rights and sponsorship because bookmakers would be likely to respond by offering inferior-value prices and reduce budgets for such things as marketing and advertising. Horse racing is a sport that is part of the very fabric of British culture. Its two codes, Flat and National Hunt have been supported by monarchs and other royals for centuries. It also courted Sir Keir Starmer, who last September became the first serving Prime Minister since Sir Winston Churchill to attend the St Leger. Now, similar to one of the PM's current political allies, it has had a change of heart and is taking a more combative approach. Racing draws in more spectators annually than every other sport in the nation, except football. It provides jobs for more than 85,000 people. If betting tax levied on the sport is raised, it's been estimated that 2,752 of those jobs will be lost in the first year alone, and this could become an ever-decreasing cycle. As a show of strength and to underline the gravity of their concerns, the whole of the industry has committed to a one-day strike on 10 September, when racing is scheduled to take place at Carlisle, Kempton Park, Lingfield Park and Uttoxeter. For an industry that has so often taken a 'softly, softly' approach to such matters and wanted to keep respective governments onside, it's akin to throwing away the painstakingly prepared form book and, instead, tossing a coin. Will the 'heads' count in the sport be forced to reduce or will ministers turn 'tails' and elect to preserve the status quo? James Hutchinson, the managing director at Ripon racecourse, is clear on why the sport is right to take such action: 'It's important that we get across this message that the current proposals for this betting duty tax will have an enormous effect on British racing and the income into British racing and therefore the amount of money that it raises in terms of levy and the return therefore to racecourses and the return of prize money to owners and trainers. 'From our point of view as a small independent racecourse, we need to be seen to be a strong industry that can support all of its constituent parts and this potential change is going to put many of those at risk and that's not something we want to see. 'I'm in support of the action that's being taken because by doing so we will hopefully be getting across and extremely strong message to government that we feel very strongly about this and the industry is prepared to go to those sort of lengths to show what it means and the effect it could have if the changes take place.' 'I don't think there's any other sporting industry that could be as dramatically affected by the sort of change that the government is proposing.' James Hutchinson, managing director at Ripon racecourse Isn't this, however, racing people expecting the sport to be treated as a special case purely because of its history? Hutchinson disagrees. 'I don't think it's necessarily a special case other than the fact that it has huge heritage. It's been an important part of the culture and the colour of the nation. 'Over five million people go racing every year and to introduce this huge increase could have a major negative impact on the industry. It could effect the amount of racing, the amount of people going racing and it would be a huge loss to the country. 'I don't think there's any other sporting industry that could be as dramatically affected by the sort of change that the government is proposing.' Those involved in the sport are clear about the financial damage that could be inflicted and are similarly unified in their action, although all four tracks that miss out on racing on that date have been offered an alternative fixture on the calendar by the BHA, by way of compensation for those individual events. The government must act in the best interests of a sport that has given the nation great service since before there was a Prime Minister. It should get this enquiry overturned before the provisional result stands, scrap any plans to increase its tax burden and leave this piece of the fabric of our society unfrayed.
