logo
The birth of House, and the rebirth of Lucius

The birth of House, and the rebirth of Lucius

'Chicago is a case study', says one of the witnesses to the birth of House music in the new film, Move Ya Body. In the 1980s Chicago was in the throes of segregation and violence, and its warehouses became the site of a new kind of dancefloor as the disco era faded away. At the epicentre was music producer Vince Lawrence, who joins Andy with Move Ya Body director Elegance Bratton to describe the creation and the Utopian aspirations of House.
Move Ya Body: The Birth of House is at Sydney Film Festival 8th and 10th of June
Holly Laessig and Jess Wolfe are the dual lead singers of the band Lucius. Between them, they have three voices: Holly's, Jess's, and a third voice, a sort of Holly-and-Jess chimera that rises up out of their voices together. Their self-titled album Lucius has just been released, and Holly and Jess tell Andy about why it was time to return to a familiar sound, and to finally name an album after the band.
Music heard in the show:
Title: Gold Rush
Artist: Lucius
Composer: Jess Wolfe, Holly Laessig
Album: Lucius
Label: Wildewoman Music
In the interview with Vince and Elegance:
Title: Under the Influence
Artist: Captain Sky, prod. Vince Lawrence
Composer: Daryl Cameron
Album: Single
Label: Slang Recordings
Title: Move Your Body
Artist: Marshall Jefferson & Solardo
Composer: Marshall Jefferson
Album: Single
Label: Trax
Title: Promised Land
Artist: Joe Smooth
Composer: Joe Smooth
Album: Single
Label: D.J. International
In the interview with Lucius:
Title: Final Days
Artist: Lucius
Composer: Jess Wolfe, Holly Laessig
Album: Lucius
Label: Wildewoman Music
Title: Do It All For You
Artist: Lucius
Composer: Jess Wolfe, Holly Laessig
Album: Lucius
Label: Wildewoman Music
Title: Great Gig in the Sky
Artist: Roger Waters, Holly Laessig, Jess Wolfe
Composer: Richard Wright
Album: Us + Them
Label: Us + Them Productions
Title: Orange Blossoms
Artist: Lucius
Composer: Jess Wolfe, Holly Laessig
Album: Lucius
Label: Wildewoman Music
The Music Show is made on Gadigal, Gundungurra, Yuggera and Turrbal Land
Technical production by Tim Jenkins and Dylan Prins
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is TV making therapy less taboo?
Is TV making therapy less taboo?

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Is TV making therapy less taboo?

We're looking at the evolution of TV therapists, from The Sopranos' Dr Jennifer Melfi, HBO's In Treatment, the oddball crew of Apple TV+'s Shrinking and the sci-fi comedy world of Demascus on Tubi. How do these fictional portrayals of going to therapy track with the rise of therapy speak? And have they helped open our minds about what it's like to go to therapy? And in the sidebar, Bev and Hannah unpack Taylor Swift's 12th album announcement and farewell film critic David Stratton. Get in touch via stopeverything@ Show notes Demascus on Tubi: Aisha Harris on the Black Lady Therapist trope:

David Stratton and Margaret Pomeranz taught us an invaluable lesson — they showed us exactly how to disagree - ABC Religion & Ethics
David Stratton and Margaret Pomeranz taught us an invaluable lesson — they showed us exactly how to disagree - ABC Religion & Ethics

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

David Stratton and Margaret Pomeranz taught us an invaluable lesson — they showed us exactly how to disagree - ABC Religion & Ethics

When David Stratton — critic, television presenter and hero to a generation of movie lovers — died last week at the age of 85, he was immediately honoured as one of this country's true soldiers of cinema: an untiring advocate who spent his life championing the artform he loved. Cinema had a loyal, passionate and fiercely intelligent friend in David Stratton. He was a man who worked hard to make loving movies seem serious and worthwhile — so much more than just a hobby. But over the course of his long and varied career, Stratton didn't just kindly, patiently and honestly explain his passions. Along with his on-screen co-host Margaret Pomeranz, he also taught us a deeply valuable ethical lesson, time and time again: a lesson in the fine art of disagreement. Nothing so trite as 'let's agree to disagree' David Stratton and Margaret Pomeranz were, from the very start of their time together, opposites. Pomeranz — who began her career in television as a producer and was encouraged to move in front of the camera by Stratton — prized a curiously outrageous form of entertainment far more than Stratton. Stratton loved to laugh, make no mistake, but he drew a line at anything he considered tacky. Pomeranz, by contrast, loved that stuff. When they butted heads, it was over films like Team America: World Police (Pomeranz loved it; Stratton hated it) and Sex and the City 2 (Pomeranz said it contained a 'jacket she'd kill for' and gave it three stars; Stratton called it 'offensive'). Margaret Pomeranz and David Stratton arrive at the world premiere of 'Little Fish' as part of the opening of the Melbourne International Film Festival at the Village City Centre on 20 July 2005 in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo by Kristian Dowling / Getty Images) These differences in opinion weren't just a casual 'let's agree to disagree' partings of ways. Once, memorably, Pomeranz gave Lars von Trier's Dancer in the Dark five stars, while Stratton gave it none. When Pomeranz stood up for Vin Diesel, a performer Stratton hated, Stratton lightly poked fun at her, saying she wanted Diesel to 'save her'. Possibly their biggest disagreement was over the classic Australian film Romper Stomper , starring Russell Crowe as a wild-eyed neo-Nazi. Stratton not only thought the film was terrible, he thought it was actively ethically harmful. Pomeranz gave it five stars. Sometimes these disagreements got a little heated. Stratton could be dismissive, and Pomeranz seemed occasionally exasperated with him. But the pair never lost respect for one another, no matter how far apart their tastes pulled them — and, importantly, they never started throwing barbs at each other . Their disagreement was focused on the thing they were disagreeing about, and did not descend into ad hominem snipes at the other's character. Pomeranz herself acknowledged this in a recent tribute written to honour her friend and colleague: I think it's extraordinary that, over all the time that David and I worked together, we never had a falling out. Minor disagreements maybe, and maybe more spirited ones on air, but it was a relationship of deep respect — certainly of me for him, maybe a little bit less of him for me — and of deep friendship. The power of disagreement Sometimes disagreement is cast as an impediment to societal functioning. We can all be guilty of occasionally speaking as though disagreement is the enemy — as though for us to all flourish, we should all get along, all the time. But the history of philosophy shows us there is power in sometimes parting opinion. Plato, for instance, presented almost all of his arguments in the form of debates, with characters going back and forth among each other as to what constitutes the best way to live. Plato's 'dialogues' — and thus his entire ethical worldview — were fashioned out of disagreement. Detail of 'The School of Athens' (circa 1510–1512), a mural by Raphael painted for Pope Julius II, at the Vatican. On the left, Plato engages in dialogue with Aristotle. (Photo by Independent Picture Service / Universal Images Group via Getty Images) It is through disagreement that we get to honour one of the truly beautiful things about our world: the differences, uniqueness and full richness of human experience. It would be a very boring, perhaps even insidious, world if we all thought the same thing. After all, a forced unity of opinion is one of the hallmarks of fascism. Disagreements, if conducted well, can also guide us away from extremes. In some matters, truth lies in between two poles. So it went on The Movie Show , at least — I am not convinced we always agreed with our favourite from the pair. As viewers, our own tastes fluctuated between the extremes of Pomeranz and Stratton. In their disagreements, we could pick and choose elements of their tastes and construct our own. Again, these were debates that never descended into name calling or anger. In this, Pomeranz and Stratton taught us another ethical lesson — that we can treat someone who disagrees with us as someone offering us kindness. Having to justify and argue for our own positions helps us better understand them. And it helps us better understand the world around us — indeed, the people around us. Margaret Pomeranz and David Stratton attend the 'At The Movies' farewell party on 2 December 2014 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Caroline McCredie / Getty Images) Laying my own cards on the table, I've always been more of a Pomeranz person: I love von Trier, Romper Stomper and Team America . But that's just the thing. No matter how much I, as a viewer raised watching The Movie Show on SBS, found myself grumpily disagreeing with Stratton, it never made me dislike him . And when he passed, the loss I felt was not just the loss of a man I had always admired. It was the loss of a defender of art and a good sparring partner — no matter that it was one-sided sparring, through the television screen. Disagreement done well is a gift. And no one more generously held out that gift than David Stratton. Joseph Earp is a poet, journalist and philosophy student. He is currently undertaking his PhD at the University of Sydney, studying the work of David Hume. An earlier version of this article was published by The Ethics Centre.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store