Apple CarPlay Ultra stalled — these brands now say they're out
Apple finally revealed CarPlay 2, as CarPlay Ultra, in May. Initially, it was supposed to be on Aston Martin, Kia, and Hyundai vehicles.
However, a new (paywalled) Financial Times report (via MacRumors) claims that a number of major manufacturers are backing away from commitments to support the next generation of the CarPlay software system. Manufacturers retreating include Audi, Mercedes-Benz, Polestar, Renault and Volvo.
The major overhaul was announced at WWDC 2022 and showed up again in 2023 with previews on Aston Martin and Porsche dashboards. When it was initially revealed, at least 14 automakers were listed as future supporters.
Compared to the current CarPlay interface, Ultra is meant to replace the entire dashboard. Not only will you see traditional iPhone apps, but also vehicle information like speed, fuel levels and temperature. Apple has called it "a unified and consistent experience across all the driver's screens."
Apparently, the luxury automakers are concerned about maintaining their own software and in-car experiences.
From the FT report:
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Additionally, Ford, Nissan and Jaguar Land Rover still seem to be on board but wouldn't really comment to Financial Times.
Apparently, BMW will implement CarPlay but not the new CarPlay Ultra. Audi seems like it will follow the BMW model, saying it wants to offer a "customized and seamless digital experience."
Aston Martin already offers CarPlay Ultra. According to FT, Hyundai, Kia and Genesis are still committed partners with Porsche planning future support.
Despite the setback, Apple apparently told Financial Times that more manufacturers are coming on board. "We're collaborating closely with automakers to provide the best of iPhone and the best of the car and this work takes time," Apple said.
When any vehicles with CarPlay Ultra will actually be available has not been announced.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New group wants to rehabilitate reputation of ‘big business'
WASHINGTON — A newly created organization wants to change how people view corporate America, even as Democrats and Republicans in Congress have targeted the business community with new proposed regulations. The American Growth and Innovation Forum is set to launch this week, the Deseret News has first learned, seeking to drive 'fact-based discussions' to change how people view corporations. The group also hopes to convince lawmakers to cut regulations. The group will focus on sharing information about how 'responsible growth' can benefit the U.S. and international economies as a way to spur economic development. 'Behind every affordable household item, reliable broadband connection, or breakthrough technology is a story of American scale and ingenuity at work,' Diana London, the executive director of AGIF, said in a statement. 'At our core, AGIF champions the reality that U.S. companies make life better for families, communities, and the country as a whole.' The creation of the group comes in response to public perceptions that big businesses are untrustworthy. Recent polling conducted by Cygnal for AGIF shows that only 40% of Americans hold a favorable view of big businesses, despite 87% of respondents acknowledging they occasionally or frequently use their products. The polling does show respondents have generally positive perceptions of corporations Apple, Amazon and Walmart. Even with the unfavorable perception, a majority of consumers (50%) say they think businesses can be used as a force for good by driving innovation, creating jobs and improving lives. That polling, AGIF founders say, reflects the misconceptions surrounding big businesses and corporations that the nonprofit organization hopes to counter. 'AGIF starts with a simple hypothesis: while the rhetoric around 'big business' is negative, we believe a majority of American businesses add tremendous value to communities and the attacks on them do not reflect the true opinions of consumers,' London said. As a result, the group hopes its educational efforts can crack down on regulatory measures often proposed by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. For example, Republicans have sought ways to rein in certain corporations for pushing what they consider to be progressive and 'woke' agendas, such as policies that prioritize diversity, equity and inclusion or environmental initiatives. Meanwhile, some Democrats have pushed to crack down on monopolies and other large businesses over accusations over price gouging and corporate consolidation. Much of that criticism is targeted toward Big Tech and Big Pharma. The AGIF says it will provide research and data advocating for 'responsible growth' in sectors such as health care, agriculture, retail and infrastructure to boost their economic growth.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
How Apple may solve its Google Search problem
I hate my Dell laptop. If I close the lid, the laptop will "suspend," but not really. Putting it in a bag in that state will make it hot, and the fans will choke. I have to watch out for this because if I don't, it will get damaged over time and die. This should be enough for the product to be recalled. There are more issues with it, but that is a topic for another day. I know that other manufacturers have the same problem. This is what you get from a modern-ish PC. Related: Analysts reset Qualcomm stock price target, send warning Anyone with an Apple MacBook would be puzzled to hear this. They don't have this problem, and how the heck do PC users tolerate it? It seems that PC manufacturers can get away with anything today, and Apple can't; it is held to a higher standard. With the release of the M1 chip in 2020, Apple left the PC competitors in the dust. It took them years to catch up. Even though I still wouldn't buy an Apple laptop for myself, this chip made me comfortable recommending them. But I digress. The reality is that innovation takes time. After all, Apple needed thirteen years to make something really "life-changing" following the launch of the iPhone. In fact, Apple generally takes its time, opting for others' so-called best-in-breed until it creates something better. Perhaps that's why it relies so much on Google for search, rather than a homegrown solution. Apple's deal with Google has worked out well for it (and is profitable), but, unfortunately, that relationship may end soon. The Justice Department's antitrust lawsuit against Google revealed that Apple (AAPL) was paid $20 billion by Google in 2022 to keep it the default search engine in the Safari browser, reported Bloomberg. Google lost the lawsuit, and the DOJ wants the company to cease multibillion-dollar payments to Apple, among other things. Reuters reported that Google plans to appeal the decision. Apple does not reveal revenue from this deal with Google in its earnings reports; however, it is part of its services revenue. Related: Analysts revamp forecast for Nvidia-backed AI stock In fiscal 2022, Apple's services revenue was about $78 billion. The calendar and fiscal year don't align, but making an estimate would mean Google's payment was about 25% of services revenue. Total revenue was $394 billion, so about 5% came from Google. More Tech Stocks: Amazon tries to make AI great again (or maybe for the first time)Veteran portfolio manager raises eyebrows with latest Meta Platforms moveGoogle plans major AI shift after Meta's surprising $14 billion move When you need to keep your revenue growing constantly, having 5% of it at risk is something you can't afford. This is especially true given that Apple has been under fire lately for its apparent failure to launch some amazing artificial intelligence products. I've already written about why the company is struggling on that front. Unconfirmed media reports suggest Apple wants to buy or partner with Perplexity AI to get its hands on its AI-powered search, which provides cited responses to search queries using third-party LLMs. According to Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan, if this deal happens, it will quickly give Apple AI abilities that can be integrated into Siri. It will also provide access to the search advertising market and a high-quality team of AI workers. Related: OpenAI makes shocking move amid fierce competition, Microsoft problems It's not all roses, though. He pointed out four drawbacks: Technology integration might prove to be company might face legal and regulatory deal would have an impact on existing Google of Perplexity's offerings are dependent on rival LLMs. Mohan has an Apple stock price target of $235 and rates the stock a buy, based on a favorable price-to-earnings ratio. He says Apple is trading at approximately 29 times his estimate for calendar year 2026 earnings per share of $8.07. The 5-year historical P/E range is 16 to 34. "We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a multi-year upgrade cycle, large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services," said Mohan. Getting into the search advertising market and fixing Siri, with one acquisition, sounds like killing two birds with one stone, but I have my doubts. Knowing that Meta tried to buy Perplexity AI and instead bought Scale AI, I hope that Apple is playing 4D chess. I think Apple would be better off buying a real search engine instead, because Google is getting worse and worse every day. Related: Amazon's latest big bet may flop The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Engadget
3 hours ago
- Engadget
US senators reintroduce bill to open Apple and Google's app stores
Senators Marsha Blacburn (R-Tenn.), Mike Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) have reintroduced a bill that would force app store owners like Apple and Google to allow third-party payment systems and sideloading apps, among a collection of other developer-friendly changes. The bill, called the Open App Markets App, was originally introduced in 2021, but it never came up for a vote after passing through the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2022. The Open App Markets Act applies its changes to app stores with 50,000 monthly users or more, most obviously applicable to the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store. Like the original bill, the reintroduced Open App Markets Act wants covered companies to allow things like sideloading, third-party app stores and alternative payments systems, while protecting developers ability to "tell consumers about lower prices and offer competitive pricing." It would also prevent app store operators from privileging their own apps and services in app store search results. While the aims of the new bill are largely the same as the original one, the legal environment is meaningfully different. Apple has been forced to allow third-party app stores and alternative payment systems in the European Union following the introduction of the Digital Markets Act in 2022. Thanks to its failure to make good on the small concession Epic won via its lawsuit, Apple has also been forced to allow developers to direct customers to pay for things outside of the App Store and its in-app payments system. The Open App Markets Act would make these kinds of changes the law in the US. It seems possible the bill could pass, too. Regulatory pressure on tech companies has only increased since 2021. For example, Utah recently passed an age-verification law that would require app stores to only allow users 18 and up to make an account.
